PakPassion Presents an Exclusive Interview With Sadiq Mohammad

Genghis

Test Debutant
Joined
Nov 20, 2005
Runs
13,325
We are delighted to present an exclusive interview with ex-Pakistani left handed opener and current Karachi Dolphins coach, Sadiq Mohammad.

Here, he speaks to PakPassion.net about his past and present experiences.

PakPassion.Net: We are very fortunate today at PakPassion.net to have ex-Pakistani left handed opener and current Karachi Dolphins coach, Sadiq Mohammad. Thank you very much for joining us today Sadiq Bhai.

PakPassion.Net: You have made a successful transition from player to coach and are part of a successful domestic cricket team. Do you feel having fewer teams could improve quality of the Pakistani domestic cricket?

Sadiq Mohammad: There are plenty of good players playing domestic cricket and hence there is a need for the 13 teams. There are 2 teams from Karachi and 2 from Lahore so there can be a case for possibly reducing the additional teams there but they are generally big cricket playing regions. So I feel that the number of teams should be kept the same. The PCB needs to give all the good players an opportunity. As long as the best players are getting a chance then I do not think 13 teams is too many. More important is that the PCB needs to take control of which players are selected for domestic cricket instead of letting the regions select players.

PakPassion.Net: You have also played county cricket in the UK. We have seen recently that the PCB has blocked players from taking up county contracts. What is your stance on this and do you feel that our players should be given the opportunity to ply their trade overseas?

Sadiq Mohammad: For the top cricketers in Pakistan, county cricket is still valuable exposure. In my days, players got county contracts for entire seasons and for lengthy periods. Nowadays players are getting short contracts for T20 tournaments or the like. I still feel that if a player is getting the chance to play first class cricket in county that he should be allowed to play.

PakPassion.Net: What do you think is the future of Test cricket as it stands at the moment? Do you think it can survive after the popularity of T20 cricket?

Sadiq Mohammad: T20 cricket is obviously very enjoyable, but the quality is not the same. It is really a slogger’s game. It is not the real test of a batsmen’s skill. It is a game to draw in the crowds. I think the ICC will be looking at how to make it even more of a spectacle by more hitting. They may even consider having a batting powerplay added. It is really a game for today’s times. As the world is running and not cruising these days, so the spectators are after quick results.

I do not think test match future will be affected by T20 cricket. Crowds will probably be affected but crowds for test match cricket were affected before T20 cricket in any case. But it has already affected test match cricket 4-5 years back. ODI were also affecting Test match crowds. The only exception to this has been Australia and England. They have done a very good job at marketing test matches which is why they continue to draw good crowds in test matches. To get crowds back to cricket in other countries, they should try and play series during the school holidays, or when the weather is best. That type of scheduling might make a difference in bringing crowds back to test match cricket.

PakPassion.Net: Now back closer to home for you, Shahzaib Hassan is one who also seems to be having a good season. What are your views on his game?

Sadiq Mohammad: Shahzaib is a good player but not quite ready for international exposure. He can hit the ball in the air, but I think hitting the ball in the air is no great quality of a batsmen. Hitting the ball through the field like Salman and Kamran did through the T20 World Cup, is how it should be done by generally playing it along the ground. The likes of Shahzaib and Afridi are the same in that they want to hit every ball in the air. Any player can hit the ball in the air, but the real quality of the batsmen is determined by how well he plays the ball through the field and along the ground.

PakPassion.Net: Another player on your books is Asad Shafiq and do you feel he has the talent to make it at the top level?

Sadiq Mohammad: Yes he is a very good player and I am sure in 1-2 years time he will have played for Pakistan. He is a very talented player.

PakPassion.Net: Are there any other up and coming Pakistani batsman do you rate highly from the domestic scene?

Sadiq Mohammad: Sarfraz Ahmed, the wicketkeeper; I believe will be back in the test team. He is a talented wicketkeeper and a good enough batsmen. The most improved player I have seen is Khurrum Manzoor. The last 4-5 matches I have seen him playing in the one day trophy he has been scoring well. But still he is still playing too much across the crease. He is not playing it straight enough, and tends to play it behind the square on both sides. This is a general problem with all players in Pakistan these days. To be able to play the ball in front of you such as through the midwicket and through cover, mid-off and mid-on, that is when the batsmen can be recognised as a good player. That is the quality that you see in Ricky Ponting, Watson, Hussey, Lara and players from the past such as Zaheer Abbas, Javed Miandad.

PakPassion.Net: Being the younger brother of the talented Hanif Mohammad, did the burden of expectations from a young age make it difficult for you?

Sadiq Mohammad: Actually being a brother of Hanif, Mushtaq and Wazir, I had a bit of pressure on me to start with, but at the same time I had such good mental strength to rectify my mistakes at home, which I used to apply in the nets and in the cricket games which made it really easy for me. I am really lucky to belong to a family where the game comes very naturally to me. One or two words of advice on footwork or backlift, or the pitch on the ball, or what type of shot to play – these kinds of instructions coming from Hanif Bhai, Mushtaq and Wazir made it very easy for me and released a lot of the pressure. Allowing me to represent the country in a fantastic way by opening with Hanif Bhai in my very first test match, that was a great honour. The downside was that no matter how well I did, I always remained in their shadow.

PakPassion.Net: Do you still regularly meet up and play cricket together?

Sadiq Mohammad: No we are all living far and separately. We do get together for dinners, birthday parties and weddings. We do all talk about cricket, but none of my other brothers play cricket anymore. I still play a couple of friendly matches here and there. We have a lot of very competitive veteran cricket here. I used to play a couple of years back, but didn’t enjoy it too much. It felt more like punishment rather than a game.

PakPassion.Net: You played for some part in an era where helmets were not worn, do you think that made batsmen better players of the short ball?

Sadiq Mohammad: Well in my early days there were no helmets. I was one of the first ones to introduce the helmet to first class and international. When it was not there, we never thought of it, we just used to come and play it in the line of the ball. But when you talk about playing the short ball and hooking, I believe the hook shot has never been perfected by any player in the world. Look at Lara, Bradman, whoever it may be, the hook shot with or without the helmet has never been perfected by any individual player. Playing the short ball is not easy, with or without a helmet you can still get hurt. Players have hit good hook shots but from the day this game has been invented till now, no player has been able to master the hook shot. The bowlers make a plan by putting two players behind the square, and put a few verbal suggestions – “you're chickening out”, “you can’t hook”, and bowl a bouncer. And the batsman loses his temper and gets out. It is just not a shot you can control.

PakPassion.Net: What was the fastest/most hostile spell of fast bowling you ever faced?

Sadiq Mohammad: In my career, Dennis Lillee and Thompson were the fastest from Australia that I faced. From the West Indies, there was Andy Roberts and Michael Holding. Michael Holding was the fastest I ever faced. I don’t think anyone can bowl as fast as he did! I cannot imagine a human being with such a smooth action and with so little effort be able to bowl 95 mph+ every ball after ball.

PakPassion.Net: It must have been a terrifying experience?

Sadiq Mohammad: Yes it was to start with to play such a fast bowler, but being a cricketer and being a professional, I have always worked out a strategy on how to cope with such speed. I have done that successfully and been able to score lots of runs. I scored runs against the West Indies, I scored two centuries in Melbourne, two fifties at Perth.

PakPassion.Net: Which was your most memorable innings and why?

Sadiq Mohammad: Both of my centuries in Melbourne at the MCG were very memorable moments. But my greatest innings was in 1975 in which I batted to save a test match against the West Indies at Karachi (http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63143.html). I got injured during fielding as I got hit by the ball at short leg. I was taken to the hospital and I was vomiting blood the next day. But Pakistan was losing the game and with some pain killers I went in at No.6 and played the entire day. I scored 98 not out that day against Andy Roberts, Bernard Julien, Lance Gibbs. And most of the time I was batting with tail enders such as Sarfraz Nawaz, Asif Masood and these were the players I had to bat with in order to save the test match.

PakPassion.Net: In the many teams you have played with both at domestic or international level, who do you feel was the best captain you have played under?

Sadiq Mohammad: I think the best captain I have played with was my brother Mushtaq as he was always looking for a result orientated game. He was never afraid of losing a match. He was a good worker and good planner. He made us play in order to achieve the result rather than go for a draw like many other Pakistani captains have done.

During county season, the best captain I came across was Tony Brown who was the Gloucestershire captain. He introduced me to county cricket.

PakPassion.Net: You were the coach of the Karachi Dolphins which Afridi plays for. What do you think of Afridi as captain?

Sadiq Mohammad: Afridi is alright. A captain is one who should lead from the front and he should contribute either as a batsmen or a bowler. He has to be good in one of these departments. A reliable player who is able to contribute every couple of games. Afridi no doubt is a good player, but somehow or another he hardly finishes the game. He hits a few sixes and fours but finishing with 20-30 runs is just not good enough. Yes he takes wickets in ODI, but how many wickets you have taken in ODI is not the true indicator of how good a player you are. For example, Wasim Akram played around 350 ODI and has about 500 ODI wickets which is about 1.5 per game. Whereas in test matches, he played 100 test matches and had over 400 wickets. Yes if you are getting wickets in the first 10 overs in an ODI than you are a good bowler, but taking wickets in one day cricket, well everyone gets wickets in the end, in the death overs etc.

PakPassion.Net: Salman Butt who is a very talented left handed opener like yourself has shown glimpses of his brilliances against top bowling attacks from teams such as England and recently in Australia, and yet he has failed to really cement his spot in the team. As a left handed opener yourself, do you think that Salman Butt can be our solution to the opening dilema?

Sadiq Mohammad: Salman no doubt is a good player. But he needs to learn to finish the game. He is a good one day player, and if he plays a good innings and scores 50+ runs he needs to make sure he's there at the end to finish the game.

PakPassion.Net: I guess that is a general problem with plenty of our players.

Sadiq Mohammad: It’s actually the problem with most of our players. They think they have done good. The coaches should put their foot down, that look you have got 80 runs on the board and now you must not come back without finishing the game. Don’t get out and expect the tail enders to finish the game for you.

PakPassion.Net: Thank you very much Sadiq Bhai for your time. We at PakPassion.net would like to wish you all the best with your future assignments.
 
I would just like to add that it was an absolute pleasure talking with such a gentleman of the game. A true legend of the game!
 
The hallmark of Mohammad family is that they are honest, truthful, dedicated, and away from all scandals and controversies.
 
He seems like he truly understands the game. Thank you for sharing this with the world
 
Very good batsman in his day!

Impressed with Khurram Manzoor?? that must have been a joke!
 
Very interesting interview genghis81 :14:

Really enjoyed reading it.

What he says about Holding is also Imran's view; that Michael was the fastest bowler they had ever seen. Not only that, he could be consistently fast through a spell, if he so chose. And it was all done very deceptively, without needless fanfare or huff n'puff (unlike a few other more recent so-called fast men) :)


Also his thoughts on Shahzaib, and on batting in general, are very sensible. Sad that glorified sloggers like him become so popular!
 
Last edited:
ShehryarK said:
Very interesting interview genghis81 :14:

Really enjoyed reading it.

What he says about Holding is also Imran's view; that Michael was the fastest bowler they had ever seen. Not only that, he could be consistently fast through a spell, if he so chose. And it was all done very deceptively, without needless fanfare or huff n'puff (unlike a few other more recent so-called fast men) :)


Also his thoughts on Shahzaib, and on batting in general, are very sensible. Sad that glorified sloggers like him become so popular!
Great interview indeed!

I agree with you SK Bhai (bolded part). I think the best quote which can sum it up is this;

"Any player can hit the ball in the air, but the real quality of the batsmen is determined by how well he plays the ball through the field and along the ground."

My clubmate tells me exactly same words. In fact, for a minute I thought it was him who was speaking at first place.

I personally believe if this is taught at our junior level then our players will turn out to be classy and great players. I am sure this is what is taught in Australia which in result produce classy players. In our part of the world, sloggers are rated higher than proper players
 
amjad_ali said:
Very good batsman in his day!

Impressed with Khurram Manzoor?? that must have been a joke!
I'm impressed by Khurram Manzoor too. He may not have good technique, but he seems to have good temperament and resolve. Something that's lacking in most Pakistani players these days. And he seems to be willing to work on his shortcomings, while playing within himself.

And Sadiq is spot on about guys like Shahzaib and Afridi. Afridi will have to curb his airy shots if he wants to play Test cricket.

Anyway, excellent interview. He seems to be a very honest and straightforward person. Keep up the good work, PP! :)
 
A very underrated coach is Sadiq and quite popular with the players.

Enjoyed reading the interview guys - thanks
 
superb interview, really enjoyed reading it! Sadiq sahab's thoughts and views are absolutely spot on!

and great work genghis bhai :14: :14:
 
Something I have posted before but might as well repear: Ian Chappell recently said that of all the batsmen who played Dennis Lillee during his time, Sadiq played him the best.
 
KB said:
Something I have posted before but might as well repear: Ian Chappell recently said that of all the batsmen who played Dennis Lillee during his time, Sadiq played him the best.
KB, did he adopt his own "technique" against Lillee or was it a case of playing each ball on merit?
 
KB, did he adopt his own "technique" against Lillee or was it a case of playing each ball on merit?

Don't actually know Saj, I have not seen any footage of him against Lillee.
 
genghis81 said:
I would just like to add that it was an absolute pleasure talking with such a gentleman of the game. A true legend of the game!

Not to disrespect to you or Sadiq Mohammad, but either you do not know the definition of legend or you have not seen Sadiq Mohammad's game.
 
Sadiq Mohammad: T20 cricket is obviously very enjoyable, but the quality is not the same. It is really a slogger’s game. It is not the real test of a batsmen’s skill.

I stop reading the interview after this line. It seems like, he has poor understanding of the game.

If he has noticed, majority of the sluggers failed in in recent T20 world cup ( bowlers have been catching up now), only players with the solid technique were able to hit the ball hard and outside the boundary line. If you are a good batsman, you should be able to play all kind of cricket.

May be Sadiq was sleeping when Hussey was throwing Pakistani bowlers outside the ground, unless Sadiq consider Hussey as a slugger.
 
Disagree with his views on Asad Shafiq and Khurram Manzoor,on bowler-friendly pitches they seem to thrive but as soon as they face tough bowling attacks on green pitches they crumble.

Shafiq was average against the England Lions and wasted some good starts,he can score 20s,30s and 50s but doesnt score the 100s and so on.

He didnt even back up as to why he should be selected ? He just said 'Yeah he's talented ?' EH ? Anyone can be talented you know. Shafiq certainly isnt the best of the bunch and we need to select only the cream of the crop.

Players like Yasin and Amin are way better and have PROVED they can stand up to the better bowlers.

To call Shahzaib Hasan a glorified slogger and not ready for Intl.Cricket was poor too. Hasan even said its not about hitting the ball in the air in an interview and he wants to preserve his wicket.

He's actually doing that now and has done brilliantly in domestic cricket,his average has increased,taking his time and building on his starts,even when facing good bowling attacks,he did well last year in the WC as well without slogging.Fully agreed with Zaids point there ^^

It would be a joke to think Manzoor and Shafiq should be selected ahead of him.It isnt blind support for sloggers,its about a player's talent,application and drive and if theres a fire in the belly and aggression from that guy,then surely thats for the better of the team ?

Also disagree when he says the amount of teams should stay the same,eh ? There are so many teams in the domestic leagues that many people would lose count,too many teams results in a lack of competition and the league gets diluted.

He contradicts himself when he says that less players should be selected but yet there should be the same amount of teams of which currently theres quite a lot !

Theres so many teams around that theres a chance that MORE players rather than less get picked.

Then there is more chance of parchi and sifarshi players getting selected along with weak players who have a good,one-off season,only the best players from a small,tough,tightly-contested league should be anywhere near the national team,that system works pretty well for Australia.

One last point... he says Sarfraz Ahmed is a good enough batsman ??? :))) :))) :)))

However,he does have good technical advice to give and I agree on his point about Pakistani batsmen not playing straight enough.
 
Last edited:
pakmania said:
Disagree with his views on Asad Shafiq and Khurram Manzoor,on bowler-friendly pitches they seem to thrive but as soon as they face tough bowling attacks on green pitches they crumble.

This is the story of modern Pakistani top order batsmen. They crumble under unhelpful conditions.
 
sadiq sahib ki apni personal opinion hai ye......... and wo test matches se xiada influenced hai!!!

warna shahzaib and afridi are tailor made for the short format of game!!!! and i think cricket is changing!! sadiq sahib is still talking abt cricket like cricket was in his time!!!!
 
Those that think Sadiq's views are outdated need just look at the success of Hashim Amla. He to me is the classic example of a player who always tries to play the ball along the ground. And he has shown that if you value your wicket you will succeed in all forms of the game. Like Sadiq Bhai says taking the aerial route is a lot simpler sometimes than playing the ball down.
 
genghis81 said:
Those that think Sadiq's views are outdated need just look at the success of Hashim Amla. He to me is the classic example of a player who always tries to play the ball along the ground. And he has shown that if you value your wicket you will succeed in all forms of the game. Like Sadiq Bhai says taking the aerial route is a lot simpler sometimes than playing the ball down.
Thats not outdated though,its common sense.He hasnt brought up anything new here.
 
gollumbird said:
This is the story of modern Pakistani top order batsmen. They crumble under unhelpful conditions.
The way he's hyping the two up is daft,talent alone isnt enough,its about standing up to top bowlers,does he really think Manzoor and Shafiq will last ? Just because they look pretty on flat wickets doesnt mean they'll be an instant success for the national team.
 
pakmania said:
The way he's hyping the two up is daft
? Are you reading the same text? Where is he "hyping" up Khurram? This is what he said:

"The most improved player I have seen is Khurrum Manzoor. The last 4-5 matches I have seen him playing in the one day trophy he has been scoring well. But still he is still playing too much across the crease. He is not playing it straight enough, and tends to play it behind the square on both sides. "


He's saying Khurram is the most improved player in the Karachi team that he coaches. What's the issue with that? In fact, he gave a very balanced appraisal of Khurram and pointed out flaws in his batting.

Even about Asad Shafiq, he was answering a SPECIFIC question - he didn't say he's great, just that he's "very talented". He didn't even say that Asad's the only talented guy around! He was simply asked a specific question about a player on his books. What should he have responded with? A lengthy speech on how Michael Clarke is a brilliantly classy batsman?
Just because they look pretty on flat wickets doesnt mean they'll be an instant success for the national team.

Did he even say that either of them will be an "an instant success for the national team"?? Did he even imply that?

Sheesh. Some people here are seriously bitter! :)
 
Last edited:
A good interview. PCB should consider a guy like Sadiq for the coach's position. By the way, where is he based nowadays? In Australia?
 
ShehryarK said:
? Are you reading the same text? Where is he "hyping" up Khurram? This is what he said:

"The most improved player I have seen is Khurrum Manzoor. The last 4-5 matches I have seen him playing in the one day trophy he has been scoring well. But still he is still playing too much across the crease. He is not playing it straight enough, and tends to play it behind the square on both sides. "


He's saying Khurram is the most improved player in the Karachi team that he coaches. What's the issue with that? In fact, he gave a very balanced appraisal of Khurram and pointed out flaws in his batting.

Even about Asad Shafiq, he was answering a SPECIFIC question - he didn't say he's great, just that he's "very talented". He didn't even say that Asad's the only talented guy around! He was simply asked a specific question about a player on his books. What should he have responded with? A lengthy speech on how Michael Clarke is a brilliantly classy batsman?


Did he even say that either of them will be an "an instant success for the national team"?? Did he even imply that?

Sheesh. Some people here are seriously bitter! :)

:)) Bitter is my middle name.

He said 1-2 years and Shafiq will be in the national team.Thats a bit far-fetched.

Manzoor the most improved guy ? :)) He'd have to be Superman to have improved that much ! There are plenty of other guys much deserving of a chance than those two.

When he said Sarfraz was 'a good enough batsman' that summed it all up perfectly :))
 
fawad_wellwisher said:
A good interview. PCB should consider a guy like Sadiq for the coach's position. By the way, where is he based nowadays? In Australia?
No still in Pakistan I beleive based in Karachi.
 
zaid65 said:
I stop reading the interview after this line. It seems like, he has poor understanding of the game.

If he has noticed, majority of the sluggers failed in in recent T20 world cup ( bowlers have been catching up now), only players with the solid technique were able to hit the ball hard and outside the boundary line. If you are a good batsman, you should be able to play all kind of cricket.

May be Sadiq was sleeping when Hussey was throwing Pakistani bowlers outside the ground, unless Sadiq consider Hussey as a slugger.
I am pretty sure he knows more than you. He is a former test player so he certainly ha more knowledge of the game than you who I am pretty sure is not a test player nor a T20 player.
 
pakmania said:
Manzoor the most improved guy ? :)) He'd have to be Superman to have improved that much ! There are plenty of other guys much deserving of a chance than those two.

I'm sorry for being rude but you seem to have a problem with reading and comprehension. Re-read ShehryarK comment again:

ShehryarK said:
He's saying Khurram is the most improved player in the Karachi team that he coaches.

Here is the roster of Karachi Dolphins. Among these players Khurram Manzoor is the most improved batsman according to Sadiq Mohammad.

Starters

Khalid Latif
Shahid Khan Afridi
Khurram Manzoor
Shahzeb Hassan
Shehryar Ghani
Tanvir Ahmed
Fawad Alam
Afsar Nawaz
Sarfraz Ahmed (WK)
Mohammad Sami (C)
Tahir Khan
Sohail Khan
Azam Hussain
Rameez Raja
Tariq Haroon

Reserves

Abdul Ameer
Asif Zakir
Iftikhar Khan
Adnan Kaleem
Misbah Khan
 
Exactly,theres a loads of much better,talented players in that Karachi team and Manzoor is the best out of that bunch ? :))
 
do you even know the meaning of the phrase "most improved"?
 
genghis81 said:
No still in Pakistan I beleive based in Karachi.


Then why does he say this

Sadiq Mohammad: No we are all living far and separately. We do get together for dinners, birthday parties and weddings.

:13:

I believe Hanif lives in Karachi too. Not sure about Mushtaq though?
 
genghis81 said:
PakPassion.Net: Salman Butt who is a very talented left handed opener like yourself has shown glimpses of his brilliances against top bowling attacks from teams such as England and recently in Australia, and yet he has failed to really cement his spot in the team. As a left handed opener yourself, do you think that Salman Butt can be our solution to the opening dilema?

Sadiq Mohammad: Salman no doubt is a good player. But he needs to learn to finish the game. He is a good one day player, and if he plays a good innings and scores 50+ runs he needs to make sure he's there at the end to finish the game.
This question i think is not asked properly. I just dont like it when an interviewer's opinion is presented as a fact to the interviewee. Then if the interviewee want to reject the interviewer's opinion, he/she will come across as not polite. What if Sadiq Mohammad do not agree that Salman Butt is a very talented left handed opener? By asking the question your way, you are making it difficult for Sadiq Mohammad to reject your opinion.

How about you asked this question in this way:
Lot of people thinks that Salman Butt is a very talented left handed opener who has shown glimpses of his brilliances against top bowling attacks from teams such as England and recently in Australia, and yet he has failed to really cement his spot in the team. As a left handed opener yourself, do you think that Salman Butt can be our solution to the opening dilema?

The question in essence is still the same yet now for the interviewee its easier to reject the opinion in a polite manner.
 
pakmania said:
Again,him the 'most improved' out of the lot ? Yeah right !

I don't think you are qualified to answer this question unless you have seen all the Karachi Dolphins games this season. Sadiq Mohammad certainly is qualified as he is the coach of the team.
 
srh said:
This question i think is not asked properly. I just dont like it when an interviewer's opinion is presented as a fact to the interviewee. Then if the interviewee want to reject the interviewer's opinion, he/she will come across as not polite. What if Sadiq Mohammad do not agree that Salman Butt is a very talented left handed opener? By asking the question your way, you are making it difficult for Sadiq Mohammad to reject your opinion.

How about you asked this question in this way:
Lot of people thinks that Salman Butt is a very talented left handed opener who has shown glimpses of his brilliances against top bowling attacks from teams such as England and recently in Australia, and yet he has failed to really cement his spot in the team. As a left handed opener yourself, do you think that Salman Butt can be our solution to the opening dilema?

The question in essence is still the same yet now for the interviewee its easier to reject the opinion in a polite manner.

Good point. I don't think Salman Butt is very talented nor his performances this season were particularly brilliant. He has done well this season, but there is tons of room to improve and there are additional burdens of the vice captaincy.
 
fawad_wellwisher said:
Then why does he say this



:13:

I believe Hanif lives in Karachi too. Not sure about Mushtaq though?


Yes Hanif does live in Karachi too, however i think what Sadiq Mohammed meant is that they live their own lives and are not at eachothers place all the time.

Mushtaq lives in the UK, as does the eldest Wazir
 
pakmania said:
Disagree with his views on Asad Shafiq and Khurram Manzoor,on bowler-friendly pitches they seem to thrive but as soon as they face tough bowling attacks on green pitches they crumble.

Shafiq was average against the England Lions and wasted some good starts,he can score 20s,30s and 50s but doesnt score the 100s and so on.

He didnt even back up as to why he should be selected ? He just said 'Yeah he's talented ?' EH ? Anyone can be talented you know. Shafiq certainly isnt the best of the bunch and we need to select only the cream of the crop.

Players like Yasin and Amin are way better and have PROVED they can stand up to the better bowlers.

To call Shahzaib Hasan a glorified slogger and not ready for Intl.Cricket was poor too. Hasan even said its not about hitting the ball in the air in an interview and he wants to preserve his wicket.

He's actually doing that now and has done brilliantly in domestic cricket,his average has increased,taking his time and building on his starts,even when facing good bowling attacks,he did well last year in the WC as well without slogging.Fully agreed with Zaids point there ^^

It would be a joke to think Manzoor and Shafiq should be selected ahead of him.It isnt blind support for sloggers,its about a player's talent,application and drive and if theres a fire in the belly and aggression from that guy,then surely thats for the better of the team ?

Also disagree when he says the amount of teams should stay the same,eh ? There are so many teams in the domestic leagues that many people would lose count,too many teams results in a lack of competition and the league gets diluted.

He contradicts himself when he says that less players should be selected but yet there should be the same amount of teams of which currently theres quite a lot !

Theres so many teams around that theres a chance that MORE players rather than less get picked.

Then there is more chance of parchi and sifarshi players getting selected along with weak players who have a good,one-off season,only the best players from a small,tough,tightly-contested league should be anywhere near the national team,that system works pretty well for Australia.

One last point... he says Sarfraz Ahmed is a good enough batsman ??? :))) :))) :)))

However,he does have good technical advice to give and I agree on his point about Pakistani batsmen not playing straight enough.
DAMN! Spot on brother! :14:
 
gr8 interview....i like the part when he's talking about him saving the match whilst being in hospital overnight......SOLDIER
 
murphyslaw79 said:
Yes Hanif does live in Karachi too, however i think what Sadiq Mohammed meant is that they live their own lives and are not at eachothers place all the time.

Mushtaq lives in the UK, as does the eldest Wazir

I have seen Mushtaq in Bahrain and Dubai a few times - seems active in coaching etc for ICC?
 
pakmania said:
Disagree with his views on Asad Shafiq and Khurram Manzoor,on bowler-friendly pitches they seem to thrive but as soon as they face tough bowling attacks on green pitches they crumble.

Shafiq was average against the England Lions and wasted some good starts,he can score 20s,30s and 50s but doesnt score the 100s and so on.

He didnt even back up as to why he should be selected ? He just said 'Yeah he's talented ?' EH ? Anyone can be talented you know. Shafiq certainly isnt the best of the bunch and we need to select only the cream of the crop.

Players like Yasin and Amin are way better and have PROVED they can stand up to the better bowlers.

To call Shahzaib Hasan a glorified slogger and not ready for Intl.Cricket was poor too. Hasan even said its not about hitting the ball in the air in an interview and he wants to preserve his wicket.

He's actually doing that now and has done brilliantly in domestic cricket,his average has increased,taking his time and building on his starts,even when facing good bowling attacks,he did well last year in the WC as well without slogging.Fully agreed with Zaids point there ^^

It would be a joke to think Manzoor and Shafiq should be selected ahead of him.It isnt blind support for sloggers,its about a player's talent,application and drive and if theres a fire in the belly and aggression from that guy,then surely thats for the better of the team ?

Also disagree when he says the amount of teams should stay the same,eh ? There are so many teams in the domestic leagues that many people would lose count,too many teams results in a lack of competition and the league gets diluted.

He contradicts himself when he says that less players should be selected but yet there should be the same amount of teams of which currently theres quite a lot !

Theres so many teams around that theres a chance that MORE players rather than less get picked.

Then there is more chance of parchi and sifarshi players getting selected along with weak players who have a good,one-off season,only the best players from a small,tough,tightly-contested league should be anywhere near the national team,that system works pretty well for Australia.

One last point... he says Sarfraz Ahmed is a good enough batsman ??? :))) :))) :)))

However,he does have good technical advice to give and I agree on his point about Pakistani batsmen not playing straight enough.


Where does he call Shahzaib a glorified slogger? All he said was he hits the ball in the air alot, which is what he does do.

You mention that Shahzaib has batted much better this season, which is true. Have you thought why that is? Sadiq Mohammed only became the coach of Karachi this season. However, never in his interview, did he hark on about how he should be given credit for the performances of Shahzaib or any other Karachi cricketer.

Maybe he can see something in Manzoor, Shafiq, and Sarfraz which has made him believe that they can crack it at the highest level, or at least deserve a chance.

Where does he say fewer players should be selected for the same number of teams. I may have missed it from his interview, so please point it out.

I don't agree with the point of having the same amount of teams, however if teams were to be reduced, then potential budding cricketers will be turned away from the game, as it will be too big a risk to try and make a career out of cricket itself. In Australia and UK, there is a solid infrastructure for basic education, which allows cricketers who have failed to make the grade fall back on other means. In Pakistan, often this is not the case.

If the above paragraph means that Team Pakistan is never the best team in the world, but a number of cricketers are provided with employment, and kept away from the world of crime, drugs, and manual jobs etc, then i would rather have it that way.

BTW I AM ABOUT TO BE CASTRATED FOR THE COMMENT MADE IN ABOVE 2 PARAGRAPHS
 
gollumbird said:
I don't think you are qualified to answer this question unless you have seen all the Karachi Dolphins games this season. Sadiq Mohammad certainly is qualified as he is the coach of the team.
I may be wrong and in a way I agree with you but watching last years SL tour,on green pitches,Manzoor was dreadful ! That 90 in Colombo was it ? Was on a pitch that was getting flatter by the day,the 77 in Hobart was again on a batsman-friendly pitch.On green pitches,how many of those Karachi Dolphins players are gonna last ? Manzoor aint gonna be one of them.
 
murphyslaw79 said:
Where does he call Shahzaib a glorified slogger? All he said was he hits the ball in the air alot, which is what he does do.

You mention that Shahzaib has batted much better this season, which is true. Have you thought why that is? Sadiq Mohammed only became the coach of Karachi this season. However, never in his interview, did he hark on about how he should be given credit for the performances of Shahzaib or any other Karachi cricketer.

Maybe he can see something in Manzoor, Shafiq, and Sarfraz which has made him believe that they can crack it at the highest level, or at least deserve a chance.

Where does he say fewer players should be selected for the same number of teams. I may have missed it from his interview, so please point it out.

I don't agree with the point of having the same amount of teams, however if teams were to be reduced, then potential budding cricketers will be turned away from the game, as it will be too big a risk to try and make a career out of cricket itself. In Australia and UK, there is a solid infrastructure for basic education, which allows cricketers who have failed to make the grade fall back on other means. In Pakistan, often this is not the case.

If the above paragraph means that Team Pakistan is never the best team in the world, but a number of cricketers are provided with employment, and kept away from the world of crime, drugs, and manual jobs etc, then i would rather have it that way.

BTW I AM ABOUT TO BE CASTRATED FOR THE COMMENT MADE IN ABOVE 2 PARAGRAPHS
Thats why we need a proper Grade system and not a hotchpotch of departmental teams.You misunderstood my other point,there should be fewer teams in the top tier of our domestic league,now if Sadiq wants less players to be selected but with the same amount of teams,why not reduce the amount of teams to do that ? So that only the best of the bunch get selected ?

Manzoor,Shafiq and Sarfraz deserve a chance ? Reason-Playing well on flat tracks against poor bowlers.
Now,put them in the England squad for this summer,Anderson,Broad and Finn are steaming in,swinging and bouncing the new ball,they are NOT going to last ! Thats the point I'm trying to make people grasp.
 
pakmania said:
Thats why we need a proper Grade system and not a hotchpotch of departmental teams.You misunderstood my other point,there should be fewer teams in the top tier of our domestic league,now if Sadiq wants less players to be selected but with the same amount of teams,why not reduce the amount of teams to do that ? So that only the best of the bunch get selected ?

Manzoor,Shafiq and Sarfraz deserve a chance ? Reason-Playing well on flat tracks against poor bowlers.
Now,put them in the England squad for this summer,Anderson,Broad and Finn are steaming in,swinging and bouncing the new ball,they are NOT going to last ! Thats the point I'm trying to make people grasp.


The only way to counter the problem of 2 many teams is to move back to the old format of keeping the Quaid-e-Azam trophy (for regions) and Patrons Trophy (for departments seperate).

The departments are never going to go away, because that is where the money is and the regions cannot pay decent money to their cricketers or in the off season, where as the departments can.

At the moment all we have is the domestic tournament to judge players on? we have no A tours abroad (for a while now) so cannot use that as a basis of judging whether players will survive on green seaming tracks.

Even when Manzoor has scored runs in Australia in the one chance he got, you water his achievements down by talking about Batsman friendly tracks. Who else got runs that day? i think the next highest score in the Pakistan line up was 30.

He is a young player, who has shown glimpses of battling it out and someone who may be willing to tough it out. He batted for about 70 odd overs in Hobart.

Asad Shafiq is an unknown quantity and Sarfraz has just started out and on top of his keeping, could have the potential to be a solid number 7 or 8.

The other one that Sadiq Mohammed groomed through was Azeem Ghumman, who is on the verge of breaking into the side, so he has an idea of what he is talking about. Not saying all his calls will be right, but a high % probably will be.
 
murphyslaw79 said:
The other one that Sadiq Mohammed groomed through was Azeem Ghumman, who is on the verge of breaking into the side, so he has an idea of what he is talking about. Not saying all his calls will be right, but a high % probably will be.
And I can assure you that the % will be far, far higher than the correct calls made by anyone on this forum, that's for sure. :O

Being an armchair critic is all very well, but these guys haven't ever played first-class cricket, some haven't even seen a single Pak domestic 4 day match in their lives, and on PP they act as if they are Mr Know It Alls who know better than experienced, capable and knowledgeable professionals.
 
ShehryarK said:
And I can assure you that the % will be far, far higher than the correct calls made by anyone on this forum, that's for sure. :O

Being an armchair critic is all very well, but these guys haven't ever played first-class cricket, some haven't even seen a single Pak domestic 4 day match in their lives, and on PP they act as if they are Mr Know It Alls who know better than experienced, capable and knowledgeable professionals.

I wonder who you could be referring to SK ;-)

inshalla the right calls are made for the good of Pakistan cricket.
 
:)) Since when did I question Sadiq's ability to coach and make the right calls ? Did you read my posts ? I thought he was a good coach BEFORE the interview,I only disagree with a few points there,arent we allowed to disagree or do we have to nod our heads like a puppy and a good little boy ?

Again,SK you didnt get the gist of what I posted.I was questioning his opinions nothing else.I apologise if you took my posts the wrong way.
 
Last edited:
some really interesting observation made by Sadiq. It was a great read
 
so, pakmania - still think sadiq was talking out of his backside re: rating the likes of asad shafiq over umar amin/shahzaib? ;)

thanks to AZ (whom i recently learned was ahmed zulfiqar, not asif zardari) for pointing out this thread again. missed it the first time. excellent interview.
 
^^ Sadiq was and remains very critical of Afridi too though: his commitment, professionalism and batsmanship - as Afridi's Official Stalker, do you agree with that ? :p :26:
 
^^ Sadiq was and remains very critical of Afridi too though: his commitment, professionalism and batsmanship - as Afridi's Official Stalker, do you agree with that ? :p :26:

Haha, yeah I absolutely do. What he tried to pull at the RBS T20 Cup when they named Sami captain instead of him (which is right after which I think this interview was taken) was ridiculous, given that Sami had hung around and captained Karachi Blues to victory when Afridi was busy playing in some Aussie tamasha league.

Bet now you're going to say I'm only agreeing with this criticism because I'm a bigger official stalker of Sami's. :p
 
Haha, yeah I absolutely do. What he tried to pull at the RBS T20 Cup when they named Sami captain instead of him (which is right after which I think this interview was taken) was ridiculous, given that Sami had hung around and captained Karachi Blues to victory when Afridi was busy playing in some Aussie tamasha league.
Yep it was right after that.
Bet now you're going to say I'm only agreeing with this criticism because I'm a bigger official stalker of Sami's. :p
To be fair, Afridi's actions didn't harm Sami per se - they harmed the team, and he was very abusive towards the Coach etc too. Not aware of any specific contretemps between him and Sami; I don't think Sami is that sorta guy :akhtar
 
Last edited:
Yep it was right after that.
To be fair, Afridi's actions didn't harm Sami per se - they harmed the team, and he was very abusive towards the Coach etc too. Not aware of any specific contretemps between him and Sami; I don't think Sami is that sorta guy :akhtar

I know. Who would pick a fight with that smile. :p But he couldn't have felt good about it, pehlay hee naazuk sa hai.

And Afridi's whiny public statements were also directed more at Dr Shah than Sadiq Mohd, but very poor taste.
 
Agree, Sami is fragile (in confidence) and hence that wouldn't have helped him at all.

And Afridi's whiny public statements were also directed more at Dr Shah than Sadiq Mohd, but very poor taste.

One gets crucified for saying this, but its par for the course for the guy - unlike many other Pak players, the better one knows him, the more there is to dislike - experience of many PPers (both members & mods). :)

He's great from afar, though! :)
 
Agree, Sami is fragile (in confidence) and hence that wouldn't have helped him at all.



One gets crucified for saying this, but its par for the course for the guy - unlike many other Pak players, the better one knows him, the more there is to dislike - experience of many PPers (both members & mods). :)

He's great from afar, though! :)

No wonder he's mean to you guys, tum log kyun chipaktay ho. :p Please maintain a respectable distance.

This is how I knew (and will remember) him:

184239537.jpg


Such a sweet kid. :D
 
Former Pakistan cricketer Sadiq Mohammad's coronavirus test will be taken at his residence as Chief Minister Sindh Syed Murad Ali Shah accepted his request after cricketer made a plea in a video message.

Sadiq, who belongs to a cricketing family, is the younger brother of Pakistan great Hanif Mohammad.

“I'm experiencing coronavirus symptoms, since last night but, as I'm 74-year-old, I can't go to the hospital for the test," said Sadiq in a video message. “I request the Sindh government to take my test at home."

CM Sindh answering his request, directed the health department to ensure that Mohammad's test was taken at his place as he is one of the most valuable assets of the country.

A team will visit former cricketer's residence, who will take his sample. Shah has also asked to share the result of the test with him as soon as the process is completed.

Apart from Hanif, the eldest, Wazir Mohammad, and younger ones, Mushtaq Mohammad and Sadiq Mohammad, represented Pakistan in the top forms of cricket. Only Raees Mohammad, the fifth brother, did not play in a single Test match.

Later, Advisor to Chief Minister Sindh on Law and Environment, Senator Murtaza Wahab confirmed that the test has been taken.

“Tests of both Sadiq Mohd [Mohammad] Sb and his wife have been taken. Fingers crossed and prayers for their well being. Aaameen," said Wahab in a tweet.

https://www.brecorder.com/2020/04/23/591778/sadiq-mohammads-covid-19-test-taken-at-his-residence/
 
Last edited:
Some excellent news that the tests have come out negative for both Sadiq Sahib and his wife.
 
76 years old today - Probably one of the least talked about Mohammad brothers.
 
Happy Birthday Sadiq Sahib

Born: May 3, 1945 (age 77 years), Junagadh, India
 
Happy Birthday to Sadiq

From my earlier cricket watching days, he was the least talked about of all the Mohammad Brothers!

We wish him well.
 
Back
Top