What's new

[PICTURE] Multan Sultans PSL 11 | Squad and Discussion Thread

He has strict principles which is he not willing to bend. He is willing to play without a sponsor even. It is the message and principle that matters.
Lol principal does not matter. He is losing per match earnings and players are losing per match earnings
 
He has strict principles which is he not willing to bend. He is willing to play without a sponsor even. It is the message and principle that matters.
Why is he playing without a sponsor though? I find it hard to believe that no brand would want to make use of that real estate on the jersey
 
Lol principal does not matter. He is losing per match earnings and players are losing per match earnings
Why is he playing without a sponsor though? I find it hard to believe that no brand would want to make use of that real estate on the jersey
He has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.
 
He has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.
Not sure if I understand.. What does not having a sponsor have to do with team value? Does he not like money? Its not like the sponsor is going to tell him which players to choose
 
Not sure if I understand.. What does not having a sponsor have to do with team value? Does he not like money? Its not like the sponsor is going to tell him which players to choose
They might be paying alot less as compared to team valuation and having someone with less pay cheque makes sure that the following sponsors in upcoming years will cite that and would like to proceed with that quotation. Thats the only logical thing i can think of
 
He has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.
He is acting immature than.

He is barely gonna keep this team for a a few seasons. Might aswell start recovering it through sponsors.

United signs 1 year deals usually. So he could had done the same, instead of going towards a loss.
 
Not sure if I understand.. What does not having a sponsor have to do with team value? Does he not like money? Its not like the sponsor is going to tell him which players to choose
He probably wants a fair value (high value) of his team. Aka more money than a sponsor is willing to give.
 
He has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.
Seems a bit silly. Like in teenage movie the guy who is unable to get girls claims he is waiting for the right woman.
 
So he's okay taking no money at all if they don't give him what he wants? That's a strange way to do business
He comes across as an idealist tbh. Has certain goals in his mind. Isn't willing to budge or lower the standard.

He has already mentioned that he has put aside 3 years of money as potential loss.
 
Back
Top