DeadlyVenom
ODI Star
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2010
- Runs
- 35,650
- Post of the Week
- 2
Good win for Australia
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol principal does not matter. He is losing per match earnings and players are losing per match earningsHe has strict principles which is he not willing to bend. He is willing to play without a sponsor even. It is the message and principle that matters.
Why is he playing without a sponsor though? I find it hard to believe that no brand would want to make use of that real estate on the jerseyHe has strict principles which is he not willing to bend. He is willing to play without a sponsor even. It is the message and principle that matters.
Lol principal does not matter. He is losing per match earnings and players are losing per match earnings
He has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.Why is he playing without a sponsor though? I find it hard to believe that no brand would want to make use of that real estate on the jersey
Not sure if I understand.. What does not having a sponsor have to do with team value? Does he not like money? Its not like the sponsor is going to tell him which players to chooseHe has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.
They might be paying alot less as compared to team valuation and having someone with less pay cheque makes sure that the following sponsors in upcoming years will cite that and would like to proceed with that quotation. Thats the only logical thing i can think ofNot sure if I understand.. What does not having a sponsor have to do with team value? Does he not like money? Its not like the sponsor is going to tell him which players to choose
He is acting immature than.He has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.
He probably wants a fair value (high value) of his team. Aka more money than a sponsor is willing to give.Not sure if I understand.. What does not having a sponsor have to do with team value? Does he not like money? Its not like the sponsor is going to tell him which players to choose
Seems a bit silly. Like in teenage movie the guy who is unable to get girls claims he is waiting for the right woman.He has mentioned that he's willing to take the loss on sponsor as he's viewing this long term and is not willing to under value his team.
So he's okay taking no money at all if they don't give him what he wants? That's a strange way to do businessHe probably wants a fair value (high value) of his team. Aka more money than a sponsor is willing to give.
He comes across as an idealist tbh. Has certain goals in his mind. Isn't willing to budge or lower the standard.So he's okay taking no money at all if they don't give him what he wants? That's a strange way to do business
So much better to have an actual adult as captain instead of a guy who wears lipstick
What because the bond at Multan was previously bad? 4 Finals in a row man speaks volumes about the team unity.So much better to have an actual adult as captain instead of a guy who wears lipstick
Do I care?What because the bond at Multan was previously bad? 4 Finals in a row man speaks volumes about the team unity.
They are off to a great start and they surely have a good enough squad to win the whole thing. They would surely make it to the playoffs at least.Hopefully my city wins this year
Let's go Sultans
All he had to do was trade Nawaz for ArafatMan released Salman Mirza and Ahmed Daniyal for Waseem JR, Faisal Akram and Arafat Minhas
I don’t think these are sensible trades. Mirza and Daniyal are solid T20 bowlers