Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
KL Rahul said "I denied the single. I told Virat that I'll just block. Virat said it would be bad if you won’t take single, people will think playing for personal milestone, but I said we are comfortably winning, you complete your century".
Exactly my point but People really don't understand the cricket.Was it selfish? Yes. Did he slow down? No. Infact he went faster.
It was a win - win situation for Indian team.
lol no. India's runrate increased. he was 81(82) and India was going along with 6.1 when he started to look for his 100. When he was done, India's run rate was 6.29. So he actually increased the run rate, improved NRR and got his personal milestone. what is the problemWhile India will most likely reach the semi's, only way this can come back to bite if they start a losing streak and not reach the semis on rr, but that is very unlikely.
Its not secret that Kohli wanted to get a 100 here and was going for the milestone. For some reason his fans were trying so hard to defend it instead of just accepting it and moving on about it.
He went for a milestone, that was obvious, he slowed abit for it after a very good start of no balls by the bowler.
Anyways, lets hope he takes that record award away from Tendu
Chalo isi baat se khush raho..The beard fashion in subcontinent was introduced by Fawad Khan of Pakistan, who is very well know for his work and particularly looks among women on both sides of the border.
And some Rohit and Sachin or Misbah fans joining them .OP seems to be lacking the basic understanding of the game. Poor thread.
He was more like 20 away when they stopped taking singlesWhen you are 3 away from the all-time record you would be stupid as hell to not chase it. Perfectly fine to go for milestones as long it doesn’t hamper the interests of the team.
That's kinda want to say .. this type of mindset should not be condonedIm not a fan of what Kohli did but he gets a pass - in this situation and this game. Don’t want to see it again though
Why would he need to take singles when he is hitting sixes and fours?He was more like 20 away when they stopped taking singles
Maybe it worked today .. but it's the wrong mindset...
Yeah, in fact, Fawad discovered beard look. He is expecting his award for the good he did for mankind.The beard fashion in subcontinent was introduced by Fawad Khan of Pakistan, who is very well know for his work and particularly looks among women on both sides of the border.
I was at work .. kinda started watching at that stage onlyWorst thing is to reach 90 to 100 in singles after hitting boundaries till 90. In this case Kohli took like 40 to 50 singles before getting into 80s then he unleashed after he realized he had an outside chance to get to 100. Because when he was on 80 India needed 20 runs needed to win. So basically he had to score most of the runs. I never imagined he would get to 100. KL Rahul seemed to have initiated this.
His 103* came off 97. This is how much deliveries it takes for many off our batters to score a 50.When you are 3 away from the all-time record you would be stupid as hell to not chase it. Perfectly fine to go for milestones as long it doesn’t hamper the interests of the team.
I was talking about the fact that he was on 47 centuries. 3 away from the record.He was more like 20 away when they stopped taking singles
Worst thing is to reach 90 to 100 in singles after hitting boundaries till 90. In this case Kohli took like 40 to 50 singles before getting into 80s then he unleashed after he realized he had an outside chance to get to 100. Because when he was on 80 India needed 20 runs needed to win. So basically he had to score most of the runs. I never imagined he would get to 100. KL Rahul seemed to have initiated this.
Oops .. but my point stand.. I still cringe at the 100th 100 by Sachin in which we actually lost to bangladesh.I was talking about the fact that he was on 47 centuries. 3 away from the record.
Had india finish the game earlier their nrr would had been even better.lol no. India's runrate increased. he was 81(82) and India was going along with 6.1 when he started to look for his 100. When he was done, India's run rate was 6.29. So he actually increased the run rate, improved NRR and got his personal milestone. what is the problem
Well, both Rohit and Rahul were super disappointed when they missed their centuries against Pakistan and Australia respectively, so I guess they understand.
Dravid seemed to have a forced smile while the whole drama was unfoldingWell, both Rohit and Rahul were super disappointed when they missed their centuries against Pakistan and Australia respectively, so I guess they understand.
And after all, Rohit wouldn’t want to be called a Dravid by Kohli fans![]()
Disagree with Manoj Tiwary being world class. He was always IPL level.Its not obsession infact they had World class batsman infact some the top batsman were discarded or thrown out due to the abundance of talent like Manoj Tiwary SKY Manish Pandey etc
This was nothing close to it. Yea. That was kind of a desperation made it a notorious 100 instead of memorable one.Oops .. but my point stand.. I still cringe at the 100th 100 by Sachin in which we actually lost to bangladesh.
Cricketers are often very superstitious, especially ones from India. I am sure that this must have factored into Kohli’s calculus.Last time King scored an ODI World Cup century against Bangladesh, India won the World Cup
Seems like KL Rahul is taking a dig lol Pandya has done it twice now. First Tilak varma.KL Rahul said "I denied the single. Virat said it would be bad if you won’t take single, people will think playing for personal milestone but I said we are comfortably winning, you complete your century".
Hope Pandya was thinking same way as Rahul .
Don’t think what he did was a big deal. But, I will say that the people excusing it are the same ones who would make multiple threads criticizing our players if they ever did the same.
“Wow is Imam that desperate to stat pad against a minnow team!”
I agree, I’m just pointing out the hypocrisyNot the first time this happens when victory is already settled. I remember Srinath bowling wides in order to ensure kumble gets the perfect 10.
If Imam achieves the feats that Kohli has in his career like smashing the like of malinga while chasing 320 in 40 overs or playing a useful knock when Pakistan are 2/3 in 1st couple of overs then people wouldn't mind him scoring a ton against lesser team.Don’t think what he did was a big deal. But, I will say that the people excusing it are the same ones who would make multiple threads criticizing our players if they ever did the same.
“Wow is Imam that desperate to stat pad against a minnow team!”
In a tournament where people are scoring 100 off 80 that isn't impressive.The guy has scored 103 of 97 balls and you call him selfish![]()
India were chasing 257 not 357 aso its completely acceptable. By the way waiting for your answer in kohli thread.In a tournament where people are scoring 100 off 80 that isn't impressive.
Kohli isn't that type of player. He can be if the situation demands for it but it didn't. He's a fast accumulator and he did his jobIn a tournament where people are scoring 100 off 80 that isn't impressive.
Basically KL Rahul donated his runs to Kohli. Otherwise Kohli didn't slow down.Looking back it is ok I guess. Kohli was in longer and he could finish off with 6s and 4s much quicker . And also it is a statement to opponents that ind were so dominant they could do it. Dont think klrahul would have gotten them faster.. they didn't waste time so that was good. To succeed in international cricket there needs to be a certain amount of selfishness and hunger in a good way.
That's what he did? He accelerated and finished earlier. He just hogged the strike. Did you not read properly? Indian runrate improvedHad india finish the game earlier their nrr would had been even better.
But i dont know why indian fans are getting irritated. They have pretty much reach the semis and its very unlikely they will lose the next 4 games.
Kohli played for his milestone. Good for him..hope he plays for his mile stone for the next games and get the record.
There is something vulgar about playing for a personal milestone in a team game, that too when a veteran does it. It's one thing to give some youngster a chance to score a fifty or century, but when a veteran of the game takes help from others to get to a milestone, it's downright obscene IMO.So what? They are miles ahead on the table, STRONG run rate. Plus he deserves it, him getting a century only probably delayed the game by an over. They are in a strong enough situation to do it. Not like Pakistan who rely on others to go through
World tournament. NRR counts. If Babar or Rizwan did the same thing it would be an international incident.If kohli was chasing a century like this match ...
![]()
AUS vs PAK Cricket Scorecard, 5th ODI at Adelaide, January 26, 2017
Get cricket scorecard of 5th ODI, AUS vs PAK, PAK tour of AUS 2016/17 at Adelaide Oval dated January 26, 2017.www.espncricinfo.com
Or even like this match...
![]()
BAN vs IND Cricket Scorecard, 4th Match at Dhaka, March 16, 2012
Live Cricket Scoreboard: Get Bangladesh vs India 4th Match, cricket scorecard, Asia Cup 2011/12 dated March 16, 2012.www.espncricinfo.com
Where centuries made their teams lose, then there would be a point.
I have NEVER seen a player who gets 100 criticized for not taking a single if he hits 6s to finish it off.
Matlab kuch bi.
World tournament. NRR counts. If Babar or Rizwan did the same thing it would be an international incident.
Yes ,if Babar Rizwan would've made a hundred with 100+ strike it and smoking sixes and four for hundred it would've been international incident.World tournament. NRR counts. If Babar or Rizwan did the same thing it would be an international incident.
To be honest Kohli kinda helped boosting it with 3 sixes in the backend instead of tuk-tuking his way to the total. Also Kohli hit a 6 when they just needed 2 runs to win. That means 4 extra runs. He was 70 in 74 balls In the end 104 in 97 balls 34 runs 23 balls. In terms of overs he scored 34 runs in 3.5 overs. That is hardly putting a dent on NRR.World tournament. NRR counts. If Babar or Rizwan did the same thing it would be an international incident.
Okay. Let Babar play inning like this or how Kohli played against Aus in upcoming matches against Australia, South Africa, NZ & England. It's perfectly fine if he is able to get victory for the teamWorld tournament. NRR counts. If Babar or Rizwan did the same thing it would be an international incident.
They called him selfish bcos he didn’t bat tuk-tuk… advise to King Kohli critics “more you rub him, Kohli is getting bigger and bigger”The guy has scored 103 of 97 balls and you call him selfish![]()
People need to get out of this Desi mindset. If this backfires and India finish second on a small margin and get knocked out in the SFs, this match will come back up.IMHO. He did nothing wrong. Game was pretty won long before. Milestones are part of the game.
Stole the words out of my mouth! Throughout his career, the more he has been rubbed by his haters, he has managed to end up doing greater things. A true champion!They called him selfish bcos he didn’t bat tuk-tuk… advise to King Kohli critics “more you rub him, Kohli is getting bigger and bigger”