[PICTURES] Inzamam-ul-Haq should not be involved in any PSL team setup

[srh]

Inzi is a chief selector and his primary job is to select players for Pakistan national team for which he gets paid. But if he is involved in any way to any PSL team setup then it is conflict of interest and questions will be asked about how honest he is in selecting players for Pakistan national team. Yet I saw this news item that Inzi is involved with Lahore Qalanders. Inzi should resign right away from Lahore Qalanders.

 

[MenInG]

Well if Mickey Arthur is allowed.

 

[MenInG]

 

[GullyCricketFlop]

Neither Mickey nor Inzi should be allowed.

 

[Slog]

Start with the money grabber Arthur

 

[Abdul]

Start with the money grabber Arthur

This. If people don't have a problem with the serial conman, then they shouldn't have a problem with this also.

 

[MMHS]

He should be allowed - not allowed rather forced to be part of every PSL team. That's the only way he can find some time to watch PAK players .... and talk with people who are involved in the changing cricket world.

Imandar admi - he shouldn't be forced to watch domestics or PAK International games.

 

[Hedz]

I’m pretty sure both are professional enough in their roles to not be bias
Let’s atleast give them the opportunity to prove that they are not (Mickey has more or less)

Majority of Pakistan fans just need something to cry about all the time

 

[Hasan123]

We'll if Arthur and Inzi are involved in the PSL it means they can see players up close. Doubt either of them watch domestic cricket

 

[indipper]

He will be able to assess Shaheen in a better way.

 

[Gubol123]

Obviously a conflict of interest for Inzy and Mickey Arthur

 

[Gubol123]

We'll if Arthur and Inzi are involved in the PSL it means they can see players up close. Doubt either of them watch domestic cricket

It will be a conflict of interest if they are getting paid.. otherwise if they are just watching matches and interacting with players, they should do it with all the teams not just one of two. then yes, that is a good thing

 

[Savak]

If a few youngsters can benefit from Inzi tips it will be well worth it. No harm in it. We need to support our PSL and all ex legends must get involved in it.

 

[DeadBall]

He's probably really really professional like Mickey. We are so blessed to have such a professional set up.

 

[DeadBall]

If a few youngsters can benefit from Inzi tips it will be well worth it. No harm in it. We need to support our PSL and all ex legends must get involved in it.

There are many legends like Akram, Younis etc involved in it. The point made was this is a conflict of interest.

 

[srh]

Well if Mickey Arthur is allowed.

Neither Mickey nor Inzi should be allowed.

Start with the money grabber Arthur

This. If people don't have a problem with the serial conman, then they shouldn't have a problem with this also.

I’m pretty sure both are professional enough in their roles to not be bias
Let’s atleast give them the opportunity to prove that they are not (Mickey has more or less)

Majority of Pakistan fans just need something to cry about all the time

We'll if Arthur and Inzi are involved in the PSL it means they can see players up close. Doubt either of them watch domestic cricket

Obviously a conflict of interest for Inzy and Mickey Arthur

It will be a conflict of interest if they are getting paid.. otherwise if they are just watching matches and interacting with players, they should do it with all the teams not just one of two. then yes, that is a good thing

I dont have a problem with Mickey Arthur involved in PSL. Remember for the national team, he is a coach i.e. his job is to coach players in the national team.

Inzi on the other hand is the chief selector for the national team i.e. his job is to pick players for the national team. Thats a huge conflict of interest.

 

[Arham_PakFan]

He should be allowed - not allowed rather forced to be part of every PSL team. That's the only way he can find some time to watch PAK players .... and talk with people who are involved in the changing cricket world.

Imandar admi - he shouldn't be forced to watch domestics or PAK International games.

I wouldn’t mind if both of them focussed their attention on all 6 teams.However if they focus on just one team it could create a conflict of interest.

 

[DeadBall]

I dont have a problem with Mickey Arthur involved in PSL. Remember for the national team, he is a coach i.e. his job is to coach players in the national team.

Inzi on the other hand is the chief selector for the national team i.e. his job is to pick players for the national team. Thats a huge conflict of interest.

I think you still don't understand the meaning of conflict of interest. He is the coach of just one team and not all the teams and given the extra interaction he could favor a certain player from his PSL team ahead of other players he hasn't "coached"

 

[Markhor]

Ideally it shouldn't happen but if they don't show any obvious biases in their selection process and are professional about it then it shouldn't be an issue.

 

[Sirris]

Don't think it's a big deal. Perhaps he might enjoy it and consider a position as a batting coach instead of a selector. After all he was one of the best batsman we ever had.

 

[Syed1]

Ideally it shouldn't happen but if they don't show any obvious biases in their selection process and are professional about it then it shouldn't be an issue.

Yeah Inzi is the paragon of neutrality, righteousness and impartiality. No wonder he selected his garbage nephew.

 

[DeadBall]

Don't think it's a big deal. Perhaps he might enjoy it and consider a position as a batting coach instead of a selector. After all he was one of the best batsman we ever had.

Then he should have taken the national batting coach job which Flower currently uses for the sole reason of earning a paycheck. If he is either a batting coach or selector and represents a team in the PSL then it is a conflict of interest. If he was the batting coach of all the PSL teams then it would have been OK. However if he chooses just one team than there is every chance he would be biased towards some players.

 

[Saj]

The PSL is a jobs for the boys club.

Basically anyone who is well in with the PCB is given a role with one of the franchises - mentors, coaches, etc. Next we will have former players given jobs as fashion managers for franchises.

 

[Savak]

The PSL is a jobs for the boys club.

Basically anyone who is well in with the PCB is given a role with one of the franchises - mentors, coaches, etc. Next we will have former players given jobs as fashion managers for franchises.

Lets look at the positives, the PSL is the only way so many of our ex legends will in some way get involved with domestic players. Money attracts quality.

 

[The_Odd_One]

So what if he selects anyone from LQ as long as they perform brilliantly in the PSL? Isn't it the whole point of PSL?

 

[Usman Chadda]

I think you still don't understand the meaning of conflict of interest. He is the coach of just one team and not all the teams and given the extra interaction he could favor a certain player from his PSL team ahead of other players he hasn't "coached"

Arthur hasn't done that though. Otherwise the likes of Sohail Khan or Usama Mir would have been playing over other players. Infact, he dropped Sohail Khan right after PSL when he was playing for Pakistan consistently before the event.

 

[DeadBall]

Arthur hasn't done that though. Otherwise the likes of Sohail Khan or Usama Mir would have been playing over other players. Infact, he dropped Sohail Khan right after PSL when he was playing for Pakistan consistently before the event.

That still isn't the point. Just because he didn't favor certain players before does not mean he will not favor others in the future. No matter how much a "professional" Sadiq and Amin person he claims himself to be.

 

[sshakir411]

Arthur hasn't done that though. Otherwise the likes of Sohail Khan or Usama Mir would have been playing over other players. Infact, he dropped Sohail Khan right after PSL when he was playing for Pakistan consistently before the event.

To add...Sohail Khan had a great PSL 2.

 

[Hasan123]

It will be a conflict of interest if they are getting paid.. otherwise if they are just watching matches and interacting with players, they should do it with all the teams not just one of two. then yes, that is a good thing

People are just over thinking this. He's Mickey Arthur selected a full 11 of Karachi players for Pakistan? No he hasn't.

They don't watch domestic cricket so it's good that they get to see the talent up close and personal.

 

[AssassinatedDevil]

Better for him to be on the ground and assess players there rather than just watch videos of these players months later. It will be alot easier to unearth talent that way. Both are professionals so i dont see what the problem is.

 

[AssassinatedDevil]

Yeah Inzi is the paragon of neutrality, righteousness and impartiality. No wonder he selected his garbage nephew.

Nothing "garbage" about his nephew. He impressed in his very first ODI and should be kept in the squad. He hasn't been given too many chances yet.

 

[super hitter]

You can't compare the two, one is a selector and the other one, a coach. And looking at Inzi's biased nature...

 

[the Great Khan]

You can't compare the two, one is a selector and the other one, a coach. And looking at Inzi's biased nature...

what....we had to go through selectors like Bari and iqbal qasim for goodness sake..Inzi is a genius compared to those...

 

[srh]

I think you still don't understand the meaning of conflict of interest. He is the coach of just one team and not all the teams and given the extra interaction he could favor a certain player from his PSL team ahead of other players he hasn't "coached"

Selector selects players in a team.
Coach coaches players in a team. Coaches dont select players in a team.
Hope it is clear now.

 

[pakistani pride]

The PSL is a jobs for the boys club.

Basically anyone who is well in with the PCB is given a role with one of the franchises - mentors, coaches, etc. Next we will have former players given jobs as fashion managers for franchises.

You can also look at thw good side. The coach and CS will see new talent playing. I am sure youngsters performing will get noticed.

Biggest examples are shadab and hasan. They didnt play for KK.

Based on merit cause they performed they got picked for PAK.

 

[ask_analyse_act]

We'll if Arthur and Inzi are involved in the PSL it means they can see players up close. Doubt either of them watch domestic cricket

only if they give chances to young performers and kick out old n senior players then yes.. or else no use

 

[DeadBall]

We'll if Arthur and Inzi are involved in the PSL it means they can see players up close. Doubt either of them watch domestic cricket

Isn't it the Chief Selectors job to watch domestic cricket so that they can select players?

 

[Hasan123]

Isn't it the Chief Selectors job to watch domestic cricket so that they can select players?

Yes they are but the revolutionary doesn't.

 

[UN talkz]

Isn't it the Chief Selectors job to watch domestic cricket so that they can select players?

In other countries - yes
In Pakistan - a big NO

 

[BunnyRabbit]

If they aren't allowed to be involved in PSL, they will start to bicker about how PSL is damaging Pakistan's players fitness and concentration and destroying their game and there is so much fatigue and............ so on.
Even Waqar Younis complained after the first season how it was like a party for players and now he is the bowling coach and director for a franchise. In Pakistan Cricket, if you are involved, everything is alright, if not, then everything is evil.