When Have I ever supported rizbar??
Infact they are worse than sharjeel but still they didn't indulge in fixing
I'm saying the evidence was circumstantial. Which is why I didn't like the case.
It's just I'm not aware of how Pakistani courts function and what the laws are regarding that or whether icc has some of their own laws and what not
But typically in most cases like this, you need proper evidence and not circumstantial evidence.
Everyone from witnesses or parties involved either denied it or claimed that they have no idea.
They literally banned him cause he knew the bookie but that's an association. If I was born in 1800 knew Jacktheripper , that doesnt mean I'm automatically a serial killer or an accomplise. You cant arrest me for murder, only for withholding information from the police but even then you'd have to prove that I had ill intent to withhold and not because I simply didn't bother to, forgot to or was too afraid too.
In sharjeel's case theirs no way to prove he played 2 dot balls deliberately. 2 dot balls in a row is standard for most people, even travis head lol.
Sharjeel even said he accepted the ban and stopped going to court cause he gave up, it was better to just accept the ban rather then get harassed on end by courts and being called up week after week.
Not everyone has the mental fortitude to put on a suit and constantly attend courts only to spout the same rubbish even though the jury, And witnesses involved all conclude the evidence to be circumstantial and non conclusive.
It's not the same as butt, Amir and asif which is 100% positive and theirs no defense.