Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was pretty good in India earlier this year, but he looks out of place in Australia with England's overall performance adding to it. It was pretty inevitable. Think it's his last series.
There is absolutely no chance he will retire before surpassing Warne’s tally, which he will do so very easily unless he suffers a career-ending injury.
Considering his fitness and experience, he will remain a world class bowler in English/swinging conditions for a couple of more years at least.
Murali’s record is obviously a bridge too far.
What bowler is not a world class bowler in English/swinging conditions.
He (and England) need to get over the obsession that a pink-ball test will mean swinging around corners and batsmen struggling to get into double digits.
After Ahmedabad and Adelaide, they shouldn't fall for this mentality again.
.
Considering his fitness and experience, he will remain a world class bowler in English/swinging conditions for a couple of more years at least.
You don’t have to look beyond your own team. Starc averages 31 in England and 34 in South Africa. Clearly not good enough in English/swinging conditions.
Nice cherry picking, what does Hazelwood, Cummins and a host of other fast bowlers average in England over the last 10 years, even some England bowlers outshine him.
What “cherry-picking”? You asked me to name a bowler who is not world class in English/swinging conditions and I did. You clearly didn’t like the answer because you weren’t expecting it, so perhaps you should blame your question instead of blaming my so-called cherry-picking.
Untrue - even against India, who do not play the moving ball well, he averaged 60 in the second innings this summer. He can’t bowl effectively for a whole match any more.
He should retire. Woakes is now a better bowler in England, and can bat too.
Untrue - even against India, who do not play the moving ball well, he averaged 60 in the second innings this summer. He can’t bowl effectively for a whole match any more.
He should retire. Woakes is now a better bowler in England, and can bat too.
You could look at the stats for fast bowlers in England, or you can avoid the obvious I don't care either way.
I did look at the stats and I found that one of your premier fast bowlers and leaders of the attack finds it hard to do well in England, so perhaps you should appreciate the fact that wickets do not come free in England and you have to actually bowl well and get the ball in the right areas to get wickets.
Thats nice, lets just ignore Hazelwood, McGrath, Harris, Cummins and M Marsh and if you add Khan, Abbas, Boult, Bumrah and Philander. I wont mention that Woakes and Robinson are both better than Anderson in England.
If you do not understand - or do not have the capacity to understand - that there is world of difference between doing well in England (or doing better than Anderson in comparison) over a handful Test matches compared to excelling in English conditions over 90+ Tests and performing against multiple generation of batsmen, then I don’t think we should be having this discussion. It would be better if you start watching cricket instead of just filtering stats without any context and understanding of the game.
Besides, no one would ever argue that McGrath wasn’t better than Anderson. The former is arguably the greatest of all time.
You are right I dont have the capacity to understand how England is going to improve their bowling unit in England or abroad with Anderson in the team.
Unless he gets that average below 25, he wont be an ATG. He has been great since mid 2010 and I considered this but at the end of the day, overall career average matters. If Walsh is not an ATG, neither is Anderson.
Having said that, theres no reason for him to retire since he still makes that spot on merit. England's pace stocks are overrated.
Most matches are won/lost in the first two innings, so third and fourth innings performances are overrated. Be it batting or bowling. Players who turn up in the first innings are bigger match-winners and set up more wins.
Anderson set up England’s only win in that series when he ran through the Indian top-order at Leeds in the first innings.
Even during the second Test at Lord’s, Anderson took a 5-fer in the first innings to put England in a position where they could take a lead, and it certainly wasn’t his fault that the batsmen crumbled in the fourth innings.
You clearly don’t like Anderson, which is your bias against him has forced you to rate the like Hoggard and Caddick above him. It is ridiculous because no English cricketer, commentator, fan or a general follower would ever do that. That is pretty much blasphemous and a huge disservice to what Anderson has achieved for England in Test cricket.
600+ wickets and counting do not come free.
You are right I dont have the capacity to understand how England is going to improve their bowling unit in England or abroad with Anderson in the team.
It’s a two-innings game.
I don’t dislike him, I feel he is overrated by some here.
Every career has an end. Anderson has gone on a season too long already. The greats such as Lillee, Hadlee, Marshall got out on top, they didn’t carry on until they were passengers for half of every match. But a kind of blindness to reality means that Anderson keeps getting picked, instead of Mahmood who would do better on Australian wickets.
So a bowler with 400 wickets at 24 is an ATG but a bowler with 700 wickets at 26 is not.
Incredible.
Longevity is a great thing but can easy turn into players playing well past their prime
He shouldve retired by last year with covid n everything This year has been a bridge too far for Mr Longevity
The management must make a call to move on from both anderson ans broad
Who are you talking about. 400 wichets at 24 ?
What a player. Leading the attack at this age and for so long. One of greatest England has ever produced.
He won’t be able to come back in the second innings, if there is nothing one….
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">James Anderson bowls Joe Root ��<br><br>Big celebs from Jimmy for that wicket!<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/LVCountyChamp?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#LVCountyChamp</a> <a href="https://t.co/y4FnvUAJ3u">pic.twitter.com/y4FnvUAJ3u</a></p>— LV= Insurance County Championship (@CountyChamp) <a href="https://twitter.com/CountyChamp/status/1525824938988515330?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 15, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
No one celebrated Sachin's longevity? At least it should be done now after looking at Virat Kohli's performances these days.![]()
Brendon is already having an impact on all of these guys, not just Jimmy. It’s visible.
3 for 62 off a very economical 27 overs is a decent effort in these conditions tbh.
He’s just wonderful.
Continues to ripen like a vintage cellar wine.
Nah mate he’s corked. Average 65, s/r 176 in the second innings over the last 12 months. He can’t do it over the whole match any more.
Do you think he can get 700 test wickets?
Nah mate he’s corked. Average 65, s/r 176 in the second innings over the last 12 months. He can’t do it over the whole match any more.
This His body and fitness arent upto it anymore, the stats show he cant replicate the same intensity or penetration in his bowling in the 2nd innings
Hes also v good at keeping it tight now but hes not gonna run through a lineup anymore home and in particularly away from home like the ashes showed He needs to be moved on
Not what he used to be till 3-4 years ago.
He doesn't take many 5 fers now especially in the second innings. Even in the first innings, he has become more of a 3 or max 4 wickets (on a good day) taker now.
He used to rip through the lineups with 5 fers frequently. I think the dip in sustained average speed of his spell is causing it. He can still amp it up to 140ks on occasion.
I think Broad when on song can still take plethora of wickets ie game changing spells.
James Anderson 5fers since 2020 - 4
Stuart Broad 5fers since 2020 - 2
Most times 5 wickets in a Test innings:
Murali 67
Shane Warne 37
Richard Hadlee 36
Anil Kumble 35
Rangana Herath 34
James Anderson 32
That is an insane stat from Murali. Everyone likes to put an asterisk on his career, but for me GOAT spinner
That is an insane stat from Murali. Everyone likes to put an asterisk on his career, but for me GOAT spinner
All this talk about Anderson only being good in England these days - last I checked he averaged 15 in India last year, 7 in Sri Lanka (all be it in just 1 match), and 23 in Australia
I would die for a Pakistani pacer to average 23 in Australia for us because last time two times we've toured Australia these are the averages of some of our notable pacers:
Shaheen Shah Afridi - 37
Wahab Riaz - 36
Mohammad Amir - 62
Rahat Ali - 57
Naseem Shah - 68
Mohammad Abbas - Didn't even take a wicket 0/100
Anderson is still amazing, just because he's 40 and you think he should retire because of his age is pure blasphemy.
I'd pick Donald ahead of Jimmy in my XI. Sad for him, many of his best years in cricket were lost due to apartheid.
Like Jimmy, Donald had such a great
and fluent bowling action.