[PICTURES] Will BazBall thrive in India?

You are shifting the goalposts here - we are talking about Stokes’ captaincy.

Surely, if a terrible captain could pick up a win in India with his outdated approach, the ATG captain with his revolutionary Bazball which is apparently the right way to play Test cricket should be winning at least two Test matches. No?

Speaking of winning matches, Stokes has never won England anything in India. Root is the highest scorer ever India.
Why can’t both things be true? Root is probably one of the best ever England batsmen, maybe it’s not even Root’s captaincy that was holding them back.

But whatever new approach England has taken is massively improving the resulting they’ve been getting. McCullum brought new life into this team similar to the white ball revolution in England before.
 
Saw an interesting stat earlier: “England are the first visiting team to reach 300 in the second innings in India since 2012” (this was also an England total)
That Ollie Pope innings is legendary - especially if England pull of the victory here!

420 in the second innings in India is incredibly impressive.
 
Pope played out of his mind.

One of the best innings on Indian soil in a long time.
 
You are shifting the goalposts here - we are talking about Stokes’ captaincy.

Surely, if a terrible captain could pick up a win in India with his outdated approach, the ATG captain with his revolutionary Bazball which is apparently the right way to play Test cricket should be winning at least two Test matches. No?

Speaking of winning matches, Stokes has never won England anything in India. Root is the highest scorer ever India.
Well there we go. Stokes the captain just won the test match with some brilliant captaincy to come from 200 runs behind in the first innings. How often does that happen?

Pie on your face already.

Time to think of excuses and call it a fluke or lucky innings from pope/ bowling from Hartley in 3…2….1
 
You are shifting the goalposts here - we are talking about Stokes’ captaincy.

Surely, if a terrible captain could pick up a win in India with his outdated approach, the ATG captain with his revolutionary Bazball which is apparently the right way to play Test cricket should be winning at least two Test matches. No?

Speaking of winning matches, Stokes has never won England anything in India. Root is the highest scorer ever India.
and he gets teh win
 
Stokes and McCullum needed this reality-check.

Bazball is nothing but a tactic to help England white ball players perform better in Test cricket.

It has nothing to do with “saving” Test cricket or making it more exciting. England’s problem is that they got preachy and tried to sell the narrative that this is how Test cricket should be played which is hilarious because they are now sweating to save a Test match in India by playing attritional cricket.
What?? Struggling to save a test match by playing attritional cricket? What game were you watching.
I think it's time for you to deride Pak fans again
 
Bazball is only as good as the leader and I guarantee without stokes England would collapse every other innings like they’re famous for.

Stokes specifically selected and promoted an underperforming Pope to number 3 when he became captain - a position he had never even batted in domestic. And he backed him with a clear purpose.

Bazball is a result, not the cause of this stunning turnaround by England since the loser Root was stripped of captaincy.
 
From what I have understood of BazBall it means you have to come out of your comfort zone and play for the team instead of your own records in whichever conditions you are playing. you will lose some games but it will give new direction to the team
 
From what I have understood of BazBall it means you have to come out of your comfort zone and play for the team instead of your own records in whichever conditions you are playing. you will lose some games but it will give new direction to the team
Stokes just said in the post match interview that Bazball is essentially when the ambition to win clearly outstrips the fear of failure and this is what England have been doing unlike our mental midgets...long it may continue....
 
I've been waiting to watch this fail in India, but at the same time, when it came off, like it did here, especially in stark contrast to India's approach to playing the England spinners, you've just got to salute them.

For now.
 
Bazball didn't thrive in 1st innings but thrived in 2nd innings.

Bazball is working in India so far.
 
The way Pope swept, reversed and scooped the Indian spinners was unbelievable.

One of the best overseas knocks in India. Credit to Bazball.
 
The way Pope swept, reversed and scooped the Indian spinners was unbelievable.

One of the best overseas knocks in India. Credit to Bazball.

I think Pope is the best English batter in Test right now. Better than likes of Stokes, Root, Bairstow etc.
 
Normally England would have crumpled to an innings defeat but the positive attitude and an incredible amount of skill from Stokes, Pope and others led to a great victory. I still Ind to win the series but well Done to England
 
and he gets teh win
Yes, so he is on par with Joe Root now who also won the first Test in the 2021 series and he didn’t have the luxury of facing an Indian team that didn’t have Kohli and Pant.
 
Pie on your face already.

Time to think of excuses and call it a fluke or lucky innings from pope/ bowling from Hartley in 3…2….1
So?

Congratulations to the “ATG” captain for matching the terrible Joe Root by winning the first Test. Remember that Joe Root didn’t have the luxury of playing an Indian team that didn’t have Kohli and Pant.

Surely if Stokes is an ATG captain he should be winning this series or at least draw it, because even Joe Root won the first Test in 2021.
 
This aged well
What?? Struggling to save a test match by playing attritional cricket? What game were you watching.
I think it's time for you to deride Pak fans again
So Root and Stokes are on par now. Both won the first Test.

Now if England lose 4-1 from here, it will be safe to say that Bazball failed and there is no difference between England’s old approach and the so-called revolutionary and exciting cricket that they are playing today.

Let’s not forget that Bazball failed in the home Ashes too. The result was 2-2, exactly the same result as the 2019 series when England were led by Joe Root.

Not to forget that Bazball failed to win a series in New Zealand as well.

I’m struggling to understand what all the fuss is about. Bazball has achieved nothing of note apart from thrashing a pathetic Pakistan team and I would argue that it wasn’t a notable achievement because any half-decent team should be trouncing Pakistan in Test cricket right now.

Pakistan might lose to the West Indies at home in March if they don’t produce turning tracks.
 
Bazball failed its first stern examination: the 2023 Ashes.

If they fail their next stern examination, the current series in India, it will cement its status as a failed tactic.

Failure in this series would be anything less than a drawn series.
 
Bazball failed its first stern examination: the 2023 Ashes.

If they fail their next stern examination, the current series in India, it will cement its status as a failed tactic.

Failure in this series would be anything less than a drawn series.
Failure is the name of your team!
To loose from that position you have to be pretty bad.
 
Bazball failed its first stern examination: the 2023 Ashes.

If they fail their next stern examination, the current series in India, it will cement its status as a failed tactic.

Failure in this series would be anything less than a drawn series.
You mean the 2023 ashes when England would have won the series had it not been for rain? A feat no other touring English side has come close to recently.
 
Bazball failed its first stern examination: the 2023 Ashes.

If they fail their next stern examination, the current series in India, it will cement its status as a failed tactic.

Failure in this series would be anything less than a drawn series.
And sorry, just to put this into perspective. Ashes 2021/22. Joe Root captains England to an abysmal 4:0 destruction.

Ben Stokes takes over. Ashes 2023, Stokes comes from behind to draw the series at 2:2 with Australia facing an innings defeat in the drawn game but saved by the rain.

And according to your logic that is a failure of bazball?
 
And sorry, just to put this into perspective. Ashes 2021/22. Joe Root captains England to an abysmal 4:0 destruction.

Ben Stokes takes over. Ashes 2023, Stokes comes from behind to draw the series at 2:2 with Australia facing an innings defeat in the drawn game but saved by the rain.

And according to your logic that is a failure of bazball?
Oh wait, I didn't even realise. Root was captain for the 2017/18 ashes series as well. Guess what the score was then... oh yes England got destroyed 4:0.

Your double standards are laughable, the way you compare the current English team with the past, all because of your hate for Stokes and love for Root.

I can accept where I'm wrong. I hated stokes, thought he was entitled and the most overrated cricketer with club level bowling and the odd fluke innings. But watching what he's done time and time again, I cannot help but accept he is one of the best cricketers in history. He has won just about everything for his nation. And I have never seen another example of a player doing it completely singlehandedly on so many different occasions. And then if that wasn't enough, he has shown he is an incredible leader who has created the perfect environment in the dressing room.

Every player is praising him. The great but moody Anderson commented that it's the best environment he's been a part of in his 20 year career. The results have turned around 180 since Root left. Bazball is the cover but Stokes is the legend.
 
So Root and Stokes are on par now. Both won the first Test.

Now if England lose 4-1 from here, it will be safe to say that Bazball failed and there is no difference between England’s old approach and the so-called revolutionary and exciting cricket that they are playing today.

Let’s not forget that Bazball failed in the home Ashes too. The result was 2-2, exactly the same result as the 2019 series when England were led by Joe Root.

Not to forget that Bazball failed to win a series in New Zealand as well.

I’m struggling to understand what all the fuss is about. Bazball has achieved nothing of note apart from thrashing a pathetic Pakistan team and I would argue that it wasn’t a notable achievement because any half-decent team should be trouncing Pakistan in Test cricket right now.

Pakistan might lose to the West Indies at home in March if they don’t produce turning tracks.
Winning the match from the position England were in will be counted among the remarkable feats in the history of cricket. India will make a comeback and may win the series but that will take nothing away from this victory in any way.
Talking about ashes England were clearly the better team and would have 3-2 if not for rain.
And England under Stokes thrashed Indian pacers to chase 375 at 5.5/over in last test of home series. Before the COVID break India led the series 2-1 thanks to Root's awful captaincy in couple of test matches
 
Delhi was a docile pitch by Indian spin track standards. They were absolutely clueless even on that track against Afghan spinners.

I'm foreseeing blind slogging and a massive collapse of bazball during the 1st innings of the 1st test in India. This will be followed by reverting back to nervous old school approach which will as well fail, because English batsmen just cannot pick lengths early and use the feet well on spinning decks.
Wow this aged well too
 
Yes, so he is on par with Joe Root now who also won the first Test in the 2021 series and he didn’t have the luxury of facing an Indian team that didn’t have Kohli and Pant.
In the last 17 Test matches that Joe Root was captain, they won only 1 of them.

Since Stokes took over, they’ve played 19 and won 14 of them.

Your hatred for Ben Stokes is blinding you from something that is blatantly obvious.
 
Well, they did well in one test so far. Hope to see more of it in entire series. It will be interesting.
 
You mean the 2023 ashes when England would have won the series had it not been for rain? A feat no other touring English side has come close to recently.
Rain didn’t cost England; Stokes’ stupid declaration in the first Test did. He gifted Australia a 1-0 lead and.

England should have won the series 3-1. You can say that it would have been 4-1 had it not rained in the fifth Test.
 
Winning the match from the position England were in will be counted among the remarkable feats in the history of cricket. India will make a comeback and may win the series but that will take nothing away from this victory in any way.
Talking about ashes England were clearly the better team and would have 3-2 if not for rain.
And England under Stokes thrashed Indian pacers to chase 375 at 5.5/over in last test of home series. Before the COVID break India led the series 2-1 thanks to Root's awful captaincy in couple of test matches
No one asked England to be under the pump. Winning by dominating from the word go is better than making a comeback.

England’s win in India in 2021 under Root was far more impressive because they were dominant from day 1 and never allowed India to get back in the game.

England didn’t win the Ashes because of the stupid declaration in the first Test not because of rain in the fifth Test. Stokes handed Australia the win on a platter after they were on the ropes.

Rohit’s absence in the fifth Test in 2022 was as big a factor for England’s win as the so-called brilliant leadership of Stokes.

He was India’s top scorer in the series in spite of missing the fifth Test and India dearly missed him.

Not only did India miss his batting, they also missed him as a leader. Bumrah was captaining in that Test and he is not captaincy material and has no leadership experience either.
 
In the last 17 Test matches that Joe Root was captain, they won only 1 of them.

Since Stokes took over, they’ve played 19 and won 14 of them.

Your hatred for Ben Stokes is blinding you from something that is blatantly obvious.
England have picked up a lot of soft wins since Stokes took over and they have had favorable circumstances too.

1. Rohit unavailable for the fifth Test. India clearly suffered without his batting and captaincy.

2. Lyon getting injured and missing the last three Tests of the Ashes. Australia were 2-0 up when he played and he bowled really well, taking 8 wickets in the first Test.

Funny how cheerleaders of Stokes captaincy conveniently ignore this @Forum363

3. Kohli not playing in this Test was obviously a big factor that greatly weakened India’s middle-order. Pant’s absence cannot be discounted either.

You are right that I hate Stokes but I loved him until 2021. He is the most selfish cricketer I have ever seen. The way he sat out of the 2021 series vs India and the WT20 was shameful.

In addition, he retired from ODIs in 2022 and gave a phony excuse that he wanted to manage his workload even though between his retirement and the 2023 World Cup, England were only playing 7 ODIs. He wouldn’t have died had he played those 7 matches.

Right before the World Cup, he decided to make himself unavailable and selfishly hogged the spot of another player. What was the point of his retirement? It completely disrupted England’s preparation for the World Cup.

The way he has humiliated by Shami in the World Cup gave me a lot of sadistic pleasure.

Stokes did an AB de Villiers in 2019 but unlike CSA, ECB didn’t have the balls to say no him. Initially, they made Brook the sacrificial lamb before deciding to switch to Roy.

Both Roy and Brook deserved to play in the World Cup ahead of Stokes who shouldn’t have retired before the World Cup in the first place but once it was done, he should have had the dignity to stay retired.

Stokes’ selfishness in 2021 was rewarded with a leadership position but a man who has a documented history of putting himself above the team should never be rewarded with captaincy because he always leave the team high and dry.

Joe Root is always available for England. These are the type of men that you want to captain your team.
 
Failure is the name of your team!
To loose from that position you have to be pretty bad.
Failure is the name of the team that hasn’t even managed to draw a Test match in Australia since Miandad’s retirement.
 
England have picked up a lot of soft wins since Stokes took over and they have had favorable circumstances too.

1. Rohit unavailable for the fifth Test. India clearly suffered without his batting and captaincy.

2. Lyon getting injured and missing the last three Tests of the Ashes. Australia were 2-0 up when he played and he bowled really well, taking 8 wickets in the first Test.

Funny how cheerleaders of Stokes captaincy conveniently ignore this @Forum363

3. Kohli not playing in this Test was obviously a big factor that greatly weakened India’s middle-order. Pant’s absence cannot be discounted either.

You are right that I hate Stokes but I loved him until 2021. He is the most selfish cricketer I have ever seen. The way he sat out of the 2021 series vs India and the WT20 was shameful.

In addition, he retired from ODIs in 2022 and gave a phony excuse that he wanted to manage his workload even though between his retirement and the 2023 World Cup, England were only playing 7 ODIs. He wouldn’t have died had he played those 7 matches.

Right before the World Cup, he decided to make himself unavailable and selfishly hogged the spot of another player. What was the point of his retirement? It completely disrupted England’s preparation for the World Cup.

The way he has humiliated by Shami in the World Cup gave me a lot of sadistic pleasure.

Stokes did an AB de Villiers in 2019 but unlike CSA, ECB didn’t have the balls to say no him. Initially, they made Brook the sacrificial lamb before deciding to switch to Roy.

Both Roy and Brook deserved to play in the World Cup ahead of Stokes who shouldn’t have retired before the World Cup in the first place but once it was done, he should have had the dignity to stay retired.

Stokes’ selfishness in 2021 was rewarded with a leadership position but a man who has a documented history of putting himself above the team should never be rewarded with captaincy because he always leave the team high and dry.

Joe Root is always available for England. These are the type of men that you want to captain your team.
Another example of Stokes’ selfishness: he made himself available for the IPL with a bad knee even though the Ashes was only a month away.

As the England Test captain, he should have been resting to ensure that he fully recovers before the Ashes.

Instead, he played in the IPL for $$$ and had to sit out many games because of his knee.

During the Ashes, he hopped on one leg and looked like someone who sneaked out of a hospital.

If his name wasn’t Stokes, he would have been roasted like a Christmas turkey for playing in the IPL with a bad knee right before the Ashes.
 
England have picked up a lot of soft wins since Stokes took over and they have had favorable circumstances too.

1. Rohit unavailable for the fifth Test. India clearly suffered without his batting and captaincy.

2. Lyon getting injured and missing the last three Tests of the Ashes. Australia were 2-0 up when he played and he bowled really well, taking 8 wickets in the first Test.

Funny how cheerleaders of Stokes captaincy conveniently ignore this @Forum363

3. Kohli not playing in this Test was obviously a big factor that greatly weakened India’s middle-order. Pant’s absence cannot be discounted either.

You are right that I hate Stokes but I loved him until 2021. He is the most selfish cricketer I have ever seen. The way he sat out of the 2021 series vs India and the WT20 was shameful.

In addition, he retired from ODIs in 2022 and gave a phony excuse that he wanted to manage his workload even though between his retirement and the 2023 World Cup, England were only playing 7 ODIs. He wouldn’t have died had he played those 7 matches.

Right before the World Cup, he decided to make himself unavailable and selfishly hogged the spot of another player. What was the point of his retirement? It completely disrupted England’s preparation for the World Cup.

The way he has humiliated by Shami in the World Cup gave me a lot of sadistic pleasure.

Stokes did an AB de Villiers in 2019 but unlike CSA, ECB didn’t have the balls to say no him. Initially, they made Brook the sacrificial lamb before deciding to switch to Roy.

Both Roy and Brook deserved to play in the World Cup ahead of Stokes who shouldn’t have retired before the World Cup in the first place but once it was done, he should have had the dignity to stay retired.

Stokes’ selfishness in 2021 was rewarded with a leadership position but a man who has a documented history of putting himself above the team should never be rewarded with captaincy because he always leave the team high and dry.

Joe Root is always available for England. These are the type of men that you want to captain your team.
You lose all credibility when you want someone like Root to remain as captain because he is ‘always available’ vs Stokes because he took rest in certain matches.

Why do your standards not apply to Kohli missing matches?

Stokes retired to manage the workload on his body.

Your argument as to why he played IPL is equally ignorant. So the only way he would be unselfish is if he played more meaningless bilateral series vs the obviously major league IPL where he would get paid a lot of money for less work?

How many players play the ipl and skip bilateral series. Why does that selfishness argument not apply to them?
 
Yes, so he is on par with Joe Root now who also won the first Test in the 2021 series and he didn’t have the luxury of facing an Indian team that didn’t have Kohli and Pant.
No Anderson
No Robinson
No Brook
Stokes can't bowl
Shoaib Bashir's Visa cancelled
Debutant Hartley
2nd Match for Rehan
Playing at Home

Still lost the game 🤣🤣
 
Dravid on Bazball:

We'll have to counter that (Bazball). I certainly haven't seen it being done that (playing sweeps, reverse sweeps) consistently against that quality of bowlers. I think the sweep is something that we've seen people employ in the past. But to be able to play a reverse sweep that consistently and that successfully for that long, you know, hats off to Pope.

Having said that, for us now, it's important that we respond and we come up with some plans and some strategies and see how we can maybe make him play those shots from probably even more difficult lengths. And be even more disciplined and even more meticulous with our execution. Because I thought a little bit our execution went off, not by much. Credit to him. It [execution] was off a little bit, and hopefully in the next test match if we get our execution right, then I hope he [Pope] makes a mistake.

 
Having said this many times before, I will say it again: the bazball technique will revolutionize the way we play Test cricket and is sure to help Test cricket attract fans from all around the world. England is doing an exceptionally fabulous job by implementing bazball technique and maintaining a fearless attitude. Stokes has faced heavy criticism for making some unorthodox decisions, decisions that traditional Test cricket captains would be afraid to make. However, this has resulted in instilling a fearless approach in English players, making them believe that they can win from any situation.
 
England have picked up a lot of soft wins since Stokes took over and they have had favorable circumstances too.

1. Rohit unavailable for the fifth Test. India clearly suffered without his batting and captaincy.

2. Lyon getting injured and missing the last three Tests of the Ashes. Australia were 2-0 up when he played and he bowled really well, taking 8 wickets in the first Test.

Funny how cheerleaders of Stokes captaincy conveniently ignore this @Forum363

3. Kohli not playing in this Test was obviously a big factor that greatly weakened India’s middle-order. Pant’s absence cannot be discounted either.

You are right that I hate Stokes but I loved him until 2021. He is the most selfish cricketer I have ever seen. The way he sat out of the 2021 series vs India and the WT20 was shameful.

In addition, he retired from ODIs in 2022 and gave a phony excuse that he wanted to manage his workload even though between his retirement and the 2023 World Cup, England were only playing 7 ODIs. He wouldn’t have died had he played those 7 matches.

Right before the World Cup, he decided to make himself unavailable and selfishly hogged the spot of another player. What was the point of his retirement? It completely disrupted England’s preparation for the World Cup.

The way he has humiliated by Shami in the World Cup gave me a lot of sadistic pleasure.

Stokes did an AB de Villiers in 2019 but unlike CSA, ECB didn’t have the balls to say no him. Initially, they made Brook the sacrificial lamb before deciding to switch to Roy.

Both Roy and Brook deserved to play in the World Cup ahead of Stokes who shouldn’t have retired before the World Cup in the first place but once it was done, he should have had the dignity to stay retired.

Stokes’ selfishness in 2021 was rewarded with a leadership position but a man who has a documented history of putting himself above the team should never be rewarded with captaincy because he always leave the team high and dry.

Joe Root is always available for England. These are the type of men that you want to captain your team.
Now, as you may not share the same enthusiasm for the bazball technique, it seems you have taken an extremely critical stance against Stokes.

I understand that people from different regions have varying preferences and adapt to new ideas at their own pace. It's true that Pakistanis, like fans from other cricket-loving nations, may need time to fully appreciate what England is bringing to Test cricket with the bazball approach. Personally, I've found that this new style of play has made Test matches more captivating for me. I never had much interest in watching England play Test cricket before they implemented the bazball technique, but I recently watched an entire Test match because of their innovative approach.

Stokes is a champion and an impactful player, which is why he has been present in all of England's major wins in the last three years or so. He may go down as the best captain from England
 
So now teams should appoint their captain based on anticipated player availability, not if they’re actually any good at the job or not. Perhaps England should make Keaton Jennings their captain in that case.
 
So now teams should appoint their captain based on anticipated player availability, not if they’re actually any good at the job or not. Perhaps England should make Keaton Jennings their captain in that case.
More than anticipated player availability, any player who has demonstrated, on multiple occasions, that he has no qualms about putting himself above his team should be excluded from any leadership roles.
 
Having said this many times before, I will say it again: the bazball technique will revolutionize the way we play Test cricket and is sure to help Test cricket attract fans from all around the world. England is doing an exceptionally fabulous job by implementing bazball technique and maintaining a fearless attitude. Stokes has faced heavy criticism for making some unorthodox decisions, decisions that traditional Test cricket captains would be afraid to make. However, this has resulted in instilling a fearless approach in English players, making them believe that they can win from any situation.
See that is my problem with Bazball and how England are trying to sell this idea that they are revolutionizing Test cricket and making it more attractive and exciting.

I think that is garbage. I don’t know a single person who has started watched Test cricket because of Bazball. People who didn’t like Test cricket still don’t like it and those liked Test cricket will like it whether it is Bazball or whatever-ball.

We have to understand why Bazball was implemented in the first place. With the exception of Root and Pope, England don’t have any proper Test batsmen who know where their off stump is and can bat for long periods of time.

What they have is a bunch of white ball players - and Test players with low attention span - who have benefited from playing Test cricket at a quicker tempo. You pick an ODI player in Test cricket and ask him to bat at a SR of 80 as opposed to asking him to bat at a SR of 50.

Surely, he has a better chance of performing if he bats at a tempo that he is comfortable at.

This is the same brand of Test cricket that McCullum himself played for New Zealand and he was a poor Test cricketer.

England’s problem is their arrogance and the evangelism where they try to convey the message that their brand of cricket is the way forward and how Test cricket should be played, and somehow, it is their responsibility to make Test cricket more exciting.

We also need to understand why Bazball or any particular-ball will not do much to revive interest in Test cricket in the long-term. To understand this, we first need to understand why most people don’t watch Test cricket.

Most people don’t watch Test cricket because they don’t have the time to watch a game that takes 4-5 days to produce a result and a typical days play will last for 8 hours or so.

That is a lot of time commitment and investment that people with jobs and lives cannot afford. It has nothing to do with whether you are batting at 3.5 runs an over or 6 runs an over.

Who can sit down and watch all 5 days of Test cricket these days? People with no jobs, people with no professional lives, people with failed relationships and so forth. Basically, you have to be a loser with nothing going in your life to have enough time to commit to a 5 days x 8 hours schedule for a game of cricket.

Has Bazball attracted a bunch of losers to watch Test cricket who had nothing productive to do and were a burden on society? Maybe, but those people are in minority.

The vast majority of the people who love cricket (like me) but don’t watch Test cricket anymore don’t do so not because we don’t like but because we don’t time for it.

I have to work, spend time with my family and play golf and I cannot commit to a 5 days x 8 hours schedule no matter what run rate England is batting at in Test cricket.
 
Some stats

SEglHQa.png
 
No Anderson
No Robinson
No Brook
Stokes can't bowl
Shoaib Bashir's Visa cancelled
Debutant Hartley
2nd Match for Rehan
Playing at Home

Still lost the game 🤣🤣
Anderson and Robinson were not selected. There is a difference between not getting selected and not being available.

Stokes can’t bowl because he chased IPL money and aggravated his knee injury.

Not sure if Bashir would have made a difference. I mean Hartley did amazing and most of these Asian players playing for England are rubbish anyway.

So what if India lost? They will still win the series. They are still one of the greatest Test sides ever and the most accomplished Test team in Asian cricket history.

Pakistani fans don’t have the right to laugh at them for losing a Test when your own team got whitewashed by England in Pakistan.

India’s cricket failures tower above the success of Pakistan cricket.
 
No one asked England to be under the pump. Winning by dominating from the word go is better than making a comeback.

England’s win in India in 2021 under Root was far more impressive because they were dominant from day 1 and never allowed India to get back in the game.

England didn’t win the Ashes because of the stupid declaration in the first Test not because of rain in the fifth Test. Stokes handed Australia the win on a platter after they were on the ropes.

Rohit’s absence in the fifth Test in 2022 was as big a factor for England’s win as the so-called brilliant leadership of Stokes.

He was India’s top scorer in the series in spite of missing the fifth Test and India dearly missed him.

Not only did India miss his batting, they also missed him as a leader. Bumrah was captaining in that Test and he is not captaincy material and has no leadership experience either.
Well what can be said when you're making excuses. Rohit's absence made Indian bowlers concede 375 at 5.5 rpo ?
And England clearly didn't win the ashes because 4th test was washed out , no two ways about it
 
See that is my problem with Bazball and how England are trying to sell this idea that they are revolutionizing Test cricket and making it more attractive and exciting.

I think that is garbage. I don’t know a single person who has started watched Test cricket because of Bazball. People who didn’t like Test cricket still don’t like it and those liked Test cricket will like it whether it is Bazball or whatever-ball.

We have to understand why Bazball was implemented in the first place. With the exception of Root and Pope, England don’t have any proper Test batsmen who know where their off stump is and can bat for long periods of time.

What they have is a bunch of white ball players - and Test players with low attention span - who have benefited from playing Test cricket at a quicker tempo. You pick an ODI player in Test cricket and ask him to bat at a SR of 80 as opposed to asking him to bat at a SR of 50.

Surely, he has a better chance of performing if he bats at a tempo that he is comfortable at.

This is the same brand of Test cricket that McCullum himself played for New Zealand and he was a poor Test cricketer.

England’s problem is their arrogance and the evangelism where they try to convey the message that their brand of cricket is the way forward and how Test cricket should be played, and somehow, it is their responsibility to make Test cricket more exciting.

We also need to understand why Bazball or any particular-ball will not do much to revive interest in Test cricket in the long-term. To understand this, we first need to understand why most people don’t watch Test cricket.

Most people don’t watch Test cricket because they don’t have the time to watch a game that takes 4-5 days to produce a result and a typical days play will last for 8 hours or so.

That is a lot of time commitment and investment that people with jobs and lives cannot afford. It has nothing to do with whether you are batting at 3.5 runs an over or 6 runs an over.

Who can sit down and watch all 5 days of Test cricket these days? People with no jobs, people with no professional lives, people with failed relationships and so forth. Basically, you have to be a loser with nothing going in your life to have enough time to commit to a 5 days x 8 hours schedule for a game of cricket.

Has Bazball attracted a bunch of losers to watch Test cricket who had nothing productive to do and were a burden on society? Maybe, but those people are in minority.

The vast majority of the people who love cricket (like me) but don’t watch Test cricket anymore don’t do so not because we don’t like but because we don’t time for it.

I have to work, spend time with my family and play golf and I cannot commit to a 5 days x 8 hours schedule no matter what run rate England is batting at in Test cricket.
If you don't watch Test cricket and don't have proper time to watch, then please do not generalize this (like a third world country's citizen perspective) on all cricket fans. Of course, nobody has that much time to watch Test matches for 5 complete days ball by ball. Of course not, but that is the format, and as fans/spectators, we cannot do anything with the longevity of the match. But if there will be some excitement like in the previous test match or in the previous Ashes series, then of course, any cricket fan will be excited to watch/get updates on a timely basis and will be attracted.

Bazball is not about playing at 6 runs per over; it's a whole new thing to ensure producing results out of a Test match. I do not understand why subcontinental people are always reluctant to adopt new things initially and then completely dissolve themselves later on when they see the positive results of it.

As a die-hard cricket fan, I never miss any Test match. By "missing," I mean I always follow it or get updates. A Test match is like a good, proper meal - a main course. Of course, a dessert or an appetizer may give you more taste and pleasure, but completeness comes with the main course. :P
 
You lose all credibility when you want someone like Root to remain as captain because he is ‘always available’ vs Stokes because he took rest in certain matches.
He didn’t take rest in certain matches. he opted out of the 2021 series vs India and the 2021 T20 World Cup because of selfish reasons.

They were the two most important assignments of the year for English cricket and he wasn’t there for England on both occasions even though he was physically fit.

He put himself above the team and anyone who does that should not be considered for a leadership role. Leaders need to be selfless to a great degree and Stokes is the polar opposite of that.
Why do your standards not apply to Kohli missing matches?
I will apply if he misses an entire high-profile series and an ICC tournament.
Stokes retired to manage the workload on his body.
Stokes retired 15 months before the World Cup. In those 15 months, England were only scheduled to play 7-8 ODIs. What workload?

If he truly wanted to manage his workload, he would have opted out of the 2023 IPL for the Ashes and the World Cup because one IPL season is more grueling and taxing than playing 7-8 ODIs in a 15 month period because of the amount of traveling involved and the number of matches condensed in a short of period of time.
Your argument as to why he played IPL is equally ignorant. So the only way he would be unselfish is if he played more meaningless bilateral series vs the obviously major league IPL where he would get paid a lot of money for less work?

How many players play the ipl and skip bilateral series. Why does that selfishness argument not apply to them?
It applies to any player who opts out of international duty to play IPL or any other franchise league. It is obviously a selfish decision motivated by money.

No one can stop Stokes or anyone from playing IPL but if you have an injured knee and you will be captaining your team in the Ashes that will be played shortly after the IPL ends, you should be resting and recuperating.

Stokes only managed to aggravate his injury further and had to sit out multiple matches in the IPL because of that aggravation, but the price of risking his participation in the Ashes or to not be fully fit was the value of his IPL contract.

Stokes fans should not be shy to admit that there has been multiple instances over the last 3 years where he has put himself above his team and acted selfishly. How hard is it to admit?
 
Well what can be said when you're making excuses. Rohit's absence made Indian bowlers concede 375 at 5.5 rpo ?
And England clearly didn't win the ashes because 4th test was washed out , no two ways about it
If Stokes didn’t do the suicidal declaration in the first Test, England would have entered the fifth Test 3-1 up. So yes, they didn’t win because of his declaration not because of the rain.

Yes, Rohit’s absence hurt India big time. Not just with the bat but also with his tactics.

Bumrah’s captaincy was shocking and he was completely flustered by the counterpunch by Root and Bairstow. A smart, experienced captain like Rohit could have tried something different.
 
If you don't watch Test cricket and don't have proper time to watch, then please do not generalize this (like a third world country's citizen perspective) on all cricket fans. Of course, nobody has that much time to watch Test matches for 5 complete days ball by ball. Of course not, but that is the format, and as fans/spectators, we cannot do anything with the longevity of the match. But if there will be some excitement like in the previous test match or in the previous Ashes series, then of course, any cricket fan will be excited to watch/get updates on a timely basis and will be attracted.

Bazball is not about playing at 6 runs per over; it's a whole new thing to ensure producing results out of a Test match. I do not understand why subcontinental people are always reluctant to adopt new things initially and then completely dissolve themselves later on when they see the positive results of it.

As a die-hard cricket fan, I never miss any Test match. By "missing," I mean I always follow it or get updates. A Test match is like a good, proper meal - a main course. Of course, a dessert or an appetizer may give you more taste and pleasure, but completeness comes with the main course. :p
So to summarize, no one has started to watch Test cricket due to Bazball because they don’t have the time to do so. It doesn’t matter what the run rate is or how you are trying or produce a result, the point is that most people cannot afford to commit to an 5 days x 8 hours schedule.

Most people just check the score from time to time and watch a few overs. They used to do that before Bazball too.

Bazball has done nothing and will do nothing Test cricket. That is England’s delusion and a product of their self-serving attitude.

The only thing Bazball has done is help a bunch of poor Test but good white ball cricketers produce favorable results by playing Test cricket like white ball cricket.

That is all there is to it and I don’t understand why that is not enough to massage their egos. Why do they want everyone to say that they are changing Test cricket and revolutionizing the format when it is simply not true.

West Indies didn’t have to Bazball their way to a win in Australia. You don’t need to play Bazball to win Test matches if you have got good Test cricketers.
 
I am certain that they did not claim that only baseball can save Test cricket. They have invented their own style to play Test matches, so what's wrong with that? If they are asserting themselves as the saviors of Test cricket, it's better to wait and see the end result, which will take some time. Anyway, they are the inventors of this game, so let's give them some space to make their claim and prove it.

I sense some excitement in their playing style, and it's good for cricket that we maintain some excitement in Test cricket, at least
So to summarize, no one has started to watch Test cricket due to Bazball because they don’t have the time to do so. It doesn’t matter what the run rate is or how you are trying or produce a result, the point is that most people cannot afford to commit to an 5 days x 8 hours schedule.

Most people just check the score from time to time and watch a few overs. They used to do that before Bazball too.

Bazball has done nothing and will do nothing Test cricket. That is England’s delusion and a product of their self-serving attitude.

The only thing Bazball has done is help a bunch of poor Test but good white ball cricketers produce favorable results by playing Test cricket like white ball cricket.

That is all there is to it and I don’t understand why that is not enough to massage their egos. Why do they want everyone to say that they are changing Test cricket and revolutionizing the format when it is simply not true.

West Indies didn’t have to Bazball their way to a win in Australia. You don’t need to play Bazball to win Test matches if you have got good Test cricketers.
I am certain that they did not claim that only bazball can save Test cricket. They have invented their own style to play Test matches, so what's wrong with that? If they are asserting themselves as the saviors of Test cricket, it's better to wait and see the end result, which will take some time. Anyway, they are the inventors of this game, so let's give them some space to make their claim and prove it.

I sense some excitement in their playing style, and it's good for cricket that we maintain some excitement in Test cricket, at least.
 
I can't see this England team under Stokes and McCullum playing any other way, wherever the match is, whoever the opponent is.

For that, they deserve credit.

Personally I love watching the current England Test side.
Me too.

But some delusional cricket pundits here thinks that it is against test match laws and we should only play traditional tuk tuk cricket in 2024 also
 
See that is my problem with Bazball and how England are trying to sell this idea that they are revolutionizing Test cricket and making it more attractive and exciting.

I think that is garbage. I don’t know a single person who has started watched Test cricket because of Bazball. People who didn’t like Test cricket still don’t like it and those liked Test cricket will like it whether it is Bazball or whatever-ball.

We have to understand why Bazball was implemented in the first place. With the exception of Root and Pope, England don’t have any proper Test batsmen who know where their off stump is and can bat for long periods of time.

What they have is a bunch of white ball players - and Test players with low attention span - who have benefited from playing Test cricket at a quicker tempo. You pick an ODI player in Test cricket and ask him to bat at a SR of 80 as opposed to asking him to bat at a SR of 50.

Surely, he has a better chance of performing if he bats at a tempo that he is comfortable at.

This is the same brand of Test cricket that McCullum himself played for New Zealand and he was a poor Test cricketer.

England’s problem is their arrogance and the evangelism where they try to convey the message that their brand of cricket is the way forward and how Test cricket should be played, and somehow, it is their responsibility to make Test cricket more exciting.

We also need to understand why Bazball or any particular-ball will not do much to revive interest in Test cricket in the long-term. To understand this, we first need to understand why most people don’t watch Test cricket.

Most people don’t watch Test cricket because they don’t have the time to watch a game that takes 4-5 days to produce a result and a typical days play will last for 8 hours or so.

That is a lot of time commitment and investment that people with jobs and lives cannot afford. It has nothing to do with whether you are batting at 3.5 runs an over or 6 runs an over.

Who can sit down and watch all 5 days of Test cricket these days? People with no jobs, people with no professional lives, people with failed relationships and so forth. Basically, you have to be a loser with nothing going in your life to have enough time to commit to a 5 days x 8 hours schedule for a game of cricket.

Has Bazball attracted a bunch of losers to watch Test cricket who had nothing productive to do and were a burden on society? Maybe, but those people are in minority.

The vast majority of the people who love cricket (like me) but don’t watch Test cricket anymore don’t do so not because we don’t like but because we don’t time for it.

I have to work, spend time with my family and play golf and I cannot commit to a 5 days x 8 hours schedule no matter what run rate England is batting at in Test cricket.
Altough I agree with that all these Bazball thing is overrated and overstated I know people who are watching test matches very closely since this Bazball thing has started only because of Stokes.

My view is you play to win and not just to entertain. And sometimes to win, you have to play differently. No one does this better than Ben Stokes himself. He bats as the situation ask him to do so.
Even his very crucial innings in the first innings of this test was brilliant because he batted as the situation asked. Very slow and watchful with Bairstow and very agressive with the tailender at the other end.

On other topic, your only problem with Ben Stokes is that he is a better cricketer than any of your countryman (men in Blue, both teams in blue).
 
Bazball itself gets misunderstood and oversimplified. It isn’t just quick scoring and trying to massacre the bowlers. That can be the output. (One of the outputs.) The philosophy is to be consistent in selection and take a stance on player welfare that makes players believe their mistakes are acceptable and that they are undroppable, so they play without fear and their natural games are released. Then if the output is bashing loads of boundaries, fine, but the output could also be expert rotation of strike (Pope) or bowling a steady line and length to eke out wickets on a turning pitch (Hartley). That is Bazball.
 
Altough I agree with that all these Bazball thing is overrated and overstated I know people who are watching test matches very closely since this Bazball thing has started only because of Stokes.

My view is you play to win and not just to entertain. And sometimes to win, you have to play differently. No one does this better than Ben Stokes himself. He bats as the situation ask him to do so.
Even his very crucial innings in the first innings of this test was brilliant because he batted as the situation asked. Very slow and watchful with Bairstow and very agressive with the tailender at the other end.

On other topic, your only problem with Ben Stokes is that he is a better cricketer than any of your countryman (men in Blue, both teams in blue).
Kohli, Sharma, Bumrah and Ashwin are all better cricketers than Stokes. Stokes is better than anyone in Pakistan though and that should worry you more than your creepy obsession with India.
 
Kohli, Sharma, Bumrah and Ashwin are all better cricketers than Stokes. Stokes is better than anyone in Pakistan though and that should worry you more than your creepy obsession with India.
None of the guys you named is as good as Stokes.
The guy is in a different league altogether.
But you and your countrymen are loyal to indians so everything you say here is completely fine.
 
None of the guys you named is as good as Stokes.
The guy is in a different league altogether.
But you and your countrymen are loyal to indians so everything you say here is completely fine.
Kohli is as good as Stokes if not better.
 
Kohli is as good as Stokes if not better.
No way.

Kohli is all stats, quantity over quality.
Where as Stokes is clutch player. He has won so many matches, and big matches.
Even in his lesser formats, he has won the ODI world cup and the T20 world cup.
 
No way.

Kohli is all stats, quantity over quality.
Where as Stokes is clutch player. He has won so many matches, and big matches.
Even in his lesser formats, he has won the ODI world cup and the T20 world cup.
Hasn't kohli smashed Pakistan a million times and won 2 icc trophies. And lol at kohli only being stats (that would be babar) , he is one of the goats and fat better than batsman Pakistan has ever produced, that's you desperately cling on to any non indian batsman.
The reason stokes doesn't have great stats is because he isn't consistent enough, otherwise he would have atleast won an ashes.
Being more clutch doesn't make you a better player.
Using your logic, gambhir is a better batsman than babar and zaheer is a better bowler than waqar.
 
Hasn't kohli smashed Pakistan a million times and won 2 icc trophies. And lol at kohli only being stats (that would be babar) , he is one of the goats and fat better than batsman Pakistan has ever produced, that's you desperately cling on to any non indian batsman.
The reason stokes doesn't have great stats is because he isn't consistent enough, otherwise he would have atleast won an ashes.
Being more clutch doesn't make you a better player.
Using your logic, gambhir is a better batsman than babar and zaheer is a better bowler than waqar.
Kohli, with an average of less than 50, not many great innings in the test format is hardly a great.
Most of his big runs are in easy games

Babar being only stats doesn't mean Kohli can't be also the same thing.
Stokes has very good stats, but he is even better than that. You will not see Stokes playing for personal milestones like Kohli did in the world cup.

No harm in accepting he is selfish, he himself showed it to the world at the world cup.
 
Kohli, with an average of less than 50, not many great innings in the test format is hardly a great.
Most of his big runs are in easy games

Babar being only stats doesn't mean Kohli can't be also the same thing.
Stokes has very good stats, but he is even better than that. You will not see Stokes playing for personal milestones like Kohli did in the world cup.

No harm in accepting he is selfish, he himself showed it to the world at the world cup.
Kohli averages a shade below 50, just like inzamam. If he isn't a test great then the same goes for inzi.
Easy runs 😂, kohli averages 54 in aus and 50 in sa, 2 places where all the so called pakistani batting greats have miserably failed.
Stokes has failed to win a test series in ind and aus and hasn't won an ashes in eng either, hardly a great.
Stokes had a miserable wc in 2023,so for engs sake he should have batted a bit selfishly
 
No way.

Kohli is all stats, quantity over quality.
Where as Stokes is clutch player. He has won so many matches, and big matches.
Even in his lesser formats, he has won the ODI world cup and the T20 world cup.
Are you saying Kohli hasn't won matches for India.
 
Kohli averages a shade below 50, just like inzamam. If he isn't a test great then the same goes for inzi.
Easy runs 😂, kohli averages 54 in aus and 50 in sa, 2 places where all the so called pakistani batting greats have miserably failed.
Stokes has failed to win a test series in ind and aus and hasn't won an ashes in eng either, hardly a great.
Stokes had a miserable wc in 2023,so for engs sake he should have batted a bit selfishly
Younis Khan averages 50+ against Australia.
Miadad averaged 47 in Australia.
 
Are you saying Kohli hasn't won matches for India.

Not any important knockout game. Only JAMODIs and group stage games.

Stokes has won clutch matches (2022 World T20 final and 2019 ODI WC final). He played crucial innings.
 
Not any important knockout game. Only JAMODIs and group stage games.

Stokes has won clutch matches (2022 World T20 final and 2019 ODI WC final). He played crucial innings.
Didn't he win the 2014 t20 semis against sa, the 2013 ct final against eng.
He hasn't performed as well in knockouts as he should but your assertion is wrong.
Not a clutch player but not a choker either
 
"'Bazball' Comes Naturally To Us": England Star Zak Crawley

England upstaged India by 28 runs in the opening Test in Hyderabad despite conceding a 190-run first innings lead, showcasing a fighting attitude that stunned the pre-series favourites.

England opener Zak Crawley on Wednesday said most of his teammates have become better players since embracing the ultra-aggressive 'Bazball' approach, which is way more compatible with their natural game than the traditional "take-your-time" strategy. England upstaged India by 28 runs in the opening Test in Hyderabad despite conceding a 190-run first innings lead, showcasing a fighting attitude that stunned the pre-series favourites. England are yet to lose a Test since pioneering 'Bazball' under their New Zealand coach Brendon McCullum.

"I suppose it ('Bazball') comes quite naturally as a lot of our teams are playing more aggressively. The mindset when I first came to England was to backlight or take your time and build a long innings and I didn't think that came naturally to me and a few of the others," Crawley said in a press conference ahead of the second Test starting here on Friday.

"A lot of us play a bit better under this regime," he added.

In contrast, India were also battling a selection crisis in addition to finding answers to their poor performance in Hyderabad after all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja and top-order batter KL Rahul were ruled out due to injuries.

The hosts are already without mainstay Virat Kohli, who has opted out of the first two Tests citing personal reasons.

Asked what it would mean for the English team, Crawley said his team is more focussed on its performance and planning.

"...we haven't spoken about that. It sounds cliched but we stick to our own lead up ... we don't bother about what they are doing," Crawley said when asked if the absence of the duo is a boost for England.

"Two very good players missing out but I'm sure looking at their depth they have two very good players coming in. So, that won't change anything for us too much. We're just trying to play the same, read the conditions on day one and see what happens for there," he added.

India have drafted in Sarfaraz Khan, Washington Sundar and Sourabh Kumar to replace the injured duo. The hosts also have the option of playing Rajat Patidar, a domestic veteran.

After the loss in spin friendly conditions in Hyderabad, there is a lot of chatter surrounding the possible nature of wickets that the hosts will prepare for the second Test starting here on Friday. Crawley that's not a concern either.

"They're absolutely a top side in their own conditions. There are four games left, we have got to stick to what we do well and hopefully results come from there," he said.England underwent an extended training camp in Abu Dhabi to prepare for the series in India and Crawley feels the camp benefitted them even though some former players had criticised the team for not landing in India early.

"It was exactly how we wanted...The wickets in Abu Dhabi turned a lot because we wanted them and we made them turn," he said.

Talking of preparation, Crawley said using sweep shots against spinners, something that Ollie Pope executed to perfection during his epic knock of 196, is a well thought out strategy.

"I think sweeping and reverse sweeping when it's spinning is a good option. It takes the spin out of plan. I think the reverse sweep is more common for us, because there's just less field in there," he said.

"They always seem to have two men out on the leg side. If they had two men out on the other side, we'd probably play the sweep...the reverse sweep comes probably just as naturally to us as the normal sweep," he added.

While their lone pacer Mark Wood went wicketless, Indian quick Jasprit Bumrah snared six wickets, including 4 for 41 in the second innings which featured a splendid spell of reverse-swing. Crawley was effusive in his praise for the Indian star.

"He is an incredible bowler. I think he bowls a yard fuller in India or bowls long yorkers and things like that.

"They have and unbelievable seam of attack, which you can't take for granted," he signed off.

Source: NDTV
 
It’s been a fantastic week just soaking all of this up and enjoying the win.

I would love to see England win another Test in this series. Winning two Tests in the series would be a pretty good effort from England even if they lose it 3-2; but who knows, it might be enough to get a tied series, or even win it.

It was huge for England to win that first Test.
 
Miandad averages 38 in Australia.
Yk averages 50 in aus boosted by an unbeaten century that he scored in a dead rubber
Virat Kohli averages 33 in England and 36 in NZ which is boosted by a century where India allowed NZ to score 600+ when they were 80 for 5. He was also caught behind on 0 but since India didn't allow the use of Drs hence he got a century so in reality his average would have been around 20 odd there too.
 
Kohli, Sharma, Bumrah and Ashwin are all better cricketers than Stokes. Stokes is better than anyone in Pakistan though and that should worry you more than your creepy obsession with India.

So Stokes despite winning England an ODI and t20 world Cup is not as good as Ashwin/ bumrah who have won basically nothing for their countries?

Yet you had the gall to call Archer the best bowler in the world for 2 years based on his performance in that same 2019 World Cup which was followed up mostly rubbish everywhere else?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And just to clarify because this thread is becoming a lot about stokes - let me explain why.

There is no ‘Bazball’. McCullum just came to the right place at the right time. The single reason for this England team’s success is Ben Stokes. He has instilled an unbeatable culture straight into the heart of this previously timid England team run by the wimp that mis Root.

Since McCullum was an aggressive player his name has become attached to this style.

I guarantee that he will completely flop the next coaching assignment he has after he leaves England.

They should rename bazball but it seems to have stuck now.
 
So Stokes despite winning England an ODI and t20 world Cup is not as good as Ashwin/ bumrah who have won basically nothing for their countries?

Yet you had the gall to call Archer the best bowler in the world for 2 years based on his performance in that same 2019 World Cup which was followed up mostly rubbish everywhere else?
Ashwin has won 2 icc trophies.
Bumrah has 2 test series in Australia, something no pakistani fast bowling great has ever done
Ask most english fans if they would prefer a test series win in Australia or a wc win and they would overwhelming choose the former.
Stokes hasn't won a home ashes series
 
Last edited by a moderator:
India won't change batting approach against England's 'Bazball': Vikram Rathour on playing reverse sweeps

India will take a traditional approach to their second home Test against England, according to the team's batting coach, despite the tourists' success with their attacking "Bazball" strategy.

After suffering a 28-run loss to England in the first of five Test match series, India are now preparing for the second match in Visakhapatnam, where they will look to right their wrongs. Skipper Rohit Sharma and his team will be looking to regain their dominance in home Tests after losing to England.

The England side recorded an iconic comeback during the Hyderabad Test, where they went from fighting against an innings defeat to the home side on Day 3 to ultimately getting the better of the home side on Day 4, majorly due to Ollie Pope's game-changing 196 off 278 innings.

The biggest reason for this turnaround was the ability of English batters like Pope and Ben Duckett, to get a hold of experienced Indian spinners like Ravichandran Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja with their sweep and reverse sweeps. The England batters effectively dealt with the low-height deliveries by Indian spinners, with perfectly timed sweep shots, leaving the Indian bowlers with no quick answer to their resilience.

Ever since India's defeat, speculations have been floating around the probability of Indian batter adopting a similar kind of approach as that of English batters, by using sweep shots to deal with the likes of Tom Hartley, who bagged 7 wickets during the Hyderabad Test.

However, Indian batting coach Vikram Rathour believes that implementing sweep shots is not as easy as it sounds and requires proper preparation. Rathour acknowledged that reverse sweeps and sweeps might just open the window for batters to bag some vital additional runs, but also stated that it was not the kind of approach that the Indian team play their games with.

"It is not something that you can try, you need to be prepared" Vikram Rathour said about Indian batters using sweep shots.

According to the 54-year-old, this Indian side is trained to be ahead of the traditional approach of cricket which mostly involves playing straight using their feet. This makes them not accustomed to any sort of sweep shots, which nullifies any probability of using them in-match.

"Of course if you can add more shots to your game it is always beneficial but are right we play in a traditional way, our strengths and strong areas are going straight using our feet we can add shots and score runs square of the wicket that is always a good addition." Rathour added.

Batters like Shubhman Gill, Shreyas Iyer struggled considerably against the English spinners like Hartley and Rehan Ahmed, amping up the speculation about a change in batting approach for the Indian batters even further.

SOURCE: https://www.indiatoday.in/sports/cr...nce-ind-vs-eng-second-test-2495917-2024-01-31
 
Back
Top