I had this same argument with my dad after Pant hit the winning runs. Though he is thrilled to bits, he refuses to rate this win even equal to our 1971 series wins in WI and Eng under Wadekar. Nostalgia speaking I guess.
It’s not just nostalgia. After a certain point statistical comparisons, comparing playing XIs listed on paper et cetera are all rendered moot.
There is only so much one can do to tray and translate and juxtapose performances in era A to that of era B, C et cetera using statistical arguments alone.
Put it like this, as I type this, there are threads on PP about some of the below topics (I have chosen the ones that came to mind readily):
1) Starc’s efficacy: the OP and posters have argued using statistics that Starc may not be the force he is portrayed to be:
Anyone who has seen decades of cricket should not need statistics and should not have done so even without the series in question. Lack of repeatability in efficacy (getting wickets in a repeatable manner) in how he goes about his business against top batsmen and has done so for some time now, him being dropped, him being underbowled even when it was reversing in comparison to Hazlewood/Cummins et cetera should have put most arguments to rest.
2) “ATG” Asian side or something:
Again, anyone who has followed any sport, vocation, academic discipline or anything else over multiple decades will know that comparing across eras holds about as much rigour as saying 2012 is going to be the end of the world. Too many variables to actually extrapolate and then that being done so with commentators who were born in 1990s, which means most would have not have been mindful of the intricacies of Test cricket until 2000s. An exercise in futility. Hell, if anyone is to compare it would be people who were old enough to watch all these decades in real time and lived to tell the tale, born no later than 1970.
Tennis (Serve & Volley versus Rally fest, Grass vs Hard Court) Formula 1 (V8, V10, Turbo-Hybrid/DRS) Cricket (umpires, bouncers, ball scratching, T20), Hockey (AstroTurf etc) are simple examples of the same with incessant arguments across eras/wins/achievements and the arguments keep becoming more and more ridiculos.
3) (apparently) how IND batsmen need to learn batting temperament from (none other than) PAK batsmen for overseas conditions:
I won’t comment much on this as this should be the most obvious amongst all, even including the cringe fest that is the “ATG” one. Think this one was most probably started before 2018-19 tour of AUS though. Which should suggest how quickly things change in the real world.
I will sign off this post with just one thing. The truly great players would have done quite well in either era. They always find a way.