Sledger
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Runs
- 58,791
- Post of the Week
- 2
Has this pitch got flatter? First Latif, now Hafeez? lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sledger said:Hafeez is and always will be rubbish, he got A LOT of opportunities to prove himself in international cricket, no need for him anywhere near the side.
It will be extremely hard for the selectors to ignore him if he smacks a century here. Also take into consideration the fact that Imran Nazir is woefully out of form at the moment. I think Hafeez has more or less cemented his spot in the T20WC squad unless Nazir can do something similar todaySledger said:Hafeez is and always will be rubbish, he got A LOT of opportunities to prove himself in international cricket, no need for him anywhere near the side.
Sledger said:Hafeez is and always will be rubbish, he got A LOT of opportunities to prove himself in international cricket, no need for him anywhere near the side.
Aren't they all lolSledger said:Hafeez is and always will be rubbish, he got A LOT of opportunities to prove himself in international cricket, no need for him anywhere near the side.
Sledger said:Hafeez is and always will be rubbish, he got A LOT of opportunities to prove himself in international cricket, no need for him anywhere near the side.
The selectors should see past one big score - like I said, he's been given a huge number of chances at the top level only to flop. The fact that an international bowler in Akhtar made him look like a tailender is a mere preview of what you'd get if you pick him for int. cricket.Usman Chadda said:It will be extremely hard for the selectors to ignore him if he smacks a century here. Also take into consideration the fact that Imran Nazir is woefully out of form at the moment. I think Hafeez has more or less cemented his spot in the T20WC squad unless Nazir can do something similar today
Sledger said:The selectors should see past one big score - like I said, he's been given a huge number of chances at the top level only to flop. The fact that an international bowler in Akhtar made him look like a tailender is a mere preview of what you'd get if you pick him for int. cricket.
Hmm, maybe not. I think tailender probably was too nice a word.IMMY69 said:lol...
You are not being serious are you?
IMMY69 said:thats right, as many chances as butt, farhat, nazir, malik, misbah and manzoor...
Hafeez, for all his bad points (which byh thw way are shared by the few i named above), is actually a very very very very good 20/20 player...His fielding is exceptional, had the ability to open and play well as opener and is more then a useful bowler...I'd like you even try and disprove the fact that Hafeez deserves a sport in the international 20/20 team!
Bring it on.
Sledger said:Hmm, maybe not. I think tailender probably was too nice a word.
And what did he do in the last T20 WC he played? Was normally out in the first over, dropped Gambhir early in the final. The only memory of him was bowling Ponting, other than that he was dead weight.IMMY69 said:thats right, as many chances as butt, farhat, nazir, malik, misbah and manzoor...
Hafeez, for all his bad points (which byh thw way are shared by the few i named above), is actually a very very very very good 20/20 player...His fielding is exceptional, had the ability to open and play well as opener and is more then a useful bowler...I'd like you even try and disprove the fact that Hafeez deserves a sport in the international 20/20 team!
Bring it on.
Then again, Akhtar has made the best of batsmen look like absolute bunnies. I am not advocating Hafeez's inclusion but the fact that he has been the most consistent of all the openers so far, he is sure to get the nod. That is UNLESS Imran Nazir is back to his good ol' destructive self tonightSledger said:The selectors should see past one big score - like I said, he's been given a huge number of chances at the top level only to flop. The fact that an international bowler in Akhtar made him look like a tailender is a mere preview of what you'd get if you pick him for int. cricket.
pak4life said:Hafeez strugles against quality bowling he goes into his shell starts to waste deliveries very similiar to Butt. I dont mind him being in the squad as a back up but we cant afford to have both him and butt in the squad.
Hafeez was in excellent touch in this tournament before the 07 WC, I think he averaged over 50 here, what did that drop down to in international cricket?Usman Chadda said:Then again, Akhtar has made the best of batsmen look like absolute bunnies. I am not advocating Hafeez's inclusion but the fact that he has been the most consistent of all the openers so far, he is sure to get the nod. That is UNLESS Imran Nazir is back to his good ol' destructive self tonight
Sledger said:And what did he do in the last T20 WC he played? Was normally out in the first over, dropped Gambhir early in the final. The only memory of him was bowling Ponting, other than that he was dead weight.
I guess we'll just have to hope he replicates this form in international cricket, because I am more than certain that he is getting picked for the WCSledger said:Hafeez was in excellent touch in this tournament before the 07 WC, I think he averaged over 50 here, what did that drop down to in international cricket?
Originally Posted by pak4life
Hafeez strugles against quality bowling he goes into his shell starts to waste deliveries very similiar to Butt. I dont mind him being in the squad as a back up but we cant afford to have both him and butt in the squad.
Yes, I do have a sleective memory unlike you. That is, when I'm looking at a guy whos played international before, I check their record in that regard over Pakistani domestics (where the likes of Naved and Kaneria can get scores of 90).IMMY69 said:Well then I guess you have selective memory!
Are you seriously trying to tyell me that the likes of Butt, Manzoor, Farhat and Latiff are better 20/20 players then Hafeez???