What's new

[REPORTS] Hashim Amla considering Kolpak deal

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,056
https://www.iol.co.za/sport/cricket/proteas/exclusive-hashim-amla-considering-kolpak-deal-10805702

CAPE TOWN – It is not only England’s Premiership football clubs that are currently actively involved in the transfer market, but so too the cricket counties, who are looking to land the prized scalp of Hashim Amla on a Kolpak deal.

Independent Media understands that South Africa’s star batsman has been approached by various counties, among them a London club, to prolong his playing career on the English county circuit.

It has already been reported that Proteas fast bowler Morné Morkel has been lined up by Warwickshire, among others, to follow the likes of Hampshire duo Kyle Abbott and Rilee Rossouw, Stiaan van Zyl (Sussex) and Dane Vilas (Lancashire), who have all recently forgone their international careers in favour of lucrative long-term county contracts.

While they are all significant losses – or potentially in Morkel’s case – to the national team’s cause, none are even comparable to Amla’s stature should the 34-year-old retire from international cricket.

Amla is the premier batsman in the Proteas Test side, having accumulated 8 281 runs in 107 Tests at an average of 49.00.

The former Test skipper also holds the record for the highest score (311 not out) by a South African in the five-day arena.

In addition, he has 7 186 runs in 156 ODI matches at an average of 50.25 and is also the fastest to reach 2 000, 3 000, 4 000, 5 000, 6 000 and 7 000 ODI runs after recently breaking Virat Kohli’s record.

Amla has previously stated that he still has the desire to have one final crack at the 2019 World Cup in England with the Proteas, which is still two years away though, when he will be 36.

However, Amla would no doubt have given serious thought to pursuing a Kolpak deal after the recent failed England tour.

The Proteas Test side are in a state of transition, with current England bowling coach Ottis Gibson reportedly set to take over from Russell Domingo as the new South African head coach shortly.

Although Amla is known to be a keen supporter of Gibson’s coaching style, it is well-documented that he developed a strong bond with Domingo over the years, often saying “the coaching staff has been as good a coaching staff that I’ve had in all my years of playing”.

With Domingo likely to exit the national team, Amla could view this period as the ideal time for a fresh start for him too.

Equally, the less-pressurised environment of county cricket could be attractive to Amla at this stage of his career.

Not only does he have a young family to consider – with a third child having been born recently – but the Proteas Test opening combination is also not functioning at the moment.

This has routinely forced Amla to virtually open the innings and play in a role that goes against his natural attacking abilities, which has led to a profound impact on his success over the last couple of years and Amla’s own high-level performances dropping as a result.

Proteas legend Allan Donald recently pleaded with Morkel not to sign a Kolpak deal, begging Cricket South Africa to “give him what he wants” because “we need him this summer”.

With powerhouses such as India and Australia set to visit South African shores this home summer, expect similar talks to be had with Amla over the course of the next few weeks in the CSA boardrooms.

The only consolation for CSA may be that Amla has committed to the T20 Global League, where he is currently the marquee player of the Kingsmead-based Durban Qalandars.

The new competition is set to begin in November.

Amla has previously enjoyed county stints as an overseas player for Essex – near London – and Surrey, particularly enjoying his time at the latter due to the “vibe” and “atmosphere” at The Oval in the southern parts of the British capital.
 
Why would he?

He will get a longer rope in the national team compared to many others due to the fact that he is established and also fills a quota pick.

Wouldnt make any sense for him to take such a step
 
Would be hilarious if he does.

I wonder how his fans will defend him.

What a sad end it will be for him and AB the way things are going for the latter.
 
Would be hilarious if he does.

I wonder how his fans will defend him.

What a sad end it will be for him and AB the way things are going for the latter.

Never cared much for Amla, but if he does choose to sign the contract, I'd assume it's in his and his families best interest. Hardly something I'd hold against him.
 
He knows his days in International Cricket are numbered anyway.. averages like 25 away in the past 2 years or so..
 
Hope it's not true. How can you not like Hashim Amla? One of the great batsmen of this generation
 
That would be terrible if it takes place. South Africa really hoping g that their top players don't go.
 
I don't think it will happen. The newspaper article is just hyping it up since counties approached morne morkel.
 
I think more than H Amla, its Morkel's departure thats gonna hurt South Africa alot more. Morkel is so underrated and easily one of the most lethal bowler going around. If he does leave for county contract (kolpak) then South Africa will find themselves struggling to beat India next year.:kohli2
Cricket South Africa (CSA) is in real mess lately, first AB saga, then T20 global league saga, and now Amla/Morkel potential departure. H Lorgat is turning out to be a joke of an admin.:ibutt

As far as Amla's kolpak deal, well as some posters here mentioned, he is probably on his final stage of career, so its probably best for him( career wise) to go with county contract or play leagues around the world.:amla
 
Lol wonder how his fans will defend this. Don't see him taking the deal anyway.
 
Hope he goes through with it. Has been terrible in the last couple of years.
 
As bad as Amla has been on away tours last 2 years and yes he's past his peak but I feel he just needs a century to regain his confidence.

In the recent series in England was SA's best batsman @ average 41 (or somwhere in the low 40s). The problem was there was no daddy hundred which we are so used to seeing him to do and his 50 to 100 conversion as a whole is just non-existent at the moment.

Still SA's best test batsman and with retirements of AB, Kallis and Grame Smith - SA can't afford him to leave tests so soon.
 
Last edited:
so IPL is destroying cricket but English league isn't?

where are the so called experts now
 
I don't believe this is true. Firstly, does Amla even qualify under Kolpak? Secondly, there is uncertainty about the EU; this means that the Kolpak rule may longer be applicable. I may be totally wrong so forgive me.
 
I don't believe this is true. Firstly, does Amla even qualify under Kolpak? Secondly, there is uncertainty about the EU; this means that the Kolpak rule may longer be applicable. I may be totally wrong so forgive me.
Any South African citizen qualifies under Kolpak, but it will cease to exist in less than two years - hence he may feel an urgency to sign up.

This isn't about race, but terrible pay: he earns only $105,000 per year.

It's why the ICC should use its $2 billion surplus to pay and contract all international players outside the Big Three, rather than on welfare handouts for the BCCI to buy state cricket association votes with.

Amla, Matthews, Bravo, Williamson and Azhar would all earn around $600,000.

Elgar, Gabriel, Yasir and Boult would earn $500,000.

The entire set of annual payments for the seven teams would be around half of what Australian Rules football and Australian Rugby League pay their players.
 
Any South African citizen qualifies under Kolpak, but it will cease to exist in less than two years - hence he may feel an urgency to sign up.

This isn't about race, but terrible pay: he earns only $105,000 per year.

It's why the ICC should use its $2 billion surplus to pay and contract all international players outside the Big Three, rather than on welfare handouts for the BCCI to buy state cricket association votes with.

Amla, Matthews, Bravo, Williamson and Azhar would all earn around $600,000.

Elgar, Gabriel, Yasir and Boult would earn $500,000.

The entire set of annual payments for the seven teams would be around half of what Australian Rules football and Australian Rugby League pay their players.

This isn't feasible actually, because cricket economy isn't balanced. Your idea is fantastic if we consider ICC like NBA or NFL commission, but it's not possible for such multi national structure. FIFA doesn't try to bring balance between EPL & Senegal League, neither pays obnoxiously high match fees for International Fixtures.


The issue of Amla isn't an ICC/BCCI fault, neither the quota system of SAF, not even lack of payment from SAF board - only reason for this is greed. $105000 as central contract might not be that high, but it's not his only income, neither his trade off is higher. This guy has calculated that, even without playing for SAF, he can earn enough from PLs & SLs as free lancer and then earn from County as well without any binding. I can bet that the annual payment from CSAF (central contract & match fees for 10 Tests, 25 ODI & 5 T20) is much, much more than what he'll get from County - BUT, Kolpak deals won't force him to miss IPL, PSL, CPL, like this time CSAF called them back from IPL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's for my own curiosity. Since Amla has a NRI status, can he play for IPL as a local player if he goes for Kolpak...
 
This isn't feasible actually, because cricket economy isn't balanced. Your idea is fantastic if we consider ICC like NBA or NFL commission, but it's not possible for such multi national structure. FIFA doesn't try to bring balance between EPL & Senegal League, neither pays obnoxiously high match fees for International Fixtures.


The issue of Amla isn't an ICC/BCCI fault, neither the quota system of SAF, not even lack of payment from SAF board - only reason for this is greed. $105000 as central contract might not be that high, but it's not his only income, neither his trade off is higher. This guy has calculated that, even without playing for SAF, he can earn enough from PLs & SLs as free lancer and then earn from County as well without any binding. I can bet that the annual payment from CSAF (central contract & match fees for 10 Tests, 25 ODI & 5 T20) is much, much more than what he'll get from County - BUT, Kolpak deals won't force him to miss IPL, PSL, CPL, like this time CSAF called them back from IPL.

Sport is a global economy.

Comparable in decline thirty-something sportsmen like Wayne Rooney or Wesley Sneijder earn the same income in less than 2 days that Amla earns in a year.

Why do players like McCullum, Cairns, Parore and Fleming retire prematurely? Because their income from their boards is inadequate.

Either the ICC can use its huge cash surplus to fix the problem, or it will get worse.
 
Amla is not sell-out like some of these other Saffers. Even at the twilight of his career, he'll help the team get through a couple of tough tours.

The only way I can see him retiring in the near future is if he has an absolutely horrible series against Bangladesh and/or India. If he's still doing well enough with the bat, I can't see him abandoning his team like a certain other South African ATG batsman.
 
Nothing wrong even if he takes it,he is a legend,and is declining only makes sense to play domestic now.He did well in IPL last season as well.
 
Amla is not sell-out like some of these other Saffers. Even at the twilight of his career, he'll help the team get through a couple of tough tours.

The only way I can see him retiring in the near future is if he has an absolutely horrible series against Bangladesh and/or India. If he's still doing well enough with the bat, I can't see him abandoning his team like a certain other South African ATG batsman.

to be honest its not being a sell out. its about securing your self financially.

International cricket is not on contract, the moment you have 2 bad tours, you are out. Its a gamble.

County at least gives you a contract and if it fires you it will still pay up.

But if does go, i will sure troll everyone around.:))
 
to be honest its not being a sell out. its about securing your self financially.

International cricket is not on contract, the moment you have 2 bad tours, you are out. Its a gamble.

County at least gives you a contract and if it fires you it will still pay up.

But if does go, i will sure troll everyone around.:))

Nothing wrong with players out of the team trying to find alternative means of income. However, when you are clearly needed by your national team and have no real need of money beyond greed then it's morally wrong to choose a domestic contract over your country.
 
Any South African citizen qualifies under Kolpak, but it will cease to exist in less than two years - hence he may feel an urgency to sign up.

This isn't about race, but terrible pay: he earns only $105,000 per year.

It's why the ICC should use its $2 billion surplus to pay and contract all international players outside the Big Three, rather than on welfare handouts for the BCCI to buy state cricket association votes with.

Amla, Matthews, Bravo, Williamson and Azhar would all earn around $600,000.

Elgar, Gabriel, Yasir and Boult would earn $500,000.

The entire set of annual payments for the seven teams would be around half of what Australian Rules football and Australian Rugby League pay their players.

You are asking the ICC to do something that it seldom does, be proactive and use common sense. Never going to happen.

Also why is the ICC giving handouts to the BCCI? Surely they have nothing to do with Indian state associations.
 
Nothing wrong with players out of the team trying to find alternative means of income. However, when you are clearly needed by your national team and have no real need of money beyond greed then it's morally wrong to choose a domestic contract over your country.

How do you know that? Each individual determines their own needs/how much is enough.
 
How do you know that? Each individual determines their own needs/how much is enough.

No one really needs more than $100,000 per annum. Anything above that is a want.
 
No one really needs more than $100,000 per annum. Anything above that is a want.

That's just you view. Each individual has a different opinion on their own needs. So they act accordingly.
 
No one really needs more than $100,000 per annum. Anything above that is a want.
In a western country?

When as a sportsman you have to live the next 45 years on the income you earned between ages 20 and 35.

On school fees (2 kids), car leases and my mortgage I spend more than that each year. But at least I have a career which will still pay at 50 and 60 years of age.

So you get back to where English football was before the maximum wage was abolished. Should sportsmen take the bus and live in a rental property?

My service currently can't get doctors to accept $250,000 per year contracts, because the average Sydney mortgage is now $960,000. And $250,000 per year is not enough to meet the repayments. They instead work as freelance locums for $2500 per day.
 
Defend what? Do you even understand what this article says?

If he was to take kolplak deal it would leave South Africa struggling in already difficult time . But whatever Amla does you will defend it anyway.
 
Nothing wrong with players out of the team trying to find alternative means of income. However, when you are clearly needed by your national team and have no real need of money beyond greed then it's morally wrong to choose a domestic contract over your country.

How are you so sure he has no real need for extra money?
 
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] tbf am guessing in SA cost of living is a lot less than in Aus or U.K.

100K USD a year will probli have u very comfortable there.

But ofc Amla will not be playing cricket into his 60s and he has to think about his future so earning a few extra dollars at the twilight of his career i can understand why he would want that.

But should stay on till 2019 WC i feel SA need him now more than ever.
 
He is done. Team won't loose anything by loosing him
 
In a western country?

When as a sportsman you have to live the next 45 years on the income you earned between ages 20 and 35.

On school fees (2 kids), car leases and my mortgage I spend more than that each year. But at least I have a career which will still pay at 50 and 60 years of age.

So you get back to where English football was before the maximum wage was abolished. Should sportsmen take the bus and live in a rental property?

My service currently can't get doctors to accept $250,000 per year contracts, because the average Sydney mortgage is now $960,000. And $250,000 per year is not enough to meet the repayments. They instead work as freelance locums for $2500 per day.

That is true. I wasn't seeing the whole picture, good point.

If he was to take kolplak deal it would leave South Africa struggling in already difficult time . But whatever Amla does you will defend it anyway.

No where does it say that he has accepted such a deal so the fact that you're drooling over the prospect of insulting him for it just shows your own problems.

He is done. Team won't loose anything by loosing him

Ranked #8 in the world, was their best batsman in England and has more matches and centuries than the whole team combined. He's crucial to South Africa getting that #1 ranking back.
 
Why is that? Don't they get adds, shows etc. like Pakistani/Indian players? Are cricketing personalities not really popular in other nations?
 
In a western country?

When as a sportsman you have to live the next 45 years on the income you earned between ages 20 and 35.

On school fees (2 kids), car leases and my mortgage I spend more than that each year. But at least I have a career which will still pay at 50 and 60 years of age.

So you get back to where English football was before the maximum wage was abolished. Should sportsmen take the bus and live in a rental property?

My service currently can't get doctors to accept $250,000 per year contracts, because the average Sydney mortgage is now $960,000. And $250,000 per year is not enough to meet the repayments. They instead work as freelance locums for $2500 per day.

May be different in AUS, but in Canada, Govt. subsidies few expenses, therefore $200K CAN, is considered a very good household earning. Here, minimum wage is around $12/hour, which they are negotiating to raise at around $14-$15 from next year. A Manager with 7+ years' experience in a top Bank or Telecom is more than happy with base salary of $85K/year, Sr. Managers around $100K and that's around 65-70% of Cost to Company.

Coming to Amla, obviously a National player wouldn't be happy if it was only that $105,000 (US, I presume). But, what I can understand (from other boards payment structure), this'll be Amla's gross payment from CSAF, excluding his Domestic club/FC contracts, endorsement money & TA/DA.

Central contract - $105K
Test match fee - $5K/Test = $50K
ODI match fee - $3.5K/ODI = $70K (I take for rotational policy, he'll play only 20 matches & won't be paid, if he is benched, which doesn't happen)
T20 match fee - $2.5K/T20 = $10K (Same as ODI)

Total : $235K, only from playing for SAF. And, these guys are covered by board for their insurance, pension, medical expenses, kits, travelling & accommodation.

Now, obviously, he can complain that some baseball players earn that much for one MLB game, but I don't think a Kolpak contract will give him more than $235K/year - not to consider that, he'll miss the % of guarantee money, endorsement shares & other perks like bonuses, Man of the match/series money etc.. And of course, as you mentioned in other thread, because of his skin color, he is destined to play for SAF till 2023, for whatever performance. I actually don't think this news is true - it doesn't make any sense for Amla.

However, I don't understand the logic of a sportsman's short career earnings theory, if he can manage his money properly. These players are earning FAT at their early age - can't tell about other countries, but in South Asia, an Engineer or Doctor starts earning at 25, average around $1K/month - next 40 years, most of the better ones should end up earning in career total less than $4mn - that's in Indian rupee average around 256 million. in PRK, probably around 450 mn. For someone like Shadab, can end up earning half of that before reaching 25!!!!!!! Safe & intelligent investment (like real estate, transportation, restaurant, shopping malls .....), can keep a very healthy inbound money stream even in their 90s....

Of course you can argue these are National stars, so they are entitled to blow quarter million in one deal at casino every time, should exchange between Bently with Bugati every summer & winter, be able to throw $10,000 booze party to friends every week end, should buy designer suits, watches, shoes for every occasion ............ but, no payment can ensure old age safety after that. Example - several NBA/NFL stars have gone bankrupt in 5/6 years after earning average $12mn+/year for best part of 2 decades. Obafemi Martins was at BP 60K/week base payment contract - for 5 years at Newcastle in 2006 - he didn't like the life style of slums around Newcastle, so he used to fly by helicopter every day from his Hyde park apartment - just tiny part of his life style ..... and this guy was trolling around in Lagos's streets just 10 years back - and he should end up there for rest of his retired life.

If I write my true feelings about SAF cricketers, Mods'll get busy again. Their administrators are poor, but players are even worse - I am sorry to say that none of their non black player takes that country as their own, no national pride. And, these players do know that after 2019, Kolpak won't be there - they are just putting pressure to increase their money from CSAF, which has better method than this.

I'll reiterate again - future of cricket in SAF lies on how fast they can integrate their native people in the game; these mercenaries will always find a way to make some issues.
 
That is true. I wasn't seeing the whole picture, good point.



No where does it say that he has accepted such a deal so the fact that you're drooling over the prospect of insulting him for it just shows your own problems.



Ranked #8 in the world, was their best batsman in England and has more matches and centuries than the whole team combined. He's crucial to South Africa getting that #1 ranking back.

As always you need to resort to personal comments. You didn't read my post , I said he won't take it anyway. But if he did it would be hilarious to see how you would defend him.
 
[MENTION=136528]super hitter[/MENTION] Cricket is a minority sport in S.A as it is mostly follower by Whites whos population is decreasing by the generation due to emigration. And also Desi Saffers.

Most Black saffers arent into cricket nor can a lot of them afford to take up cricket as a sport.

So im guessing Amla isnt getting loads of endorsements and obvs a lot of advertisement n endorsement are off limits for Amla.

even in england cricket being a minority sport u dont get many cricketers who get big advertisement deals or sponsorships only one i can remember who got that was Flintoff in recent years who became somewhat of a pop culture figure n a celebrity.

India and Pakistan are totally diff kettle of fish. Cricket is the main sport in these countries by a country mile and cricketers are like rockstars there. Not the case in a country like SA.
 
Can see different sides of the argument, and it boils down to sentimentalism over money and vice versa, feeling entitled or not to a working professional should keep playing their beloved sport because it adds to pleasure of spectator.

May seem unfair to some, but who can judge saying yes or no to that kind of money that they've never had or even could dream of having?

Amla is 34. His test form is declining, and he may even be dropped if he has a shocker in the coming home season.

It may be the right time to go, whether or not fans can say, Thanks Hashim. We loved watching you, but everyone gets old and needs to step away from international cricket.

I love Amla, Steyn and Morkel. Without them, SA will be a notch above SL who are an embarrassment.

In the next few years Tests between Pakistan, Australia, India and England may end up being the only watchable teams. Sad that the other four can barely beat Division 2 second XIs.
 
Sorry if this has been asked before but...

...why can't the board change rules so Kolpak players can still represent SA? Or is that an EU/ECB thing too? Even if it is, why are the rules in the way of a compromise?
 
May be different in AUS, but in Canada, Govt. subsidies few expenses, therefore $200K CAN, is considered a very good household earning. Here, minimum wage is around $12/hour, which they are negotiating to raise at around $14-$15 from next year. A Manager with 7+ years' experience in a top Bank or Telecom is more than happy with base salary of $85K/year, Sr. Managers around $100K and that's around 65-70% of Cost to Company.

Coming to Amla, obviously a National player wouldn't be happy if it was only that $105,000 (US, I presume). But, what I can understand (from other boards payment structure), this'll be Amla's gross payment from CSAF, excluding his Domestic club/FC contracts, endorsement money & TA/DA.

Central contract - $105K
Test match fee - $5K/Test = $50K
ODI match fee - $3.5K/ODI = $70K (I take for rotational policy, he'll play only 20 matches & won't be paid, if he is benched, which doesn't happen)
T20 match fee - $2.5K/T20 = $10K (Same as ODI)

Total : $235K, only from playing for SAF. And, these guys are covered by board for their insurance, pension, medical expenses, kits, travelling & accommodation.

Now, obviously, he can complain that some baseball players earn that much for one MLB game, but I don't think a Kolpak contract will give him more than $235K/year - not to consider that, he'll miss the % of guarantee money, endorsement shares & other perks like bonuses, Man of the match/series money etc.. And of course, as you mentioned in other thread, because of his skin color, he is destined to play for SAF till 2023, for whatever performance. I actually don't think this news is true - it doesn't make any sense for Amla.

However, I don't understand the logic of a sportsman's short career earnings theory, if he can manage his money properly. These players are earning FAT at their early age - can't tell about other countries, but in South Asia, an Engineer or Doctor starts earning at 25, average around $1K/month - next 40 years, most of the better ones should end up earning in career total less than $4mn - that's in Indian rupee average around 256 million. in PRK, probably around 450 mn. For someone like Shadab, can end up earning half of that before reaching 25!!!!!!! Safe & intelligent investment (like real estate, transportation, restaurant, shopping malls .....), can keep a very healthy inbound money stream even in their 90s....

Of course you can argue these are National stars, so they are entitled to blow quarter million in one deal at casino every time, should exchange between Bently with Bugati every summer & winter, be able to throw $10,000 booze party to friends every week end, should buy designer suits, watches, shoes for every occasion ............ but, no payment can ensure old age safety after that. Example - several NBA/NFL stars have gone bankrupt in 5/6 years after earning average $12mn+/year for best part of 2 decades. Obafemi Martins was at BP 60K/week base payment contract - for 5 years at Newcastle in 2006 - he didn't like the life style of slums around Newcastle, so he used to fly by helicopter every day from his Hyde park apartment - just tiny part of his life style ..... and this guy was trolling around in Lagos's streets just 10 years back - and he should end up there for rest of his retired life.

If I write my true feelings about SAF cricketers, Mods'll get busy again. Their administrators are poor, but players are even worse - I am sorry to say that none of their non black player takes that country as their own, no national pride. And, these players do know that after 2019, Kolpak won't be there - they are just putting pressure to increase their money from CSAF, which has better method than this.

I'll reiterate again - future of cricket in SAF lies on how fast they can integrate their native people in the game; these mercenaries will always find a way to make some issues.


Lot of problems with this.

No 1: You are pretending there's nothing in between players blowing 150M$ in a casino like Antoine Walker and a possibly all-time great player living the lifestyle of an average person after his playing days are over. It's absurd. Junaids is talking about very legitimate needs. Living in a nice city, in a good house and being able to send your kids to a good school isn't incredibly excessive demand. Just because some people use helicopters to arrive at training (which Gayle also did I think, it isn't that uncommon) does not mean there is nothing expensive in between subsistence lifestyle and high-roller casinos with $100k a bet.

2. Even if some people are irresponsible with their earnings does not nobody deserves to earn. If you look at lawyers, bankers, CEOs, presidents; all professions have some people who spend in unproductive ways that does not mean nobody in the profession deserves to earn a lot.

3. Everybody is a 'mercenary' if it is defined as not providing self-less service for free. Unless you have dedicated your life to selfless service and donated all/most your money to charity etc, this is a very hypocritical observation.
 
Sorry if this has been asked before but...

...why can't the board change rules so Kolpak players can still represent SA? Or is that an EU/ECB thing too? Even if it is, why are the rules in the way of a compromise?

That's an ECB thing. They don't change it in order to discourage kolpaks.
 
Lot of problems with this.

No 1: You are pretending there's nothing in between players blowing 150M$ in a casino like Antoine Walker and a possibly all-time great player living the lifestyle of an average person after his playing days are over. It's absurd. Junaids is talking about very legitimate needs. Living in a nice city, in a good house and being able to send your kids to a good school isn't incredibly excessive demand. Just because some people use helicopters to arrive at training (which Gayle also did I think, it isn't that uncommon) does not mean there is nothing expensive in between subsistence lifestyle and high-roller casinos with $100k a bet.

2. Even if some people are irresponsible with their earnings does not nobody deserves to earn. If you look at lawyers, bankers, CEOs, presidents; all professions have some people who spend in unproductive ways that does not mean nobody in the profession deserves to earn a lot.

3. Everybody is a 'mercenary' if it is defined as not providing self-less service for free. Unless you have dedicated your life to selfless service and donated all/most your money to charity etc, this is a very hypocritical observation.

You are mixing the generic problem of Cricket being lower paid than other major sports - but it can't be applied on going to Kolpak leaving SAF. I don't mind if Md. Irfan goes (went) to Basketball instead of cricket, but he can't say that Cricket pays lower than Basketball, hence to make up that money, I'll ........

Rest part of your post is again a motherhood statement - a CEO is entitled to blow all his riches to Casino, problem is when he cries fowl that I am bankrupt, because I wasn't paid enough. My point was exactly that - unless you cut your coat to your size, unlimited fabrics won't serve you at the end.

And, I didn't understand the last part - what it has to do to go for Kolpak, leaving SAF, when none is going to give him a Walker like spending power. Gayle once came to practice for media stunt - that Nigerien Paindu hired an express air service for hole year to carry him from his roof at London to St. James Park, Newcastle, wait their till he finises his practice or match & fly him back - sometimes twice a day.

Cricket indeed needs money - but more than Cricket, those majority people living in most of the few countries where Cricket is played, needs fundamental essentials like food, medicine, shelter, education ..... more. The day people of cricket mad South Asia or West Indies or Southern Africa can match the per Capita earning of just like Poland or Romania or Argentina - average Cricketer's will indeed earn to live that life style.
 
Any South African citizen qualifies under Kolpak, but it will cease to exist in less than two years - hence he may feel an urgency to sign up.

This isn't about race, but terrible pay: he earns only $105,000 per year.

It's why the ICC should use its $2 billion surplus to pay and contract all international players outside the Big Three, rather than on welfare handouts for the BCCI to buy state cricket association votes with.

Amla, Matthews, Bravo, Williamson and Azhar would all earn around $600,000.

Elgar, Gabriel, Yasir and Boult would earn $500,000.

The entire set of annual payments for the seven teams would be around half of what Australian Rules football and Australian Rugby League pay their players.

Not true, he earns more than $300,000 playing for South Africa.
 
He has the right to secure his and his family's future. $200-300K an year for 10-15 years won't be enough for lifetime in a western country.
 
[MENTION=136528]super hitter[/MENTION] Cricket is a minority sport in S.A as it is mostly follower by Whites whos population is decreasing by the generation due to emigration. And also Desi Saffers.

Most Black saffers arent into cricket nor can a lot of them afford to take up cricket as a sport.

So im guessing Amla isnt getting loads of endorsements and obvs a lot of advertisement n endorsement are off limits for Amla.

even in england cricket being a minority sport u dont get many cricketers who get big advertisement deals or sponsorships only one i can remember who got that was Flintoff in recent years who became somewhat of a pop culture figure n a celebrity.

India and Pakistan are totally diff kettle of fish. Cricket is the main sport in these countries by a country mile and cricketers are like rockstars there. Not the case in a country like SA.

Actually surprised to know that the Worlds second most popular sport is just being followed in the sub continent at high proportions...But at the same time Soccer has been dominant in these countries which may be taken as one of the major factors when talking about individuals.
 
[MENTION=136528]super hitter[/MENTION] its world second most popular sport if u look at numbers ofc because whole subcontinent has cricket as their main sport and thats like 1.6 1.7 billion nearly a quarter of worlds population and u add aus too n rest of the countries.

But cricket isnt evenly distributed geographically its mostly popular in former British colonies. The caribbean Subcontinent Aus NZ SA were all under British rule and thats how they got the game.

Rest of Europe and Americas have no interest in cricket.

Nor does East Asia.

Its not a global sport in the way football is or even something like tennis.
 
I'll be very surprised if Amla takes up a Kolpak deal. He has also in the past spoken about playing until the 2019 WC and giving it a shot.

Nothing is impossible but as of now I think it is the counties approaching him more than anything else. CSA have also said that both Morne and Hash have pledged their commitments towards playing for South Africa.

Kolpak deals are also not good for England as such, it robs a young English cricketer of a place in the county team as an outsider takes his place as a 'local' player.
 
Its his retirement, like sanga and chanderpaul. He never abandoned south Africa like the others after 5 games.
 
Back
Top