- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 218,133
Looks like a confident lad and seems to be showing little or less nerves
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Doesn't have the ability to hit sixes![]()

He should bat at 3 in place of haris sohail who is frustrating to watch he plays 1930's brand of cricket
Wrong place
Need to play at 3 and drop Haris
Do not rate him.
Even for tests? Scoring daddy hundreds on tough pitches is not to be scoffed at.
This. Haris played a really selfish knock and deserves to be dropped.
Attitude was extremely timid
Haris is way better then him.
Tough situation for the lad today.
I hope they play him in the next match maybe batting at number 3.
very tough situation today. The lad is all bones though. Can we ask him to bulk up a bit.
Looked decent, i hope he plays the next game too and bats at 4.
He is best upcoming youngster along with Usman Salahuddin in test cricket
He scored 900+ runs in most difficult domestic season when no one was even close to him with dukes ball and green pitches. He has already 11 FC hundreds and double century on green pitch
But i doubt he is a ODI player he has just 1 ODI hundred and its again same old story wrong people selected in wrong format. Adil Amin was better choice
I hope he proves me wrong as ODI player but he shouldn't bat lower than 3 otherwise there is no use of him in ODI
Same mistake again
What will he do at 6 , he isn't that player
Mickey just can't get it , he doesn't know what he does if he is a bowler or batsman
whats the point of selecting Saad if he is not going to bat at #3/4/5? #6 is too low for his game; #6 is for some one who is explosive like Umar Akmal
correct but at least in this squad he is the only one who can take on the bowlers; Saad Ali should have batted at #4 instead of #6akmal is more implosive than explosive these days tbh
correct but at least in this squad he is the only one who can take on the bowlers; Saad Ali should have batted at #4 instead of #6
Garbage selection from Inzi. He's not a good player.
to one dimensional from what little ive seen im afraid, not doubting he has batting ability, but pak dont need more accumulators in the odi line up. hes not gonna bat at 3 or 4 in the world cup and if you bat at 5 or below you need a hitting game, and 15 sixes from 50 list a games says he aint really got that.
Arthur is cluelessSaad Ali in the 2 matches he has played:
4th ODI - Sent in at number 6
5th ODI - Sent in at number 6 again, with the team needing 90 off 62 balls
Is this really giving a new player a proper chance?
Saad Ali in the 2 matches he has played:
4th ODI - Sent in at number 6
5th ODI - Sent in at number 6 again, with the team needing 90 off 62 balls
Is this really giving a new player a proper chance?
If you can’t work out in gym and build muscles to get strength, then get onto Harris Sohail’s paratha with desi ghee diet at least to bulk up in some way and get some power in those forearms.
Saad Ali looks like he might fall over due to the weight if he had to bat an over with Chris Gayle’s heavy bat.
From first impressions, doesn’t look like he has the game to hit big shots or even fours. Looks like a nudger. Sending him at #6 is an absolute joke from mickey and co. Guy should not even be in ODI and if he was selected, they pretty much destroyed his career by sending him in a position he is not built for.
I am seriously disappointed in our batting talent. Why do these guys not have the muscle to get some power in their shots? Asif Ali would have been a much better prospect at #6
whats the point of selecting Saad if he is not going to bat at #3/4/5? #6 is too low for his game; #6 is for some one who is explosive like Umar Akmal