What's new

Sachin Tendulkar vs Abdul Razzaq in Australia (ODI’s) - Who performed better?

In tests also Razzaq was trash.
Even by your obviously biased standards for an all-rounder to average 28 with the bat and 36 with ball across 46 tests is not trash.

And atleast he played 46 tests. He didn't run away at the thought of his brittle body breaking apart in five-day cricket.

Also in ODIs, Razzaq was a far better batter and bowler than Pandya who didn't have the luxury of batting in an era of flat pitches and two new balls. Also faced far better bowling attacks on far tougher pitches and had a far greater and longer track-record of success.
 
Pandya is a three times ICC trophy winner.
Thats 2 more than Razzaq.

Jobbers average 37 with the ball in test cricket.
Jobbers run away from test cricket because they know their body is made of glass and will break apart and then who will make that easy IPL money?

Ofcourse real cricketers have their priorities straight and know that if you can't play test cricket, you are not a serious cricketer.
 
Congrats to Sachin for that, well done; now explain what does that have to do with this innocent comparison, does it hurt that Razzler did well compared to Sachin? I am sorry to offend

Nothing to do with the tread title and the OP. Good for Razzaq that he did better than SRT with the bat in a specific country.

But my post is intended at the ensuing "discussion" that has predictably swayed toward's SRT's impact. The same SRT who has the most man of the match awards in international cricket...ever.
 
Even by your obviously biased standards for an all-rounder to average 28 with the bat and 36 with ball across 46 tests is not trash.

And atleast he played 46 tests. He didn't run away at the thought of his brittle body breaking apart in five-day cricket.

Also in ODIs, Razzaq was a far better batter and bowler than Pandya who didn't have the luxury of batting in an era of flat pitches and two new balls. Also faced far better bowling attacks on far tougher pitches and had a far greater and longer track-record of success.

I”ll entertain that argument if there is even one showing off that cuck that compares to the Razzlers hat-trick in Sharjah
 
Nothing to do with the tread title and the OP. Good for Razzaq that he did better than SRT with the bat in a specific country.

But my post is intended at the ensuing "discussion" that has predictably swayed toward's SRT's impact. The same SRT who has the most man of the match awards in international cricket...ever.

I wanted to highlight it given how underrated Razzaq clearly even now but a lot the small sensitive folk got upset, if anything, Sachin fans could have taken it as a positive that he was being used to level up a guy that kind of didn’t need it when it came to impact
 
Let's say am also surprised by oboyo with the bat .he is better than every pak batsmen apart from anwar in wc.

He was as good as waqar and better than saqlain in bowling too.

Yes Razzaq made Sachin his bunny and had much greater impact then him, Sachin played for himself, Razzaq played to win
 
So u have agreed entire minnow pak team is pathetic and impact less than Kenyan a.r oboyo .

Sachin had less impact then Kenyans to I don’t know what that has to do with Razzler making him his bunny, Sachin tampered to unlike Oboyo
 
Sachin had less impact then Kenyans to I don’t know what that has to do with Razzler making him his bunny, Sachin tampered to unlike Oboyo
Oboyo is the greatest all rounder who has beaten the entire gutless , pathetic , impactless pak team .he meets your specific country conditions perfectly.
 
I wanted to highlight it given how underrated Razzaq clearly even now but a lot the small sensitive folk got upset, if anything, Sachin fans could have taken it as a positive that he was being used to level up a guy that kind of didn’t need it when it came to impact

People use the word underrated for everyone and everything these days. No. Razzaq is not underrated..he is fairly rated by everyone. His knock against South Africa still gets attention today and even Sachin mentioned in an interview that he found Razzaq the toughest bowler to face.
 
I can't think of a single Razzaq performace of note. He gave the odd cameo here and there like Ravi Jadeja did. Although I think I rate Jadeja higher as a player.
 
I can't think of a single Razzaq performace of note. He gave the odd cameo here and there like Ravi Jadeja did. Although I think I rate Jadeja higher as a player.

Maybe because you are new to cricket. :inti

Check these out:

 
Oboyo is the greatest all rounder who has beaten the entire gutless , pathetic , impactless pak team .he meets your specific country conditions perfectly.

Oboyo has a spare room in every Indian household, so that just shows the cowardly cretin’s Indian teams has always been
 
So called Cowardly Indian team played finals while the real cowards didn't reach super 6. Minnows Kenya reached semis.

Sachin couldn’t do anything in Australia compared to Razzaq and on top of that got bent over in the finals, just could for scoring a few runs against a bowler who Indian midgets don’t rate themselves, Kenya did better then Sachin in that Tournie, they overachieved
 
Even by your obviously biased standards for an all-rounder to average 28 with the bat and 36 with ball across 46 tests is not trash.

And atleast he played 46 tests. He didn't run away at the thought of his brittle body breaking apart in five-day cricket.

Also in ODIs, Razzaq was a far better batter and bowler than Pandya who didn't have the luxury of batting in an era of flat pitches and two new balls. Also faced far better bowling attacks on far tougher pitches and had a far greater and longer track-record of success.
lol razzaq is no Botham, heck not even Kapil Dev or maybe even Chris Cairns level in test cricket tbf, but whatever standard test allrounder he was I'll gladly take him over Aamer Jamal, Hardik Pandya, allrounders in test cricket
 
Back
Top