FreePalestine
Local Club Regular
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Runs
- 1,547
- Post of the Week
- 1
Who would replace him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The answer to that question changes every TestWho would replace him?
The answer to that question changes every Test![]()
Well Pak cricket is in shambles anyways at the moment so I doubt PCB can afford such liabilities. Changes of faces does give hopes to fans otherwise interest will just fade away.The answer to that question changes every Test![]()
So you want the captaincy to change hands every Test? Or would you like either of Kamran or Umar Akmal to be made captain?Well Pak cricket is in shambles anyways at the moment so I doubt PCB can afford such liabilities. Changes of faces does give hopes to fans otherwise interest will just fade away.
So you want the captaincy to change hands every Test? Or would you like either of Kamran or Umar Akmal to be made captain?![]()
I want a captain who looks like a leader and merits his place in the team not a captain who can't even make team on merit, shouts like an angry kid and has zero inspiration to offer.
I do too. But that description certainly doesn't fit either Umar Akmal or Kamran Akmal or any other player in this teamI want a captain who looks like a leader and merits his place in the team not a captain who can't even make team on merit, shouts like an angry kid and has zero inspiration to offer.
Two fifties in five innings against the world's best bowling attack. Haters still finding reasons to hate.
Problem is his team isnt doing well.
Problem is his team isnt doing well.
What can captain do if senior batsmen Azhar and Asad are getting out for ducks?
Azhar has looked like a tailender all series. Heck Amir, Hasan and Abbas have looked better batsmen than him.
Faheem has at least shown something with ball to be persisted with in tests . Shadab has no business playing as a specialist spinner in tests . Obviously if he is selected I will give him time but would rather see a specialist offie like Gohar play oversees than Yasir or Shadab.
Oh my goodness me what a poor thread,
People expecting him to bowl 25 overs out of 90 on these conditions lol
Everything else that is happening is down to sarfaraz
I am reporting you as a troll.
6 overs in 70? At least equal distribution of overs would have been nice.
Bhaijan the other team is NOT playing a spinner. Why equal distribution?
But those guys aren't playing right now. And shadab is. So, not allowing him to bowl is just poor cricket
His ikka dukka fans are too busy celebrating his streaky half-century, so I don’t think you will be able to extract an answer from them.
The only thing I can think of is that Shadab does give boundary balls and Sarfraz doesn't want score to increase anymore.
Makes sense, but Shadab is a wicket taking option.
But that does explain why he doesn't attack more often than not and put fielders in defensive positions.
Other team is also playing Amla, if we go by your logic. I am talking about equal work load for bowlers
I can't believe u need to be told this. Most of the 70 overs should be bowled by quicks. Not equal distribution by any means.
I'm not here to defend the captain btw
I disagree. Sarfraz was wrong in this. About 90% of the overs were bowled by quicks, and clearly it didn't work.
What can captain do if senior batsmen Azhar and Asad are getting out for ducks?
Azhar has looked like a tailender all series. Heck Amir, Hasan and Abbas have looked better batsmen than him.
Similar was the case when Yasir bowled . He had a slightly higher percentage coz we only had 4 bowlers then
Two fifties in five innings against the world's best bowling attack. Haters still finding reasons to hate.
This is exactly why people are hating on him. He's the captain of the Pakistan national cricket team and we're happy with a couple of 50s.
What a sad sad demise .
But what happened to: our quicks need to bowl more overs lol. Let's agree to disgree and call it a day.
Our quicks do need to bowl more and they did. That's y shadab hasn't bowled as much ( and SA didn't play a spinner). I'm not sure where u are going with hsi
This is exactly why people are hating on him. He's the captain of the Pakistan national cricket team and we're happy with a couple of 50s.
What a sad sad demise .
This is exactly why people are hating on him. He's the captain of the Pakistan national cricket team and we're happy with a couple of 50s.
What a sad sad demise .
BUT. IT. DIDN't. WORK.
Kindly read my posts in context.
Given some fools on here keep calling him a specialist captain, I was simply pointing out he has scored two fifties in five innings against the world's best bowling attack. That's a hell of a lot better than most of the top order. Which part of that is wrong?
As for your point about 100s, you are stating the obvious whilst also missing the actual point. Sarfaraz himself said he should have scored another 50-70 runs yesterday, so no one is disagreeing with that. But more to the point, you don't expect/rely on your number seven scoring regular centuries. After all, this is QdK's first test century in two years! In other words, comparing a top order batsman and a wicketkeeper who bats at seven is foolish.
I am not relying on a keeper to score a 100 but when he was on 50 yesterday , he has to go on and get a century with the position we were in.
So you aren't relying on your keeper to score a 100, but you are relying on your keeper to score a 100.![]()
Also once again you change your argument without accepting it.
No point discussing with you.)
But if a batsmen is set at 50, is it wrong for me to ask for him to go on to score a 100. And did you see how he got out? An awful shot.
Again, read my post. I addressed this directly, as did Sarfaraz. That isn't what this discussion is about. All you are doing is stating the obvious.
Bottom line is your only interest is in criticising Sarfaraz. So no matter what, you will keep shifting the goalposts:
First you complained he wasn't scoring runs (rightly so). Now he is scoring runs, you find another reason to criticise.
If Sarfaraz scored a century, you would complain it wasn't a double.
He broke the record of most catches by a pakistani wicket-keeper in a test match (this match) but you will ignore it/still find reason to complain.
Heck, if he saved a baby's life, you would probably say why didn't he save the lives of two?
And so it goes on.
There's plenty of reason to criticise him, and I do, but the vitriolic hatred and abuse which the likes of you harbour towards him is uncalled for and says a lot about you as a person.
he is limited captain how goes according to script and don,t think out of box
Which is why he shouldn't be captain anymore. Have seen enough of Sarfaraz to make the conclusion that he is just not going to improve
Abbas wouldn't have got Elgar or Markram's wickets if Sarfaraz had been standing up.