What's new

SC finds discrepancies in Imran's money trail to Banigala land

uberkoen

ODI Debutant
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Runs
9,985
ISLAMABAD: Serious discrepancies have been found in the money trail provided by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan regarding the purchase of more than 300 kanals in Banigala on which the politician has built his house.

A three-judge bench of apex court headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar on Thursday, raised nine questions regarding Khan’s money trail. The bench questioned how the PTI chief’s agent Rashid Khan paid the seller nine months before having received the amount from Jemima Khan.

Further, the bench not only raised questions over the construction documents, but also asked Khan to provide complete records of Jemima’s bank statement, as details regarding how she transferred the amount to Rashid’s account were missing.

Unsatisfied with the revenue record regarding the transfer of land in Jemima’s name, the bench asked Khan how he would reconcile the record. Questions were also raised over Khan’s failure to disclose his ownership of an offshore company in 2002 nomination papers.

“We will go to any extent to find the truth in this case”, CJ Nisar observed during the hearing, as the bench sought complete records of PTI’s foreign funding case from Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

Further, the bench directed PTI counsel Naeem Bukhari to provide assistance over how offshore companies are being formed and what is the motive for owning one. The hearing of the case has been adjourned till Tuesday, May 30.

On Tuesday, Khan told the Supreme Court that it was accusations such as ‘Zionist lobby’ and ‘purchase of antique tiles’ levelled on Jemima Khan by the Sharifs “that ended their marriage in divorce and forced his former wife to leave the country”. Khan was referring to the political campaign of the late 1990s launched against him by his political opponents. When they got nothing against him, he said, they found Jemima and targeted her Jewish family background. It was in those days that a case was registered against Jemima for illegally exporting hundreds of antique tiles to the UK.

“In 2002, having been hounded by allegations of still being part of the Jewish lobby and a false case [instituted] by the Sharifs of illegally taking out antique tiles (which had [actually] been purchased in a shop in the federal capital and were anything but antique) for which an FIR was also filed, Jemima Khan took our two children and moved back to London,” says Khan in his 10-page affidavit submitted in the apex court on Tuesday.

The affidavit was submitted in reply to a petition filed by PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi, seeking disqualification of the PTI chief for giving contradictory statements about ownership of the Banigala land.


Source: https://tribune.com.pk/story/1418922/sc-finds-discrepancies-imrans-money-trail-banigala-land/
 
SC logic: A flimsy money trail is worse than no money trail.


:salute
 
ISLAMABAD: Serious discrepancies have been found in the money trail provided by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan regarding the purchase of more than 300 kanals in Banigala on which the politician has built his house.

A three-judge bench of apex court headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar on Thursday, raised nine questions regarding Khan’s money trail. The bench questioned how the PTI chief’s agent Rashid Khan paid the seller nine months before having received the amount from Jemima Khan.

Further, the bench not only raised questions over the construction documents, but also asked Khan to provide complete records of Jemima’s bank statement, as details regarding how she transferred the amount to Rashid’s account were missing.

Unsatisfied with the revenue record regarding the transfer of land in Jemima’s name, the bench asked Khan how he would reconcile the record. Questions were also raised over Khan’s failure to disclose his ownership of an offshore company in 2002 nomination papers.

“We will go to any extent to find the truth in this case”, CJ Nisar observed during the hearing, as the bench sought complete records of PTI’s foreign funding case from Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

Further, the bench directed PTI counsel Naeem Bukhari to provide assistance over how offshore companies are being formed and what is the motive for owning one. The hearing of the case has been adjourned till Tuesday, May 30.

On Tuesday, Khan told the Supreme Court that it was accusations such as ‘Zionist lobby’ and ‘purchase of antique tiles’ levelled on Jemima Khan by the Sharifs “that ended their marriage in divorce and forced his former wife to leave the country”. Khan was referring to the political campaign of the late 1990s launched against him by his political opponents. When they got nothing against him, he said, they found Jemima and targeted her Jewish family background. It was in those days that a case was registered against Jemima for illegally exporting hundreds of antique tiles to the UK.

“In 2002, having been hounded by allegations of still being part of the Jewish lobby and a false case [instituted] by the Sharifs of illegally taking out antique tiles (which had [actually] been purchased in a shop in the federal capital and were anything but antique) for which an FIR was also filed, Jemima Khan took our two children and moved back to London,” says Khan in his 10-page affidavit submitted in the apex court on Tuesday.

The affidavit was submitted in reply to a petition filed by PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi, seeking disqualification of the PTI chief for giving contradictory statements about ownership of the Banigala land.


Source: https://tribune.com.pk/story/1418922/sc-finds-discrepancies-imrans-money-trail-banigala-land/

If IK has broken the law disqualify him but we know what the real issue is here.
 
I find it funny how most PTI followers are MIA on this thread. If this was something on Nawaz it would've gone to over 300 posts on how he's corrupt and what not.
 
I find it funny how most PTI followers are MIA on this thread. If this was something on Nawaz it would've gone to over 300 posts on how he's corrupt and what not.

HE IS corrupt and what not...... Bachay Bachay ko Pata hay Pakistan mein Nawaz Sharif Kitna Bara Dakoo Aur Choor hay....
 
I like how this trail of money is being taken very serious but the pms corruption was just downplayed.


Yes corruption is bad, but pms corrupttion is worse then all.

Anyways, just read the article which talks about how the jewish and zionisy bs was said, and i really feel sorry for imran. Our awaam is waqee jahil.
If imran does gets elected i hope he learns from his marriage and ends the minority discrimination the hate for jews and other groups
 
Hilarious to see PMLN supporters jumping around
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I find it funny how most PTI followers are MIA on this thread. If this was something on Nawaz it would've gone to over 300 posts on how he's corrupt and what not.

Which govt office has IK held to steal public funds, which foreign account has he transferred the money to from PK and where was you when the Sharifs couldn't show how they got the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ABROAD.
 
Last edited:
I find it funny how most PTI followers are MIA on this thread. If this was something on Nawaz it would've gone to over 300 posts on how he's corrupt and what not.

Sure bro, i assure you that this thread would be one of the most epic ones in history of Pakpassion since the guy who accuses others of corruption is found to be corrupt himself if only you can enlighten us how it proves Imran Khan is corrupt?

At worst, this could be a case of failing to report something in timely manner which could be due to so many reasons. Even PMLN lawyer Salman Akram Raja (one of tope lawyers in Pakistan) said Imran Khan's reponse is very solid and opponents will have to try extremely hard to find any holes.

Still though, could you explain the corruption that Imran Khan did in this case?
 
Actually there is another case of 'Foriegn funding" to disqualify Imran Khan that you may want to create a thread about.

Apparently all us overseas Pakistanis dual citizens can't donate funds to a political party in Pakistan because our loyalty to the country is questionable as per PMLN lawyer.
 
Actually there is another case of 'Foriegn funding" to disqualify Imran Khan that you may want to create a thread about.

Apparently all us overseas Pakistanis dual citizens can't donate funds to a political party in Pakistan because our loyalty to the country is questionable as per PMLN lawyer.

Oh wait so you are telling us that loyalty of Hassan Nawaz and Hussain Nawaz is questionable... :13:
 
and of course 'no money trail' Imran Khan is doodh ka dhulla

Please do tell us:

Which govt office has IK held to steal public funds? Like our 3rd time PM

How he transferred the money from Pakistan to overseas after stealing? Like all the Noora family
 
I find it funny how most PTI followers are MIA on this thread. If this was something on Nawaz it would've gone to over 300 posts on how he's corrupt and what not.

Not really, that is credibility speaking which can take a life time to achieve. Vast majority of people have no doubts over the credibility or integrity wrt to IK but would not even give any benefit of the doubt to NS and rightly so.
 
Not really, that is credibility speaking which can take a life time to achieve. Vast majority of people have no doubts over the credibility or integrity wrt to IK but would not even give any benefit of the doubt to NS and rightly so.

There is a reason why IK is still able to build 3rd cancer hospital and planning for 4th one even after all the allegations from PMLN leaders in last 6 years people still trust IK for their donations...
 
What's truly interesting here is that the "dehaati" Nawaz Sharif supporter that sell their votes at 20 ruppees are in fact literate and can speak a decent amount of English. You learn something new everyday.

There may or may not be minor discrepancies with regards to the purchase of Imran's home but the man is not financially corrupt. The only reason this is even in front of the supreme court is because Imran Khan has continuously opposed the establishment. You'd think that if PML-N were seriously concerned about corruption they might start with PPP or maybe conduct an in-house investigation.

And this is coming from someone who neither supports Imran Khan, the politician, nor PTI.
 
IK isn't corrupt that's one of the reason even his ex wife defends him time and time again instead of using it as an opportunity.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Truth. <a href="https://t.co/COtJe1HOq4">https://t.co/COtJe1HOq4</a></p>— Jemima Goldsmith (@Jemima_Khan) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jemima_Khan/status/869127854868615168">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Whether SC investigates or forms JIT in my case, here is my challenge: whatever they want to do, they will come to only one conclusion -</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869085123911843840">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I bought London flat from taxed legit cricket earnings in 1983; sold it in 2003 & brought funds back thru legit banking channels <a href="https://t.co/SmnmTETTTH">https://t.co/SmnmTETTTH</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869086820839174147">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Paid for purchase of Bani Gala property from these earned funds remitted back to Pakistan. <a href="https://t.co/PsUPXmEIvF">https://t.co/PsUPXmEIvF</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869087294329942016">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Was taxpayer in UK for 20 yrs; am taxpayer in Pak since 1981. Never have I done anything illegal; nor have I ever been served a tax notice</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869088864811573248">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In contrast, I predict JIT will find NS, while he held PM office guilty of tax evasion, money laundering & perjury (Qatari letter) <a href="https://t.co/djNSlAqQI6">https://t.co/djNSlAqQI6</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869089988843122689">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Those who think I am playing with fire & might get disqualified, it will be a small price to pay to rid Pak of corruption mafias' Godfather.</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869091406413008900">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited:
IK isn't corrupt that's one of the reason even his ex wife defends him time and time again instead of using it as an opportunity.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Truth. <a href="https://t.co/COtJe1HOq4">https://t.co/COtJe1HOq4</a></p>— Jemima Goldsmith (@Jemima_Khan) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jemima_Khan/status/869127854868615168">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Whether SC investigates or forms JIT in my case, here is my challenge: whatever they want to do, they will come to only one conclusion -</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869085123911843840">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I bought London flat from taxed legit cricket earnings in 1983; sold it in 2003 & brought funds back thru legit banking channels <a href="https://t.co/SmnmTETTTH">https://t.co/SmnmTETTTH</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869086820839174147">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Paid for purchase of Bani Gala property from these earned funds remitted back to Pakistan. <a href="https://t.co/PsUPXmEIvF">https://t.co/PsUPXmEIvF</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869087294329942016">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Was taxpayer in UK for 20 yrs; am taxpayer in Pak since 1981. Never have I done anything illegal; nor have I ever been served a tax notice</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869088864811573248">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In contrast, I predict JIT will find NS, while he held PM office guilty of tax evasion, money laundering & perjury (Qatari letter) <a href="https://t.co/djNSlAqQI6">https://t.co/djNSlAqQI6</a></p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869089988843122689">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Those who think I am playing with fire & might get disqualified, it will be a small price to pay to rid Pak of corruption mafias' Godfather.</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/869091406413008900">May 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This is the credibility of the man, even the ex wife supports him 100% on his honesty and integrity.

Still waiting for our friend [MENTION=107753]uberkoen[/MENTION] to exaplain the corruption in this case.
 
[MENTION=135]Waseem[/MENTION] [MENTION=138254]Syed1[/MENTION] [MENTION=491]IMMY69[/MENTION] [MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION]

If only the Supreme Court would accept tweets as evidence in court. Unfortunately, that isn't the case.

So far, it's all talk and no action. If its as clear as all of you and Imran Khan make it out to be why doesn't he just submit the details to the supreme court?

SC gives Imran 7 days to submit money trail
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan to submit his reply within one week over the matters pertaining to money trail of Bani Gala residence and offshore company Niazi Services Incorporation Limited.

The notice was issued on a civil miscellaneous application filed by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Hanif Abbasi through his counsel Advocate Akram Sheikh.

Abbasi had requested to direct Khan to produce the statement of accounts of his offshore company from its opening till date along with record of accounts from Citibank to establish the authenticity, and consequently, reliability of Khan's documents.

The application stated that Khan's lawyers had disclosed that the loan obtained for purchase of the flat in London was returned to Jemima Khan and that it was paid back to her from the account of Niazi Services Corporation through a cheque amounting to GBP 562,415.54.

"The refund of this amount is of course important but what is more important are the sources from where the 117,500 GBP funds were reportedly generated by Imran Khan, who claims to have acquired the same through playing cricket on which taxes were paid both in Australia and London. Yet no record of payment of any payments or any taxes paid thereon in London and Australia has been provided. Therefore, it raises a big question mark as to where the seed money for the purchase of the flat in 1983 came from?" the petitioner questioned.

It added that Khan was required to produce his 2003 income tax returns to confirm the declaration of such funds having been brought to Pakistan and duly declared by him.

PMLN's application stated that Khan had recorded that the flat in London was placed in NSL by him which was an admission that flat was purchased prior to it being placed in NSL as an asset thereof.

"In case of PTI LLC California (6160), the number of ghost donors is 114, corporations are 80, Indian probable (from the pattern and resemblance of name) are 23, foreigners 21 and duplicates are 34. Similarly, in the case of PTI Texas LLC (5975), the number of ghost donors is 10, corporations 195, Indian probable 18, foreigners 21 and duplicates are 51. Therefore, the plea of the defendants that all the funds was raised from overseas Pakistani's only stands refuted," the application stated.

Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar observed that evidence would have to be submitted before the court if Imran Khan had taken loan from his wife. He further asked the counsel as to what will be the consequences if it was not proven that loans were taken from Jemima for the purchase of the Bani Gala property.

The counsel told the bench that Jemima had been contacted for the documents to be produced before the court. He requested for more time to produce a complete record of the banking transactions leading to the purchase of the land.

The top court also sought a reply from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) regarding PTI's objection over the commission's jurisdiction to determine the party's foreign funding issue.

The hearing of the case has adjourned till Wednesday.
 
[MENTION=107753]uberkoen[/MENTION]. I'll let you know that you will be very disappointed in this case. There is no case. On the other hand there is merit to the foreign funding from overseas Pakistanis case as protocol took a hike there on PTI's part

However the issue is this. The focus on PML-N and the Nawaz tola is because their corruption is on the awaam's money. The Bani gala land is a private individual's case and it will be thrown out anyway.
 
Btw its hilarious the zabardasti on [MENTION=107753]uberkoen[/MENTION]'s part to make a false equivalence of this with the Panamagate case or mehrangate etc.
 
Actually there is another case of 'Foriegn funding" to disqualify Imran Khan that you may want to create a thread about.

Apparently all us overseas Pakistanis dual citizens can't donate funds to a political party in Pakistan because our loyalty to the country is questionable as per PMLN lawyer.

Yes precisely my point. Missed this post

If nooras had a collective brain amongst them they would have been making a bigger issue of this case as according to the law their argument might have merit as many countries have this protocol of foreign citizens not allowed to fund a party's operations. But obviously expecting them to understand the matter at hand is a stretch....
 
[MENTION=135]Waseem[/MENTION] [MENTION=138254]Syed1[/MENTION] [MENTION=491]IMMY69[/MENTION] [MENTION=133397]WebGuru[/MENTION]

If only the Supreme Court would accept tweets as evidence in court. Unfortunately, that isn't the case.

So far, it's all talk and no action. If its as clear as all of you and Imran Khan make it out to be why doesn't he just submit the details to the supreme court?

SC gives Imran 7 days to submit money trail
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan to submit his reply within one week over the matters pertaining to money trail of Bani Gala residence and offshore company Niazi Services Incorporation Limited.

The notice was issued on a civil miscellaneous application filed by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Hanif Abbasi through his counsel Advocate Akram Sheikh.

Abbasi had requested to direct Khan to produce the statement of accounts of his offshore company from its opening till date along with record of accounts from Citibank to establish the authenticity, and consequently, reliability of Khan's documents.

The application stated that Khan's lawyers had disclosed that the loan obtained for purchase of the flat in London was returned to Jemima Khan and that it was paid back to her from the account of Niazi Services Corporation through a cheque amounting to GBP 562,415.54.

"The refund of this amount is of course important but what is more important are the sources from where the 117,500 GBP funds were reportedly generated by Imran Khan, who claims to have acquired the same through playing cricket on which taxes were paid both in Australia and London. Yet no record of payment of any payments or any taxes paid thereon in London and Australia has been provided. Therefore, it raises a big question mark as to where the seed money for the purchase of the flat in 1983 came from?" the petitioner questioned.

It added that Khan was required to produce his 2003 income tax returns to confirm the declaration of such funds having been brought to Pakistan and duly declared by him.

PMLN's application stated that Khan had recorded that the flat in London was placed in NSL by him which was an admission that flat was purchased prior to it being placed in NSL as an asset thereof.

"In case of PTI LLC California (6160), the number of ghost donors is 114, corporations are 80, Indian probable (from the pattern and resemblance of name) are 23, foreigners 21 and duplicates are 34. Similarly, in the case of PTI Texas LLC (5975), the number of ghost donors is 10, corporations 195, Indian probable 18, foreigners 21 and duplicates are 51. Therefore, the plea of the defendants that all the funds was raised from overseas Pakistani's only stands refuted," the application stated.

Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar observed that evidence would have to be submitted before the court if Imran Khan had taken loan from his wife. He further asked the counsel as to what will be the consequences if it was not proven that loans were taken from Jemima for the purchase of the Bani Gala property.

The counsel told the bench that Jemima had been contacted for the documents to be produced before the court. He requested for more time to produce a complete record of the banking transactions leading to the purchase of the land.

The top court also sought a reply from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) regarding PTI's objection over the commission's jurisdiction to determine the party's foreign funding issue.

The hearing of the case has adjourned till Wednesday.

Mate really??
 
As usual SC getting sidetracked by Imran Khan's Bani Gala money trail rather than focus on the core issue at hand which is PMs corruption. All these guys are in the pocket of Nawaz and will do whatever they can to ensure Nawaz completes his term. Once election day comes no one will remember Panama gate or any other scandals.
 
<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="270" src="//www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x5odzbu" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5odzbu_imran-khan-doesnt-have-complete-record-of-bani-gala-property-transactionss_creation" target="_blank">Imran Khan doesnt have complete record of Bani...</a> <i> <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/" target="_blank"></a></i>
 
<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="270" src="//www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x5odzbu" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5odzbu_imran-khan-doesnt-have-complete-record-of-bani-gala-property-transactionss_creation" target="_blank">Imran Khan doesnt have complete record of Bani...</a> <i> <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/" target="_blank"></a></i>

Has IK ever been in a public office? How will he steal public funds without being in public office? Or SC is more concerned about British taxpayer's money than Pakistani taxpayer's money?
 
There are obvious discrepancies here, and in how he claims to have no running source of income, but continues to live in an estate with a multitude of servants. Nonetheless, it is a small issue compared to Panama, which we should not deviate from. Of course this doesn't override the hypocrisy of Imran and his documented history of letting the corruption of his friends and allies brush under the carpet.
 
Has IK ever been in a public office? How will he steal public funds without being in public office? Or SC is more concerned about British taxpayer's money than Pakistani taxpayer's money?


When a Case comes infront of their Eyes than they cannot ignore it. Especially when IK is the actual Leader of Opposition. This is exactly what IK himself said that He won't mind SC trying PM & IK under same TOR's.


If IK gets cleared, PTI gets clean chit in foreign funding than it would massively help IK, PTI & Pakistan.


As far as your question number 3 is concerned than definitely Pakistani's Tax payer's money and the csse sorrounding PML N who have been in Power in more important.


Now there are 4 important cases running side by side. Hope justice prevails.
 
When a Case comes infront of their Eyes than they cannot ignore it. Especially when IK is the actual Leader of Opposition. This is exactly what IK himself said that He won't mind SC trying PM & IK under same TOR's.


If IK gets cleared, PTI gets clean chit in foreign funding than it would massively help IK, PTI & Pakistan.


As far as your question number 3 is concerned than definitely Pakistani's Tax payer's money and the csse sorrounding PML N who have been in Power in more important.


Now there are 4 important cases running side by side. Hope justice prevails.

The biggest joke of a case is that petition in ECP about overseas pakistanis funding PTI. Bhai phr remittances lena be band kerdo overseas Pakistanis se...
 
The biggest joke of a case is that petition in ECP about overseas pakistanis funding PTI. Bhai phr remittances lena be band kerdo overseas Pakistanis se...


It is not like that. The Political Party has to show that who gave you party funds ? Worth what and if the Audit of those funds were done or not ?


PTI can come clean on it. It's a test of their Legal team. They have to convince the Commision that there were no discrepancies. ECP has to also keep it in mind that a huge chunk of funding is for financial support of democratic movements but that is charity money. IK says there is annual Audit of all funds so there shouldn't be any problem.
 
<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="270" src="//www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x5oo5ox" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5oo5ox_nadeem-malik-s-comments-on-money-trail-of-imran-khan-provided-by-jemaima-khan_news" target="_blank">Nadeem Malik's comments on Money Trail of Imran...</a> <i> <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/" target="_blank"></a></i>
 
[MENTION=107753]uberkoen[/MENTION] I was going to respond in full details but looks like case has been resolved.

Even if Jamaima had not provided these statements, it would not have proven any corruption. It just meant that Jamaima sent some money without using proper channel which is not a massive crime and surey couldn't result in disqualification of Imran but there was outside chance.

I think there is still one more slight issue which is Imran's offshore company was not declared mainly because ONLY linked asset was flat which was declared including sale price and all relevant documents. Again, no corruption whatsoever since there was no tax evasion.

It was a desperate attempt by PMLN to throw mud at Imran ONLY because Imran exposed them in Panama case. Foriegn funding case is similar desperate attempt, unless they can prove that Imran was getting money form foriegn agencies or countries. Their main argument is some foriegn sounding names have funded PTI with one being a Pakistani American working in Jewish owned company paid by cheque under the company name and a Sikh who married woman from KPK donated $500.
Even if there are missing docs or misuse of funds, does it prove Imran Khan takes funds from foriegners or he personally misused funds? Finally, was it government money misused??
 
[MENTION=107753]uberkoen[/MENTION] I was going to respond in full details but looks like case has been resolved.

Even if Jamaima had not provided these statements, it would not have proven any corruption. It just meant that Jamaima sent some money without using proper channel which is not a massive crime and surey couldn't result in disqualification of Imran but there was outside chance.

I think there is still one more slight issue which is Imran's offshore company was not declared mainly because ONLY linked asset was flat which was declared including sale price and all relevant documents. Again, no corruption whatsoever since there was no tax evasion.

It was a desperate attempt by PMLN to throw mud at Imran ONLY because Imran exposed them in Panama case. Foriegn funding case is similar desperate attempt, unless they can prove that Imran was getting money form foriegn agencies or countries. Their main argument is some foriegn sounding names have funded PTI with one being a Pakistani American working in Jewish owned company paid by cheque under the company name and a Sikh who married woman from KPK donated $500.
Even if there are missing docs or misuse of funds, does it prove Imran Khan takes funds from foriegners or he personally misused funds? Finally, was it government money misused??

I didn't call IK corrupt even once in any of my posts. All I did was post an article and the fact is that there were discrepancies and if he is unable to counter the arguments made in Supreme Court it means he indulged in illegal activity whether knowingly or unknowingly.

The evidence is yet to be presented in court and the verdict is yet to be given. My point is that if the evidence is not deemed sufficient or if questions are raised on IK's integrity. These should be properly discussed as well. Fact of the matter is that in the end whether you benefit through bringing money in the country via some back channel or you engage in political corruption you are either way engaging in illegal corrupt activity and the two should not be differentiated because corruption is corruption and there's no such thing as little or big when it comes to such things.
 
Daneyal Aziz ko Wazeer Bana Dou.

Itniiiii khidmatt :)


With No Money Trail Why Isn't Imran Khan Diqualified ? Daneyal Aziz


 
I didn't call IK corrupt even once in any of my posts. All I did was post an article and the fact is that there were discrepancies and if he is unable to counter the arguments made in Supreme Court it means he indulged in illegal activity whether knowingly or unknowingly.

The evidence is yet to be presented in court and the verdict is yet to be given. My point is that if the evidence is not deemed sufficient or if questions are raised on IK's integrity. These should be properly discussed as well. Fact of the matter is that in the end whether you benefit through bringing money in the country via some back channel or you engage in political corruption you are either way engaging in illegal corrupt activity and the two should not be differentiated because corruption is corruption and there's no such thing as little or big when it comes to such things.

Illegal doesn't mean corrupt. In Pakistan the standards are so low IK still seems a saint amongst politicians. .
 
Special Provisions for this Laadla Hypocrite Liar Puppet Selected Ameer ul Momineen of Madina ki Riasatt.


This Man has living in a house for decades (illegal construction)


Supreme Court declared Sadiq and Ameen.



First Musharaf’s Amnesty for his Flat and now CJ Supreme Courts Amnesty for him to legalise illegal construction.



And this guy has audacity to utter Hazrat Umar RA’s and Madina ki Riasatt’s examples.

شرم مگر تم کو نہیں آتی



[MENTION=26195]DW44[/MENTION] [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] [MENTION=146217]InziRules[/MENTION] [MENTION=107753]uberkoen[/MENTION] [MENTION=2071]saadibaba[/MENTION] [MENTION=132734]Endymion[/MENTION] [MENTION=43242]Dr_Bassim[/MENTION] [MENTION=5869]yasir[/MENTION]
 

Attachments

  • B0B5CC58-51D5-453D-8491-C759C8FE75B9.jpg
    B0B5CC58-51D5-453D-8491-C759C8FE75B9.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 68
Back
Top