Rana
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Runs
- 88,063
He was better than Waqar Younis for sure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The change they need to make is BAN the word senior, bhai amd religion. I mean this senior tag got us in huge trouble. When the players talk about Malik and Hafeez it seems they are talking about Ponting and Lara!
Lucky or unlucky, Pakistan still failed to qualify for the semis. The ODI team had a 14 match-losing streak. The test team has seen some all-time lows. Not a single player has improved under Mickey. It is time to move on and appoint someone who understands Asian cricket better. Mickey at this point brings nothing to the table. Statistically, he is the worst coach Pakistan ever had.
Pakistan is going to be playing most of its test cricket in Asia and the next ODI world cup is also in India, so it is time to get an Asian coach who is capable of building a team for Asian conditions.
When you recommend we go for an Asian coach, are you suggesting the candidate could include anyone from the region including non-Pakistanis? If so, did you have anyone in mind?
Yes, Mahela or Sanga
Someone who understands Asian cricket and has played the modern game
I have a feeling PCB will give him another contract - maybe for at least a couple of years.
According to media reports, his report was very brutal against Sarfaraz. He wants the pcb to appoint a new captain and a bring in a replacement for Sarfaraz
Mahela or Sanga would be fantastic options if they are onboard, but i think PCB will go back to an Pakistani coach if not Mickey Arthur.
Personally, i would still prefer Mickey Arthur as head coach with different bowling, batting & fielding coaches. Plus Inzi has to go too.
I must say it's refreshing to see that PPers are overwhelmingly in favour of Mickey staying. No knee-jerk reactions to what was a decent enough World Cup campaign.
According to media reports, his report was very brutal against Sarfaraz. He wants the pcb to appoint a new captain and a bring in a replacement for Sarfaraz
I am actually more concerned that Sarfaraz and Inzi will keep their positions going forward..I have a feeling PCB will give him another contract - maybe for at least a couple of years.
wow...talk about change of hearts!!!! very keen to know what he says about him, not defending Sarfaraz but I am sure Sarfaraz must have a long list of complains about Mickey... One of those conferences he said that after Ind game he did meeting with players "without management" .. interesting!!!!!!![]()
Among Mickey and Sarfi, Sarfraz is way better at his job as a captain than Mickey as a coach. Wanna see results? Just watch the first 4 seasons of PSL where Mickey has time and again showed how clueless he is.
Laughable to see people pointing all fingers on Sarfaraz. Even Sarfaraz wanted Haris against India but Mickey and Inzi overruled his decision.
Your genius captain Sarfraz lost UAe series where his tactics were bad and he couldn't hold a bat at all. Unforgivable.
Your genius Mickey was hell bent on playing 3 pacers and has time and again showed his faith in spin allrounders rather than proper spinners. Be it Karachi Kings or be it Pakistan. Next?
As a genuine well wisher of pak cricket ....... extending his contract means screwing pak cricket even more than he already has
Yes, Mahela or Sanga
Someone who understands Asian cricket and has played the modern game
Your genius Mickey was hell bent on playing 3 pacers and has time and again showed his faith in spin allrounders rather than proper spinners. Be it Karachi Kings or be it Pakistan. Next?
Among Mickey and Sarfi, Sarfraz is way better at his job as a captain than Mickey as a coach. Wanna see results? Just watch the first 4 seasons of PSL where Mickey has time and again showed how clueless he is.
Laughable to see people pointing all fingers on Sarfaraz. Even Sarfaraz wanted Haris against India but Mickey and Inzi overruled his decision.
His contract is finished, PCB will review the performances and do an overview of Mickey Arthur and the management's tenure.
Do you want him to continue or should he be replaced?
Among Mickey and Sarfi, Sarfraz is way better at his job as a captain than Mickey as a coach. Wanna see results? Just watch the first 4 seasons of PSL where Mickey has time and again showed how clueless he is.
Laughable to see people pointing all fingers on Sarfaraz. Even Sarfaraz wanted Haris against India but Mickey and Inzi overruled his decision.
Looked at objectively-
Mickey produced the worst fielding team in the entire competition. The worst.
Even after having YEARS to plan & prepare Mickey turned up to the biggest comp in the world with NO IDEA who his best team was. No idea who his best quicks were. No idea who should be in the middle order. This cost you games & meant you didn't qualify. This is a failure of management. The best side did not play enough games.
Silly ideas like bowling first inn big games so no idea what his best tactics were. Again. Points thrown away. Failure of leadership & strategy.
Players were picked who didn't even make the initial 30, yet played pivotal roles. Other players were picked in the squad but clearly never trusted to play a game. So no idea how to select a squad. Incompetence.
Literally just making it up as he tried to muddle through the tournament & presume to somehow beat the actually professional sides this way. Maybe you can fluke a win or two, but you won't beat good sides regularly time & again that way.
It was shambolic from start to end.
There is no objective way any person could consider that a professional managerial success in the most important single project in a 4 year cycle.
It would be only Pakistan then who would extend Mickey after that. He's a nice guy, he cares & he tries but his outcomes were pathetic.
You have to get him away . He has made some drastic mistakes , which are not expected from Head Coach of International Team. Tactic to play one spinner in UAE and loosing to Lanka , and then in next match still being adamant about that , shows his lack of tactic.
You have to get him away . He has made some drastic mistakes , which are not expected from Head Coach of International Team. Tactic to play one spinner in UAE and loosing to Lanka , and then in next match still being adamant about that , shows his lack of tactic.
How do you 'produce' a good or bad fielding side?
Middle order criticism is correct, the management gave Haris Sohail one chance and 4 and immediately fell back to the failed seniors after that, there is no justification for such poor decision-making. Regarding the quicks, the only strange decision was omitting Shinwari despite investing so many matches in him. Hasan, Shaheen and Amir were considered the main focal points of the attack, Shaheen struggled to find the right lengths initially but got it right, while the faith in Amir was repaid. Hasan was the only real disappointment.
It is indeed true that failure to play the best XI cost us and I was very disappointed to see that no one asked Mickey or Sarfaraz about why Haris and Shaheen were dropped so quickly despite their stellar performances in the past 18 months or so.
If you followed the build up to the tournament, quite a few captains mentioned the early 10.30AM starts and they were expecting batting conditions to be difficult early on in the first innings, thus a few teams initially opted for the chasing method. However, once the variation in pitches was realised, teams eventually switched to a runs on the board strategy. It's not about silly ideas, it's the correct thought process but the conclusions didn't pay off, that happens in sport.
None of the wins against New Zealand, England, South Africa or Bangladesh were flukes. If anything, the fluke was against the weakest side that we beat, Afghanistan. There was a method to all the other wins. You don't just turn up and manage to beat England and New Zealand any day, as India's matches showed.
The main concerns about Mickey relate to Test matches, and probably the biggest issue is his lack of knowledge with regards to spinners, it will be difficult to overcome that. The batting problems can be overcome once this lot gains more experience. As with the ODI team, the Test team has suffered due to under-performing seniors.
You "produce" a bad fielding side by allowing an effective coach to leave & then presiding over deteriorating standards during your tenure & then dropping the ball- literally- at the biggest show in town. As hed coach, you own the results in all departments or you fix it. There are no more excuses or anyone else to blame. It's not about working harder- it's about getting the RIGHT training from the right person to improve. Smarter not harder. Although looking at the team, they don't look like they've been working very hard to me.
Ok, fine. Keep muddling on without a plan & under weak leadership. Then occasional fluke wins will happen. But consistent success doesn't follow when the leadership clearly cannot plan & have no clue themselves what the team should be doing- as demonstrated by my examples above. That's what I mean by fluke- sure beat some teams on your day but never be a team capable of reliably showing up & turning out performances good enough to beat good teams regularly.
Mickey had nothing to do with Rixon leaving or staying, that was in PCB's hands. I'm sure he would have liked him to continue, but there were some difference between PCB and Rixon. If you're putting it all on the Head Coach then I'm not sure what purpose Grant Bradburn serves.
Consistent success will come when the team matures and manages to play at a high standard on a regular basis. Currently, many of the players are in their first few years of international cricket, while the ones who can be called experienced aren't very good, barring Amir and maybe Wahab.
This excuse making is exactly why the team is where it is. Even the head coach isn't held to account. Mickey is a senior international coach- if he's serious, he gets the coaching team he wants or he walks. Or he ensures a suitable replacement is found. Not fail to deliver (to the point of being the WORST team in the entire comp, including teams who are true minnows) in a major tournament because he let one of the games 3 pillars slide.
Again, you don't get to use the "young team" excuse when you are head coach of a team of which you had 3-4 years to prepare & select. It's the WC. You take your best players & a team you think can win. It's not a development tour.
If you take out Hasnain - which arguably he should have since he didn't use him- then Pakistan is the same age on avg as every other team at the cup.
The performance was a shambles at every stage. Poor selection, strategy & awful fielding. All coachable elements, all management issues. Like I said, only in Pakistan would this guy be discussed as being extended based on that.
Not fail to deliver (to the point of being the WORST team in the entire comp, including teams who are true minnows) in a major tournament because he let one of the games 3 pillars slide.
Are we talking about this years competition, i'm confused?
I don't quite get what people were expecting, overall we finished joint fourth behind India, England, Aus, and NZ. That is where we are at the moment we have one world class player in Babar Azam i don't know what you expect the coach to do, looking a the squad if anything we overachieved this world cup.
This excuse making is exactly why the team is where it is. Even the head coach isn't held to account. Mickey is a senior international coach- if he's serious, he gets the coaching team he wants or he walks. Or he ensures a suitable replacement is found. Not fail to deliver (to the point of being the WORST team in the entire comp, including teams who are true minnows) in a major tournament because he let one of the games 3 pillars slide.
Again, you don't get to use the "young team" excuse when you are head coach of a team of which you had 3-4 years to prepare & select. It's the WC. You take your best players & a team you think can win. It's not a development tour.
If you take out Hasnain - which arguably he should have since he didn't use him- then Pakistan is the same age on avg as every other team at the cup.
The performance was a shambles at every stage. Poor selection, strategy & awful fielding. All coachable elements, all management issues. Like I said, only in Pakistan would this guy be discussed as being extended based on that.
I think he simply deserves a better captain than Sarfaraz. Wasn’t he the head coach when Pak got the Test Mace?
That's exactly right.
The reason our UAE streak is resting in pieces is because Captain Fantastic couldn't even produce 27 frickin' runs in two Abu Dhabi runchases vs SL and NZ.
Yet his fans make him out to be the Asian Clive Lloyd and supposedly best captain since IK ! Only in lala land !
Rixon had a falling out with the PCB. How on earth does Mickey come into the picture? I don't follow, unless you're saying that Mickey should have put his foot down with... who exactly? Force Rixon to stay? How?
I think it is pretty much confirm arthur will get extension till t20 worldcup 2019
Unless there is another candidate with alot more credentials