Major
T20I Star
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Runs
- 31,803
- Post of the Week
- 7
When Sarfraz Ahmed was removed from the team due to poor performance, he was still kept in the team only because he was from a particular region and so that his fans from that region don't get upset. There was media pressure.
Alot of hue and cry was made when Sarfraz Ahmad was the water boy, and the media did not like this at all.
For the first time ever, we saw that while Rizwan would get all the initial games of a series, Sarfraz Ahmed would than replace him or someone else in the team in the last game of every series. Even though Rizwan was performing with both bat and gloves. Sarfraz Ahmed, who was not performing, was being given the gloves while Rizwan was made to field.
Now that Rizwan was dropped due to poor performance from the test 11, and Sarfraz Ahmed has performed in a game for now, should Rizwan get the same treatment?
Shouldn't Rizwan now play the last test game based on the standards that were made for Sarfraz?
I understand its wrong, but when we created these standards for one player, than why not the other?
Alot of hue and cry was made when Sarfraz Ahmad was the water boy, and the media did not like this at all.
For the first time ever, we saw that while Rizwan would get all the initial games of a series, Sarfraz Ahmed would than replace him or someone else in the team in the last game of every series. Even though Rizwan was performing with both bat and gloves. Sarfraz Ahmed, who was not performing, was being given the gloves while Rizwan was made to field.
Now that Rizwan was dropped due to poor performance from the test 11, and Sarfraz Ahmed has performed in a game for now, should Rizwan get the same treatment?
Shouldn't Rizwan now play the last test game based on the standards that were made for Sarfraz?
I understand its wrong, but when we created these standards for one player, than why not the other?
