Flat_Track_Bully
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2015
- Runs
- 6,618
Time to drop Naseem again 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
135 avg discounting the slower onesWhat are his speeds? I did not pay attention
Ball is moving, they just need to pitch in good length. Shaheen tried slower ball in his first over, Naseem was all over the place and also tried short ball.Typical Naseem. Trying something every ball rather than sticking to good areas
They do not seem to learn which is so frustrating after all these yearsBall is moving, they just need to pitch in good length. Shaheen tried slower ball in his first over, Naseem was all over the place and also tried short ball.
They need to learn to be patient.
Naseem has talent. Much higher ceiling and clutch than this brainlessTime to drop Naseem again![]()
Probably talking about Pakistani fast bowling stocksMy pcb stream ain’t working, says no content available.
Babar is 9 runs away from being AT top scorer in T20I! We have 7 centuries total in the format if I am not wrong and Babar has 3 of them!


Is this the 35 averaging Naseem you are talking about? The one who has among the worst average in T20 cricket? Rauf averages 21.Naseem has talent. Much higher ceiling and clutch than this brainless
Rauf who humiliated us on the big stage so many times.

Ramiz: Saim has been a "Massias" (tries to say Messiah)

Saim is well on his way into transitioning into an inferior Hafeez. Lovely
Hafeez played in an era when bilateral cricket was not devalued as it is nowInferior? lol.
It took Hafeez a decade for him to even find his footings in international cricket and could barely bat in SENA conditions. Saim Ayub centuries in SA alone is more than Hafeez ever had in his entire ODI career vs SENA.
Naseem has clutched out games. Rauf is a bottler.Is this the 35 averaging Naseem you are talking about? The one who has among the worst average in T20 cricket? Rauf averages 21.
You are very particular about pointing out average when talking about Rizbar. Now average doesn't matter but "ceiling" does?


I absolutely enjoy your rona donaDosti Yaari we are back!
The fact that Usman Khan is playing ahead of Rizwan is making my blood boil. Azam Khan, usman Khan, Harris....our legacy is being buried by the clowns.Message to pakistan cricket bosses. Unfairly kick out Riz and bad luck will be your muqaddar forever.
QDK the ODI and test batsman is better thoughView attachment 159061
Just checked cricinfo as I am in transit and viewers know their cricket @Ahmed216 @gazza619 @Raja Ishtiaq @heddie19
That is a difference of 1.4%A difference of 0.7%, calm down lad.
Test I would agree. ODI is Babar's format. He is the Original there, QDK is not far behind though. Hard to rate QDK ahead of Babar in ODIs when Babar was instrumental in 2017 CT and SA have won zilch.QDK the ODI and test batsman is better though
If trophy is the parameter it makes Babar better than ABD too.Test I would agree. ODI is Babar's format. He is the Original there, QDK is not far behind though. Hard to rate QDK ahead of Babar in ODIs when Babar was instrumental in 2017 CT and SA have won zilch.
That is a difference of 1.4%. Not surprised you struggle with counting
![]()


With SA bowlers and the Pindi pitch honestly we should be chasing 200+ with ease here. Especially as two dynamic batsmen have replaced RizBar, even 250 should be chased with Farhan being a big hitter as he showed in AC.
But the difference between the 2 is 1.4%, if a team wins a 4 match series 3-1, you don't say the difference was 1. I won't respond to the vile name calling - just showing the typical Roterham class.0.7% makes it 50/50
Already ruled out from the seriesWhere's Mphaka who had Babars number in the series back in SA
