- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 217,977
A badly hurt Indian Test squad would be looking for revenge or will they wilt under the pressure?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rahul and Rahane in, vj, pujara and kohli to bat for longer periods no other change is needed.
Centurion is a Bowl first wicket in general. Morris replacing Styen and rest same for SAF.
in the context of that match (low score to chase, and team being blown away) it was an encourage innings. not sure if it will count for much in a new game.Kohli showed some spark in his last inning. He was trying to score from every delivery putting bowlers under the pressure before finally getting out. This is the right approach in these conditions. Rahul and Rahane too can attack if needed.
Murali on the other hand looks terrible with his new technical adjustment of shuffling across the crease. Not sure why needed to do it.
This is one of the result assured ground
SA has only lost only 2 out of 22 test matches here at centurion
Fast bowlers would love to bowl here....3 years back johnson scalps 12 wickets here and in last series against england rabada took 13
How about batting, Has Amla or AB scored big here?
Amla's star in limping a bit....Don't expect much from him in this series.
He lost that consistency but might score big in 1 test atleast
I hope this goes like the India-Aus series where we lost the first Test with a similar performance (abysmal batting) but came back to win the series. The difference of course is that against Aus the batsmen fell to spin, whereas against SA we have a more difficult problem of overcoming their pace bowlers.
We did outscore SA in the second innings, which is a positive sign.
I hope this goes like the India-Aus series where we lost the first Test with a similar performance (abysmal batting) but came back to win the series. The difference of course is that against Aus the batsmen fell to spin, whereas against SA we have a more difficult problem of overcoming their pace bowlers.
We did outscore SA in the second innings, which is a positive sign.
I hope this goes like the India-Aus series where we lost the first Test with a similar performance (abysmal batting) but came back to win the series. The difference of course is that against Aus the batsmen fell to spin, whereas against SA we have a more difficult problem of overcoming their pace bowlers.
We did outscore SA in the second innings, which is a positive sign.
It seems all 4 benched players had an extensive net session.
Rahul and Rahane are the obvious picks. I just hope Kohli doesn't persist with Dhawan because of the left-right bull-crap.
Bumrah certainly has done enough to play at Centurion. However I do think Ishant should come in for Shami despite that spell on Day 4 morning, Shami hasn't shown the discipline India require. Something Ishant has mastered in the last 12-14 months.
Rahul
Vijay
Pujara
Kohli
Rahane
Saha
Hardik
Ashwin
Bhuvi
Ishant
Bumrah
If the pitch won't aide spin at all, might as well just pick Rohit over Ashwin. We anyway didn't need him at Cape Town which was supposed to be the only pitch on this tour where a spinner could come in handy.
Mohammad Shami is India's best pace bowler. Can't you guys hope that Kohli plays your best players for once instead of proven failures like Ishant Sharma?
How about batting, Has Amla or AB scored big here?
I feel the Indians would be much better off dropping Ashwin for Rahane and bringing Rahul in for Rohit. A little unorthodox but batting is, and always has been, India's strength. Better to back that and at least draw this test than try to go toe to toe with the South Africans' bowling and lose. Dhawan deserves another go because if he gets going, he can take the Saffers apart. My team would be:
1) Vijay
2) Dhawan
3) Pujara
4) Rahane
5) Kohli (c)
6) Rahul
7) Saha (wk)
8) Pandya
9) Shami
10) Kumar
11) Ishant
Four pacers should be enough bowling in South African conditions. Ashwin and Maharaj had nothing to do in the first test and it is likely that the same will be the case in Centurion. Kohli and Rohit are also decent-enough part-timers.
Indeed possible, but I think, there is another difference apart from spin - that series was at home, this one in SAF.
It's Amla and AB's favourite venue in SA, I think Amla has 1700+ runs @60, AB 1200 @60+ as well IIRC. The latter is the third leading run scorer behind Kallis, while the former is the leading run scorer.
I'd replace Steyn with Morris, India's bowling attack requires an extra bat.
I'm tempted by this aggressive approach Gibson and Faf are taking. Take 20 wickets and worry about the runs later. But Ngidi is coming back from a serious injury and has mostly played T20's.
Organise a gig for him in County Cricket (I'm sure Gibson has contacts there), if he proves his fitness unleash him in the summer against Pakistan. I'd be tempted to include him for the Lanka away tour, but that's too soon. Let's ease him in to Test cricket.
I hope this goes like the India-Aus series where we lost the first Test with a similar performance (abysmal batting) but came back to win the series. The difference of course is that against Aus the batsmen fell to spin, whereas against SA we have a more difficult problem of overcoming their pace bowlers.
We did outscore SA in the second innings, which is a positive sign.
There is a reason to play Rohit if lateral movement is not going to be too much.
Indeed possible, but I think, there is another difference apart from spin - that series was at home, this one in SAF.
For the sake of excitement I hope India wins this. No one wants the 3rd test to be dead rubber.
On topic India have never been white washed in SA before so hoping they comply with the tradition in this game.
Its not like host players scored hundreds at will. No player can score consistently on that sort of surface.
Morris last I saw him was not really quick enough to trouble Indian Batsmen but handy with the bat. Does he get in the air or off the pitch movement ?
The difference between the both sides is not that much. SA batting is pretty weak .
India need to make sure there top order scores , if they do , Indian bowling can get wickets.
Another thing, the first Test against Australia was a blow out loss for India, with the combined scores of two innings (105 and 107) for India being less than both individual innings for Australia (260 and 285). From that hammering to win 2 of the 3 remaining games and close to winning the 3rd was fantastic. Hoping for a similar turnaround this series.
Not only against Australia, but also against England we started the series slow before picking up momentum.
Why are we guys even discussing this?
Centurion is known to be the bounciest pitches in the country and India lost by an innings last time we played (with the star batting line up)
The only time SA lost here in recent times is when they ran into Johnson who breathed fire with 12 wickets.
Rabada took 13 wickets against England last time. I shudder to think what he would do against India.
To add to that, I guess SA may want to scar India a bit more and give Lungi Ngidi a debut who also clocks 145-150 kph.
Only solace for India could be that there shouldn't be too much lateral movement, so all India may have to do is handle the bounce.
India may drop Rohit and bring in Rahane and would want Ashwin to bat at 6 or 7. Truth to be told, Ash showed decent technique, as he did in England
There is a reason to play Rohit if lateral movement is not going to be too much.
He's not India's best pacer, Bhuvi is. At least based on last 6 months form.
Shami was atrocious on day 1, totally let SA off the hook after the start Bhuvi provided. After so many games, least you expect from a bowler is control.
Would love to see Lungi Ngidi(is in the squad), he is another 145+ bowler. It will be a black player to replace Steyn to get the quota average right after end of the season
Bhuvi is trundler you will see that on road pitches. He has luck that he gets only green top to play for in test matches. Yes he is far more consistent but on flat roads there no comparison between bhuvi and shami.
Bhuvi is no way our best bowler in test cricket and he won't get this kind of helpful pitches all around world. Won't take alot time to see him trundling in 120's in aus on highways.
KL Rahul to replace Shikhar Dhawan for 2nd Test; Rohit may get another chance
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...y-get-another-chance/articleshow/62452928.cms
You do him a great disservice, Kumar is an excellent bowler and more consistent than Shami in all conditions.
How dumb can the team manegement be?![]()
Bear in mind that South Africa played the last Test over the maximum quota of White players they are allowed to select.
It was the only way to get both De Villiers and Steyn into the side, but the political masters are furious that one of only two black players - Temba Bavuma - was dropped to incorporate De Villiers.
The quota is an annual one, but the omission of Bavuma means that there will be hell to pay in political terms if Morris replaces Steyn.
In addition, let’s assume that the big Australia tour in February-March leads to the white quota continuing to be exceeded. Pakistan will be the tourists in December, and they could be the beneficiaries of race-based selection to try to meet the year-end quotas.
Pakistan aren't going to benefit from nothing just like the Australians didn't benefit when they were beaten black and blue by a Protea side that's keeping in line with the government's radical socio economic transformation. No amount of complaining from clueless individuals is going to change that.
If South Africa keep picking 6 Whites for all seven India and Australia Tests, they may well get to December and find that they can only meet the annual quota by only picking 3 or 4 Whites for the Pakistan Tests. And Mickey Arthur will know that very well!
It’s a serious problem. Let’s be frank: without the quota, Amla and Maharaj would not be in the team in 2018.