What's new

Sri Lanka to ban burqa, shut many Islamic schools: Minister for public security

Varun

Senior Test Player
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Runs
26,111
Post of the Week
1
Sri Lanka will ban the wearing of the burqa and shut more than 1,000 Islamic schools, the latest actions affecting the country’s minority Muslim population.

Minister for Public Security Sarath Weerasekera told a news conference on Saturday that he had signed a paper on Friday for cabinet approval to ban the burqa on “national security” grounds.

A “burqa” is an outer garment that covers the entire body and the face, and is worn by some Muslim women.

“In our early days, Muslim women and girls never wore the burqa,” he said. “It is a sign of religious extremism that came about recently. We are definitely going to ban it.”

The wearing of the burqa in the majority-Buddhist nation was temporarily banned in 2019 after the bombing of churches and hotels by armed fighters that killed more than 250.

The move drew a mixed response, with activists saying the move “violated Muslim women’s right to practise their religion freely”.

Later that year, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, best known for crushing a decades-long insurgency in the north of the country as defence secretary, was elected president after promising a crackdown on extremism.

Rajapaksa is accused of widespread rights abuses during the war, charges he denies.

Weerasekera said the government plans to ban more than 1,000 Islamic schools that he said were flouting national education policy.

“Nobody can open a school and teach whatever you want to the children,” he said.

The government’s moves on burqas and schools follow an order last year mandating the cremation of COVID-19 victims – against the wishes of Muslims, who bury their dead.

This ban was lifted earlier this year after criticism from the United States and international rights groups.

Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/13/sri-lanka-to-ban-burqa-shut-many-islamic-schools
 
Sri Lanka to ban burqas, close over 1,000 Islamic schools

https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...an-burqas-close-1000-islamic-schools-76435802

Sri Lanka on Saturday announced plans to ban the wearing of burqas and said it would close more than 1,000 Islamic schools known as madrassas, citing national security.

Minister of Public Security Sarath Weerasekara said he signed a paper on Friday seeking the approval of the Cabinet of Ministers to ban burqas — outer garments that cover the body and face worn by some Muslim women.

“The burqa has a direct impact on national security,” Weerasekara told a ceremony at a Buddhist temple on Saturday, without elaborating.

“In our early days, we had a lot of Muslim friends, but Muslim women and girls never wore the burqa," Weerasekara said, according to video footage sent by his ministry. “It is a sign of religious extremism that came about recently. We will definitely ban it.”

The wearing of burqas was temporarily banned in 2019 after the Easter Sunday bomb attacks on churches and hotels in Sri Lanka that killed more than 260 people. Two local Muslim groups that had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group have been blamed for the attacks at six locations — two Roman Catholic churches, one Protestant church and three top hotels.

Weerasekara also said the government will ban more than 1,000 Madrassas, saying they are not registered with the authorities and do not follow the national education policy.

The decision to ban burqas and madrassas is the latest move affecting the Indian Ocean island nation's minority Muslims.

Muslims make up about 9% of the 22 million people in Sri Lanka, where Buddhists account for more than 70% of the population. Ethnic minority Tamils, who are mainly Hindus, comprise about 15% of the population.
 
I am completely blindsided by this move. I remember a few years ago some terrorists bombed churches on Easter day - I wonder that provided the impetus for this move.

Any Sri Lankan posters - can you please shed light on the reason why this ban is being talked about now?

As far as banning madrassas is concerned - it appears if they register with the national authorities - in theory - it appears they can come back.
 
Last edited:
Where ever they maybe be banned - they probably won't be banned in India anytime soon. Say for example a place like Hyderabad - it is almost impossible to implement it.

What ,why would they implement it? What would be the justification to ban it in India?
 
Dumb move. Who cares how a woman chooses to dress? They are right in going after the madrassas where kids don't learn anything that's useful for a good career. How many maulvis do you need anyway? The rest of the kids should be taught math, science etc so they can atleast have a career. By going after insignificant things like burqa they will push the minorities further into isolation.
 
Dumb move. Who cares how a woman chooses to dress? They are right in going after the madrassas where kids don't learn anything that's useful for a good career. How many maulvis do you need anyway? The rest of the kids should be taught math, science etc so they can atleast have a career. By going after insignificant things like burqa they will push the minorities further into isolation.

No one cares as long as it doesn't affect others. If it does, the regulations will come in to play.
 
I think Burqas will eventually be banned worldwide.

Most places.

On what basis you came to this conclusion? Other than France, i havent heard of a single country doing it and there are more than 100 countries in the world. The strength of "Islamic" terrorism is also gone after ISIS was destroyed. The world faces more danger from a nuclear fallout between Pakistan/India, India/China, USA/China.
 
No one cares as long as it doesn't affect others. If it does, the regulations will come in to play.

How does a womens wear affect others? Most of the times it's portrayed as if the women are forced to wear by men. There's this perception that women are being liberated if the burqa is banned But poll after poll shows that's what the women like to wear. Governments should stay away from these silly notions.
 
On what basis you came to this conclusion? Other than France, i havent heard of a single country doing it and there are more than 100 countries in the world. The strength of "Islamic" terrorism is also gone after ISIS was destroyed. The world faces more danger from a nuclear fallout between Pakistan/India, India/China, USA/China.

Burqas should be worn by every woman in india. it liberates them from the x ray scanning gaze of indian men.
 
Except Pakistan and USA.

Religious freedom will always be there in USA.

Please dont forget Canada, the land of the free. Even better than USA in this regard. Canada is the new land of the free with amazing humans like Justin Treadue leading them.
 
Please dont forget Canada, the land of the free. Even better than USA in this regard. Canada is the new land of the free with amazing humans like Justin Treadue leading them.

canada is good despite trudeau, the ultimate virtue signaller and leader of the wokes.
 
What ,why would they implement it? What would be the justification to ban it in India?

That is exactly what I said too. I do not see burqa being banned in India. Even if in theory they get banned - it will never be implemented.
 
Right on the 2nd anniversary of the Christchurch massacre

Good point, doesn't seem like a coincidence. I would have thought it would have coincided with that disastrous Sri Lankan terror attack.

While I always think less faith schools are a good thing, this is unfair if it disproportionately affects Muslims.
 
Looks like the Chinese influence in Sri Lanka could be starting to take shape.. We all know how much Chinese loves Muslims in their country..
 
Looks like the Chinese influence in Sri Lanka could be starting to take shape.. We all know how much Chinese loves Muslims in their country..

lol this is had nothing to do with china but buddhist radicalism. Anti-Muslim Pogroms were already going on Sri Lanka as far back as 2011/2012, I remember there being many reports of Buddhist extremists attacking Muslims in Sri Lanka back then. You can even ask Tamil rights activists, the Sri Lankan state has been strongly advocating for Sinhalese Buddhist identity since the end of civil war and it's the extremist that even discriminat against Tamil Hindus.
 
The burqa in South Asia is an Arab import anyway.
 
On what basis you came to this conclusion? Other than France, i havent heard of a single country doing it and there are more than 100 countries in the world. The strength of "Islamic" terrorism is also gone after ISIS was destroyed. The world faces more danger from a nuclear fallout between Pakistan/India, India/China, USA/China.

I don't disagree.

I am saying its the natural progression.

The world will eventually move towards complete CCTV surveillance and burqa will stand in the way which will lead to it slowly being abolished everywhere.
 
Looks like the Chinese influence in Sri Lanka could be starting to take shape.. We all know how much Chinese loves Muslims in their country..

There is a verse in the Quran which specifically mentions all kafirs will join together against Muslims, so the Sri Lankans govt, Chinese authorities and yourself would be understandably all together on this issue. I will dig it out for you later on if you like.
 
Sri Lanka said on Tuesday a call to ban the wearing of the burqa was “merely a proposal”, following criticism from regional allies ahead of a crucial United Nations vote on human rights in the island nation.

Sri Lanka’s minister for public security, Sarath Weerasekera, said on Saturday it would “definitely” ban the full-face covering worn by some Muslim women on national security grounds, pending cabinet approval.

But the foreign ministry said on Tuesday a decision had not yet been taken on what it described as “merely a proposal [...] under discussion”.

“The government will initiate a broader dialogue with all parties concerned and sufficient time will be taken for necessary consultations to be held and for consensus to be reached,” it said in a statement.

Muslims make up around a tenth of the population in majority-Buddhist Sri Lanka.

The statement follows criticism from Pakistan’s ambassador to Sri Lanka, Saad Khattak, who said in a tweet on Monday a ban “will only serve as injury to the feelings of ordinary Sri Lankan Muslims and Muslims across the globe”.

Ahmed Shaheed, a Maldivian diplomat currently serving as the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, said a ban was incompatible with international laws that protect religious belief and freedom of expression.

Several Muslim-majority countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh, are among the 47 nations that will vote on Sri Lanka’s human rights record at a United Nations session in Geneva next week.

A UN resolution passed against Sri Lanka could allow for prosecutions of government and military officials involved in ending a decades-long civil war in 2009, and Colombo is sensitive to anything that may impact voting there, according to a person familiar with the developments.

Almost a third of the 47 nations are members of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, which last year criticised a Sri Lankan policy to forcibly cremate coronavirus victims in the country, in violation of the Islamic tradition of burial.

The policy was repealed last month.

DAWN
 
There is a verse in the Quran which specifically mentions all kafirs will join together against Muslims, so the Sri Lankans govt, Chinese authorities and yourself would be understandably all together on this issue. I will dig it out for you later on if you like.

That would be great CAP if you can dig it up,, I assume there will also be a war with the Gazhwe E Hind (Sorry if I spelt it wrong), with Pakistan commanding the Islamic army? .
 
Masks also can be security threat . How many crimes have been committed with burqa , and how many with masks ?

of course masks can be security threat because they cover nose and mouth. So logical that burqa can be even more security threat as they cover much more.
 
of course masks can be security threat because they cover nose and mouth. So logical that burqa can be even more security threat as they cover much more.

My point is that if security is the reason, then it should be same with mask , if security is not the reason , something else is , it should be mentioned honestly.
 
My point is that if security is the reason, then it should be same with mask , if security is not the reason , something else is , it should be mentioned honestly.

If you see it as binary, then yes both are equal threats, but if you see it as spectrum then mask will be of lower security threat than burqa. I think this is fallout of the Easter bomb blasts in SL. Don't support it, but I am not a sri lankan neither am a muslim, so no skin in the game eitherways.
 
Never a fan of banning any kind of dress or headgear as long as they can show their face on request.

You cannot enforce any kind of dress code on people. It is regressive and undemocratic.
 
Never a fan of banning any kind of dress or headgear as long as they can show their face on request.

You cannot enforce any kind of dress code on people. It is regressive and undemocratic.

If anything, it's the more hardline Muslim nations - the Saudi Arabias and Irans of this world - who enforce a dress code.

Sri Lanka and France aren't doing that. Enforcing a dress code would mean them asking all women of the land to wear a saree or long skirts like the aforementioned nations.
 
If anything, it's the more hardline Muslim nations - the Saudi Arabias and Irans of this world - who enforce a dress code.

Sri Lanka and France aren't doing that. Enforcing a dress code would mean them asking all women of the land to wear a saree or long skirts like the aforementioned nations.

Enforcing Burqa is same as banning it completely. Both are wrong. People need to have the freedom to choose what they want to wear. It should be an individual decision. Government should keep out of it.
 
Enforcing Burqa is same as banning it completely. Both are wrong. People need to have the freedom to choose what they want to wear. It should be an individual decision. Government should keep out of it.

Both are right in their own way. Enforcing burqa saves women from male gaze, and should be done in countries like india. banning burqa is fine in western countries where they think seeing others face is a basic right.
 
Sri lanka is a border line dictatorship country with grave human rights violations. I never understand the blind love for Sri lanka among the Pakistanis.
 
Please dont forget Canada, the land of the free. Even better than USA in this regard. Canada is the new land of the free with amazing humans like Justin Treadue leading them.

Lol i live in canada, its far from free. Infact as things are going we are becoming more of a socialist/communist state.

Trudeau has royaly destoryed canadas economy. His 2 year tenure has been worse then harper.

Probably the worst PM in my eyes ever. And one of the dumbest.
 
Both are right in their own way. Enforcing burqa saves women from male gaze, and should be done in countries like india. banning burqa is fine in western countries where they think seeing others face is a basic right.

Its because not all cultures all equal...
 
Lol i live in canada, its far from free. Infact as things are going we are becoming more of a socialist/communist state.

Trudeau has royaly destoryed canadas economy. His 2 year tenure has been worse then harper.

Probably the worst PM in my eyes ever. And one of the dumbest.

Whats wrong in being socialist? Canada is after all a welfare state and keeps human lives first. I am not sure about his economic performance but his pro immigration and pro human approach is what makes me like him.
 
Whats wrong in being socialist? Canada is after all a welfare state and keeps human lives first. I am not sure about his economic performance but his pro immigration and pro human approach is what makes me like him.

You must be naive. World isnt a nice place, and the fact he didnt prioritize canadians first shows that he doesnt care about canada.

Pro immigration would be good if there were jobs being created. Pro human? We live in the 21 century he isnt pro human, he is pro self image.

Economics matters more then anything else. The fact that he destroyed our economy, loss of jobs, more reliance on handouts.

Have you read history? What socialist state has ever been successful? Same with communist...

Dont say sweden they are a CAPITLISTIC STATE FIRST with some socialist tendicies.

Everytime someone says what wrong with socialism shows their lack of knowledge in history.

Canada has become a welfare state, we were a capitalist country with some socialist tendencies. But have been infiltrated by literal socialist idiots.

Socialism will never work because there will always be corruption since we are dealing with corruptable humans...

You clearly have a very simple view of world. I suggest you read some history.
 
Slim,

It all comes down to control, right now we have freedom.

Once you start taking handouts ita good game, all your freedoms will be limited, you will jave limited spending power.
If your thinking doesnt align with them you will face consequences.

Capistalism gives the avg man power. While socialism and communism takea that power away and put it in a few corrupt peoples hands.

Who will make every decision for you.
 
Sri lanka is a border line dictatorship country with grave human rights violations. I never understand the blind love for Sri lanka among the Pakistanis.

Perhaps they share some common culture, from your description I think it would be a fair assumption.
 
Is this due to external pressure from other countries?
 
An authoritarian move. As a liberal, this disappoints.
 
Disgusting people! How ironic when they say wearing the burqa is a sign of religious extremism when they are the ones planning extreme measures. No one is buying their rubbish, it's just plain out hate.

If Sri Lanka goes through with this, Muslim nations should boycott Sri Lanka as this is a direct attack on Muslims and their freedom to practice their religion.
 
Has the Messiah fired off a tweet yet? He needs to hurry up; the world is waiting!
 
Disgusting people! How ironic when they say wearing the burqa is a sign of religious extremism when they are the ones planning extreme measures. No one is buying their rubbish, it's just plain out hate.

If Sri Lanka goes through with this, Muslim nations should boycott Sri Lanka as this is a direct attack on Muslims and their freedom to practice their religion.

100% agree...if u can walk around naked why can't u cover yourself fully? If they ban it they should wear a mask and cover that way.
 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1630503/sri-lanka-investigates-troops-over-humiliation-of-muslims

Sri Lanka's military launched an investigation on Sunday after social media posts showed soldiers forcing minority Muslims to kneel in the streets as a punishment for flouting lockdown rules.

Armed troops ordered Muslim civilians to raise their hands in the air while kneeling on a road in the town of Eravur, about 300 kilometres east of the capital, Colombo.

Local residents said they considered the order to be degrading and humiliating, while officials acknowledged that troops had no power to mete out such punishments.

The victims were on their way to two restaurants to buy food.

“An initial Military Police investigation has already commenced after certain photos went viral depicting an alleged harassment in the Eravur area,” the army said in a statement.

It said the officer in charge had been removed and the soldiers involved ordered to leave the town.

“The army will adopt the strictest disciplinary action against all errant army personnel,” the military added, in a rare display of willingness to investigate its own.

Sri Lanka is under a month-long lockdown to contain a third wave of coronavirus infections.

The number of deaths from the virus has increased more than fourfold to 2,531 since the start of the wave in mid-April.

The military, which is facing allegations of war crimes in a decades-long Tamil separatist war that ended in 2009, has been deployed to help police and health authorities enforce virus restrictions.

Successive governments have denied that troops killed around 40,000 civilians in the final stages of the separatist war, which claimed more than 100,000 lives in total between 1972 and 2009.
 
Back
Top