What's new

Sri Lanka's Muslims 'demonised' after Easter bombings

JaDed

Test Star
Joined
May 5, 2014
Runs
38,484
Until a few months ago, Mohammed Iliyas, was doing a thriving business in his hardware shop in western Sri Lanka. Now trade has plummeted and his losses are mounting.

His shop stocks everything from paint tins to electric bulbs and is one of the better known in and around Kottaramulla village, about 90 kilometres (56 miles) from the capital Colombo.

Minority Muslims live among the majority Sinahalese community in this area. For decades, Mr Iliyas, who is a Muslim, spent his days serving people from all religious communities.

But that has changed since Sri Lanka's Easter Sunday bombings in April.

"Since the Easter Sunday bombings, almost 90% of my Sinhalese customers have stopped buying from my shop. My business has gone down significantly and I have lost hundreds of thousands of rupees," Mr Iliyas said.

Islamists linked to little-known local groups targeted high-end hotels and churches in Colombo and in the east of the country killing more than 250 people, including foreigners. The devastating attack, claimed by the Islamic State group, shocked the nation.

"Though some customers have started coming back in recent weeks it is not enough. If this trend continues then I am in big trouble," Mr Iliyas said.

Many Muslims feel that since the suicide bombings they have been demonised, and traders from the community say that they have become a target.

There have been attacks on Muslim-owned businesses and houses in several parts of Sri Lanka, with the worst violence in May.

In June, a senior Buddhist monk openly called on the Sinhalese people not to buy from Muslim shops, prompting strong criticism from Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera, who urged "true Buddhists" to unite against what he described as the "Talibanisation" of the religion.

Ethnic and religious fault lines run deep in a multi-ethnic and multi-religious Sri Lanka. Muslims make up nearly 10% of Sri Lanka's 22 million people, who are predominantly Sinhalese Buddhists.

About 12% of the population are Hindus, mostly from the ethnic Tamil minority, and 7% are Christians.

The Sri Lanka bombings killed more than 250 people on Easter Sunday
The country endured a brutal civil war that ended in 2009 with the total defeat of the separatist Tamil Tiger rebels. Tens of thousands of people were killed in the nearly three decade-long conflict. Nearly ten years of relative peace was shattered on Easter Sunday.

Muslims across the island have denounced the senseless killings. But their outright rejection of violence and condemnation hasn't satisfied a section of Sinhalese hardliners. Initially, their anger was directed at those that follow the hard-line Wahhabi form of Islam.

Now Muslim leaders say that the entire community is facing retaliation. They feel that Sri Lanka's mainstream politicians and the security forces are indifferent to violence against them. The government says it has increased security to control communal tensions.

Sri Lanka attacks: What led to carnage?

"My brother was killed just outside the house by a Sinhalese mob who were vandalising Muslim properties in June this year. We are not sure whether we will get justice," said Mohamed Najeem, who lives in north-western Sri Lanka's Puttalam district.

Police say that two people have been arrested in connection with the killing of Najeem's brother, Mohamed Ameer Mohamed Sally, and investigations continue.

Muslim women wearing traditional Islamic dress were also targeted after Easter Sunday as the government banned face coverings in public, citing security reasons.

Though the niqab and burka - which cover most or all of the face and are worn by some Muslim women - were not specifically named, rights groups say even those wearing head scarves have been harassed.

"Muslim women working in government offices are facing problems. In some places, those who are wearing only headscarves are being asked to go home and come back wearing a saree," said Juwairiya Mohideen, director of the Muslim Women Development Trust.

Some Sinhalese women refuse to sit next to Muslim women wearing the traditional Abaya - a long loose-fitting robe - on public buses, she said.

Buddhist monk Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero has been accused of fanning the flames of hatred against Muslims
Community representatives say actions including boycotts of Muslim businesses are in part driven by the messages of local Buddhist clergy, who are in turn inspired by senior monks.

One monk accused of triggering anti-Muslim sentiments in the past is Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero, leader of the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) or "Buddhist Power Force", a nationalist group.

"No organisation has asked people not to buy from Muslim shops. People are doing it on their own, we have nothing to do with it," he said.

President Maithripala Sirisena pardoned the monk in May this year, freeing him from prison after he had served less than a year of a six-year prison term for contempt of court.

Where is the Islamic State group still active?

"The Muslim community will have to discuss among themselves and find answers. We don't say that all the Muslims are involved in violence… But Muslim businessmen should find out those who are supporting hardline Islam and expose them," the BBS leader said.

But Muslim leaders said the monk should question his own views. "He must stop pontificating to us. He must turn the search light inwards," said Rauff Hakeem, the leader of the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress and a minister in the government.

He said Muslims were willing to engage in serious introspection to find out where things went wrong in the community and they were already doing so voluntarily.

"When hate speech emanates from totally unexpected quarters at the high echelons of religious power it is very disappointing and quite disgraceful," said Mr Hakeem.

Media captionBack in May, Sri Lanka's president said IS "chose Sri Lanka to show they exist"
There have been some signs of progress for Sri Lanka's Muslims in recent weeks.

Muslim ministers who resigned in May this year to protest the linking of their entire community with terrorism have been sworn in again as ministers.

A Muslim gynaecologist who was accused of sterilising thousands of Buddhist women against their will has been released on bail.

Dr Mohammed Shafi was taken into custody in May after a Sinhala newspaper published a report making the allegations without any evidence. He was held for several weeks despite the Criminal Investigation Department informing the court that there was no evidence against him.

Some Muslim traders in Colombo's busy Pettah market also said their Sinhalese customers had started coming back, though at a slow pace.

But they were anxious to see how the situation would develop as the country gears up for a presidential election that has to be held by 9 December. National security is expected to be a key political issue.

Muslim leaders fear that anti-Muslim rhetoric will be used for political point-scoring, and to divide communities.

"They should realise this kind of polarisation and demonisation of a community can [actually] create a fertile ground for further radicalisation," warned Mr Hakeem.

Sri Lankan Muslims hope and pray that they will not become a pawn in a bigger political game.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49249146
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been reading about Muslim persecution in Sri Lanka since as far back as 2012, this is just an excuse for the extremists there to antagonize a minority.
 
People are not buying from the shops owned by Muslims, have Lankans shown that after hatred that was directed towards Tamils , the war being over its now being directed towards Muslims?

Reminds me of :

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
 
I've been reading about Muslim persecution in Sri Lanka since as far back as 2012, this is just an excuse for the extremists there to antagonize a minority.

Its the normal people doing it this time, not buying stuff from shops owned by Muslims, not the extremists as such.
 
Rights groups and members of civil society have raised concerns over the continued incarceration of a Muslim lawyer in Sri Lanka, adding that his prolonged detention “had a chilling effect on anyone involved in peaceful dissent and advocacy”.

Hejaaz Hizbullah, a prominent human rights lawyer, was arrested on “terrorism” charges in April and has remained in detention without charges, with rights groups saying he has been denied due process rights.

Bombings, which left more than 250 people dead and injured more than 500 – the Indian Ocean island nation’s worst attack since the end of civil war in 2009.

Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director at Human Rights Watch, said the police had not presented “any credible evidence” against Hizbullah, adding that he was denied his due process rights and kept in custody despite calls from UN experts “that prison populations must be reduced to prevent the spread of COVID-19”.

The president’s spokesperson Mohan Samaranayake did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

Hizbullah, a lawyer at the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, was arrested under the controversial Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), which allows the government to detain suspects without charge and or having to present them before a judge.

“Even though the Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration has said that it does not want to continue its support to the Human Rights Council resolution, the Sri Lankan government remains obliged to keep its pledges, including to repeal PTA, regardless of the party that might be in power,” Ganguly added.

A person can be detained for 90 days under the PTA, with the option to renew the incarceration period for another 90 days for up to 18 months.

The New York-based HRW has dubbed the PTA a “draconian” law, one that the previous Sri Lankan government headed by Maithripala Sirisena pledged to revoke in a 2015 Human Rights Council resolution.

Rights groups have raised concerns over shrinking space for dissent since President Gotabaya Rajapaksa – a Buddhist hardliner – took power last November on the promise to boost security in the island nation in the wake of the deadly bombings.

In August, the HRW said the government of President Gotabaya has waged “a campaign of fear and intimidation against human rights activists, journalists, lawyers, and others challenging government policy”.

According to Thyagi Ruwanpathiran, South Asia researcher at Amnesty International, Hizbullah’s arrest “had a chilling effect on anyone involved in peaceful dissent and advocacy, be it lawyers, human rights defenders or members of the minority Muslim community”.

“There is a real fear of being targeted for your professional work where you could suffer reprisals from the state,” she told Al Jazeera.

The Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists, the European Union and UN Human Rights Core Group on Sri Lanka have also expressed their concerns regarding the arbitrary arrest and detention of Hizbullah.

A local magistrate court in the capital, Colombo, is hearing his case again on October 28, but activists say there is little hope of bail.

‘Pure fabrication’
Of the several accusations made against Hizbullah include his relationship with Yusuf Mohammad Ibrahim, a business owner, whose sons Inshaf and Ilham were two of the seven perpetrators of the Easter Sunday bombings. Hizbullah was Ibrahim’s lawyer.

Hizbullah, along with Ibrahim, also served on the board of the Save the Pearl charity, which works with underprivileged children.

Ilham also served on the board briefly in 2016 briefly, until he was asked to step down, a report by Amnesty International said. According to the human rights group, these associations with Ibrahim and Save the Pearl were being used to detain Hizbullah.

“The detention order says that Hejaaz [Hizbullah] is being investigated for allegedly ‘aiding and abetting’ the Easter Sunday bombers and for engaging in activities deemed ‘detrimental to the religious harmony among communities'”, the Amnesty report said.

Another accusation against Hizbullah is that he indirectly, through a school funded by Save the Pearl, fed “extremist” ideas and thoughts to children between the ages of 8-13, Hafeel Farisz, one of Hizbullah’s lawyers, told Al Jazeera.

The children from Al-Zuhriya Arabic College in Puttalam district were interrogated by the police for several days in April, during which they were threatened and coerced into accusing Hizbullah of providing “terrorist” training, said the lawyer.

Farisz said the children described accusations against Hizbullah as “pure fabrication”.

It was also revealed in the media that the children questioned had filed for legal action against the police for “infringement of their fundamental rights”.

‘Real fear’
Critics say Hizbullah was targeted because of his work on interfaith relations and reconciliation amid rising Islamophobia in the island nation fraught with sectarian and ethnic divide.

Hilmy Ahmed, CEO of Young Asia Television, told Al Jazeera from Colombo that Hizbullah was a “victim of the hate campaign that has been staged-managed by extremist Buddhists”.

“Hejaaz [Hizbullah] is a non-violent and extremely values-based individual who would never promote any form of extremism let alone violence,” Ahmed said, adding he had known the accused for more than 20 years.

Since the Easter bombing, anti-Muslim sentiment has been running high, with rights groups blaming Buddhist nationalists for “hate speech” and “mob violence” against Muslims.

Groups such as Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), a Buddhist far-right group, has been accused behind attacks against Muslims since 2009 when the Sri Lankan forces defeated Tamil separatists, ending a civil war that lasted nearly 30 years.

The BBS has previously successfully run an anti-halal campaign and called for a ban on the burqa, a full-body veil worn by some Muslim women that covers the face as well.

Muslims, who comprise about 10 percent of the population, say they have faced discrimination and hate speech from hardline Buddhist groups, who wield influence in the current governing Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) party led by the Rajapaksa brothers.

Earlier this year, the government decision to cremate Muslims who died of COVID-19, caused anguish in the community, as the traditional Islamic funeral was denied. Families said it was against WHO guidelines and done to harass Muslims, who were blamed for spreading the virus that has killed more than one million people globally

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/10/15/sri-lanka-muslim-lawyer
 
Sri Lanka jails firebrand Buddhist monk for Muslim insults

A Sri Lankan court on Thursday sentenced an influential Buddhist monk to four years’ hard labour for fanning sectarian hatred against the island’s minority Muslim population.

The Colombo High Court found Galagodaatte Gnanasara had hurt Muslims by making disparaging remarks about Islam at a 2016 press conference.

“The monk was sentenced to four years of hard labour and fined 100,000 rupees ($330),” a court official said. “He was sent to prison to start serving his sentence.”

Gnanasara has been accused of instigating violence against Muslims in the Buddhist-majority country, where roughly 10 percent of the 22 million people follow Islam.

He has close ties with Wirathu, an extremist monk based in Myanmar.

This is not the first time that Gnanasara, who once enjoyed powerful political ties, has been in jail.

In 2018, he was sentenced to six years for intimidating the wife of a missing cartoonist and contempt of court but was freed nine months later after former president Maithripala Sirisena pardoned him.

Ex-president Gotabaya Rajapaksa later made Gnanasara the head of a panel to recommend legal reforms to ensure religious harmony.

At the time, opposition lawmaker Shanakiyan Rasamanickam described Gnanasara’s committee as “the definition of irony”.

 
Last edited:
What about National Thowheeth Jama'ath?
or
Jammiyathul Millathu Ibrahim

Non Muslims?
They also do not represent Muslims. If a party is not following ISLAMIC teaching, we as Muslims do not care about their names. Terrorists have no religion.
 
They also do not represent Muslims. If a party is not following ISLAMIC teaching, we as Muslims do not care about their names. Terrorists have no religion.

This isn't going to wash with anyone anymore.

The terrorists were Muslims, whether you accept it or not isn't going to change people's opinion.

What is relevant here is that acts of these people do not represent Islam.

Ofcourse these people will say that killing Kafirs is allowed in Islam.
 
Back
Top