Agree with the bold. India may be probably having the best run among all teams in limited overs cricket history, but it does not excuse missing simple run out or losing 9 wickets in 30 odd runs when playing against India. That was not due to Indian brillance, it was was due to very poor cricket from Pakistan. Pakistan can't control how India plays, but surely control how they play. Before some one says that India bowled well to take 33/9, nah. Bowled well but not that well, it was mostly Pakistani batsmen losing their mind collectively. Harris had no business missing that run out.
I see many posters are saying that run would have not changed much, I beg to differ. Getting a set batsman out and having a new batsman can always create some oppurtunities. I am not saying that Pakistan would have surely won if taken that run out wicket, but chances would have surely improved.