That Fakhar has to open. Despite evidence suggesting that he is clearly better performing at no. 4.
The problem with this EVIDENCE is that it once again Ignores variables.
Answer the following questions
A) Is Imad wasim the greatest No 7 batsmen for Pakistan of all time because he avg 42 and sr of 110 on odi at no 7.
B) Is Uganda captain the greatest series/tours captain in t20 history 2nd only to babar azam?
^^ EVIDENCE SUGGESTS THAT IS THE CASE. but obviously you won't accept that. You'll talk about variables such as teams that Uganda played not being test nation teams, and most of imad's inflation being scores of 5 runs of 3 balls not out end of innings with a few half centuries here and their and mostly just being 10 of 4 balls not puts etc etc.
Well variables are in play, and what are those variables?
A) Fakhar not opening in 4+ years.
B) Fakhar skill wise not being the same batsmen from 4 years ago 4 years ago he was mostly a legside player but 4 years later he plays way more unorthodox strokes, and had developed those drives which were a frequent play for him since the NZ 2023 series, hence most of the deliveries he struggled with would no longer apply.
C) More confidence being given to him, In odi his place is assured at opening so he doesn't need to worry and can get 180 scores and doesn't have fear of failure. In t20 he's under constant pressure in leagues to try to prove his worth at opening, he clearly wishes to open otherwise he wouldn't be opening in leagues. Similarly in t20 unlike rizwan who's pakistan's darling, fakhar is under constant pressure to perform knowing Bobby just wants fakhar dropped and is looking for ways to do so, such as him doing so in 2022 t20 wc as well.
D) Despite low scores in t20 during hisnopening stint, his few performances such as 91 were match winning and the off-chance he performed in 1 in 10 games were victory assured which was a key factor that led to 29 wins and no 1 rank in the first place against half strength teams, A feature that's now Adays missing with babar/rizzu either at opening or in the top order with Pakistan losing to not even half strength team but bottom line c tier and associate nations.
This whole narrative argument isn't an attack and doesn't give you a superior position like you think it does. What are you trying to suggest? That I shouldn't propose a narrative to justify why said argument is falsely presented?
That if I take your stats at face value then automatically it would mean imad wasim is the greatest allrounder in odi Pakistan history and that imam ul haq is superior to Inzimam by every metric?