What's new

Thanks to Pakistan's efforts, UN declares 15th March as Islamophobia day

Lonewarrior

First Class Star
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Runs
3,416
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I want to congratulate the Muslim Ummah today as our voice against the rising tide of Islamophobia has been heard & the UN has adopted a landmark resolution introduced by Pakistan, on behalf of OIC, designating 15 March as International Day to Combat Islamophobia.</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1503753267209449472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 15, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Good timing I assume.

USA and UK are desperate for OPEC to increase oil production. This seems to be some sort of appeasment encouring them to do so.

Islamaphobia wont disappear but with the UN adopting this, it will kill a lot of arguments from Anti-Islam bigots.
 
Islam and Muslims are here to stay.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the title should read as "day of combat against Islamophobia" rather than writing as simple as "Islamophobia day".

The latter gives the vibe of celebrating the hatred against Muslims on 15th March.
 
Ok islamophobia is bad. Agreed.

UN passed a resolution. Double yay.

How is it a victory for Pakistan or Imran Khan or what does it accomplish exactly?

Anyway don’t want to spoil the celebration, I will participate in this too. Down with islamiphobia.
 
Ok islamophobia is bad. Agreed.

UN passed a resolution. Double yay.

How is it a victory for Pakistan or Imran Khan or what does it accomplish exactly?

Anyway don’t want to spoil the celebration, I will participate in this too. Down with islamiphobia.

Celebration? lol - must be difficult to comprehend the concept of this resolution.
 
If Jews have Holocaust remembrance day.

If Blacks have Black history month in USA and UK

If Women have suffragette day (also known as Black Friday)

Then there's every reason we should have an Islamophobia day.

Move on.
 
Islamophobia is bad, but the United Nations is the last entity on the planet who is going to curb it. The "U" is "UN" stands for "Useless".

This move is nothing other than a Google Doodle move. Nothing will change.
 
Ok islamophobia is bad. Agreed.

UN passed a resolution. Double yay.

How is it a victory for Pakistan or Imran Khan or what does it accomplish exactly?

Anyway don’t want to spoil the celebration, I will participate in this too. Down with islamiphobia.

Pakistan was the first country who forward the resolution in UN .....
 
Celebration? lol - must be difficult to comprehend the concept of this resolution.

Thanks for the love but you should first read the OP before my post.

PM of Pakistan is “congratulating” the “ummah”. Am I reading that wrong? People congratulate when there is a reason for celebration don’t they?

I am on your side on this so not sure why you have a problem with my post.All Muslims should not be discriminated for the acts of some of the bad apples. I am totally on board with this, so not sure why the squirming .
 
Good timing I assume.

USA and UK are desperate for OPEC to increase oil production. This seems to be some sort of appeasment encouring them to do so.

Islamaphobia wont disappear but with the UN adopting this, it will kill a lot of arguments from Anti-Islam bigots.

Are you seriously that naive that you think both UAE and Saudi Arabia have the best interests of Islam at heart? Lol.
 
Guess which country opposed it?

Hint: the biggest proclaimed fake secularists in South Asia
 
Guess which country opposed it?

Hint: the biggest proclaimed fake secularists in South Asia

Doesn't take much guesswork when some of their fine citizens are already posting in this thread with "Of course Islamphobia is bad BUT...."
 
Thanks for the love but you should first read the OP before my post.

PM of Pakistan is “congratulating” the “ummah”. Am I reading that wrong? People congratulate when there is a reason for celebration don’t they?

I am on your side on this so not sure why you have a problem with my post.All Muslims should not be discriminated for the acts of some of the bad apples. I am totally on board with this, so not sure why the squirming .

You have a habit of showing subtle bigotry toward Muslims of India and Pakistani Muslims. In almost all of your original comments, when get called out, you ask other to point out why? Lets not pretend reader of your comments are that naïve.

It is a resolution that had been recognized by UN. Only someone who has issued with it would post such comments in this tone:

Ok islamophobia is bad. Agreed.

UN passed a resolution. Double yay.

How is it a victory for Pakistan or Imran Khan or what does it accomplish exactly?

Anyway don’t want to spoil the celebration, I will participate in this too. Down with islamiphobia.
 
Guess which country opposed it?

Hint: the biggest proclaimed fake secularists in South Asia

Fast paced marched toward Hindu Rasthra will necessitate marginalizing of the largest minority of India.

Secularism <> Hindu Rasthra, hence no option but to oppose anything that would hinder acceptable domestic bigotry.
 
Islamophobia resolution sponsored by 55 Muslim states plus China.
Yes, China that locks up Muslims in concentration camps. And yes, the same Muslim nations that eliminate Ahmadiyas, Hazaras and other Muslim minority sects. And the UN fell for it!

:sree
 
This thread another one which is already veering off topic / being taken off topic.

Let’s reboot the conversation and start again.

OP is “Thanks to Pakistan's efforts, UN declares 15th March as Islamophobia day” with an accompanying tweet from Imran Khan.

Let the discussion flow from there please.
 
I'm not sure asking what constitutes Islamophobia is veering off-topic. I really would like to know if this has also been defined.
 
I'm not sure asking what constitutes Islamophobia is veering off-topic. I really would like to know if this has also been defined.

With all respect — pull the other one.

You can look up a definition of Islamophobia and the possible examples of it yourself.

There are search engines, online libraries, and dictionary websites for this.

This thread is not to be used as a platform for you to be mischievously poking people with such questions.
 
Wikipedia defintion:
Islamophobia is the fear of, hatred of, or prejudice against the religion of Islam or Muslims in general, especially when seen as a geopolitical force or a source of terrorism.

Webster-Miriam
Irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against Islam or people who practice Islam

UNHCR working definition gives this - The requested page cannot be found

As you can see this is all rather vague. What constitutes hate speech towards Islam specifically?
 
Last edited:
?? How is the question Islamophobic?

Internet just came to existence yesterday.

India never had over 200 million Muslims.

And you never cheered when the Muslims of India were marginalized.

As It is all apparent. You do not need to be given example of Islamophobia because that is not the point.
 
This day means nothing if activities are not done along with this day and the dispora are not engaged by the highcommisions world wide.

My views (could be wrong) is that alot of islamophobia is spread because many of our muslims fail to intereact or be part of the foreing societies that they live in. They live in those societies but dont interact or divulge in them.

Does Islamophobia day also combat the hate speech that our foreign molvis do while sitting in foreign lands? One of the reasons why Jews were hated was exactly this. Sitting in the UK while talking against the UK govt and its people. Muslims do this too which offcourse would lead to hatred from the white natives.

Yes, for this day, schools in the west should educate students about the suffering the muslims get because of their faith

But the responsibility of combating Islamphobia is not only on the west but it is on the Muslim's aswell. Its two way thing.
 
This day means nothing if activities are not done along with this day and the dispora are not engaged by the highcommisions world wide.

My views (could be wrong) is that alot of islamophobia is spread because many of our muslims fail to intereact or be part of the foreing societies that they live in. They live in those societies but dont interact or divulge in them.

Does Islamophobia day also combat the hate speech that our foreign molvis do while sitting in foreign lands? One of the reasons why Jews were hated was exactly this. Sitting in the UK while talking against the UK govt and its people. Muslims do this too which offcourse would lead to hatred from the white natives.

Yes, for this day, schools in the west should educate students about the suffering the muslims get because of their faith

But the responsibility of combating Islamphobia is not only on the west but it is on the Muslim's aswell. Its two way thing.

Your view is wrong.

Citizens of any country are well within their rights to criticise their own countries. Muslims shouldn't be exempt from this.
 
Your view is wrong.

Citizens of any country are well within their rights to criticise their own countries. Muslims shouldn't be exempt from this.

Exposing himself as a pseudo-liberal.

Would be jumping up and down if a Pakistani hindu was criticize for highlighting their plight in Pakistan but if a Canadian born Muslim does it then, ' you are not assimilating with their society ' - you is a very bad bad man, lol.
 
Your view is wrong.

Citizens of any country are well within their rights to criticise their own countries. Muslims shouldn't be exempt from this.

depends on what kind of criticism it is.

To say that shariah should be enforced, to critisize the faith of the people living in the country, to even go further and critisize the white man as evil, that doesnt do good to your own people.

This is what jewish people did in europe and it only created resentment against them.

If an afghani was to talk against Pakistan or against Imran, 80% of this forum would be throwing insults at him
 
depends on what kind of criticism it is.

To say that shariah should be enforced, to critisize the faith of the people living in the country, to even go further and critisize the white man as evil, that doesnt do good to your own people.

This is what jewish people did in europe and it only created resentment against them.

If an afghani was to talk against Pakistan or against Imran, 80% of this forum would be throwing insults at him

First facepalm for the highlighted part.

Enjoy reading your post transitioning from initial general comment and when get called out then replying with I meant irrelevant point that are upheld by the slim minority of Muslims in the west.

You believe the vast majority of the Muslim criticize west in a gathering with other non desi people because they want to impost Sharia - lol.
 
First facepalm for the highlighted part.

Enjoy reading your post transitioning from initial general comment and when get called out then replying with I meant irrelevant point that are upheld by the slim minority of Muslims in the west.

You believe the vast majority of the Muslim criticize west in a gathering with other non desi people because they want to impost Sharia - lol.

you are too immature to have discussion with (as i have said before), yet you like quoting me just for attention :)
 
Pakistani media is hardly reporting this because the credit will go to Imran Khan. Unbelievable ****. In teh hatred of Imran, they would go this far
 
you are too immature to have discussion with (as i have said before), yet you like quoting me just for attention :)

Me quoting you should not be confused with me hoping for discussion, it is rather highlighting how ridiculous your comments are, case in point would be, you stating, "Someone in Europe affording a BMW on a bartender salary" - that was a pretty immature comment in haste, as in the case with most of your comments, which was put to the bed.

In this thread, every comment of yours is generalized to make it appear as if every Pakistani in the west or Muslim who criticize the western government is pushing for implementation of Sharia - which is obviously a wrong assertion and you knew it when the majority of the criticism of the west had always been unnecessary war that had killed many Muslims.

Assimilation does not mean losing the right to criticize in the west while in a gathering with your 'white' friends who also criticize the same government for the same thing. It is not the cause of Islamophobia.

You are quoted because in most of the thread you pollute every thread with generalize and ill-informed immature comments, particularly about overseas Pakistani.


So please, when I quote you, I am not expecting a response nor a discussion, because it will be waste of my time as most overseas Pakistani already knew what is being corrected :)
 
This day means nothing if activities are not done along with this day and the dispora are not engaged by the highcommisions world wide.

My views (could be wrong) is that alot of islamophobia is spread because many of our muslims fail to intereact or be part of the foreing societies that they live in. They live in those societies but dont interact or divulge in them.

Does Islamophobia day also combat the hate speech that our foreign molvis do while sitting in foreign lands? One of the reasons why Jews were hated was exactly this. Sitting in the UK while talking against the UK govt and its people. Muslims do this too which offcourse would lead to hatred from the white natives.

Yes, for this day, schools in the west should educate students about the suffering the muslims get because of their faith

But the responsibility of combating Islamphobia is not only on the west but it is on the Muslim's aswell. Its two way thing.

Your view is wrong.
 
This day means nothing if activities are not done along with this day and the dispora are not engaged by the highcommisions world wide.

My views (could be wrong) is that alot of islamophobia is spread because many of our muslims fail to intereact or be part of the foreing societies that they live in. They live in those societies but dont interact or divulge in them.

Does Islamophobia day also combat the hate speech that our foreign molvis do while sitting in foreign lands? One of the reasons why Jews were hated was exactly this. Sitting in the UK while talking against the UK govt and its people. Muslims do this too which offcourse would lead to hatred from the white natives.

Yes, for this day, schools in the west should educate students about the suffering the muslims get because of their faith

But the responsibility of combating Islamphobia is not only on the west but it is on the Muslim's aswell. Its two way thing.

Did you ever live in western society or you just spit non sense all the time ?
 
Did you ever live in western society or you just spit non sense all the time ?

i have, and i have seen how often muslims (especially from Pakistan) spit nonsense while sitting there living in those countries. There are many of them you will find here.

Evil west, but want to earn under the same evil west system.

You criticize a country, not socialize with them hate spreads.

For example, muslims who think wishing Christmas is a sin.
 
Pakistani media is hardly reporting this because the credit will go to Imran Khan. Unbelievable ****. In teh hatred of Imran, they would go this far

Why does Pakistani media hate Imran Khan - who owns news/entertainment corporations in the country?
 
Are you seriously that naive that you think both UAE and Saudi Arabia have the best interests of Islam at heart? Lol.

Try reading carefully.

The reason I gave was to appease OPEC. Whether it makes a difference to UAE or Saudi best interests of Islam the US/UN are trying everything for them to follow their output demands and for them not to sell oil in other than $.



India opposed this? lol Hindu fanatics in power in India are fearful of their history.
 
Why does Pakistani media hate Imran Khan - who owns news/entertainment corporations in the country?

After 911 the US threw millions at Pak media. The likes of Geo and Dawn are paid well to spread divide in Pakistan.
 
After 911 the US threw millions at Pak media. The likes of Geo and Dawn are paid well to spread divide in Pakistan.

lol because this guy doesnt like Dawn, he is now spreading another lie that Dawn is dividing pakistan...

the things you dont like or agree, make a conspiracy out of them while sitting on the internet.
 
i have, and i have seen how often muslims (especially from Pakistan) spit nonsense while sitting there living in those countries. There are many of them you will find here.

Evil west, but want to earn under the same evil west system.

You criticize a country, not socialize with them hate spreads.

For example, muslims who think wishing Christmas is a sin.

There's nothing wrong with earning in a western system, where did you get this idea?

Who says Muslims can't socialise with people from the country they live in? What are you talking about?

Do you seriously think Muslims living abroad are that bothered about how Christmas is celebrated in Christian countries? Where do you get your views from?
 
depends on what kind of criticism it is.

To say that shariah should be enforced, to critisize the faith of the people living in the country, to even go further and critisize the white man as evil, that doesnt do good to your own people.

This is what jewish people did in europe and it only created resentment against them.

If an afghani was to talk against Pakistan or against Imran, 80% of this forum would be throwing insults at him

I dont know where you are getting your information about Jewish people but it isn't correct brother.

If someone says Sharia should be enforced he has every right to, provided he doesn't incite violence.

Similarly a person has the right to criticise the beliefs of others, if it is done in a respectful way.

I dont think Muslims behave in the manner you think they do but if someone is a law abiding and tax paying citizen then they should be allowed to challenge the system within the confines of the law.

Those on the opposing side have every right to counteract their claims.



Similarly if an Afghani is a Pakistani national and law abiding citizen then he should be treated the same as a Pakistani who has lived their for generations. He is just as free to criticise IK as Nooras and PPP supporters do.

Of course in every society you get your fair share of zealots but these are the exception rather than the rule.
 
A lot of generalised opinions re what "Muslims" in the west do! We live our lives and yes just like everyone else criticise the government based on our views, some right wing/some left wing. The ones [MENTION=135038]Major[/MENTION] is talking about are a minority who want to overhaul the system.

No deserves to be on the receiving end of discrimination based colour/faith....so I think it is great it is being recognised (not sure how effective it will be).
 
I dont know where you are getting your information about Jewish people but it isn't correct brother.

If someone says Sharia should be enforced he has every right to, provided he doesn't incite violence.

Similarly a person has the right to criticise the beliefs of others, if it is done in a respectful way.

I dont think Muslims behave in the manner you think they do but if someone is a law abiding and tax paying citizen then they should be allowed to challenge the system within the confines of the law.

Those on the opposing side have every right to counteract their claims.



Similarly if an Afghani is a Pakistani national and law abiding citizen then he should be treated the same as a Pakistani who has lived their for generations. He is just as free to criticise IK as Nooras and PPP supporters do.

Of course in every society you get your fair share of zealots but these are the exception rather than the rule.

would criticism of belief be accepted by the muslim community?
 
would criticism of belief be accepted by the muslim community?

This is a good question.

If I may add, if I do criticise the belief as non muslim, would this be considered Islamophobia?

Where would one draw the line?
 
would criticism of belief be accepted by the muslim community?

I think rather than making a point you are trying ( and failing) at proving a point.

Yoru posts make references, mullahs, jews of europe, afghanis and now muslim community.

There are a plethora of books/newspaper articles / debates/ interfaith dialogues that by their very nature are critical of Islamic beliefs.

These have existed for centuries and accepted as normal.

And despite the intention of you and Indian posters ( including one who pops his head up like a whack-a-mole whenever Muslims are mentioned) these have nothing to do with Islamophobia.

Islamophobia was first mentioned as a term in 1996 - way before the Mullahs that you mention were even newsworthy.

If you want to actually learn about this topic I suggest you read through the related literature about what Islamophobia is, why it is an issue and and how is cultivated by people with an aversion to Muslims in general ( such as some Hindus) before making a post again.
 
This is a good question.

If I may add, if I do criticise the belief as non muslim, would this be considered Islamophobia?

Where would one draw the line?

Please refer to the post by James.

I know psychologically you are driven to make a post against Muslims at least once a day so perhaps the advice given by James in post 22 will help you.
 
I think rather than making a point you are trying ( and failing) at proving a point.

Yoru posts make references, mullahs, jews of europe, afghanis and now muslim community.

There are a plethora of books/newspaper articles / debates/ interfaith dialogues that by their very nature are critical of Islamic beliefs.

These have existed for centuries and accepted as normal.

And despite the intention of you and Indian posters ( including one who pops his head up like a whack-a-mole whenever Muslims are mentioned) these have nothing to do with Islamophobia.

Islamophobia was first mentioned as a term in 1996 - way before the Mullahs that you mention were even newsworthy.

If you want to actually learn about this topic I suggest you read through the related literature about what Islamophobia is, why it is an issue and and how is cultivated by people with an aversion to Muslims in general ( such as some Hindus) before making a post again.

Salman rushdies book is accepted by the people? Or do they have to forcefully accept as they live in a country where law and order is maintained?

I am not denying islamophobia. My question is, with regards to the spread of Islamphobia, how much percent would you attribute it to the muslims themselves and their acts? (especially the ones that sit abroad and be critical of the western system).

Or are the muslims fully 100 percent victims of it, with all the blame going on the ones that spread hate?
 
Rushdie example is one extreme example. He is a notorious Indian islamophobe but the issue was exacerbated by the government of Iran.

Now you tell me why you want to take this example and use it, instead of the centuries old historic criticisms of Islam? Again its to try and prove a flawed point.

There millions of books available that make slanderous allegations against our Holy Prophet. They are freely available on amazon and their authors appear on TV discussing them.

Your second question is once again flawed. You can't blame a victim of a crime for the fact the crime was committed against them.

The bad actions of one muslim cannot justify the crimes against many related innocent muslims. This is similar language to what terrorists use.
 
will someone plz tell me why India had objection on this resolution, not even Israel , but only India. :yk
 
will someone plz tell me why India had objection on this resolution, not even Israel , but only India. :yk

Because Islamophobia is a vague term with no clear markings as what constitutes one. Not only India but EU also opposed due to vague nature. All these countries wanted to establish what constitutes as Islamophobia first before passing it as resolution.
 
Because Islamophobia is a vague term with no clear markings as what constitutes one. Not only India but EU also opposed due to vague nature. All these countries wanted to establish what constitutes as Islamophobia first before passing it as resolution.

source ?
 
lol because this guy doesnt like Dawn, he is now spreading another lie that Dawn is dividing pakistan...

the things you dont like or agree, make a conspiracy out of them while sitting on the internet.

I dont read Dawn. USA gave up to $50 million to certain Pakistan media to further their agenda. Do some basic research while cheering for Zardari.
 
You know Islamophobia is rife when athiests defend Hindutva, but question Islam.

Don't feed the desktop troll peeps!
 
France and India, guess whats similar , both are obsessed with islam and Hijab.
still they both coudnt do jack to stop this resolution. :)))

None tried to stop the resolution. Both wanted authority to clear the terms since Islamophobia can be define differently before passing it as resolution.

It is similar to the identity crisis that gender fluidity has brought. Since the terms are interpreted differently and there's no standard, the confusion has created a mess.

Forceful implementation is against the interest of the concerned people in reality.
 
i have, and i have seen how often muslims (especially from Pakistan) spit nonsense while sitting there living in those countries. There are many of them you will find here.

Evil west, but want to earn under the same evil west system.

You criticize a country, not socialize with them hate spreads.

For example, muslims who think wishing Christmas is a sin.

where and when did you live ? looking at your english and logic, its hard to believe.
 
You know Islamophobia is rife when athiests defend Hindutva, but question Islam.

Don't feed the desktop troll peeps!

What's funnier is they never attack other Abrahamic beliefs openly like Christianity or Judaism. Heck they won't even admit to being Hindutva and instead present themselves as atheists. Who would ever trust them in future? Putin? Bojo? Biden? Rouhani? Xi Jinpeng? Is there anythig they believe in other than the next ruling power whom they can serve without question?
 
for people who are asking for Islamophobia explaination, explain this.

Date : Jan 21, 2022

India calls for the UN to recognise 'Hinduphobia'

 
Pakistan urges global action on Islamophobia
Khar pushes for inter-faith, inter-civilisational dialogue at 9th Global Forum

ISLAMABAD:
Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Hina Rabbani Khar stressed on Wednesday the importance of continued and robust inter-religious, inter-civilisational and inter-faith dialogue as a catalyst to promote peaceful co-existence, mutual understanding, and harmony.

Addressing the ninth Global Forum of the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC), being held in Fez, by Morocco, Khar articulated Pakistan’s perspective and concerns about the growing problem of religious intolerance, discrimination, Islamophobia and violence worldwide.

She particularly drew the attention of the delegates towards the state-driven discrimination, hostility and phobia directed against Muslims and Islam, and the ensuing climate of impunity for such heinous acts.

“Given its pervasive and widely documented impacts, it is time for the international community and the United Nations to formulate an action plan to meaningfully address the insidious phenomenon of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hatred,” she said.

UNAOC was created in 2005 in response to tensions between the Muslim world and the West in the aftermath of 9/11 attacks in the United States. One of its core objectives is to advance mutual respect for all cultures, traditions and religious beliefs.

The 9th Forum is being held under the overarching theme of ‘Towards an Alliance of Peace: Living Together as One Humanity’. As a member of the UNAOC Group of Friends, Pakistan has been actively contributing to advancing the Alliance’s mandate.

Meanwhile, Khar met Portuguese Foreign Minister Joao Cravinho on the sidelines of the forum. They discussed ways to enhance bilateral collaboration in diverse fields, a Foreign Office Spokesperson said in a twitter post. The two leaders exchanged views on regional and global issues of mutual interest, the spokesperson added.

Express Tribune
 
Pakistan urges global action on Islamophobia
Khar pushes for inter-faith, inter-civilisational dialogue at 9th Global Forum

ISLAMABAD:
Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Hina Rabbani Khar stressed on Wednesday the importance of continued and robust inter-religious, inter-civilisational and inter-faith dialogue as a catalyst to promote peaceful co-existence, mutual understanding, and harmony.

Addressing the ninth Global Forum of the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC), being held in Fez, by Morocco, Khar articulated Pakistan’s perspective and concerns about the growing problem of religious intolerance, discrimination, Islamophobia and violence worldwide.

She particularly drew the attention of the delegates towards the state-driven discrimination, hostility and phobia directed against Muslims and Islam, and the ensuing climate of impunity for such heinous acts.

“Given its pervasive and widely documented impacts, it is time for the international community and the United Nations to formulate an action plan to meaningfully address the insidious phenomenon of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hatred,” she said.

UNAOC was created in 2005 in response to tensions between the Muslim world and the West in the aftermath of 9/11 attacks in the United States. One of its core objectives is to advance mutual respect for all cultures, traditions and religious beliefs.

The 9th Forum is being held under the overarching theme of ‘Towards an Alliance of Peace: Living Together as One Humanity’. As a member of the UNAOC Group of Friends, Pakistan has been actively contributing to advancing the Alliance’s mandate.

Meanwhile, Khar met Portuguese Foreign Minister Joao Cravinho on the sidelines of the forum. They discussed ways to enhance bilateral collaboration in diverse fields, a Foreign Office Spokesperson said in a twitter post. The two leaders exchanged views on regional and global issues of mutual interest, the spokesperson added.

Express Tribune

Pakistan should start by giving followers of other faith equal status in their own country.
 
Pakistan should start by giving followers of other faith equal status in their own country.
Also Muslimphobia should be banned, but what's wrong with Islamophobia. Islam is an ideology like all other religions, and hence if there are those who love it, there will exist those who are afraid of it. I mean why wouldn't a LGBT person would not be afraid of Islam given its position against them ? The word should change to Muslimophobia and not Islamophobia.
 
Portuguese police have shot a man suspected of stabbing two people to death at an Ismaili Muslim center in Lisbon, Portugal. Prime Minister Antonio Costa told reporters it was "a criminal act" and that two lives had been lost in the incident on Tuesday.

He said the suspect had been hospitalised.

He added: "Everything points to this being an isolated incident."

Police said in a statement they encountered a suspect "armed with a large knife".

They added the suspect was ordered to surrender but as he refused and advanced, he was "neutralised".

Two people were killed in the attack and several other were wounded.

There was no immediate word on the identity of those killed.

Armed police from a special operations unit could be seen forming a perimeter outside the building.

Mr Costa said police were investigating the attack and it was too soon to speculate about a motive.

The Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims, generally known as the Ismailis, belong to the Shia branch of Islam, according to their website.

The Ismaili Muslims are a culturally diverse community living in more than 25 countries around the world, it says.

Portugal has not recorded any significant terror attacks in recent decades, and religious violence is virtually unheard of.
 
India Abstains From Voting On UN Resolution On Islamophobia. Here's Why

India abstained in the UN General Assembly on a draft resolution introduced by Pakistan and co-sponsored by China on Islamophobia, asserting that the prevalence of “religiophobia” against Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and other faiths facing violence and discrimination must also be acknowledged rather than singling out just one religion.

The 193-member General Assembly adopted the resolution ‘Measures to combat Islamophobia', introduced by Pakistan on Friday, with 115 nations voting in favour, none against and 44 abstentions, including India, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Ukraine and the UK.

India's Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Ruchira Kamboj voiced condemnation of all acts motivated by anti-Semitism, Christianophobia and Islamophobia but asserted that it is crucial to acknowledge that such phobias extend beyond Abrahamic religions.

“Clear evidence shows that over decades, followers of non-Abrahamic religions have also been affected by religiophobia. This has led to the emergence of contemporary forms of religiophobia, particularly anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist and anti-Sikh sentiments,” she said, in an explanation of India's position on the resolution.

India stressed that the adoption of the resolution should not establish a precedent that could result in numerous resolutions centred on phobias tied to specific religions, “potentially dividing the United Nations into religious camps.” “It is crucial for the UN to maintain its stance above such religious concerns, which have the potential to fragment us rather than unite us under the banner of peace and harmony, embracing the world as one global family,” Kamboj said.

India called on all member states to consider the broader scope of religious discrimination that persists globally.

“While the issue of Islamophobia is undoubtedly significant, we must acknowledge that other religions are also facing discrimination and violence. Allocating resources solely to combat Islamophobia, while neglecting similar challenges faced by other faiths, might inadvertently perpetuate a sense of exclusion and inequality,” she said.

Kamboj told the UN General Assembly that “it is crucial to recognise” that Hinduism, with over 1.2 billion followers, Buddhism with more than 535 million and Sikhism with over 30 million followers worldwide, are all subject to religiophobia.

“It is time that we acknowledge the prevalence of religiophobia, rather than single out just one,” she said.

Kamboj said the contemporary forms of religiophobia are evident in the increasing attacks on religious places of worship such as gurudwaras, monasteries and temples, as well as the spreading of hatred and disinformation against non-Abrahamic religions in many countries.

“The destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas, violations of gurudwara premises, massacres of Sikh pilgrims in gurudwaras, attacks on temples, and the glorification of breaking idols in temples all contribute to the rise of contemporary forms of religiophobia against non-Abrahamic religions,” she said.

The destruction of the giant Buddha statues of Bamiyan in Afghanistan by the Taliban in March 2001 led to global condemnation.

Kamboj underlined that India stands against all forms of religiophobia, be it antisemitism, Christianophobia, or Islamophobia, as “we stand against all anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist, and anti-Sikh sentiments.” The resolution condemned the incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence against Muslims as manifested in the increasing number of incidents of desecration of their holy book, attacks on mosques, sites and shrines and other acts of religious intolerance, negative stereotyping, hatred and violence against Muslims.

It also requested UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to appoint a United Nations Special Envoy to combat Islamophobia.

India said it “in principle” is opposed to the creation of the post of a Special Envoy on the basis of a single religion, she said.

Kamboj pointed out that the substantial budgetary implications of establishing such a position “prompt us to pause and reflect on whether this is the most effective use of resources. Could we not achieve greater impact through a more inclusive approach that addresses religious discrimination in its entirety?” She underscored that India's rich history as a pluralistic and democratic nation, embracing diverse religions, has long served as a refuge for those persecuted for their faith.

“Whether Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Jews, or adherents of any other belief, they have consistently found in India a sanctuary free from persecution or discrimination,” she said.

Prior to adopting the resolution, the Assembly rejected two amendments to the draft introduced by Belgium on behalf of the EU. India voted in favour of both the amendments.

One amendment proposed changes in the resolution's language to remove references to the desecration of the Quran.

The other amendment would have called for the appointment of a “United Nations focal point, within existing structures and resources, to combat anti-Muslim discrimination” instead of a UN special envoy.

The General Assembly adopted a resolution in 2022 proclaiming March 15 as the International Day to Combat Islamophobia in the wake of the 2019 mass shootings in two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand that had killed over 50 people.

In his remarks to mark the day, Guterres said that around the world, there is a rising tide of anti-Muslim hate and bigotry in many forms such as structural and systemic discrimination, unequal immigration policies, unwarranted surveillance and profiling and restrictions in accessing citizenship, education, employment and justice.

The UN chief also voiced concern over “supremacist ideologies and attacks” against Jews, minority Christian communities and many others. “Hatred of one group fuels hatred of another. Hate normalises hate. Hate destroys the fabric of our societies,” he said. PTI YAS AMS AKJ AMS

NDTV
 
All discussing India abstain from voting…. Why not ask same question to Pakistan’s friend Ukrain
 
Back
Top