What's new

The architecture of Indian fascism is quickly being put into place: Arundhati Roy (New York Times)

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
NEW DELHI — As India celebrates her 73rd year of independence from British rule, ragged children thread their way through traffic in Delhi, selling outsized national flags and souvenirs that say, “Mera Bharat Mahan.” My India is Great. Quite honestly, it’s hard to feel that way right now, because it looks very much as though our government has gone rogue.

Last week it unilaterally breached the fundamental conditions of the Instrument of Accession, by which the former Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir acceded to India in 1947. In preparation for this, at midnight on Aug. 4, it turned all of Kashmir into a giant prison camp. Seven million Kashmiris were barricaded in their homes, internet connections were cut and their phones went dead.

On Aug. 5, India’s home minister proposed in Parliament that Article 370 of the Indian Constitution (the article that outlines the legal obligations that arise from the Instrument of Accession) be overturned. The opposition parties rolled over. By the next evening the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019 had been passed by the upper as well as the lower house.

The act strips the State of Jammu and Kashmir of its special status — which includes its right to have its own constitution and its own flag. It also strips it of statehood and partitions it into two Union territories. The first, Jammu and Kashmir, will be administered directly by the central government in New Delhi, although it will continue to have a locally elected legislative assembly but one with drastically reduced powers. The second, Ladakh, will be administered directly from New Delhi and will not have a legislative assembly.

The passing of the act was welcomed in Parliament by the very British tradition of desk-thumping. There was a distinct whiff of colonialism in the air. The masters were pleased that a recalcitrant colony had finally, formally, been brought under the crown. For its own good. Of course.

Indian citizens can now buy land and settle in their new domain. The new territories are open for business. Already India’s richest industrialist, Mukesh Ambani, of Reliance Industries, has promised several “announcements.” What this might mean to the fragile Himalayan ecology of Ladakh and Kashmir, the land of vast glaciers, high-altitude lakes and five major rivers, barely bears consideration.

The dissolution of the legal entity of the state also means the dissolution of Article 35A, which granted residents rights and privileges that made them stewards of their own territory. So, “being open for business,” it must be clarified, can also include Israeli-style settlements and Tibet-style population transfers.

For Kashmiris, in particular, this has been an old, primal fear. Their recurring nightmare (an inversion of the one being peddled by Donald Trump) of being swept away by a tidal wave of triumphant Indians wanting a little home in their sylvan valley could easily come true.

As news of the new act spread, Indian nationalists of all stripes cheered. The mainstream media, for the most part, made a low, sweeping bow. There was dancing in the streets and horrifying misogyny on the internet. Manohar Lal Khattar, chief minister of the state of Haryana, bordering Delhi, while speaking about the improvement he had brought about in the skewed gender ratio in his state, joked: “Our Dhakarji used to say we will bring in girls from Bihar. Now they say Kashmir is open, we can bring girls from there.”

Amid these vulgar celebrations the loudest sound, however, is the deathly silence from Kashmir’s patrolled, barricaded streets and its approximately seven million caged, humiliated people, stitched down by razor wire, spied on by drones, living under a complete communications blackout. That in this age of information, a government can so easily cut off a whole population from the rest of the world for days at a time, says something serious about the times we are heading toward.

Kashmir, they often say, is the unfinished business of the “Partition.” That word suggests that in 1947, when the British drew their famously careless border through the subcontinent, there was a “whole” that was then partitioned. In truth, there was no “whole.” Apart from the territory of British India, there were hundreds of sovereign principalities, each of which individually negotiated the terms on which it would merge with either India or Pakistan. Many that did not wish to merge were forced to.

While Partition and the horrifying violence that it caused is a deep, unhealed wound in the memory of the subcontinent, the violence of those times, as well as in the years since, in India and Pakistan, has as much to do with assimilation as it does with partition. In India the project of assimilation, which goes under the banner of nation-building, has meant that there has not been a single year since 1947 when the Indian Army has not been deployed within India’s borders against its “own people.” The list is long — Kashmir, Mizoram, Nagaland, Manipur, Hyderabad, Assam.

The business of assimilation has been complicated and painful and has cost tens of thousands of lives. What is unfolding today on both sides of the border of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir is the unfinished business of assimilation.

What happened in the Indian Parliament last week was tantamount to cremating the Instrument of Accession. It was a document with a complicated provenance that had been signed by a discredited king, the Dogra Hindu King, Maharaja Hari Singh. His unstable, tattered kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir lay on the fault lines of the new border between India and Pakistan.

The rebellions that had broken out against him in 1945 had been aggravated and subsumed by the spreading bush fires of Partition. In the western mountain district of Poonch, Muslims, who were the majority, turned on the Maharaja’s forces and on Hindu civilians. In Jammu, to the south, the Maharaja’s forces assisted by troops borrowed from other princely states, massacred Muslims. Historians and news reports of the time estimated that somewhere between 70,000 and 200,000 were murdered in the streets of the city, and in its neighboring districts.

Inflamed by the news of the Jammu massacre, Pakistani “irregulars” swooped down from the mountains of the North Western Frontier Province, burning and pillaging their way across the Kashmir Valley. Hari Singh fled from Kashmir to Jammu from where he appealed to Jawaharlal Nehru, the Indian prime minister, for help. The document that provided legal cover for the Indian Army to enter Kashmir was the Instrument of Accession.

The Indian Army, with some help from local people, pushed back the Pakistani “irregulars,” but only as far as the ring of mountains on the edge of the valley. The former Dogra kingdom now lay divided between India and Pakistan. The Instrument of Accession was meant to be ratified by a referendum to ascertain the will of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. That promised referendum never took place. So was born the subcontinent’s most intractable and dangerous political problem.

In the 72 years since then, successive Indian governments have undermined terms of the Instrument of Accession until all that was left of it was the skeletal structure. Now even that has been shot to hell.

It would be foolhardy to try to summarize the twists and turns of how things have come to this. Let’s just say that it’s as complicated and as dangerous as the games the United States played with its puppet regimes in South Vietnam all through the 50s and 60s.

After a long history of electoral manipulation, the watershed moment came in 1987 when New Delhi flagrantly rigged the state elections. By 1989, the thus far mostly nonviolent demand for self-determination grew into a full-throated freedom struggle. Hundreds of thousands of people poured onto the streets only to be cut down in massacre after massacre.

The Kashmir valley soon thronged with militants, Kashmiri men from both sides of the border, as well as foreign fighters, trained and armed by Pakistan and embraced, for the most part, by the Kashmiri people. Once again, Kashmir was caught up in the political winds that were blowing across the subcontinent — an increasingly radicalized Islam from Pakistan and Afghanistan, quite foreign to Kashmiri culture, and the fanatical Hindu nationalism that was on the rise in India.

The first casualty of the uprising was the age-old bond between Kashmir’s Muslims and its tiny minority of Hindus, known locally as Pandits. When the violence began, according to the Kashmiri Pandit Sangharsh Samiti, or the K.P.S.S., an organization run by Kashmiri Pandits, about 400 Pandits were targeted and murdered by militants. By the end of 1990, according to a government estimate, 25,000 Pandit families had left the valley.

They lost their homes, their homeland and everything they had. Over the years thousands more left — almost the entire population. As the conflict continued, in addition to tens of thousands of Muslims, the K.P.S.S. says 650 Pandits have been killed in the conflict.

Since then, great numbers of Pandits have lived in miserable refugee camps in Jammu city. Thirty years have gone by, yet successive governments in New Delhi have not tried to help them return home. They have preferred instead to keep them in limbo, and stir their anger and understandable bitterness into a mephitic brew with which to fuel India’s dangerous and extremely effective nationalistic narrative about Kashmir. In this version, a single aspect of an epic tragedy is cannily and noisily used to draw a curtain across the rest of the horror.

Today Kashmir is one of the most or perhaps the most densely militarized zone in the world. More than a half-million soldiers have been deployed to counter what the army itself admits is now just a handful of “terrorists.” If there were any doubt earlier it should be abundantly clear by now that their real enemy is the Kashmiri people. What India has done in Kashmir over the last 30 years is unforgivable. An estimated 70,000 people, civilians, militants and security forces have been killed in the conflict. Thousands have been “disappeared,” and tens of thousands have passed through torture chambers that dot the valley like a network of small-scale Abu Ghraibs.

Over the last few years, hundreds of teenagers have been blinded by the use of pellet-firing shotguns, the security establishment’s new weapon of choice for crowd control. Most militants operating in the valley today are young Kashmiris, armed and trained locally. They do what they do knowing full well that the minute they pick up a gun, their “shelf life” is unlikely to be more than six months. Each time a “terrorist” is killed, Kashmiris turn up in their tens of thousands to bury a young man whom they revere as a shaheed, a martyr.

These are only the rough coordinates of a 30-year-old military occupation. The most cruel effects of an occupation that has lasted decades are impossible to describe in an account as short as this.

In Narendra Modi’s first term as India’s prime minister, his hard-line approach exacerbated the violence in Kashmir. In February, after a Kashmiri suicide bomber killed 40 Indian security personnel, India launched an airstrike against Pakistan. Pakistan retaliated. They became the first two nuclear powers in history to actually launch airstrikes against each other. Now two months into Narendra Modi’s second term, his government has played its most dangerous card of all. It has tossed a lit match into a powder keg.

If that were not bad enough, the cheap, deceitful way in which it did it is disgraceful. In the last week of July, 45,000 extra troops were rushed into Kashmir on various pretexts. The one that got the most traction was that there was a Pakistani “terror” threat to the Amarnath Yatra — the annual pilgrimage in which hundreds of thousands of Hindu devotees trek (or are carried by Kashmiri porters) through high mountains to visit the Amarnath cave and pay their respects to a natural ice formation that they believe is an avatar of Shiva.

On Aug. 1, some Indian television networks announced that a land mine with Pakistani Army markings on it had been found on the pilgrimage route. On Aug. 2, the government published a notice asking all pilgrims (and even tourists who were miles from the pilgrimage route) to leave the valley immediately. That set off a panicky exodus. The approximately 200,000 Indian migrant day laborers in Kashmir were clearly not a concern to those supervising the evacuation. Too poor to matter, I’m guessing. By Saturday, Aug. 3, tourists and pilgrims had left and the security forces had taken up position across the valley.

By midnight Sunday, Kashmiris were barricaded in their homes, and all communication networks went down. The next morning, we learned that, along with several hundred others, three former chief ministers, Farooq Abdullah, his son, Omar Abdullah of the National Conference and Mehbooba Mufti of the People’s Democratic Party, had been arrested. Those are the mainstream pro-India politicians who have carried India’s water through the years of insurrection.

Newspapers report that the Jammu & Kashmir police force has been disarmed. More than anybody else, these local police men have put their bodies on the front line, have done the groundwork, provided the apparatus of the occupation with the intelligence that it needs, done the brutal bidding of their masters and, for their pains, earned the contempt of their own people. All to keep the Indian flag flying in Kashmir. And now, when the situation is nothing short of explosive, they are going to be fed to the furious mob like so much cannon fodder.

The betrayal and public humiliation of India’s allies by Narendra Modi’s government comes from a kind of hubris and ignorance that has gutted the sly, elaborate structures painstakingly cultivated over decades by cunning, but consummate, Indian statecraft. Now that that’s done — it is down to the Street vs. the Soldier. Apart from what it does to the young Kashmiris on the street, it is also a preposterous thing to do to soldiers.

The more militant sections of the Kashmiri population, who have been demanding the right to self-determination or merger with Pakistan, have little regard for India’s laws or constitution. They will no doubt be pleased that those they see as collaborators have been sold down the river and that the game of smoke and mirrors is finally over. It might be too soon for them to rejoice. Because as sure as eggs are eggs and fish are fish, there will be new smoke and new mirrors. And new political parties. And a new game in town.

On Aug. 8, four days into the lockdown, Narendra Modi appeared on television to address an ostensibly celebrating India and an incarcerated Kashmir. He sounded like a changed man. Gone was his customary aggression and his jarring, accusatory tone. Instead he spoke with the tenderness of a young mother. It’s his most chilling avatar to date.

His voice quivered and his eyes shone with unspilled tears as he listed the slew of benefits that would rain down on the people of the former State of Jammu and Kashmir, now that it was rid of its old, corrupt leaders, and was going to be ruled directly from New Delhi. He evoked the marvels of Indian modernity as though he were educating a bunch of feudal peasants who had emerged from a time capsule. He spoke of how Bollywood films would once again be shot in their verdant valley.

He didn’t explain why Kashmiris needed to be locked down and put under a communications blockade while he delivered his stirring speech. He didn’t explain why the decision that supposedly benefited them so hugely was taken without consulting them. He didn’t say how the great gifts of Indian democracy could be enjoyed by a people who live under a military occupation. He remembered to greet them in advance for Eid, a few days away. But he didn’t promise that the lockdown would be lifted for the festival. It wasn’t.

The next morning, the Indian newspapers and several liberal commentators, including some of Narendra Modi’s most trenchant critics gushed over his moving speech. Like true colonials, many in India who are so alert to infringements of their own rights and liberties, have a completely different standard for Kashmiris.

On Thursday, Aug. 15, in his Independence Day speech, Narendra Modi boasted from the ramparts of Delhi’s Red Fort that his government finally had achieved India’s dream of “One Nation, One Constitution,” with his Kashmir move. But just the previous evening, rebel groups in several troubled states in the north east of India, many of which have Special Status like the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir, announced a boycott of Independence Day. While Narendra Modi’s Red Fort audience cheered, about seven million Kashmiris remained locked down. The communication shutdown we now hear, could be extended for some time to come.

When it ends, as it must, the violence that will spiral out of Kashmir will inevitably spill into India. It will be used to further inflame the hostility against Indian Muslims who are already being demonized, ghettoized, pushed down the economic ladder, and, with terrifying regularity, lynched. The state will use it as an opportunity to close in on others, too — the activists, lawyers, artists, students, intellectuals, journalists — who have protested courageously and openly.

The danger will come from many directions. The most powerful organization in India, the far-right Hindu nationalist Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, or the R.S.S., with more than 600,000 members including Narendra Modi and many of his ministers, has a trained “volunteer” militia, inspired by Mussolini’s Black Shirts. With each passing day, the R.S.S. tightens its grip on every institution of the Indian state. In truth, it has reached a point when it more or less is the state.

In the benevolent shadow of such a state, numerous smaller Hindu vigilante organizations, the storm troopers of the Hindu Nation, have mushroomed across the country, and are conscientiously going about their deadly business.

Intellectuals and academics are a major preoccupation. In May, the morning after the Bharatiya Janata Party won the general elections, Ram Madhav, a general secretary of the party and a former spokesman for the R.S.S., wrote that the “remnants” of the “pseudo-secular/liberal cartels that held a disproportionate sway and stranglehold over the intellectual and policy establishment of the country … need to be discarded from the country’s academic, cultural and intellectual landscape.”

On Aug. 1, in preparation for that “discarding,” the already draconian Unlawful Activities Prevention Act was amended to expand the definition of “terrorist” to include individuals, not just organizations. The amendment allows the government to designate any individual as a terrorist without following the due process of a First Information Report, charge sheet, trial and conviction. Just who — just what kind of individuals it means — was clear when in Parliament, Amit Shah, our chilling home minister, said: “Sir, guns do not give rise to terrorism, the root of terrorism is the propaganda that is done to spread it … And if all such individuals are designated terrorists, I don’t think any member of Parliament should have any objection.”

Several of us felt his cold eyes staring straight at us. It didn’t help to know that he has done time as the main accused in a series of murders in his home state, Gujarat. His trial judge, Justice Brijgopal Harkishen Loya, died mysteriously during the trial and was replaced by another who acquitted him speedily. Emboldened by all this, far-right television anchors on hundreds of India’s news networks, now openly denounce dissidents, make wild allegations about them and call for their arrest, or worse. “Lynched by TV,” is likely to be the new political phenomenon in India.

As the world looks on, the architecture of Indian fascism is quickly being put into place.

I was booked to fly to Kashmir to see some friends on July 28. The whispers about trouble, and troops being flown in, had already begun. I was of two minds about going. A friend of mine and I were chatting about it at my home. He is a senior doctor at a government hospital who has dedicated his life to public service, and happens to be Muslim. We started talking about the new phenomenon of mobs surrounding people, Muslims in particular, and forcing them to chant “Jai Shri Ram!” (“Victory to Lord Ram!”)

If Kashmir is occupied by security forces, India is occupied by the mob.

He said he had been thinking about that, too, because he often drove on the highways out of Delhi to visit his family who live some hours away.

“I could easily be stopped,” he said.

“You must say it then,” I said. “You must survive.”

“I won’t,” he said, “because they’ll kill me either way. That’s what they did to Tabrez Ansari.”

These are the conversations we are having in India while we wait for Kashmir to speak. And speak it surely will.

Arundhati Roy is the author of the novel “The Ministry of Utmost Happiness.” Her most recent book is a collection of essays, “My Seditious Heart.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/opinion/sunday/kashmir-siege-modi.html
 
A chilling read. Two details stick out:

First, the throwing under the bus of the More Loyal Than the King Kashmiri stooges, i.e. the J&K Police, and the NC and PDP leadership. I remember discussing this with [MENTION=131678]Madplayer[/MENTION], and he said the local police are in some ways worse than the occupation forces. But then Roy suggests that if the Kashmiris think the cops and the mainstream parties will now see the light of day, there is more smoke and mirrors the Indians are planning for whatever political dispensation will exist. I guess the NC and PDP will shift the goalposts, claiming that they will fight to restore the now-defunct articles (and how they were kept under arrest because of their previous courageous fight for Kashmir), and if that is all they will do, normal service will resume. If not, the Indians will cultivate some other minions who will.

Second, the reference to the "sly, elaborate structures painstakingly cultivated over decades by cunning, but consummate, Indian statecraft." One has to admit that the hamfisted Powers That Be in Pakistan are rank amateurs compared to their Indian counterparts.
 
I have to agree that the ideology of RSS is dangerous for the secular concept of India. They are Hindu centric and vilify everything that comes from west.

Not just RSS, but VHP and other right wing organizations are a threat to India. May be not now. But in the coming decades. They need to be put in their place.
 
I have to agree that the ideology of RSS is dangerous for the secular concept of India. They are Hindu centric and vilify everything that comes from west.

Not just RSS, but VHP and other right wing organizations are a threat to India. May be not now. But in the coming decades. They need to be put in their place.

Yup , RSS schools have been functional for years, but no one concentrated much on them till the students became rich and now ‘RSS Bias’ is a huge part of earning class in so many states in India, I have couple if college friends that studied in these schools and while they are good people but the bias is there.

To give you an example, Javed Akhtar said a comedic movie scene could be filmed in a Hindu temple In 70s but not anymore and even during 70s and it wasn’t possible in Mosques, this change has happened.

To counter there needs to be a Liberal class of people that criticize all religious schooling esp of children, but not happening.

On Arundhati Roy , her love for rebellions is always there, this aspect of idealism always seems to be there among Malayalees and Bengalis and she is both.
 
Last edited:
Damn that’s a very chilling read.

Most Pakistanis and Indians on twitter and other social media are just trying to one up each other but these internet warriors should atleast spare a thought for the poor Kashmiris being crushed and living in what could only be considered a hell on earth these days.
 
Roy has written some remarkable articles over the years , but with age I feel she has love for anarchy and romanticizes rebellion.

She is a free spirited person with clarity of thought but you would never see her indulge in debates(good ones) probably coz of her belief in her righteousness.
 
Yup , RSS schools have been functional for years, but no one concentrated much on them till the students became rich and now ‘RSS Bias’ is a huge part of earning class in so many states in India, I have couple if college friends that studied in these schools and while they are good people but the bias is there.

To give you an example, Javed Akhtar said a comedic movie scene could be filmed in a Hindu temple In 70s but not anymore and even during 70s and it wasn’t possible in Mosques, this change has happened.

To counter there needs to be a Liberal class of people that criticize all religious schooling esp of children, but not happening.

On Arundhati Roy , her love for rebellions is always there, this aspect of idealism always seems to be there among Malayalees and Bengalis and she is both.

Help me understand. Do you think some of the alarmism is overblown?

Is it possible to have a version of Hindutwa that is divorced from some of the RSS extreme endgame stuff? I would hate for my world view to be informed by a few gruesome videos.
 
Help me understand. Do you think some of the alarmism is overblown?

Is it possible to have a version of Hindutwa that is divorced from some of the RSS extreme endgame stuff? I would hate for my world view to be informed by a few gruesome videos.

In all honesty I don’t know, all these lynchings as a person who has lived in 3 different cities across India I cannot believe was possible but it’s happening.

Could be I was sheltered.

My hope is economic and technological advancement and corporations coming into play and should help eradicate such stuff but again how can one control crime in smaller villages and towns unless police reforms happen?
 
Help me understand. Do you think some of the alarmism is overblown?

Is it possible to have a version of Hindutwa that is divorced from some of the RSS extreme endgame stuff? I would hate for my world view to be informed by a few gruesome videos.

It's somewhere in the middle. People like Arundhati oppose industrialization. She even hates building dams if it will displace a few people. On top.of this, she's very loud as she knows she can be a western media darling as a liberal icon. The same western media sitting in high rises in the countries that have waged wars and went through rapid industrialization. I have never once seen her speak about India or USA or any western democracy in a positive light. She wants us to believe that she's a simpleton that just wants liberty, nature and peace. How will millions eat if there is no industrialization you might ask? She will ask you to climb a tree and eat an apple.

So coming to the point, based on all accounts, India is fed up with being timid and a support player. Indian middle class, youth have made rapid progress in education, technology and made their mark in many top companies across the world. They have disposable cash. They don't adhere to the same principles their meek and timid parents or grand parents followed. They want to be taken seriously. Religion is never an identity for these people. It's nationalism. Congress couldn't offer it and were destroyed. The appeasement of minorities irked many considering many hindus think Muslims are not equally patriotic. Pakistanis leaders haven't helped the situation by appealing to Indian Muslims either. They have identified a leader that can put an end to this crap. They needed a leader with strong vision that can help project India not as a coward but an important player with growing economy. That's how Modi came to power, on the back of his economic agenda. There was no sympathy for Kashmiris among Indian hindus or Muslims considering the typical kashmiri aloofness and bravado. However , the Amarnath land transfer conflict changed the entire scenario. The way kashmiri Muslims reacted to a mere 100 acres being transferred on a temporary basis to Amarnath temple for visitor accommodation changed the way Indians viewed kashmiri Muslims. Google it. You will see how stupid the Muslims were and I believe was the trigger for the 370 abrogation. Congress govt initially approved the land transfer but later cancelled it fueling riots in Jammu. A majority hindu nation couldn't tolerate itm a lesson had to be taught. This brought BJP at the forefront in the state. Jammu voted for BJP in a few years and BJP was part of the ruling coalition. The coalition was disbanded, president's rule was set, Modi won a huge victory and all this paved way for the abrogation of 35a and 370.

As far as I know hindus have many divisions among them and don't vote on a pattern as Muslims do in India. However, majority of them have identified that BJP is the party that has India's best interests. RSS and BJP came to power years ago on religious platform. However their main USP is nationalism. They will not tolerate bullying by minorities as in Bengal and will not tolerate anything Anti India. Considering the biggest positive lights of India being secularism, communists and critics zero in on it and highlight the hindu part. As far as the rest of her article goes, it's fairly accurate and her fears are to some extent accurate. However, majority of Indians don't see it that way because they want a place in the world and they think this is the way to be bold.
 
In all honesty I don’t know, all these lynchings as a person who has lived in 3 different cities across India I cannot believe was possible but it’s happening.

Could be I was sheltered.

My hope is economic and technological advancement and corporations coming into play and should help eradicate such stuff but again how can one control crime in smaller villages and towns unless police reforms happen?

I sort of get what you are saying here. I lived in Pakistan for a while, but I would hear and read reports of targeted killing of Shia Doctors or lately of Christians in the villages in Punjab and somehow could not reconcile it with my own version of Pakistan. I had friends who went to schools run by Christian missionaries, - it St. this or St that school. So its sort of difficult to see it when you are in a majority. I had never seen anti-Ahmedi sentiment until I went deep rural and seemingly educated ppl had such virulent views. To be clear, I think there is room for theological debate, but not for some of the vile stuff being suggested by these folks.
I think its just difficult to see it when you are in a majority. The fear that afflicts minority communities is sometimes real but often overblown. The thing is that the majority has a role in pacifying it. Think both countries fail on this. although I do feel our politicians are a little more restrained about it. Its more localized insidiousness.
 
It's somewhere in the middle. People like Arundhati oppose industrialization. She even hates building dams if it will displace a few people. On top.of this, she's very loud as she knows she can be a western media darling as a liberal icon. The same western media sitting in high rises in the countries that have waged wars and went through rapid industrialization. I have never once seen her speak about India or USA or any western democracy in a positive light. She wants us to believe that she's a simpleton that just wants liberty, nature and peace. How will millions eat if there is no industrialization you might ask? She will ask you to climb a tree and eat an apple.

So coming to the point, based on all accounts, India is fed up with being timid and a support player. Indian middle class, youth have made rapid progress in education, technology and made their mark in many top companies across the world. They have disposable cash. They don't adhere to the same principles their meek and timid parents or grand parents followed. They want to be taken seriously. Religion is never an identity for these people. It's nationalism. Congress couldn't offer it and were destroyed. The appeasement of minorities irked many considering many hindus think Muslims are not equally patriotic. Pakistanis leaders haven't helped the situation by appealing to Indian Muslims either. They have identified a leader that can put an end to this crap. They needed a leader with strong vision that can help project India not as a coward but an important player with growing economy. That's how Modi came to power, on the back of his economic agenda. There was no sympathy for Kashmiris among Indian hindus or Muslims considering the typical kashmiri aloofness and bravado. However , the Amarnath land transfer conflict changed the entire scenario. The way kashmiri Muslims reacted to a mere 100 acres being transferred on a temporary basis to Amarnath temple for visitor accommodation changed the way Indians viewed kashmiri Muslims. Google it. You will see how stupid the Muslims were and I believe was the trigger for the 370 abrogation. Congress govt initially approved the land transfer but later cancelled it fueling riots in Jammu. A majority hindu nation couldn't tolerate itm a lesson had to be taught. This brought BJP at the forefront in the state. Jammu voted for BJP in a few years and BJP was part of the ruling coalition. The coalition was disbanded, president's rule was set, Modi won a huge victory and all this paved way for the abrogation of 35a and 370.

As far as I know hindus have many divisions among them and don't vote on a pattern as Muslims do in India. However, majority of them have identified that BJP is the party that has India's best interests. RSS and BJP came to power years ago on religious platform. However their main USP is nationalism. They will not tolerate bullying by minorities as in Bengal and will not tolerate anything Anti India. Considering the biggest positive lights of India being secularism, communists and critics zero in on it and highlight the hindu part. As far as the rest of her article goes, it's fairly accurate and her fears are to some extent accurate. However, majority of Indians don't see it that way because they want a place in the world and they think this is the way to be bold.
Anrundathi Roy is a principled liberal. The kind that Pakistanis like to quote. I suppose we had Asma Jehangir. They will never be happy until there’s a utopia of universal justice that will never exist. Having said, facts do matter and she is good at recounting those. The main criticism I have seen of her is her idealism but not her analysis.
As for the other stuff, I find it troubling that appeasement of minorities is seen as an issue. Is it appeasement or majority of no one gets arrested for bringing down the Babari Mosque or the Mumbai and Gujrat riots etc.
I would like to blv that a lot of modern urban Indians are not religious but nationalist, but I do think there is a strong anti-Muslim sentiment. There’s a difference between nationalist and fascist. The movies churned out by Bollywood peddle rampant islamophobia and re-litigation of history that is long past.
But this bit about not wanting to be meek anymore has roots in some of the RSS literature as well.
Like I said, if the BJP vote bank is truly nationalist, then at some stage they will have to make choices between economic growth or persecuted majority syndrome.
 
Anrundathi Roy is a principled liberal. The kind that Pakistanis like to quote. I suppose we had Asma Jehangir. They will never be happy until there’s a utopia of universal justice that will never exist. Having said, facts do matter and she is good at recounting those. The main criticism I have seen of her is her idealism but not her analysis.
As for the other stuff, I find it troubling that appeasement of minorities is seen as an issue. Is it appeasement or majority of no one gets arrested for bringing down the Babari Mosque or the Mumbai and Gujrat riots etc.
I would like to blv that a lot of modern urban Indians are not religious but nationalist, but I do think there is a strong anti-Muslim sentiment. There’s a difference between nationalist and fascist. The movies churned out by Bollywood peddle rampant islamophobia and re-litigation of history that is long past.
But this bit about not wanting to be meek anymore has roots in some of the RSS literature as well.
Like I said, if the BJP vote bank is truly nationalist, then at some stage they will have to make choices between economic growth or persecuted majority syndrome.

There is no injustice to minorities in general. All the government schemes are going equally to all parties. The idea of democracy is to treat everybody equally with no discrimination. Appeasement violates that principle.

Nationalism is typical.with growing economies that find themselves in spotlight and don't have enough maturity you see with developed economies. Look at how the Chinese reacted when South Korea replayed THAAD to counter North Korea. Do you see the same reaction in Americans? Do they stop buying cheap Chinese bicycles if USA has a tiff with China? It's part of growing up and nationalism plays a role in it. Anyway, there's a lot of hyperbole going around. There are.multiple checks and balances in India asnin any democracy and bigwigs like Indira Gandhi were thrown out of power after emergency by people who were then part of a nascent democracy. People know their rights and know what's good for them and for their country.
 
Back
Top