I have been struggling in recent weeks to process the reaction to Sami Aslam moving to the USA.
It was - from a cricketing point of view - a foolish decision. He is clearly the Pakistan opener with the best technique and the best record overseas. When Shan Masood was passed over for the captaincy he took with him any cricketing argument for why he should be in the team. With Abid Ali averaging 17.71 against the combined forces of England, New Zealand, South Africa and Bangladesh, and with Imran Butt clearly out of his depth, Sami Aslam should have been next in line.
But as we all know, he took a $100,000 contract to play in the USA. He effectively moved overseas for a better life. And now he is considered to have made himself unselectable.
But why is he unselectable? Why is this viewed now as treachery, as treason?
Where does Shakib-al-Hasan live? Milwaukee, in Wisconsin, in the USA.
Where did Clive Lloyd live for the entire time that he captained the West Indies? Cheadle Hulme, on the outskirts of Manchester.
Did Imran Khan live in Pakistan when he captained Pakistan? No, he lived in Hove, on the outskirts of Brighton. That's why he played no domestic cricket in Pakistan - he used to fly home just before a series.
What about Wasim Akram? He lived in Altrincham, also on the outskirts of Manchester.
But let's bring it forward to the present day.
I know for a fact that Waqar Younis lives in Sydney, having grown up in Sharjah. But he is considered eligible to be the bowling coach for Pakistan. And I'm pretty sure that Pakistan have been carrying Shoaib Malik around the cricket world even though he lives in Dubai.
And this phenomenon is not restricted to players from Third World countries. Sir Andrew Strauss was the England team supremo when he actually lived in Victoria, Australia.
So why is Sami Aslam treated as a traitor for doing something that is so common across the cricket world?
It was - from a cricketing point of view - a foolish decision. He is clearly the Pakistan opener with the best technique and the best record overseas. When Shan Masood was passed over for the captaincy he took with him any cricketing argument for why he should be in the team. With Abid Ali averaging 17.71 against the combined forces of England, New Zealand, South Africa and Bangladesh, and with Imran Butt clearly out of his depth, Sami Aslam should have been next in line.
But as we all know, he took a $100,000 contract to play in the USA. He effectively moved overseas for a better life. And now he is considered to have made himself unselectable.
But why is he unselectable? Why is this viewed now as treachery, as treason?
Where does Shakib-al-Hasan live? Milwaukee, in Wisconsin, in the USA.
Where did Clive Lloyd live for the entire time that he captained the West Indies? Cheadle Hulme, on the outskirts of Manchester.
Did Imran Khan live in Pakistan when he captained Pakistan? No, he lived in Hove, on the outskirts of Brighton. That's why he played no domestic cricket in Pakistan - he used to fly home just before a series.
What about Wasim Akram? He lived in Altrincham, also on the outskirts of Manchester.
But let's bring it forward to the present day.
I know for a fact that Waqar Younis lives in Sydney, having grown up in Sharjah. But he is considered eligible to be the bowling coach for Pakistan. And I'm pretty sure that Pakistan have been carrying Shoaib Malik around the cricket world even though he lives in Dubai.
And this phenomenon is not restricted to players from Third World countries. Sir Andrew Strauss was the England team supremo when he actually lived in Victoria, Australia.
So why is Sami Aslam treated as a traitor for doing something that is so common across the cricket world?
Last edited: