cricketInsight
Tape Ball Captain
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Runs
- 1,269
- Post of the Week
- 1
that would be poor choice
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wahab and Shinwari should both be in the squad in place of Junaid and Hasnain. People will have their reservations - as they should - but these guys might actually win us the odd game.
The present lot is bad but Wahab isn't the solution either![]()
Here is an example:
![]()
You can't play wahab and shinwari in the same team though. If a batting side gets going these two lose their radar completely. 500 on the cards.
I have my reservations about Wahab , but can it seriously be worse than what we've already seen?
Yes, because riaz was dishing out performances like this even before batting became this absurd
He averages 34 in Odis and people are acting like he is some saviour
He isn't good but watching the harmless dross bowled by the bowlers this close to the WC, surely he is better than this.
Wahab is even worse. I remember him being smacked senseless in that onslaught at Trent Bridge in 2016 and then by a past-it Yuvraj Singh. The guy kept serving buffet balls in Yuvraj's hitting zone and just couldn't learn.He isn't good but watching the harmless dross bowled by the bowlers this close to the WC, surely he is better than this.
What evidence is there to back it up?
He is as dumb as any bowler to play for us, he is closer to 40 then 30 and his record is abysmal
Wahab is even worse. I remember him being smacked senseless in that onslaught at Trent Bridge in 2016 and then by a past-it Yuvraj Singh. The guy kept serving buffet balls in Yuvraj's hitting zone and just couldn't learn.
Shinwari is better, albeit a dumb bowler in his own right.
He did, but it's never about form for Wahab Riaz. As soon as a batsmen starts going after him, he becomes too predictable and gets duly smashed. He has lost the plot with amazing regularity.I can't disagree with you say about his form then, but these guys look totally lost. He is Bowling quick and with looked one of the better Bowlers in the PSL.
He did, but it's never about form for Wahab Riaz. As soon as a batsmen starts going after him, he becomes too predictable and gets duly smashed. He has lost the plot with amazing regularity.
I would call in Shinwari. I really hope they realize Junaid will be next to useless on these wickets.

My thread worked
I wonder if Inzi, Sarfraz and Mickey do actually read PP!
We did it. We got wahab back.ignore the haters, wahab is our trump card. Well done bro!My thread worked
I wonder if Inzi, Sarfraz and Mickey do actually read PP!
This really shows neither you nor Inzi had any idea of bowling...
Now 500+ on cards if he plays
Your 100!% right. If mickey done his homework, then he will know ireland played england in malahide just before us and almost beat thek, curran just got them over the line in a low scoring game. And how they restricted England run rate was by bowling fast bouncers at them. They couldnt handle it.You're clueless. You cant not select players based on such a defensive mindset. You need aggression if you wanna win games.
Faheem would get dropped for Amir or Asif anyway so comparing Faheem to Wahab is a waste of time.
So that leaves us with Junaid
Junaid Averages 36 in England
Wahab averages 96 in England
Junaid has an economy of 5.58 in England
Wahab has an economy of 6.67 in England
During the last ICC event - 2017CT - which also occured in England:
Junaid had an average of 19 and Econ of 4.6
Wahab had an average of infinity and an econ of 10
In the last 4 years:
Junaid Averages 34 in 24 ODI matches
Wahab averages 50 in 22 ODI matches
Sure - stats aren't everything - and I'm not trying to bore you to death with stats. But what I'm trying to show is that there is clearly no logical reason to pick Wahab over Junaid. Our domestic cricket is not strong enough to make the assumption that if you perform there you would be able to perform at the international stage. If that was the case Umar Akmal would be giving Kohli a run for his money.
Picking Wahab will be a classic case of not learning from our past mistakes and selecting tried and tested failures. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Their is a tendency in Pakistani cricket for your stock to rocket through the roof when you are sitting on the bench. All people can remember about Wahab is "express pace" and "that over to Watson" and "how much better he is then the current bowlers" because he hasn't worn the green shirt recently.
It's a cliche case of the grass always being greener on the other side.
What fans forget is why he got dropped in the first place. His fast - yet erratic - bowling which would get smacked to all parts of the ground on the flat pitches and tiny boundaries we have seen in England so far.
The bowlers we have in England are the most logical choice. The only bowler who may feel a little bit hard done by is Usman Shinwari given his recent performance, yet we need to limit it to a squad of 15 so someone was bound to miss out.
One of the greatest decision taken by inzamam.This decision is going to pay off.Wahab is going to shut his haters with wonderful performance yet again in the world cup.
Am I the only one to have watched our medium pace attack get ripped to shreds in this odi series and thought, I wish we had Wahab's fire at our disposal?
How can it possibly be the case that the slow middle of the road bowling of someone like Junaid is better than the pace and experience of Wahab?
Don't get me wrong - Wahab is capable of being hit for 100 runs on a bad day. But he's also capable of ripping through a side on a good day and crucially, has the ability to bowl fast and accurate yorkers - a lost art in Pakistani cricket. When our middle of the road medium pacers are being hit for a 100 runs anyway, what exactly is the reason for not selecting Wahab? What could he possibly do to make things worse?
In the last odi, Hasnain got us the key breakthroughs of both openers which enabled the match to get close at the end. Yet Hasnain is inexperienced, and so he doesn't quite understand how to bowl at the death. Wahab has just as much pace as Hasnain but crucially is a man with tons of experience who has been there, done it and has the t-shirt.
If I was Inzi, Sarfraz or Mickey right now, I'd be ensuring that Wahab was on the next plane to England.
You can't win matches single handedly.it's a team game.He was best bowler from pakistan in that world cup and was 2nd best bowler overall.His stats in world cup are amazing.Yet again? When has he won matches for Pakistan in the WC?
As I said elsewhere, Wahab at least can bowl decent yorkers and pacy bouncers, none of which JK was capable of. Junaid was bowling half trackers fgs against this power-packed English batting line-up at death end, which at his pace are ht-me deliveries.
Junaid trumps Wahab with new ball without doubt, but we've seen ball doing absolutely nothing on belters that are being served in England and his new ball role can also be played by Hasan/Amir/Shaheen with similar efficiency
All these arguments of Wahab being able to do X, Y and Z whilst Junaid only does A, B & C are based on peoples opinion of how they perceive the two bowlers. The fact is that regardless of what Wahab can do and what Junaid can do - Junaid has delivered a much better result than Wahab has.
Please dont forget what happened to Wahab the last time he played in English conditions - whether that is the 2017 CT where we went at over 10 an over vs India or in the 2016 Pak vs Eng ODI series where he averaged 186 at a econ of 7+. I mean the guy went for 110 in his 10 overs at Trent Bridge.
Anyway - the decision has been made now and he is in the squad so it's time to back him and hope he delivers for Pakistan.
Wahab CAN do a lot of things. He showed that in Mohali in the 2011 World Cup and against Watson in the 2015 World Cup. I just hope that this time around - in his 3rd World Cup - he actually DOES do those things on a consistent basis and wins games for Pakistan. The difference between what Wahab can do and what he has done has been the biggest problem in Wahab's international career. I hope he puts it right this time when he has been gifted a spot in the team.
Conditions with assistance for seamers, junaid is a much better bowler as we say in CT 17 however the way conditions are looking now based upon the Eng series, Junaid was gonna be toothless as we saw in thr match he played.
If conditions are going to be assisting pacers we have already got Hassan, Amir and Shaheen.
You can't win matches single handedly.it's a team game.He was best bowler from pakistan in that world cup and was 2nd best bowler overall.His stats in world cup are amazing.

What are his stats in the WC? Please tell us.
The stats are pretty good tbh.
![]()
Having 5 seamers makes sense - given the length of the competition. That seamer being Wahab is questionable.
If we are expecting flat pitches - we have seen what Wahab is capable of on flat pitches in the past...
We did it. We got wahab back.ignore the haters, wahab is our trump card. Well done bro!
I honestly laughed a little at this thread thinking how impossible this is but woah this is like a prophecy.
Well done Sir let's hope Wahab delivers now.
I too thought that my own thread was a long shot to put it politely. But, it's happened and inshallah Wahab will do us all proud.Look what this thread made Inzi do.
Inzi definitely reads pakpassion forums to make his decisions and get tips
I think Inzi visits pakpassion nowadays.
His favorite reporters ran a good campaign... Salute to them.
Wo the OP has done wonders. Congrats
thanks. In reality we don't know whether Inzi's decision had anything to do with this thread but if it did, then I am very pleased as I really do think Inzi has made a great move here.Thank you![]()
When I saw the squad announcement this morning, I could barely believe my eyes. For once a Pakistani selectors acts proactively and does what is required in the national interest.
I too thought that my own thread was a long shot to put it politely. But, it's happened and inshallah Wahab will do us all proud.
Don't know what, if anything, this thread had to do with it, but Inzi has played an absolute blinder.
I do wonder if that is true after today!
In the end, this will all benefit team Pakistan, inshallah!
thanks. In reality we don't know whether Inzi's decision had anything to do with this thread but if it did, then I am very pleased as I really do think Inzi has made a great move here.
I too look forward to a repeat of the first game of the CT where wahab performed as per his pedigree.
World Cup is a different beast, it brings out the best in some players.
Sound logic.
Australia going undefeated from 2003 - 2007.
not sure if i understand
Australia were pummelled 3-0 by New Zealand before the World Cup 2007 and then come the World Cup, Australia raised their game.
Why? Because the World Cup is a different beast altogether.
You posted in another thread saying we would eat West Indies for lunch in a bilateral but not in the World Cup... Why do you say that? Because the World Cup is a different beast altogether.
Yeah... that analogy doesnt really work. Australia was a leading odi team before and after NZ series. Whereas we have lost ten games on the trot.
As for Windies example, thats more down to pakistan being rubbish in world cups.
We have never really raised our game in any world cup barring maybe 1992.
No other option available in terms of a pacer who can bowl decent yorkers. Haris Rauf should have been in the squad but he wont have been selected with inexperience of Shaheen and Hasnain already there. Plus Wahab looked to have worked hard on his yorkers as he was bowling them pretty well in PSL.
Most of the poor spells from Wahab are when he is given new or semi new ball, I am sure he can do better job at the death overs than what we saw from other pacers against Eng.
Mannnn I wish the next time you eat biryani every time you chew it’s a elachi I hate you so much why why why man couldn’t you have wished for anything else other than making sure we absolutely not only lose the World Cup but set new world records for the highest score conceded in odi cricket and wahab to beat his previous record
) That biryani comment is too funny!
You don't think 5/46 against India is a decent bowling performance?
[MENTION=758]Usman[/MENTION]
What a performance and what a thread.
I too look forward to a repeat of the first game of the CT where wahab performed as per his pedigree.
World Cup is a different beast, it brings out the best in some players.
Sound logic.
I told you.
This really shows neither you nor Inzi had any idea of bowling...
Now 500+ on cards if he plays
Humble pie for me.
He bowled really well.
Its still a tragedy that his stats still read 10 overs 82 runs and 3 wickets. Maybe could've had another if Sarfraz had a slip for him.
In 3 games (1 warm up) Wahab has blown, hot, cold and hot.
The point is he has to be conceding lesser runs on his good days. You can give him a pass today because the target was 350. He will need to find a consistency and balance in his bowling where he can threaten without giving it away.
Seriously guys, stop looking at scorecards and start watching the matches. That's how you judge performances.