Who is saying that Lesnar is better then those guys? i think you guys are just butt hurt about what lesnar achieved despite all the odds stacked against him. Jon Jones did not start out so late nor was he chucked in at the deep end with limited experience in the world of MMA, nor did he have diverticulitis and nor did he go to the WWE or some other place his career has always been in the MMA thats a significant advantage over someone like Lesnar who got in the sport so late with little experience, you should learn to give credit where it's due instead of coming out with nonsensical examples thinking you know more then a fake wrestling guy who's opinions don't matter right just like how you guys look down on lesnar after he made you eat some humble pie
Lol you're messed. Jon Jones started at 19 and cleared the division at 22. He was fighting guys with 10-20 years experience within MMA and beat everyone in the most competitive division in arguably MMA history. He didn't start late, he was just so talented that he could learn what was required to be successful in the same amount of time that it took Brook and was unbelievably more successful. Anderson Silva has fought fights with broken ribs, Rich Franklin KO'ed someone after he broke his hand WITHIN THE FIGHT. I think that's a lot worse than diverticulitis, you need to relax because you're making these extremely biased statements and you're discrediting how people have done more impressive things than Brook but you focus on the fact that Brook won like 4 fights in the UFC. One against a guy who's career went down after he got into a motorcycle accident, one against a guy who almost KO'ed him and should've won if the ref had stopped it (which he should've), one against a 45 year old and one against a no name. Relax, its 4 fights against a weak division. Did you even see how Velasquez and Overeem made a mockery of his life, don't speak about the UFC you know nothing.