What's new

Time to allow unlimited bouncers in Cricket

Should there be a limit on bouncers in an over?


  • Total voters
    4
  • Poll closed .

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,133
I feel that the current rule of limits on balls above head height etc are no longer needed. We have batsmen wearing enough protection, and there is enough rules regarding subs etc to mitigate the risk.

Allowing unlimited bouncers in an over will add to the entertainment for fans and also will be a great test of skills of batsmen and bowlers too.

Bouncer is an essential part of a bowler's ability to bowl. Why take it away?
 
The wind is actually blowing in the other direction with the recent increased awareness about the risk of concussions and long-term impact on the brain. I think in a decade or so, the calls to ban the bouncer altogether will be too loud to ignore.
 
So both Indian batsmen hurt by the short balls? But is this an issue with their skills and why are bouncers to blame?
 
We've already lost the old ball in ODI's, now we have another potential rule change which will limit Pakistan :))

Imagine this happening in the SA series. We have to face endless bouncers from Rabada and Nortje while they handle 125km/h thunderbolts from our terrible bowlers. We may as well become an associate nation lol.
 
Definitely, it's time to allow unlimited bouncers. Batters already have too much things going on for them there should be something for bowlers.
 
Definitely, it's time to allow unlimited bouncers. Batters already have too much things going on for them there should be something for bowlers.

When there were unlimited bouncers the scoring rates in test cricket were slow and a high proportion of drawn matches, what is the aim of unlimited bouncers, bowlers will still only get the same amount of wickets but the scoring will slow down and more tests will end in draws.
 
Some discussion on this aspect in Australia's use of bouncers in games against India.
 
A concussion specialist has recommended the ban of bouncers, at least in the underage cricket tournaments to avoid long-term problems. The recent spate of cricketers diagnosed with concussion after copping blows to helmet/head has given rise of a raging debate over whether the time has come to ban bouncer from the game altogether.

Those in support of the ban cite the safety of players involved while those who oppose reason that the game is already heavily titled towards batsman and taking away bouncer will rob bowlers of an effective weapon. The Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), the custodians of the game’s laws, have started a consultation process to discuss if the short-pitched deliveries should be deemed illegal.

Michael Turner, media director of the International Concussion and Head Injury Research Foundation, reckons that the brain should not be subject to concussion at least when it’s still evolving. “You want to avoid concussing the adolescent brain while it’s still evolving. You want to avoid concussions at any stage, but it’s particularly bad for youngsters,” Turner told The Telegraph.

“If stopping concussion in this age group means changing the rules to ensure that there are no short deliveries in junior cricket, this should be a serious consideration by those in authority,” he added.

The tragic incident of Australia batsman Phil Hughes dying after being hit on the back of the neck during a domestic competition is cited as the prime example of the dangers the controversial delivery poses. More recently, upcoming Australia batsman Will Pucovksi had to miss the the first two Tests against India last year due to concussion after being hit on the helmet during a practice match against the visiting Indian team.

Turner said helmets cannot prevent concussion. “Helmets are designed to prevent skull fracture but do not stop concussion. The way forward is to prevent concussion taking place – by changing the rules if necessary,” he reasoned.

“The outcome is likely to be more severe in younger brains. The evidence is that the younger you are when you get a concussion, the more likely you are to have long-term problems with it. Your brain is still developing up until your early 20s. And so concussion in the developing brain tends to have a worse outcome than one in an adult brain,” he added.

He suggests players below 18 years of age should get an informed consent from their parents.

“Under the age of 18 an adult has to take responsibility for the welfare of the people taking part,” he said.

“Once you have had a concussion, the long-term outcome cannot be assessed or reversed. Your fate is sealed as soon as the concussion occurs. Once individuals reach 18 and become adults, they are free to make their own decisions and assess the risks they are prepared to take,” he added.

https://www.cricketcountry.com/news...s-banning-bouncers-for-u-18-cricketers-968006
 
The MCC World Cricket committee (WCC) met recently via Conference Call. It was the first meeting of 2021, following the postponement of the physical meetings which were planned for 2020.

The key discussion points of the meeting were as follows:

Short-pitched bowling

The committee heard that MCC is to embark on a global consultation on whether the Law relating to short-pitched deliveries is fit for the modern game.

As Guardian of the Laws of the game, it is MCC’s duty to ensure that the Laws are applied in a safe manner, a viewpoint consistent across all sports. With research into concussion in sport having increased significantly in recent years, it is appropriate that MCC continues to monitor the Laws on short-pitched bowling, as it does with all other Laws.

There are important aspects to consider in the consultation, namely the balance between bat and ball; whether or not concussion should be recognised as a different injury to any other sustained; changes which are specific to particular sectors of the game - e.g. junior cricket; and whether or not lower-order batsmen should be given further protection than the Laws currently allow.

It is commonplace for the Club to launch consultation processes with various groups before changing Laws. For the major re-draft of the Laws, published in 2017, MCC consulted with various national governing bodies to gain feedback from all levels of the game.

The committee discussed the Law and were unanimous that short-pitched bowling is a core part of the game, particularly at the elite level. There was also discussion on other aspects of the game at all levels which may mitigate the risk of injury. They agreed to provide feedback during the consultation, which will begin with a survey that is due to be distributed in March 2021 to the specific groups identified to partake in the exercise. Data is to be collected from these stakeholders by the end of June 2021, after which the results will be debated by various committees and sub-committees within the Club as mentioned above, as well as the International Cricket Council (ICC), during the latter half of the year.

The final proposal and recommendations, whether for a change of Law or not, will be decided by the MCC Committee in December 2021, with any decision to be publicised in early 2022.
 
Back
Top