JaDed
Test Star
- Joined
- May 5, 2014
- Runs
- 39,606
Good this is a bipartisan effort, surprising wall street allowed this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
China and the EU appear to have resolved their differences over protecting labour rights in China and are set to sign a long-delayed investment agreement on Wednesday likely to make the economies of the two blocs more interdependent.
The investment talks have centred on opening up Chinese markets for European investment, as well as addressing Chinese practices opposed by the EU concerning industrial subsidies, state control of enterprises and forced technology transfers.
Markets likely to be opened in China include foreign investment in manufacturing including electric vehicles, telecoms and private hospitals. Issues of enforcement and arbitration have been at the heart of the talks.
China is already ranked as the EU’s second-largest trading partner (behind the US), with two-way goods commerce valued at more than €1bn (£908m) a day.
China is not the origin, the Chinese have stated this multiple times.
Covid19 has been found in Europe months before its thought to have originated in Wuhan.
Lol.
Italy sewage study suggests COVID-19 was there in December 2019
Elon Musk denies Tesla cars are used for spying in China
Elon Musk, the chief executive of the US electric carmaker Tesla, says his firm would be "shut down" if its vehicles were used for spying on China.
His comments came in response to reports that China's military had banned Tesla cars from its facilities.
The military had raised security concerns about the data collected by cameras installed in the cars.
China is Tesla's largest market after the US, accounting for about a quarter of the firm's global sales in 2020.
On Saturday, Mr Musk said if a business did engage in spying on a foreign government, "the negative effects for that company would be extremely bad".
"There's a very strong incentive for us to be very confidential with any information," Mr Musk told an influential Chinese business forum via video link. "If Tesla used cars to spy in China or anywhere, we will get shut down."
There has long been unease about the presence of big American companies operating in China and vice versa.
Relations between China and the US - the world's biggest two economies - are at their most strained for years.
Earlier this week, officials from both countries traded angry words in the first high-level talks between the Chinese government and the administration of US President Joe Biden.
Mr Musk urged greater mutual trust between China and the US, where Tesla is based in California.
He sought to downplay concerns over companies sharing sensitive data with their home governments, referencing the case of the Chinese-owned video platform TikTok.
Last year, former President Donald Trump threatened to ban TikTok in the US over concerns that users' data could be handed over to the Chinese government.
"Even if there was spying, what would the other country learn and would it actually matter?," Mr Musk said.
Elon Musk's car firm won approval for its Shanghai factory in 2018, becoming the first foreign automaker to operate a wholly owned plant in China.
China is the world's largest car market and its government has been heavily promoting the adoption of electric vehicles. This demand helped Tesla make a profit of $721m (£519m) in 2020.
The document shows the Chinese officials describing SARS coronaviruses as heralding a "new era of genetic weapons” that can be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human disease virus", the Australian media reported.
MONEYCONTROL NEWS MAY 09, 2021 / 11:12 PM IST
Representative image
Representative image
The Chinese military and senior public health officials discussed "weaponising" coronavirus, claims a "leaked" document dating back to 2015, the Australian media has reported.
Details of the document, titled 'The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons', was obtained by The Australian newspaper.
The document showed the purported Chinese officials discussing that bio-weapons could be produced at "0.05 per cent of the cost of traditional weapons", the daily reported.
Also Read: China honours 'Bat Woman' of controversial Wuhan lab as WHO team arrives to probe COVID-19 origins
The paper was obtained by the US State Department during its investigation into the origins of SARS-COV-2 virus, which causes the COVID-19 infection, the reports said.
COVID-19 Vaccine
Frequently Asked Questions
Show
RELATED STORIES
Cipla, Jubilant to face action if they fail to fulfill supply obligation of Remdesivir within 24 hou...
Key economic data for April, May not to be affected as compared to last year: Pronab Sen
‘You’ve Lost Your Sparkle’: What to do when burnout hits
Among the authors of the document were Lee Feng, former deputy director of China’s Bureau of Epidemic Prevention, and Xu Dezhong, the former chief of China's SARS Epidemic Analysis Expert Group, the Australian media claimed.
The document shows the Chinese officials describing SARS coronaviruses as heralding a "new era of genetic weapons” that can be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human disease virus, then weaponised and unleashed in a way never seen before”, The Australian reported.
Robert Potter, a cybersecurity specialist who analysed the document obtained by the Australian media, said it does not appear to be fake.
"We reached a high confidence conclusion that it was genuine … It’s not fake but it’s up to someone else to interpret how serious it is,” news.com.au quoted Potter as saying.
The 2015 document is featured in the upcoming book What Really Happened in Wuhan, by Australian journalist Sharri Markson.
Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) chief Peter Jennings said the document is significant amidst the suspicion over China's alleged role in the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The document "clearly shows that Chinese scientists were thinking about military application for different strains of the coronavirus and thinking about how it could be deployed", he told news.com.au.
Notably, Australia was among the first countries that called for an independent investigation to ascertain the reason behind the COVID-19 outbreak. The country has expressed a lack of confidence over Beijing's claim that coronavirus began spreading from a wet market in Wuhan.
The Chinese state-run Global Times, while reacting to the Australian media reports over the "leaked" 2015 document, accused them of spreading false information. They are "embarrassingly twisting" an open book as evidence against China, it said.
The book was published by Xu Dezhong in 2015 and was put on sale on Amazon, the Global Times claimed. "The book suggests that SARS epidemic during 2002 and 2004 in China originated through an unnatural way of genetic modification originating from abroad," the nationalist tabloid stated.
A leaked 2015 government paper has revealed a discussion by top Chinese scientists who said a virus could be “unleashed in way never seen before”.
Riah Matthews
riahmatthews
MAY 8, 20217:45PM
Video
Image
Wuhan Institute of Virology is ‘still genetically manipulating’ bat-coronaviruses
A document written by Chinese scientists and Chinese public health officials in 2015 discussed the weaponisation of SARS coronavirus, reveals the Weekend Australian.
Titled The Unnatural Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons, the paper predicted that World War Three would be fought with biological weapons.
Released five years before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it describes SARS coronaviruses as a “new era of genetic weapons” that can be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human *disease virus, then weaponised and unleashed in a way never seen before”.
Peter Jennings, the executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), told news.com.au that the document is as close to a “smoking gun” as we’ve got.
“I think this is significant because it clearly shows that Chinese scientists were thinking about military application for different strains of the coronavirus and thinking about how it could be deployed,” said Mr Jennings.
“It begins to firm up the possibility that what we have here is the accidental release of a pathogen for military use,” added Mr Jennings.
He also said that the document may explain why China has been so reluctant for outside investigations into the origins of COVID-19.
“If this was a case of transmission from a wet market it would be in China’s interest to co-operate … we’ve had the opposite of that.”
RELATED: Key detail pins China for virus leak
A micrograph of SARS-CoV-2 virus particle. Picture: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases / AFP.
A micrograph of SARS-CoV-2 virus particle. Picture: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases / AFP.Source:AFP
Among the 18 listed authors of the document are People’s Liberation Army scientists and weapons experts.
Robert Potter, a cyber security specialist who analyses leaked Chinese government documents was asked by The Australian to verify the paper. He says the document definitely isn’t fake.
“We reached a high confidence conclusion that it was genuine … It’s not fake but it’s up to someone else to interpret how serious it is,” Mr Potter told news.com.au.
“It emerged in the last few years … they (China) will almost certainly try to remove it now it’s been covered.”
Mr Potter says it isn’t unusual to see Chinese research papers discussing areas that they’re behind on and need to make progress in and that doesn’t necessarily equate to action being taken.
“It’s a really interesting article to show what their scientific researchers are thinking,” he added.
The document is discussed in a new book What really happened in Wuhan by The Australian investigations writer Sharri Markson which will be published by HarperCollins in September.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been caused by a coronavirus named SARS-Co V-2 which emerged in December 2019. Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses, several of which cause respiratory diseases in humans – ranging from a common cold to Severe Acute Respiritory Syndome (SARS).
NED-3586 How Coronavirus mutates - 0
Investigations by the World Health Organisation (WHO) have concluded the virus was most likely of animal origin and crossed over to humans from bats.
Director of public health pathology Dominic Dwyer went to Wuhan in January as the Australian representative as part of WHO investigations into the origins of COVID-19.
He told The Conversation in February that the Wuhan wet market, which was initially blamed as the source of the virus, may not be the original source of the disease.
RELATED: WHO backtracks on COVID lab leak
Wuhan’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, a “wet market’’ where exotic animals are kept alive in cages, and butchered for meat. Picture: Supplied.
Wuhan’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, a “wet market’’ where exotic animals are kept alive in cages, and butchered for meat. Picture: Supplied.Source:Supplied
“The market in Wuhan, in the end, was more of an amplifying event rather than necessarily a true ground zero. So we need to look elsewhere for the viral origins,” said Mr Dwyer.
On the hypothesis that the virus escaped from a lab, Mr Potter said that was highly unlikely.
“We visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is an impressive research facility, and looks to be run well, with due regard to staff health,” wrote My Dwyer.
“We spoke to the scientists there. We heard that scientists’ blood samples, which are routinely taken and stored, were tested for signs they had been infected. No evidence of antibodies to the coronavirus was found. We looked at their biosecurity audits. No evidence.”
The P4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province. Experts from the World Health Organisation (WHO) eliminated a controversial theory that COVID-19 came from a laboratory in Wuhan. Picture: Hector RETAMAL / AFP.
The P4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province. Experts from the World Health Organisation (WHO) eliminated a controversial theory that COVID-19 came from a laboratory in Wuhan. Picture: Hector RETAMAL / AFP.Source:AFP
In March WHO reported on their Wuhan visit and called for further investigations into the origins of COVID-19.
“As far as WHO is concerned, all hypotheses remain on the table … We have not yet found the source of the virus, and we must continue to follow the science and leave no stone unturned as we do,” said WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began there have been 156 million cases of COVID-19 and 3.26 million deaths worldwide.
Riah Matthews is the commissioning editor for news.com.au.
whats new, this was known back in december 2019
Theres enought evidence to suggest it originates from the wuhan lab
lol China allowed a top secret document to find its way into the hands an Aussie paper.
Are Indians now saying the debacle in their country is because Covid19 is a biological weapon?
Bro you need to stop supporting the Chinese. Their regime is the most inhumane in this world today.
there already in the thread on the topic.
Ive read it, cannot see any evidence. Perhaps you can point it out?
I will brother if the Indians can prove China made Covid19, a biological weapon. Do you believe this?
you wont even see it if i put it on the table infront of you so whats the point?
lol. Others might.
It seems you are struggling to point out this evidence. Perhaps you should back up your claims before accusing others? Can you show us the evidence or not?
because you never accept facts, youve made your mind up already - China is the savior of the world sent by god and now nothing is going to change your mind on it.
Theres enought evidence to suggest it originates from the wuhan lab
China would be the last people on Earth to save Muslims. They're the most inhumane out of the regions around the world.
It's an open secret that the Chinese didn't allow independent investigators to inspect the Wuhan lab and most of the early samples of the virus were deliberately destroyed.
https://www.businessinsider.com/china-confirms-that-it-destroyed-early-samples-of-new-coronavirus-2020-5
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/coronavirus-cause-china-research-evidence-destroyed-a9495856.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-56054468
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-refuses-to-give-who-raw-data-on-early-covid-19-cases-11613150580
Anyone doing propaganda for the CCP is absolutely disingenuous.
I can’t be sure it was from a Chinese lab, however:
1. Anyone who thinks that China doesn’t have a bio weapons program is naive.
2. It is a huge coincidence that Wuhan where the virus started is also the site of a Chinese virus lab.
China already has a plan to save Muslims, just ask the Ugyhurs. Forced sterilizations, wives being forced to share their bed with male monitors while their husbands rot in concentration camps, no closing restaurants during Ramadan etc.
China is excepted in the selective outrage manual. Please dont bring this up again ever.
Would you like India to go to war with China? Surely this is then an act of war?
Well, if this was proven beyond doubt - it holds China accountable to the whole world not just India. Unless your selective bias allows you to ignore deaths in your country just because the perpetrator is China.
Personally, I do think there is some dirty Microbiology science that has happened between US & China through gain of function research that has caused this accident - this has been fact checked as a conspiracy theory. Though too many pointers & coincidences still for me.
Please detail why you believe China created Covid19 a bio weapon. Should be a fun read.![]()
So far it seems its mainly Indians suggesting this. India will far surpass all other nations with numbers or deaths. So if India can prove but others are not sure, you will go to war with the Dragon?
Would you like India to go to war with China? Surely this is then an act of war?
So far it seems its mainly Indians suggesting this. India will far surpass all other nations with numbers or deaths. So if India can prove but others are not sure, you will go to war with the Dragon?
Theres enought evidence to suggest it originates from the wuhan lab
The origin of the novel coronavirus is still unclear and the theory that it was caused by a laboratory leak needs to be taken seriously until there is a rigorous data-led investigation that proves it wrong, a group of leading scientists said.
COVID-19, which emerged in China in late 2019, has killed 3.34 million people, cost the world trillions of dollars in lost income and upended normal life for billions of people.
"More investigation is still needed to determine the origin of the pandemic," said the 18 scientists, including Ravindra Gupta, a clinical microbiologist at the University of Cambridge, and Jesse Bloom, who studies the evolution of viruses at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
"Theories of accidental release from a lab and zoonotic spillover both remain viable," the scientists including David Relman, professor of microbiology at Stanford, said in a letter to the journal Science.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/694.1
The authors of the letter said the World Health Organization's investigation into the origins of the virus had not made a "balanced consideration" of the theory that it may have come from a laboratory incident.
In its final report, written jointly with Chinese scientists, a WHO-led team that spent four weeks in and around Wuhan in January and February said the virus had probably been transmitted from bats to humans through another animal, and that a lab leak was "extremely unlikely" as a cause.
But there are myriad different ideas about the origin of the virus including a series of conspiracy theories.
"We must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data," the scientists said, adding that an intellectually rigorous and dispassionate investigation needed to take place.
"In this time of unfortunate anti-Asian sentiment in some countries, we note that at the beginning of the pandemic, it was Chinese doctors, scientists, journalists, and citizens who shared with the world crucial information about the spread of the virus—often at great personal cost."
It "seems" to you that it is mainly Indians, but that's just your bias. The belief is rather widespread. This is one of the most authoritative voices:
https://www.usnews.com/news/top-new...e-thinks-covid-19-originated-in-a-chinese-lab
Theres enought evidence to suggest it originates from the wuhan lab
Care to share because im not a mind reader?![]()
Ive not see any mainstream tv news channel in Europe making reports to suggest Covid came out of a lab, while I have seen Indian news channels asserting its pretty much proven.
The main reasons given are, Wuhan had a lab, Its very contagious, spread very quickly.
It needs to proven scientifically.
A full World Health Organization (WHO) report into the origins of the virus was published in March and said the virus most likely jumped from an intermediate animal to humans. The report said it was “extremely unlikely” the virus escaped from a government lab in Wuhan. Investigators were not able to determine exactly how and when the original transmission took place.
WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called the report an “important beginning” but noted it failed to find the source of the virus.
That report was criticized by many who argued the investigation was not extensive enough as access to raw data was restricted by Chinese authorities.
The letter published Thursday notes that while there were no findings in clear support of either a natural spillover or lab accident, the team of investigators assessed the zoonotic spillover from an intermediate host theory as “likely to very likely” and the lab accident theory as “extremely unlikely.”
“The two theories were not given balanced consideration,” the letter states.
“As scientists with relevant expertise, we agree with the WHO director-general, the United States and 13 other countries and the European Union that greater clarity about the origins of this pandemic is necessary and feasible to achieve,” the scientists said.
“We must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data. A proper investigation should be transparent, objective, data-driven, inclusive of broad expertise, subject to independent oversight, and responsibly managed to minimize the impact of conflicts of interest.”
The letter follows several similar public statements from groups of scientists all over the world calling for a new and more transparent investigation.
https://thehill.com/changing-americ...call-for-deeper-inquiry-into-covid-19-origins
You are probably watching too much Indian news channels. Discussion in this thread restarted with a couple of posts by [MENTION=150069]Lego20[/MENTION] the second of which was from an Australian media source with the headline "Chinese military and health officials discussed weaponising coronavirus in 2015, claims 'leaked' doc".
I know of these report & im actually open to the view its a man made virus but we need more than just conjecture, we need science to prove this. There is someone who can, do you know who?
Some leading scientists think that WHO is abetting a coverup by China.
The Daszak and Andersen letters were really political, not scientific, statements, yet were amazingly effective. Articles in the mainstream press repeatedly stated that a consensus of experts had ruled lab escape out of the question or extremely unlikely. Their authors relied for the most part on the Daszak and Andersen letters, failing to understand the yawning gaps in their arguments. Mainstream newspapers all have science journalists on their staff, as do the major networks, and these specialist reporters are supposed to be able to question scientists and check their assertions. But the Daszak and Andersen assertions went largely unchallenged.
...
This was surprising because both the SARS1 and MERS viruses had left copious traces in the environment. The intermediary host species of SARS1 was identified within four months of the epidemic’s outbreak, and the host of MERS within nine months. Yet some 15 months after the SARS2 pandemic began, and after a presumably intensive search, Chinese researchers had failed to find either the original bat population, or the intermediate species to which SARS2 might have jumped, or any serological evidence that any Chinese population, including that of Wuhan, had ever been exposed to the virus prior to December 2019. Natural emergence remained a conjecture which, however plausible to begin with, had gained not a shred of supporting evidence in over a year.
...
Baric and Shi referred to the obvious risks in their paper but argued they should be weighed against the benefit of foreshadowing future spillovers. Scientific review panels, they wrote, “may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue.” Given various restrictions being placed on gain-of function (GOF) research, matters had arrived in their view at “a crossroads of GOF research concerns; the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks must be weighed against the risk of creating more dangerous pathogens. In developing policies moving forward, it is important to consider the value of the data generated by these studies and whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved.”
That statement was made in 2015. From the hindsight of 2021, one can say that the value of gain-of-function studies in preventing the SARS2 epidemic was zero. The risk was catastrophic, if indeed the SARS2 virus was generated in a gain-of-function experiment.
...
The grants were assigned to the prime contractor, Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, who subcontracted them to Shi. Here are extracts from the grants for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. (“CoV” stands for coronavirus and “S protein” refers to the virus’s spike protein.)
“Test predictions of CoV inter-species transmission. Predictive models of host range (i.e. emergence potential) will be tested experimentally using reverse genetics, pseudovirus and receptor binding assays, and virus infection experiments across a range of cell cultures from different species and humanized mice.”
“We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential.”
What this means, in non-technical language, is that Shi set out to create novel coronaviruses with the highest possible infectivity for human cells. Her plan was to take genes that coded for spike proteins possessing a variety of measured affinities for human cells, ranging from high to low. She would insert these spike genes one by one into the backbone of a number of viral genomes (“reverse genetics” and “infectious clone technology”), creating a series of chimeric viruses. These chimeric viruses would then be tested for their ability to attack human cell cultures (“in vitro”) and humanized mice (“in vivo”). And this information would help predict the likelihood of “spillover,” the jump of a coronavirus from bats to people.
Probably the best discussion of the origins of the virus, and the attempt by various parties to mislead the public is found here. The author is a former New York Times science reporter:
https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] [MENTION=140824]Last Monetarist[/MENTION] [MENTION=150069]Lego20[/MENTION] @Ch Tab
I was in Shanghai when the virus emerged in Hubei Province at the end of December 2019, none of the Chinese people I worked with, some of them from Hubei, believed the official story of it originating in the wet market and there being no links with the virology institute. There was a crackdown on Chinese social media such as Weibo and WeChat by the censors at the start of January 2020 to prevent people from sharing data. Journalists and healthcare professionals that tried to speak up in Hubei were silenced and arrested.
The guileless clowns that keep defending the CCP are worth contempt.
I was in Shanghai when the virus emerged in Hubei Province at the end of December 2019, none of the Chinese people I worked with, some of them from Hubei, believed the official story of it originating in the wet market and there being no links with the virology institute. There was a crackdown on Chinese social media such as Weibo and WeChat by the censors at the start of January 2020 to prevent people from sharing data. Journalists and healthcare professionals that tried to speak up in Hubei were silenced and arrested.
The guileless clowns that keep defending the CCP are worth contempt.
Are you saying Covid19 is a man made virus?
The grants were assigned to the prime contractor, Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, who subcontracted them to Shi. Here are extracts from the grants for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. (“CoV” stands for coronavirus and “S protein” refers to the virus’s spike protein.)
“Test predictions of CoV inter-species transmission. Predictive models of host range (i.e. emergence potential) will be tested experimentally using reverse genetics, pseudovirus and receptor binding assays, and virus infection experiments across a range of cell cultures from different species and humanized mice.”
“We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential.”
What this means, in non-technical language, is that Shi set out to create novel coronaviruses with the highest possible infectivity for human cells. Her plan was to take genes that coded for spike proteins possessing a variety of measured affinities for human cells, ranging from high to low. She would insert these spike genes one by one into the backbone of a number of viral genomes (“reverse genetics” and “infectious clone technology”), creating a series of chimeric viruses. These chimeric viruses would then be tested for their ability to attack human cell cultures (“in vitro”) and humanized mice (“in vivo”). And this information would help predict the likelihood of “spillover,” the jump of a coronavirus from bats to people.
You have to be clear about what you mean by "man made"?
A virus made by taking bits and pieces of different viruses is man made. The covid virus doesn't seem to have been created in this manner.
However, a virus taken from nature and given conditions in a lab where its mutations are selected on the basis of whether they can infect humans can also be called man made. This is called "gain of function" research. There is quite a bit of support for the covid virus having been created by such a process.
It is documented that Shi was doing "gain of function" research in the Wuhan lab. From the article by Wade:
Both are defintions of man made. I know what gain of function is, this is a very serious experiment of using virus, making them mega-viruses and then finding some sort of cure.
So you believe it's man made. I also have reservations of it being a natural virus, so im not totally disagreeing.
The question then arises, if China is behind this virus due to gain of function experiments or is there another power behind it?
Did you know the US was funding the Wuhan lab?
Facebook has lifted a ban on posts claiming Covid-19 was man-made, following a resurgence of interest in the “lab leak” theory of the disease’s onset.
The social network says its new policy comes “in light of ongoing investigations into the origin”.
In February, Facebook explicitly banned the claim, as part of a broad policy update aimed at “removing more false claims about Covid-19 and vaccines”. In a public statement at the time, it said: “Following consultations with leading health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), we are expanding the list of false claims we will remove to include additional debunked claims about the coronavirus and vaccines.”
Anyone posting claims that Covid-19 was “man-made or manufactured” could have seen their posts removed or restricted, and repeatedly sharing the allegation could have led to a ban from the site entirely.
On Wednesday, the company said: “In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of Covid-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that Covid-19 is man-made from our apps. We’re continuing to work with health experts to keep pace with the evolving nature of the pandemic and regularly update our policies as new facts and trends emerge.”
The change follows a Wall Street Journal report that US intelligence sources believe there is some evidence to warrant further investigation of the “lab leak” theory. According to the newspaper, three staff members at the Wuhan Institute for Virology sought hospital treatment for flu-like symptoms in November 2019. Others have criticised the reporting, noting that it still relies on circumstantial evidence and speculation.
Facebook is keen to ensure that a change in one rule doesn’t lead to a free-for-all for Covid misinformation. On the same day that it lifted the ban on lab-leak theories, it tightened up restrictions on users who “repeatedly share misinformation on Facebook”.
Under the new rules, individual Facebook users who repeatedly share content that has been rated false will have all their posts suppressed, even ones that have not been – or have yet to be – rated false. Additionally, users who like a page that has repeatedly shared false information will now be given a pop-up notice, warning them of the posting history.
“Whether it’s false or misleading content about Covid-19 and vaccines, climate change, elections or other topics, we’re making sure fewer people see misinformation on our apps,” Facebook said in a statement.
The company has come under fire this year for its failure to act on misinformation “superspreaders”: individual users with hundreds of thousands, or millions, of followers who regularly post false claims about Covid-19.
Hypocrisy rears its ugly head again, if mainstream media had played an honest role at the start of the crisis instead of tedious grandstanding against Donald Trump, maybe China won't have gotten away with the biggest state crime perpetrated on the planet since WWII.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/may/27/facebook-lifts-ban-on-posts-claiming-covid-19-was-man-made
There are many reasons to believe that virus came from the Wuhan lab, though nothing can be determined with 100% certainty if the Chinese government doesn't share data.
For example, if there was an animal from which the virus jumped to humans then other animals of this specie would show the presence of the virus. No specie has been found.
I doubt the US was trying to develop bioweapons in a Chinese lab.
So US released a virus in China, then 100s of 1000s of Americans died of it.The US was funding work in Wuhan, surprised you dont know this. One being EcoHealth Alliance. The US has its won bioweapons labs of course but they were involved in Wuhan, its silly to deny this.
Maybe it wasnt the Chinese but the US, who released a virus to blame China?
The US was funding work in Wuhan, surprised you dont know this. One being EcoHealth Alliance. The US has its won bioweapons labs of course but they were involved in Wuhan, its silly to deny this.
Maybe it wasnt the Chinese but the US, who released a virus to blame China?
Read what I wrote carefully.
I did not say the US was not funding Wuhan.
I said it wasn't trying to develop bioweapons in Wuhan. The US may or may not have bioweapons programs in the US, but to think it was trying to develop bioweapons in Wuhan which was easily accessible to the Chinese Army is absurd.
If you think that the US deliberately released the virus with the goal of blaming China, I really don't have time for this kind of nonsense.
I never suggested this is what I think or believe. Im asking you if you are also keeping this option on the table with an open mind? In Oct 2019 there was a world military games in Wuhan, with US personnell present. There are reports of an American contracting the virus soon after back in the US.
When you are funding a lab which is experimenting with viruses you have to accept some sort of responsiblity with their work too.
Please go ahead and explain what you BELIEVE? Was it an accident or deliberate attempt by China to release a man made virus?
3 things I believe are most likely:
1) The virus came from the Wuhan lab. No animal has been found with virus in spite of an extensive search.
https://nypost.com/2021/05/28/inside-chinas-exhaustive-search-for-covid-positive-animals/
2) The Chinese military engages in bioweapons research and collaborates with the different virus labs in China.
3) It was an accidental release. The Chinese are crazy enough to do "gain of function" virus research without proper safeguards, but not that crazy to release the virus deliberately.
This is what the US might claim in the coming months. China will of course refute this. What next? US and the world will wage war on China? Also why arent the US or Indian government openly stating this? Surely they know as much as you do.
This is what the US might claim in the coming months. China will of course refute this. What next? US and the world will wage war on China? Also why arent the US or Indian government openly stating this? Surely they know as much as you do.
Don't forget that Chinese banks invested/loaned $2.5 billion to a private equity firm partly owned by Biden's drug-addict son Hunter. Biden is going to make a lot of noise but not going to take any strong action against the Chinese.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403
India is probably waiting for more facts to come, which will most likely come from US investigations. India is not united, it is a democracy. So whatever the government says, it has to say carefully.
Even if India came out and said openly that the virus came from a Chinese lab doing "gain of function" research, how will it benefit India? It can only benefit if it acts together with the Western countries, not if it goes at it alone. Have to wait for a year or so to see where this goes.
What Western democracies, Japan and India should do is to cut off economic ties with China as long as it is ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (which also is committing genocide against the Uyghurs). However these are democracies, so they are soft and won't take action which will mean real change. There are enough lobbies in these countries (to which Hunter Biden also belongs) which profit from China trade, and these lobbies will block real action.
If China knowingly hasnt told the world it came from a lab & from their research it can be classed as an act of war with millions dying while in China more have prob died of falling over. China holds US $ bonds, is the biggest trader on Earth, has a powerful military etc. Nothing can be done to China, prob best for India to accept it and move on.
While China has the lead, Western multinationals are starting to move their production to other countries like Vietnam. While Pakistan may not get to China's level, it can get a share of Western FDI. That is pretty much the only feasible way to utilize Pakistan's rich human talent pool.