What's new

Trevor Bayliss would remove T20I cricket from international calendar

UN talkz

First Class Star
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Runs
4,138
Trevor Bayliss :

"I wouldn't play T20 internationals.

If you want to play a World Cup every four years, then let the teams play T20s for six months before that.

I'd just let the franchises play"

Views????
 
There's a lot of T20s played. I wouldn't be against just having a T20 WC and no more international T20s. There's enough T20 leagues for players to stay T20 sharp and improve their skills in that format.
 
It's a money making machine for majority of cricket boards and they would never let this happen. You are seeing more of these three T20 matches series and Tri series for a reason.
 
Agree with Trevor bayliss.There is no need for international t20s.just plan t20 world cups at regular intervals.
 
Boards like the PCB, WICB will never agree to this.

But yea I only care about the T20 WC's. The rest do not matter. I would rather have more 5 matches OD series and 3 tests series.
 
Agree with Bayliss, exact same stance has been taken by BCCI from long back. For BCCI T20i are opurtunity to try out different new players. Just before T20 WC, focus will be shifted towards T20i from BCCI / Team Ind.

IPL is the most important thing for BCCI outside T20 WC
 
Last edited:
Trevor Bayliss would remove T20 cricket from international calendar

Trevor Bayliss told Sky Sports he does not believe Twenty20 should feature in international cricket outside of World Cups.

England coach Bayliss - speaking after his side beat New Zealand in their final T20 Tri-Series game in Hamilton but missed out on a spot in the final against Australia on net run rate - reckons the game's shortest format should primarily be played domestically.

However, the 55-year-old expects separate T20 coaches - Ricky Ponting has expressed interest in a role of that ilk for Australia - to become the norm as the international calendar tries to fit in that format, ODI cricket and Test matches.

"I haven't changed my opinion - I wouldn't play T20 international cricket," Bayliss told Sky Sports' Ian Ward following England's two-run win at Seddon Park in their 100th Twenty20 international.

"If you want to play a World Cup every four years or so then maybe get the international teams to play six months before but I'd just let the franchises play.

"I think [separate T20 coaches] is definitely the way it's heading if we continue to put in so many games. There will be a blow out with coaches."

Australia have won each of their four games in the Tri-Series so far with a squad of players who had principally come off the back of strong Big Bash League campaigns, such as D'Arcy Short, Billy Stanlake and Chris Lynn.

Bayliss says that T20 experience showed in the Trans-Tasman series and thinks cricket will continue to see players focussing on the white-ball game over the red - England spinner Adil Rashid doing that this week after confirming he will only play limited-overs cricket in 2018.

"It is quite obvious that [Australia's] players have all come out of two months of T20 cricket, whereas both New Zealand and England have been playing other forms or, as is the case for some of our guys, sitting at home," said Bayliss.

"That was quite evident in the way that they played - they were up to speed with the T20 game.

"[Adil] was out of the Test team and wants to concentrate on his white-ball cricket. I think there will be more of those players - it's just the nature of the beast and the way world cricket is going.

"In swimming you have a 1500m specialist and a 100m specialist. It's the way it seems to be heading - only the best players are able to play in all three formats so if some guys want to concentrate on one form, so be it."

England will return to action in a five-match ODI series against New Zealand, starting in Hamilton next Sunday - but Bayliss says that game may come too early for Ben Stokes.

Stokes has been training with England in New Zealand after pleading not guilty to affray and is eyeing his first game for his country since the third ODI against Windies in September.

"Ben has fitted right back in and it only seems like yesterday that he went away," added Bayliss. "It will take a while for him to get up to speed and we will have to make a decision [based on] nets.

"I think [the first ODI] might be a bit early for him - and as we won our last series 4-1 [against Australia] there might not be a spot for him!

"We are just going to have to play it by ear."

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ne...emove-t20-cricket-from-international-calendar
 
I'm with him. Keep the T20s limited to the circus leagues.

Agree with Bayliss, exact same stance has been taken by BCCI from long back. For BCCI T20i are opurtunity to try out different new players. Just before T20 WC, focus will be shifted towards T20i from BCCI / Team Ind.

IPL is the most important thing for BCCI outside T20 WC

I agree with him. T20I s are just a waste of time.

Agree with Trevor bayliss.There is no need for international t20s.just plan t20 world cups at regular intervals.



Watch the game between India and SA the atmosphere is like a carnival.. T20 is a fun way for families and friends to go out and get entertained watching a cricket match.. This is the future, only on forums such as these people talk about tests and even those same people don’t watch 5 days themselves..

T20’s will stay and in fact in next 15-20 years you will see T20’s as the biggest thing in cricket.. There would be iconic test tourns in between but eventually the year will be filled with T20’s.. Whether leagues or international that has to be seen..
 
Look at the full house in wanderers for Ind vs SA game. T20 is MUST if cricket has to survive .
 
Watch the game between India and SA the atmosphere is like a carnival.. T20 is a fun way for families and friends to go out and get entertained watching a cricket match.. This is the future, only on forums such as these people talk about tests and even those same people don’t watch 5 days themselves..

T20’s will stay and in fact in next 15-20 years you will see T20’s as the biggest thing in cricket.. There would be iconic test tourns in between but eventually the year will be filled with T20’s.. Whether leagues or international that has to be seen..

League cricket can already do that with much more variations like bringing overseas players and club rivalries etc.
Problem here is that some cricket board's revenue takes hit if they don't get to host t20 internationals and that is upto icc to find solution about it.
Because t20 leagues will clash with international matches.
 
Lol at you dinasours. The market is shifting tolerates t20. You get in or get left behind.
 
Watch the game between India and SA the atmosphere is like a carnival.. T20 is a fun way for families and friends to go out and get entertained watching a cricket match.. This is the future, only on forums such as these people talk about tests and even those same people don’t watch 5 days themselves..

T20’s will stay and in fact in next 15-20 years you will see T20’s as the biggest thing in cricket.. There would be iconic test tourns in between but eventually the year will be filled with T20’s.. Whether leagues or international that has to be seen..

But most teams use T20 as some kind of a warm up match to find players for their ODI side. Look at the side they fielded. They should eliminate 3 match series . May be 1 is enough
 
No need to fix something that's not broken.

I would rather change tests to a league system and play them at night. This will eliminate the home advantage and squads will be more balanced.
 
I think T20Is are fine the way they are. Very rarely are they long as ODI or Test Series. Most T20 legs of bilateral series have 1,2 or 3 T20Is only. Any more is rare.
 
New Zealand coach Mike Hesson defends T20Is after Trevor Bayliss calls for its abolition

Wellington: New Zealand coach Mike Hesson defended T20I cricket after his English counterpart called for it to be cut from the sports crowded calendar. Hesson acknowledged England coach Trevor Bayliss concerns about burnout among players and staff but said T20 had an important role to play internationally. "There's always a workload issue, I think that's fair, but there's also a revenue generation issue," he told reporters.

"In some countries that's not as big a deal but for New Zealand Cricket, to get 35,000 people to Eden Park is huge for us, huge for the game and huge for the promotion of the game." Hesson also rejected the notion that T20Is were not meaningful fixtures."Too right they are," he said.

"You've got guys that only play T20 and that's their chance to play international cricket, so I think absolutely its meaningful." Bayliss sparked the debate after his side failed to qualify for the trans-Tasman T20 series final, despite beating New Zealand by two runs in Hamilton on Sunday. The Australian, who was appointed as England's head coach in all forms of the game in 2015, questioned the wisdom of retaining the T20 format at the top level, citing the burden on top players and coaches.

Instead, he suggested administrators could ease international fixture congestion by leaving T20 to domestic competitions such as India's IPL and the Australian Big Bash League."I wouldn't play T20Is, I'd just let the franchises play," Bayliss told Sky Sports.

"If we continue putting on so many games there will be a certain amount of blowout, not just players but coaches as well." Bayliss, who has coached in both the IPL and BBL, said any international T20s should be held in a limited window based around the ICC's T20 World Cup. If you want to play a World Cup every four years or whatever it is, maybe six months before you get the international teams and let them play some T20 internationals," he said.

England have struggled for form in the T20 tri-series, missing key players in the wake of the Ashes and one-day international series in Australia. They edged past New Zealand with a two-run victory in Hamilton on Sunday but failed to qualify for Wednesdays final against Australia due to an inferior run rate.

The tourists still have a Test and one-day series to come in New Zealand and Bayliss said coaching all three formats on such a marathon tour was challenging.

He said it made sense to split coaching duties between different formats.

http://www.cricketcountry.com/news/...olition-687177/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
 
The biggest crowd we've had this summer was for a T20, don't think anything else came close.

It would be stupid to get rid of them when they make so much money for boards.

IIRC, 1 T20 makes more money than 5 days of Test cricket in India as well.
 
Last edited:
Why would the ICC and the cricket boards voluntarily give up millions in profit by giving T20 internationals? Why would countries like NZ, Eng do so, when they don't have a proper T20 league of their own to make money from?

Trevor Bayliss is another over-rated blowhard coach. I don't think he's going to make it to the 2019 as England coach.
 
T20s are here to stay. None has time to watch cricket 8 hours a day for 5 days when Azhar Ali and Sami Aslam are batting.
 
Back
Top