What's new

TV ratings and attendances for Pakistan Tests in Australia

I disagree with Cricket Australia CEO James Sutherland - I think that the SCG Test should be a Day/Night one too.

Here are the ratings for the Sydney Test:

Day 1:

1 NINE NEWS Nine 1,088,000
2 NINE NEWS 6:30 Nine 1,050,000
3 SEVEN NEWS Seven Network 1,045,000
4 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT Seven Network 1,024,000
5 A CURRENT AFFAIR Nine 892,000
6 THIRD TEST – AUSTRALIA V PAKISTAN SESSION 3 Nine 883,000
7 CRICKET: BIG BASH LEAGUE GAME 15 – SESSION 2 Network Ten 786,000

Day 2
1 NINE NEWS 1,057,000
2 NINE NEWS 6:30 1,017,000
3 SEVEN NEWS 961,000
4 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT 922,000
5 THIRD TEST – AUS V PAKISTAN S3 831,000

Day 3
1 SEVEN NEWS Seven Network 1,060,000
2 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT Seven Network 1,021,000
3 NINE NEWS Nine 974,000
4 NINE NEWS 6:30 Nine 972,000
5 A CURRENT AFFAIR Nine 873,000
6 CRICKET: BIG BASH LEAGUE GAME 17 – SESSION 2 Network Ten 838,000
7 THIRD TEST – AUSTRALIA V PAKISTAN SESSION 3 Nine 742,000

Day 4
1 SEVEN NEWS 1,097,000
2 NINE NEWS 1,001,000
3 NINE NEWS 6:30 981,000
4 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT 954,000
5 THIRD TEST – AUS V PAKISTAN S3 873,000
 
I disagree with Cricket Australia CEO James Sutherland - I think that the SCG Test should be a Day/Night one too.

Here are the ratings for the Sydney Test:

Day 1:

1 NINE NEWS Nine 1,088,000
2 NINE NEWS 6:30 Nine 1,050,000
3 SEVEN NEWS Seven Network 1,045,000
4 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT Seven Network 1,024,000
5 A CURRENT AFFAIR Nine 892,000
6 THIRD TEST – AUSTRALIA V PAKISTAN SESSION 3 Nine 883,000
7 CRICKET: BIG BASH LEAGUE GAME 15 – SESSION 2 Network Ten 786,000

Day 2
1 NINE NEWS 1,057,000
2 NINE NEWS 6:30 1,017,000
3 SEVEN NEWS 961,000
4 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT 922,000
5 THIRD TEST – AUS V PAKISTAN S3 831,000

Day 3
1 SEVEN NEWS Seven Network 1,060,000
2 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT Seven Network 1,021,000
3 NINE NEWS Nine 974,000
4 NINE NEWS 6:30 Nine 972,000
5 A CURRENT AFFAIR Nine 873,000
6 CRICKET: BIG BASH LEAGUE GAME 17 – SESSION 2 Network Ten 838,000
7 THIRD TEST – AUSTRALIA V PAKISTAN SESSION 3 Nine 742,000

Day 4
1 SEVEN NEWS 1,097,000
2 NINE NEWS 1,001,000
3 NINE NEWS 6:30 981,000
4 SEVEN NEWS / TODAY TONIGHT 954,000
5 THIRD TEST – AUS V PAKISTAN S3 873,000

Lol where do you even get these numbers
 
Man, you guys are all at [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] like a pack of wolves. Good stats, just a shame Pakistan have been such a letdown for the crowds that came in.
 
I very much doubt that any of us expected these numbers......

First Test at Brisbane
78,085 = Pakistan attendance 2016-17 (record for a non-Ashes Test)
(53,572 = New Zealand attendance 2015-16)

Second Test at Melbourne
142,188 = Pakistan attendance 2016-17 (of which 63,478 on rain-affected Boxing Day)
(127,069 = West Indies attendance 2015-16)

Of note, Melbourne is nowadays the city with the most Indians in Australia, so whereas until 2003 attendances for Pakistan used to dwarf those for India, the opposite is true now:

1983-84 Pakistan: Boxing Day = 40,277 total = 111,611
1984-85 West Indies: Day 1 = 15,504, total = 97,271
1985-86 India: Boxing Day = 18,146, total = 77,715
2014-15 India: Boxing Day = 69,993, total = 194,481

Third Test at Sydney
112,029 = Pakistan attendance 2016-17
(Last year's West Indies Test was rain-ruined, but the Day 1 attendance of 30,305 was up by more than 10,000 on when India visited the previous year, source http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/great-exp...han-half-full-on-day-one-20150106-12itqv.html ).

that is encouraging

I hope pcb can arrange more matches for pakistan vs aus in australia with cricket australia.
If both boards agree. I think as long as cost justifies profit, this should not be a problem unless a peculiar third party has an issue with this
 
Good numbers.

Pak could have done wayyyyyyyyy better in terms of performance on the field. And that would've raised the attendance numbers much more.

Rain at the MCG also affected these, I'd say by as much as 50 thousand.

We were really good in the first two tests, barring the last day at the MCG, which is THE WORST in probably our entire history. I'll never forget it, worse than Sydney 2010.

Result would have been different with MA and Salman Butt playing
 
All the rubbish posted above aside, I seriously hope Test cricket is revived like the earlier times. Grew up in the 1990's watching packed stadiums at Eden/ Lords/ MCG etc. Crowd for tests matches is always welcome.

Tests are a dying breed but still some life is left in Aus/ Eng and somewhat in India (last Mumbai test had incredible crowds).
 
That all non-South African tourists to Australia tend to get smashed, but these 2016-17 Pakistanis were popular and highly watchable tourists who also had the good grace to put up a fight in the first two Tests and then lose!

Except 2012 India hasn't got smashed in Australia in last decade or so. Or do you think otherwise?
 
Except 2012 India hasn't got smashed in Australia in last decade or so. Or do you think otherwise?
I almost agree with you.

The 2003-4 Indians had the amazing fortune that McGrath and Warne were away.

The 2007-8 Indians had an ATG batting line-up, but 2-1 flattered them: Australia lost at Perth after Monkeygate in a state of fury at their own Board for sucking up to India rather than defending their own players.

2011-12 was a Pakistan-style whitewash.

2014-15 was fascinating: dead pitches helped India but they had learned the lessons of the previous tour and had a younger, better team.

The irony is that the flat Aussie pitches now make the matches almost unwatchable for me: the batsmen are in complete control.

I attended two of the three Tests but found even the Gabba Test was on a pitch with too little grass. Whereas the Adelaide one was a beauty.
 
I almost agree with you.

The 2003-4 Indians had the amazing fortune that McGrath and Warne were away.

The 2007-8 Indians had an ATG batting line-up, but 2-1 flattered them: Australia lost at Perth after Monkeygate in a state of fury at their own Board for sucking up to India rather than defending their own players.

2011-12 was a Pakistan-style whitewash.

2014-15 was fascinating: dead pitches helped India but they had learned the lessons of the previous tour and had a younger, better team.

The irony is that the flat Aussie pitches now make the matches almost unwatchable for me: the batsmen are in complete control.

I attended two of the three Tests but found even the Gabba Test was on a pitch with too little grass. Whereas the Adelaide one was a beauty.

In 2003-04: Australians were lucky Zaheer was injured. We would have won the series otherwise.

In 2007-08: Without Steve Bucknor's farcical umpiring at SCG, we would have won that test and the series 2-1

In 2011-12: Was a proper hammerring with an overaged Sachin/ Sehwag/ Dravid

In 2014-15: We were easily more competetive than Eng/ Pak/ SL/ NZ/ WI last time they were in Australia. Came close to winning at adelaide. Still managed to draw at MCG/ SCG.


See, how flawed your comparisons are?
 
In 2003-04: Australians were lucky Zaheer was injured. We would have won the series otherwise.

In 2007-08: Without Steve Bucknor's farcical umpiring at SCG, we would have won that test and the series 2-1

In 2011-12: Was a proper hammerring with an overaged Sachin/ Sehwag/ Dravid

In 2014-15: We were easily more competetive than Eng/ Pak/ SL/ NZ/ WI last time they were in Australia. Came close to winning at adelaide. Still managed to draw at MCG/ SCG.


See, how flawed your comparisons are?

The only places where India would have won the 2008-09 series was in the fantasy island which Indian cricket fans inhabit from time to time

2003-04 the strongest India side in ages came up against a weakened Aussie side and failed to do the job. Zaheer didn't have much of a test pedigree back then btw
 
In 2003-04: Australians were lucky Zaheer was injured. We would have won the series otherwise.

In 2007-08: Without Steve Bucknor's farcical umpiring at SCG, we would have won that test and the series 2-1

In 2011-12: Was a proper hammerring with an overaged Sachin/ Sehwag/ Dravid

In 2014-15: We were easily more competetive than Eng/ Pak/ SL/ NZ/ WI last time they were in Australia. Came close to winning at adelaide. Still managed to draw at MCG/ SCG.


See, how flawed your comparisons are?

But I started off by saying I largely agree with you. I admire India's batting. Having said that, by the end of the (drawn) SCG Final Test two years ago they were as mentally wrecked as Pakistan.

If you recall, Umesh Yadav had figures of 3-0-45-0 and then Suresh Raina completed his pair. But Rahane and Bhuvi Kumar held out for the last 11 overs to draw 7 wickets down, which was admirable.

That's why I really, really respect and admire Rahane.
 
The only places where India would have won the 2008-09 series was in the fantasy island which Indian cricket fans inhabit from time to time

2003-04 the strongest India side in ages came up against a weakened Aussie side and failed to do the job. Zaheer didn't have much of a test pedigree back then btw

Did you even watch that series? Austral;ia were 5 down for 100 odd runs. Symonds was not given out TWICE. And to we lost that match in the last session of day 5 with perhaps 5 odd overs left.

Imagine if Symonds was given and Australia was bowled out for 200 odd.

We won on a green pitch at Perth. Could have been 2-1 to us.

I know you hate India. But do use logic sometime.
 
But I started off by saying I largely agree with you. I admire India's batting. Having said that, by the end of the (drawn) SCG Final Test two years ago they were as mentally wrecked as Pakistan.

If you recall, Umesh Yadav had figures of 3-0-45-0 and then Suresh Raina completed his pair. But Rahane and Bhuvi Kumar held out for the last 11 overs to draw 7 wickets down, which was admirable.

That's why I really, really respect and admire Rahane.

I agree with all of your points at the start of the thread. But when you say India was :destroyed: in Australia traditionally is way overstating it. We were perhaps the most competitive of all the teams barring SA during 2000-2010 in Australia.
 
I agree with all of your points at the start of the thread. But when you say India was :destroyed: in Australia traditionally is way overstating it. We were perhaps the most competitive of all the teams barring SA during 2000-2010 in Australia.

People stating how Australia was under strength in 2004 dont seem to bring uo the same argument about the recently concluded England-PAkistan series.
 
Did you even watch that series? Austral;ia were 5 down for 100 odd runs. Symonds was not given out TWICE. And to we lost that match in the last session of day 5 with perhaps 5 odd overs left.

Imagine if Symonds was given and Australia was bowled out for 200 odd.

We won on a green pitch at Perth. Could have been 2-1 to us.

I know you hate India. But do use logic sometime.

First ponting was given not out caught keeper,symonds given not out twice,even the 3 rd umpire gave symonds not out the third time ,even has a stumping decision not referred by bucknor
 
Did you even watch that series? Austral;ia were 5 down for 100 odd runs. Symonds was not given out TWICE. And to we lost that match in the last session of day 5 with perhaps 5 odd overs left.

Imagine if Symonds was given and Australia was bowled out for 200 odd.

We won on a green pitch at Perth. Could have been 2-1 to us.

I know you hate India. But do use logic sometime.

I would say you need to look use logic and get out of the fantasy worlds where India are beating Australia in Australia in 2 consecutive series :))
 
Hello guys!

Stick to the topic

Topic is not about India, OK?
 
I almost agree with you.

The 2003-4 Indians had the amazing fortune that McGrath and Warne were away.

The 2007-8 Indians had an ATG batting line-up, but 2-1 flattered them: Australia lost at Perth after Monkeygate in a state of fury at their own Board for sucking up to India rather than defending their own players.

2011-12 was a Pakistan-style whitewash.

2014-15 was fascinating: dead pitches helped India but they had learned the lessons of the previous tour and had a younger, better team.

The irony is that the flat Aussie pitches now make the matches almost unwatchable for me: the batsmen are in complete control.

I attended two of the three Tests but found even the Gabba Test was on a pitch with too little grass. Whereas the Adelaide one was a beauty.

So leaving the could bes and would bes aside, India got smashed only once in more than a decade?

Lets not club them with Sri Lanka (yet to win a test in Australia) and Pakistan (getting thrashed since last century) please. Thanks.
 
I almost agree with you.

The 2003-4 Indians had the amazing fortune that McGrath and Warne were away.

The 2007-8 Indians had an ATG batting line-up, but 2-1 flattered them: Australia lost at Perth after Monkeygate in a state of fury at their own Board for sucking up to India rather than defending their own players.

2011-12 was a Pakistan-style whitewash.

2014-15 was fascinating: dead pitches helped India but they had learned the lessons of the previous tour and had a younger, better team.

The irony is that the flat Aussie pitches now make the matches almost unwatchable for me: the batsmen are in complete control.

I attended two of the three Tests but found even the Gabba Test was on a pitch with too little grass. Whereas the Adelaide one was a beauty.

If drawing a series against a team containing hayden,langer.gilchrist,ponting,martyn,steve waugh,lee,bichel,macgill is of nothing to u then what about the white wash against this mediocre aus team which has many novices making debuts and a team that losy 5 test matches in a row
 
[MENTION=78661]cricketfanfirst[/MENTION] [MENTION=138463]Slog[/MENTION]

Seems sarcasm is very tough for posters here. So here it is.

Junaid was going on about how India was destroyed in every tour of Australia and then analysed our two better tours of 2003-4 and 2007-8 by cherry picking that some Aussies were no playing, pitches were flat, etc.

In response to that, I said that we were missing Zaheer otherwise we would have won 2003-4 and If not for Steve Bucknors' farcical umpiring, we would havw won the SCG test!

Gosh! You guys need to read the whole thread first then attacking a poster without understanding the context!
[MENTION=142737]Drreddymd[/MENTION] Thanx for explaining man!
 
I'm not even 50, let alone 60!

This thread is about how - compared with any other country - Test cricket is the top rating non-News TV program in Australia, and Australia v Pakistan has consistently out-rated BBL this summer. And also had high (by non-Ashes standards) attendances.

What stop the bus, Australian national test team out rated its domestic teams. Wow wow wow has that ever happened before.

Gee Juniads you are really clutching at straws.
 
What stop the bus, Australian national test team out rated its domestic teams. Wow wow wow has that ever happened before.

Gee Juniads you are really clutching at straws.

I also don't get the point here. He is just pointing which happens all the time.
 
Test summer sets new records

Australian cricket fans have set a new Test match record - for attendances over a summer that did not feature England or India.

A total of 521,725 came along to the six-match Commonwealth Bank Test series that featured South Africa and Pakistan, eclipsing the previous record of 515,157 in 2005-06, featuring the West Indies and South Africa (also over six Tests).

Other records set were the highest attendance at the Gabba in Brisbane for a non-Ashes Test (78,085) since records began in 1979, the highest ever attendance for a Pakistan Test match at the SCG, and a Day 1 record on Boxing Day in Melbourne for a Pakistan Test (63,478 v. 61,552 in 2004).

The 2016-17 season will also be remembered as the highest attended non-Ashes Test summer since 2007-08 (featuring India), and the third highest non-Ashes Test summer on record.

The chief executive officer of Cricket Australia, James Sutherland, said it was a remarkable result, especially given one day was lost to rain in Hobart (a Sunday), and rain also affected the matches in Melbourne and Sydney.

“This just shows that Australians love Test cricket, they enjoy the ebb and flow of the game, and they relish the battle that quality visiting teams bring.

“In particular, the day-night Tests in Adelaide and Brisbane were both a great success, and the public’s support of the Pink Test in Sydney was marvellous.

“We had a tough start to the summer – with all credit due to the South Africans and the way they played – and it was especially pleasing to see the way our players bounced back and were supported by big crowds at the last four games.’’

Key numbers

Highest attendance for a Test summer not featuring England or India:

2016-17: 521,725 (South Africa and Pakistan, six Tests).

Previous highest: 2005-06; 515,157; West Indies and South Africa (six Tests).

Record Ashes: 2006-07; 819,447

Record India: 2003-04; 565,212 (with Tests against Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe)

Highest attendance non-Ashes Test summer since 2007-08

(529,630, India and Sri Lanka, six Tests)

Third highest non-Ashes Test summer on record

Highest: 2003-04; 565,212; India, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe.

Second highest: 2007-08; 529,630; India and Sri Lanka

Highest attendance non-Ashes Gabba Test (since records began in 1979)

2016-17: 78,085. Previous record: 2007; 55,947; v. Sri Lanka

Highest attendance for a Pakistan Test match at the SCG

2016-17: 112,029. Previous record: 2005; 105,407

Highest Day 1 for a Boxing Day Test, MCG, v. Pakistan

2016-17: 63,478. Previous record: 61,552; 2004-05

Attendance for all Tests this summer:

Perth v South Africa = 45,647

Hobart v South Africa = 17,783

Adelaide v South Africa = 125,993

Brisbane v Pakistan = 78,085

Melbourne v Pakistan = 142,188

Sydney v Pakistan = 112,029

Total = 521,725
 
Hello guys!

Stick to the topic

Topic is not about India, OK?

I'm not even sure what the topic is about to be honest.

The test matches perform like this every single year with the exception of the massive boost when ever England tour
 
Give me tips. We are 0-5 away on the trot but you guys had 0-8 so maybe you can help there :D
Try SA next, 2 to 6 tests (since you love to talk about how little tests you get to play away) & I'm sure you'll do better than us.
 
I'm not even sure what the topic is about to be honest.

The test matches perform like this every single year with the exception of the massive boost when ever England tour
No, they don't. See [MENTION=53377]jeetu[/MENTION] post straight before yours.
 
I'm not even sure what the topic is about to be honest.

The test matches perform like this every single year with the exception of the massive boost when ever England tour
Do England games (Ashes) have better attendance than say India even at Melbourne or SCG, where there'd be large number of Indians?
 
No, they don't. See [MENTION=53377]jeetu[/MENTION] post straight before yours.

That is attendance not tv and entirely due to having the day night test in Brisbane which normally gets horrible crowds for anyone but England
 
I was at an English-themed pub in Adelaide during early 2018 when a drunk man from Yorkshire, complete with missing teeth, howled over Cricket Australia's decision to sell telecast rights to Foxtel and Seven West Media.

Key points:

International T20 series suffers a lack of public awareness and has no free-to-air television coverage
Cricket Australia puts the focus on promoting women's cricket in a summer of change
Anti-siphoning rules do not stop free-to-air sell-off of broadcasting rights to Foxtel

"Don't go down the same path as England," he snarled angrily, as if I'd personally made the decision myself.

"We lost free-to-air cricket and now the whole thing's gone to s**t."

I eventually had to remove the irritating man from my personal space, but two years later, with poor international cricket attendances and many Australians unaware games are being played, his warnings ring louder than ever.

Australia versus Sri Lanka's opening T20 match at Adelaide Oval on Sunday drew an attendance of just over 16,000.

The second match at the Gabba last Friday attracted even less with about 12,000.

The third at the MCG drew a better crowd of 28,568 — about 28 per cent of capacity — while the Australia's T20 against Pakistan at the SGC drew just 19,176.

It could be argued that an earlier than usual, six-game T20 series against Sri Lanka and Pakistan scheduled outside school holidays is to blame, but when social media indicates people were not even aware games were underway, it suggests something else is afoot.

A lack of promotion
International cricket receives heavy promotion from its broadcast partners, sometimes weeks out from the event.

But because the men's T20 games this season have been behind a paywall, free-to-air television promotion has been missing and, if criticism on Twitter is anything to go by, the wider public's awareness is suffering.

Veteran ABC cricket commentator Jim Maxwell said it was fair to suggest promotion had suffered as a result of there being no free-to-air coverage.

"A lot of my friends have been saying, 'Oh. Is Australia playing?'," he said.

But he added that with or without promotion, there was a general lack of interest in international T20 unless it was part of a tournament.

"Australia is building towards the T20 World Cup next year, so I suppose there's a need for them to play as a team in T20," Mr Maxwell said.

"Until test cricket starts, I think for a lot of us, cricket doesn't have much clout.

"If you stick it behind a paywall, you're buying trouble, and that's what Cricket Australia decided to do."

Cricket Australia (CA) executive general manager of fan engagement Anthony Everard admitted that playing international white ball cricket this early in the season was "reasonably new for fans and no doubt it's going to take them time to adjust".

"We understand the men's T20 offering is different to what it has been, and we acknowledge it may take time for fans to get used to scheduling and where to watch the cricket," he said.

He also pointed out that attendances for Australia's One Day International (ODI) series against South Africa in November 2014 suffered similarly poor attendances — managing just over 14,000 at the MCG — while the ODI series against New Zealand in December 2017 also suffered.

A key difference, however, was those games were broadcast by Channel 9 and this fortnight's T20 games have not received free-to-air coverage at all.

Judging by the amount of interest online — highlights from the Australia vs Pakistan game at Manuka Oval on Tuesday is trending high on YouTube with 4.4 million views as of lunchtime Thursday — viewing numbers would have been strong.

A focus on bolstering women's cricket
Mr Everard said cricket was now covered by a variety of platforms, "which will again take time for fans to adjust to".

"There have been some trade-offs made with some of our formats, but that is in line with our strategy of delivering a broader range of cricket to our fans," he said.

Which athletes and teams will you remember most for their performances in 2019? Vote in this year's AIS Sport Performance Awards.
"Last week alone we had three Sheffield Shield games lives streamed via cricket.com.au and CA Live."

He said CA had taken significant steps towards "elevating the women's game, with the Women's Big Bash League [WBBL] having 23 games on free-to-air television over seven consecutive weekends".

"The first night of WBBL in Sydney opened with an audience of 390,000 across Network Seven, Foxtel and Kayo [Foxtel's streaming service]," Mr Everard said.

"We have now just completed our third of seven festival weekends, which is providing continuity and consistency for fans for the first time ever domestically for the women's game.

"This summer of cricket, more than ever, takes a different shape."

He added that the women's and men's T20 World Cup, to be played in late 2020 in Australia, would be broadcast free-to-air on Channel Nine.

Cricket's demise in England
The England and Wales Cricket Board in 2005 sold broadcasting rights to BskyB, putting home test matches and ODIs behind a paywall in a four-year deal that earned them 220 million pounds over four years.

Home cricket has not been shown on terrestrial television ever since, although the BBC from next year will have limited rights to broadcast highlights of tests and ODIs, as well some T20s — mostly from the men and women's domestic competition.

Cricket Australia's deal in 2018 did not go as far as the ECB's.

All the men's home test matches in 2019-20 will remain broadcast on free-to-air along with 43 of 59 home-and-away Big Bash League games.

But the men's T20 matches will be available only through Foxtel or Kayo, along with the men's ODI series against New Zealand.

"Cricket is Australia is doing the same thing [as the ECB],' Mr Maxwell said.

"You have to ask the question, as custodians of the game, are they looking after the interests of everybody by putting it behind a paywall?

"I think the answer from a lot of people would be no."

Anti-siphoning rules don't prevent sell-off
In Australia, so-called anti-siphoning rules are supposed to protect certain events from being put behind a paywall.

According to the most current version on the Government's website, all senior men's international home games, including T20s, are on its anti-siphoning list, along with all international home women's matches.

Subscription-based licensees, such as Foxtel, are prevented from acquiring the rights to televise events on the anti-siphoning list until a free-to-air broadcaster has acquired the rights first — or the Minister has taken it off the list at least 26 weeks before the event.

The 2018 deal to put limited-overs games behind a paywall was struck during former communications minister Mitch Fifield's tenure, despite all the T20 and ODI games for both men and women remaining on the list.

Former CA chief executive officer James Sutherland oversaw the deal.

A spokesperson for current Federal Communications Minister Paul Fletcher said he expected broadcasters to comply with the Broadcasting Services Act, but enforcing anti-siphoning rules was a matter for Australian Communications and Media Authority [ACMA].

An ACMA spokesperson said it was "advised by Seven West Network that it acquired the rights to all cricket matches on the anti-siphoning list".

But he said the rules did not stop a free-to-air broadcaster from acquiring rights for anti-siphoning listed events and then selling them to a subscription broadcaster, such as Foxtel.

"A subscription broadcaster has acquired the rights to televise matches that Seven West Network does not intend to broadcast," the ACMA spokesperson said.

"The use of broadcast rights are matters for the free-to-air broadcasters to determine, based on commercial considerations, which are not within the ambit of the anti-siphoning rules.

By that explanation, perhaps worryingly, there is nothing to stop Channel Seven from selling the rights to test matches as well, at which point my antagonistic northerner friend would probably laugh his way to the depths of his next pint.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-11...-cricket-begins-but-does-anyone-know/11680534
 
Last edited:
As expected, the decision to move all white-ball cricket into a subscription only channel has decimated the ratings. Just like in England.

It’s still extraordinary how high the attendances and TV ratings were for Pakistan’s 2016-17 Test Tour of Australia. Probably because they were competitive: they almost won the First Test and should have drawn at Melbourne.

And it highlights the craziness of moving the Brisbane Test back to daytime.
 
For Cricket Australia, some unorthodox early-season scheduling was a case of damned if you fixture a bunch of low-key international men's T20s against overwhelmed opposition, damned if you don't.

If you have felt nonplussed by Australia's unusually subdued start to the summer against Sri Lanka and Pakistan, then fast-forward to the T20 World Cup next October when the international version of the extremely-limited-over games will be, for a rare moment, front and centre in the national sporting consciousness.

If Australia had not used a tiny hole in the crowded international fixture this season to refine selection and tactics then failed before full houses in the T20 World Cup, the same critics now bemoaning these sparsely attended games would be asking why there had not been more.

As England proved with its well-calculated and inevitably successful ODI World Cup planning, some of the chance can be removed from the ever more sophisticated and data-driven short formats with thorough preparation.

Australia's season of international cricket has begun but how many people know?
Poor attendances and a lack of public awareness about international T20 prompts questions about Cricket Australia's deal to put limited-overs games behind a paywall.
At the very least, by crushing Sri Lanka and Pakistan over six lopsided T20s, Australia gained the answer to one compelling question.

Yes, Steve Smith is a walk-up start for Australia's T20 World Cup team, having embarrassed those of us who wondered if he had the ability to click into fourth gear like the world's great T20 sloggers.

This will please the local T20 World Cup organisers, who can use Smith's briefly diminished but now wholly rehabilitated public profile to build their promotional campaigns and help fill stadiums.

The same tournament organisers might, like those who don't have subscription TV, feel less pleased that the early season heroics of Smith, David Warner, Aaron Finch, Mitchell Starc and co were witnessed by a relatively minuscule audience because of Fox Sports exclusive coverage.

Cricket Australia would argue that the extra money from the Fox Sports element of its media rights deal allows it to bankroll the WBBL (which ran concurrently with the men's T20s but on free-to-air TV) and the improved wages of female players in an increasingly competitive market.

However, as English cricket followers would be quick to counter, the deprivation of cricket from the vast majority who have only free-to-air TV presents an enormous risk.

This threat to cricket's overall exposure was considered by a House of Lords committee which recently argued The Ashes should be included on Britain's list of "protected programs" to be shown only on free-to-air; an obviously unfeasible finding given the need to package media rights in a saleable block.

Still, this recognition that the same lucrative rights deals that provide enormous potential revenue opportunities can also potentially poison sport's roots is timely.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.
VIDEO: David Warner hits maiden T20 century on final ball of innings (ABC News)
In future programming, Cricket Australia will also no doubt consider the reputational damage caused when relatively tiny crowds watch the usually acclaimed national men's team at home.

The BBL has been driven by potential fans at home seeing the upbeat atmosphere at venues and wanting to get in on the fun. It was highly unlikely anyone with a Fox Sports subscription who saw this season's international T20s was rushing to the ground to sit in the empty bay of seats and listen to another clumping shot by Warner or Finch echo around the stadium.

Another lesson from England's recent experience is that placing an obsessive focus on winning a major trophy at home can cause undue distraction from other compelling tasks.

There is little doubt the long-term effort England devoted to winning a first ICC World Cup left Test players in the ODI set-up exhausted, dishevelled and vulnerable in at least the early stages of this winter's Ashes series.

So with Australia having departed the T20 laboratory after a brief and necessary period of experimentation, it is reassuring that full attention will now be turned to what some still call "the real thing" — the forthcoming Test series against Pakistan and New Zealand.

Do what you like to Steve Smith, but you can't and you won't stop him until he does what he wants to do, writes Geoff Lemon.
The first stage of this process is arguably even more unassuming than the early international T20s: a three day-night match between Australia A and Pakistan in Perth. But the implications for the impending summer are compelling, most obviously on Australia's still-unsolved batting line-up.

The automatic incumbency of Warner and Smith now make it seem as if last summer was a weird variation on the standard cricket nightmare (it's your turn to bat but you can't get your pads and gloves on).

To Smith and Warner you can add another certain starter in the admirable Marnus Labuschagne, who has performed upon his return from a successful Ashes series in the same manner that demanded his selection — churning out big fifties and the occasional ton on tough tracks and in tight situations.

Matthew Wade is the other name writing itself on the selection sheet, while Queensland opener Joe Burns has the vote of those still traumatised by the sight of Stuart Broad charging in to destroy yet more left-handed cannon fodder.

But there are cases to be made for Marcus Harris back on the hard Australian tracks where his slashing strokes are more handsomely rewarded, the eternally enigmatic Usman Khawaja, the not-quite-established Travis Head, the precocious Will Pucovski but, sadly, not for a while the convalescing Nic Maddinson.

So much to ponder in the next few weeks before the first Test against Pakistan, just as there was much to ponder in the international T20s.

Although the machinations of those games will only be appreciated should Australia's men lift the T20 World Cup about this time next year.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-11...t20-world-cup-sporting-consciousness/11691068
 
First Test between Australia and Pakistan averages 358,000 metro viewers for Seven

Seven’s Test cricket has begun, with the first match between Australia and Pakistan bringing an average of 358,000 metro viewers to the channel on Thursday afternoon across three sessions.

That’s down from an average of 414,333 last year in the test against India.

The most-watched session this year was the third with 474,000 metro viewers. Session one brought in 253,000 and session two, 347,000. Nationally, 719,000 watched session three, 511,000 session two and 380,000 session one.

Last year’s Test between Australia and India brought in 301,000 for session one, 398,000 for session two and 544,000 for session three.

A Seven spokesperson said the network was delighted by the result.

“It’s great to see Australians returning in droves this summer for Seven’s coverage of the cricket, with over 2.5m viewers tuning in across the first day of the first test. We can’t wait to bring Australians more of their favourite summer sport as the season rolls on.”

Seven’s cricket agreement, which came into play last year, doesn’t hand the network exclusive coverage. On Foxtel, 174,000, 133,000 and 95,000 were the averages for the three sessions.

The honours were split between Seven and Nine last night, with Nine winning the primary channel battle with 19.5% to Seven’s 18.5%. With the addition of multi-channels, however, Seven snuck ahead with a network share of 30.3% to Nine’s 29.4%.

ABC secured 10.8% and 15.8%, while Ten managed 10.0% and 17.1%. Seven had the most popular multi-channel with 7Mate holding 5.0%.

Seven’s AFL panel show The Front Bar aired a cricket special to tie in with the Test, seeing hosts Mick Molloy, Sam Pang and Andy Maher turn their attentions to the summer sport. 391,000 metro viewers tuned in for the episode and 572,000 nationally.

In the key advertising demographics of 16-39, 18-49 and 25-54, it was a mixed bag. Seven News took top of the 16-39s, and was the most-watched program overall for the evening with 877,000 metro viewers. Jamie Oliver’s The Naked Chef Bares All on Ten was the most-watched by the 18-49s, as well as delivering 442,000 metro viewers overall. And in the 25-54s it was Nine News that topped, alongside bringing in 828,000 metro viewers.

Nine was the most-watched channel by metro audiences in the 25-54 demographic, holding a 19.3% share, while Seven held the top spot with the metro audiences 16-39 (18.4%).

The next episode of David Attenborough’s Seven Worlds One Planet, which focused on South America, delivered 595,000 metro viewers. Wednesday night’s Australia episode has so far been the best performer with 772,000 metro viewers tuning in for the locally-focused program.

Ten’s Pilot Week commission Trial By Kyle slipped to 229,000 metro viewers, its lowest to date after premiering to 363,000 four weeks ago.
https://mumbrella.com.au/first-test...verages-358000-metro-viewers-for-seven-607645
 
The Gabba may be a fortress for Australian cricket, but the poor crowd attendance on the opening Test of the summer hasn’t stopped experts discussing where it stands in the pecking order.

A sparse Gabba crowd to begin the Test summer wasn’t the best start for the venue's cause as Brisbane fights for an Indian visit next season.

Just 13,561 watched Pakistan battle a patient Australian bowling attack on Thursday, with the two-Test series ending with a pink ball Test in Adelaide later this month.

India will play four Tests in Australia next summer, while Afghanistan will visit for the first time for a one-off Test preceding that series.

The new Optus Stadium in Perth, refurbished Adelaide Oval, plus Melbourne and Sydney's traditional Boxing Day and New Years slots leave the Gabba fifth in the pecking order and as the most likely venue for that maiden Test encounter.

In the Gabba's favour are the major public transport upgrades underway as part of a long-term rejuvenation of the precinct, plus the fact Australia haven't lost a Test at the venue since 1988.

But small crowds, albeit for games in awkward time slots, haven't helped the stadium in the short term.

Cricket expert Robert Craddock suggested the winning record at the Gabba is the reason the players would want to play in Brisbane against India.

“It’s such a big thing for this team to be able to win matches early in the series, India don’t like coming here,” he said on Fox Sports’ Cricket 360.

“But it’s a war between Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth. I think Adelaide is the number one cricket ground in Australia at the moment, Perth is jostling hard.

“The refurbishment of $40 million, people are excited about it, but that to me doesn’t bring this ground up to the level of Perth. But they win here, what price do you put on victory?”

Shane Warne said during commentary it was “non-negotiable” that the Australian Summer should start with a Test at the Gabba. But he also conceded the crowd was only “okay for a workday”.

Less than 12,000 turned up for a low-key Twenty20 international against Sri Lanka in October this year, while only 13,900 attended day one of the twilight Test against the same opponent in January.

Pakistan last visited the Gabba in 2016 for a twilight Test that broke records as the best non-Ashes attendance, with 26,353 fans through the gates on the first day.

The Gabba has a 42,000-person capacity, with the 2006 Ashes series drawing close to 40,000 fans on each of the first three days.

Not since 2015 has the Gabba hosted the first Test of the summer against a side other than England, when a day one crowd of 16,181 watched Australia and New Zealand.

https://au.sports.yahoo.com/poor-crowd-gabba-sparks-australian-cricket-debate-224220108.html
 
'Absolute disgrace': Former Aussie opener blasts Gabba Test

Former Australian Test opener Ed Cowan has called out the appalling crowd from the first Test at the Gabba and claims Brisbane doesn’t become an automatic selection for next year.

Australia racked up an innings win over Pakistan on Sunday afternoon to extend their undefeated run at the Brisbane stronghold to 31 matches in as many years.

India will play four Tests in Australia next summer and are a strong chance of opening their summer with a pink ball Test at the Gabba.

But just 4,825 spectators were at the Gabba on Day 5 of the Test.

This was exacerbated with the figure across the five days reaching just 45,991.

Despite Australia’s incredible record at the Gabba, winning its last 31 matches - in as many years - Cowan told ABC Grandstand the numbers were a “disgrace”.

“There was no one there,” Cowan said.

“It was Sunday, last day of the Test match and there were 4000 people there. It’s an absolute disgrace.

“You can kick and scream and say, ‘Oh the wicket is the best in the country’ and, ‘They deserve to have the first Test of the summer’. If people don’t go and watch, it will not continually have the first Test of the summer. That is the cold hard facts.”

He went on to claim Brisbane should be considered for a day-night match considering the hot climate and design of the stadium.
https://au.sports.yahoo.com/ed-cowan-blasts-gabba-crowd-attendance-as-disgrace-074420126.html
 
No wants to watch Pakistan play. Can’t blame the Brisbane crowd for not turning up.
 
No wants to watch Pakistan play. Can’t blame the Brisbane crowd for not turning up.

Crowd at the Gabba was more than it was for Gilchrist's debut apparently. If Aussie fans weren't turning up to watch Wasim, waqar, Shoaib, saqi ,inzi and Anwar , then it's hard to were the numbers increase for this Pakistan side. Last time around , the numbers were primarily because it was a pink ball test.
 
Pakistan is playing this for experience and not to win. So not surprised this Test had a bad outing. If there was a serious team playing to win, we probably would have gotten a better reception.
 
they need to find out her sources of income rather than stadium attendance because test cricket is real cricket and it should be preserved at any cost.

Fans cant come in for all 5 days. Sort it out. broadcast, stream, ppv etc.
 
they need to find out her sources of income rather than stadium attendance because test cricket is real cricket and it should be preserved at any cost.

Fans cant come in for all 5 days. Sort it out. broadcast, stream, ppv etc.

This is the biggest flaw in the game of cricket - its best product is not watchable anymore as 5 days are too long. Test cricket is only preserved by India, Australia and England. And once BCCI for ICC to give them the bigger share other teams will just refuse to even play it anymore.
 
No wants to watch Pakistan play. Can’t blame the Brisbane crowd for not turning up.

Why did they not turn up with they were playing India?
Most of the crowd were Indians. You could barely even spot any Aussies in that "sea of blue".
 
Why did they not turn up with they were playing India?
Most of the crowd were Indians. You could barely even spot any Aussies in that "sea of blue".

because most indians are wealthy abroad and they can afford to buy tickets in bulk. They pre order a year before itself.
 
This is the biggest flaw in the game of cricket - its best product is not watchable anymore as 5 days are too long. Test cricket is only preserved by India, Australia and England. And once BCCI for ICC to give them the bigger share other teams will just refuse to even play it anymore.

no test cricket is very popular. Everyone views it on TV these days though. Stadium revenue barring the weekend will be on the lower end of the spectrum. People have lives. They have to work lol. ICC just need to figure out different platforms preferably an online Pay per view or stream model to boost their revenue.
 
no test cricket is very popular. Everyone views it on TV these days though. Stadium revenue barring the weekend will be on the lower end of the spectrum. People have lives. They have to work lol. ICC just need to figure out different platforms preferably an online Pay per view or stream model to boost their revenue.

lol is it very popular? I have not watched a full day of test cricket for 10 years! I actually dont know anyone who did and I am surrounded with cricket fans as I am still an active player in the club with over 100 members plus family and friends. They have all watched T20s and ODIs.

Nobody watches test cricket just keep an eye on it at best and see the result on cricinfo or highlight if available.
 
Sadly Pakistan are a bit of a laughing stock in Australia.

In the past Aussie crowds would come and watch the likes of Imran Khan, Waqar Younis and Wasim Akram, but these days there aren't many Pakistani players who the Australian crowds actually rate and want to see.
 
lol is it very popular? I have not watched a full day of test cricket for 10 years! I actually dont know anyone who did and I am surrounded with cricket fans as I am still an active player in the club with over 100 members plus family and friends. They have all watched T20s and ODIs.

Nobody watches test cricket just keep an eye on it at best and see the result on cricinfo or highlight if available.

yea maybe for the meidocre teams. All top teams fans watch their team play and know test cricket is real cricket.
India
australia
south africa
new zealand
England
even Bangladesh fans are crazy about test.
I am certain pakistan deep down care about it. I don't know. It's a shame if they don't because the world needs a strong pakistan.

hell Sri Lanka cares about test cricket.

The viewing firgurs in australia is still at an all time high for test cricket especially if a good team tours.
 
Sadly Pakistan are a bit of a laughing stock in Australia.

In the past Aussie crowds would come and watch the likes of Imran Khan, Waqar Younis and Wasim Akram, but these days there aren't many Pakistani players who the Australian crowds actually rate and want to see.

full points to c.a to try to create as much hype as they..
but this pk team standard is too low .. babar can't do everything alone.. azhar, misbah must go
 
yea maybe for the meidocre teams. All top teams fans watch their team play and know test cricket is real cricket.
India
australia
south africa
new zealand
England
even Bangladesh fans are crazy about test.
I am certain pakistan deep down care about it. I don't know. It's a shame if they don't because the world needs a strong pakistan.

hell Sri Lanka cares about test cricket.

The viewing firgurs in australia is still at an all time high for test cricket especially if a good team tours.

Obviously Pakistanis care about it. It's always trending no.1 on Twitter when the match is on and the pre-match shows are watched as well by many people.

Pakhs is saying that no-one watches the WHOLE 90 overs and that is somewhat true because they, as rude as this may sound, have a life. They have to go to their job, business etc. On weekends, most people watch at least 60 overs if not the whole 90.
 
Pakistan is playing this for experience and not to win. So not surprised this Test had a bad outing. If there was a serious team playing to win, we probably would have gotten a better reception.

Turns out there were only 3 teams in the last decade which were interested in winning in Aus. Looks like stadiums are gonna be empty in the next decade. :virat
 
Obviously Pakistanis care about it. It's always trending no.1 on Twitter when the match is on and the pre-match shows are watched as well by many people.

Pakhs is saying that no-one watches the WHOLE 90 overs and that is somewhat true because they, as rude as this may sound, have a life. They have to go to their job, business etc. On weekends, most people watch at least 60 overs if not the whole 90.
exactly but that was always the case before too.
I guess you need marketable players. before we had big names like wasim, waqar, bret lee, sachin, akthar, laxman, g.smith, de villiers etc.

Test cricket need popular big name players to attract attention. Just saying though. Even before no one really watch all 5 days of test cricket.
 
Turns out there were only 3 teams in the last decade which were interested in winning in Aus. Looks like stadiums are gonna be empty in the next decade. :virat

Which is why its shocking Pakistan never wanted to win this series. Imagine them putting in the effort we would could of who knows created history. This team is only interested in the future series not this one.
 
Sadly Pakistan are a bit of a laughing stock in Australia.

In the past Aussie crowds would come and watch the likes of Imran Khan, Waqar Younis and Wasim Akram, but these days there aren't many Pakistani players who the Australian crowds actually rate and want to see.
That’s a bit harsh.

Last year nobody had head of any of the Indians apart from Kohli - and they won!

Even in The Ashes, nobody would know Denley or Burns.

The problem is that Pakistan would struggle to compete at full strength, and this squad is nowhere close to full strength.

Literally the first five players I would pick for the Adelaide greentop would be

Amir
Abbas
Babar
Shadab
Faheem

Only two of those five people will even play.

Adelaide Day/Night Tests are basically double innings 60 over ODIs like we watched in England until 1990. They are more like 60 over ODIs than Tests. But Pakistan look as if they think they are entering a conventional Test match.

Pakistan are trying to compete with one hand tied behind their back.

Are you in Adelaide? I’ll be at the IC next to the ground from tomorrow afternoon if you or anyone else on PP wants to meet.

I’m still bursting with excitement at footage of the GOAT Test series in the West Indies in 1988 being found. And happy to share the excitement!
 
Australia don't care about playing Pakistan or see us as a threat. Let's be honest.
 
That’s a bit harsh.

Last year nobody had head of any of the Indians apart from Kohli - and they won!
Bro, I literally was in Australia during the series. Watched every single match in stadium. Everyone was so looking forward to watching the Indian pace attack, especially Bumrah in action. Pujara and Rahane are big names too. I was in the stadium when white Australians were rooting for Pant. Do you really live in Australia?
 
Last edited:
yea maybe for the meidocre teams. All top teams fans watch their team play and know test cricket is real cricket.
India
australia
south africa
new zealand
England
even Bangladesh fans are crazy about test.
I am certain pakistan deep down care about it. I don't know. It's a shame if they don't because the world needs a strong pakistan.

hell Sri Lanka cares about test cricket.

The viewing firgurs in australia is still at an all time high for test cricket especially if a good team tours.

Test has never been forte of Pakistan in terms of viewing. Even when Imran Khan, Wasim, Waqar, Akhtar were playing, the stadiums would still be empty especially at home. That hasn't changed even today.

I remember back in Pakistan few years ago that there was series on between Pakistan and Australia at Abu Dhabi in ODI series and nobody cared. Pakistan is not obsessed as India does religiously. Perhaps most Indians have nothing better to do than watch cricket all days long. Even in most forums dominated by India especially in cricket entertainment, and it is always Indians on large scale requesting highlights of some sort.

Even if Pakistan was fielding eleven best, that wouldn't changed anything. Pakistan doesn't follow cricket religiously as India does. Pakistan has better to do than staying glued to cricket all days long treating it as religious experience. I am not surprised why Tendulkar was seen as GOD for billion of Indians for decades.

Cricket and entertainment is that Indians crave whereas Pakistan is diversified to many things. There is the reasons why Pakistan used to dominate many sports including entertainment in the past. Today, Pakistan is going through the turmoils hence not many care about tuned-down cricket to clips the bowlers' wings off to accommodate billions happy making it one-sided competition so that billions can be entertained watching four-sixes in the small stadiums on the dead track.
 
Bro, I literally was in Australia during the series. Watched every single match in stadium. Everyone was so looking forward to watching the Indian pace attack, especially Bumrah in action. Pujara and Rahane are big names too. I was in the stadium when white Australians were rooting for Pant. Do you really live in Australia?

He's talking about the majority.
A few people don't represent the whole group
 
Interesting. Wonder what his source is. Did he conduct a survey?

Do you live in Australia?
I don't think so. Well he does live in Australia so I'd take his word over yours. Your sample size is too small. His isn't
 
Do you live in Australia?
I don't think so. Well he does live in Australia so I'd take his word over yours. Your sample size is too small. His isn't

Australians have contradicted Junaids multiple times already, they are not gonna come and correct him on each and every thread.

Check the one with Wahab Riaz.
 
Do you live in Australia?
I don't think so. Well he does live in Australia so I'd take his word over yours. Your sample size is too small. His isn't

So you would also agree with Junaids that Australians dislike this Pakistani team because the players, especially Misbah, have long beards? Interesting.
 
Test has never been forte of Pakistan in terms of viewing. Even when Imran Khan, Wasim, Waqar, Akhtar were playing, the stadiums would still be empty especially at home. That hasn't changed even today.

I remember back in Pakistan few years ago that there was series on between Pakistan and Australia at Abu Dhabi in ODI series and nobody cared. Pakistan is not obsessed as India does religiously. Perhaps most Indians have nothing better to do than watch cricket all days long. Even in most forums dominated by India especially in cricket entertainment, and it is always Indians on large scale requesting highlights of some sort.

Even if Pakistan was fielding eleven best, that wouldn't changed anything. Pakistan doesn't follow cricket religiously as India does. Pakistan has better to do than staying glued to cricket all days long treating it as religious experience. I am not surprised why Tendulkar was seen as GOD for billion of Indians for decades.

Cricket and entertainment is that Indians crave whereas Pakistan is diversified to many things. There is the reasons why Pakistan used to dominate many sports including entertainment in the past. Today, Pakistan is going through the turmoils hence not many care about tuned-down cricket to clips the bowlers' wings off to accommodate billions happy making it one-sided competition so that billions can be entertained watching four-sixes in the small stadiums on the dead track.

In other words, this is the sort of excuse a mediocre team would come up with to hide the flaws of their team.

And what other sports are pakistan good at now? hockey? last I checked india are world number 4.
Pakistan are like 13th.
Pakistan never dominated cricket at any time apart from the period under imran khan.
They did dominate in hockey. India too dominated the Olympics in the past in hockey.

No one watches all 5 days. I am not from india. I live in Australia. I don't have time to watch all 5 days. I just watch on the weekends if it's interesting. I can't speak for India's. You probably have to confirm with Indians. Indians in india probably don't have time to watch all 5 days either. I am sure with their busy schedule of study, work, family, tuition, sport, clubbing life they won't quite have time either.
 
Sadly Pakistan are a bit of a laughing stock in Australia.

In the past Aussie crowds would come and watch the likes of Imran Khan, Waqar Younis and Wasim Akram, but these days there aren't many Pakistani players who the Australian crowds actually rate and want to see.
No worries, when pakistan whoop their team in the adelaide pink ball test night test, these aussies fans will learn to respect Pakistan cricket once again.

The brisbane fans can be forgiven for not showing up, as the aussies have not lost there since 1988, 31 years and most tests there are one sided. Maybe CA need to make the pitch more balanced and we might get more evenly played matches.
 
Australians have contradicted Junaids multiple times already, they are not gonna come and correct him on each and every thread.

Check the one with Wahab Riaz.
One poster - [MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION] - has disputed my comments. That's pretty normal.

Australians are horribly parochial about their cricket. They basically only follow their team and they switch off their attention when they are losing.

Last season is a great example. Bear in mind that nobody here watches the IPL.

Australia hosted India and lost convincingly. Most cricket followers weren't paying attention - they were angry with their team for Sandpapergate, cricket had moved to a new channel (yes, seriously, that's a thing here) and they knew that a full-strength India would probably win.

So they switched off. To this day I doubt that 1 in 10 Australian cricket fans could recognize a photo of Jasprit Bumrah if it was shown to them alongside pictures of Shami or even Shan Masood!

Most Australians' points of reference for international cricket are:

1. The Ashes
2. South Africa
3. New Zealand - this is very new, as in last 5 years new.
4. What people have achieved versus Australia.

Wahab Riaz had the famous (unsuccessful) World Cup spell against Shane Watson. And then he came on tour here the next year and was almost identical in performance to Mitchell Starc. And he speaks proper English.

So he got a media profile here. Not massive, but when for example the T20 series happened earlier in the month, Wahab Riaz was the Pakistan player who had a microphone attached.

Yes, I know Jasprit Bumrah is twice the bowler that Wahab Riaz ever was. But even after performing pretty well in Australia, Bumrah remains completely unknown to parochial Aussie fans compared with Wahab Riaz.

It's crazy, but it's true.
 
Test cricket is dying!
Its a slow lingering death, but it will be dead eventually.
India are keeping it alive, because of their home record, its the only sport where they can beat the big boys at home, infront of their patriotic(racist?) crowds.
In england and australia, cricket is way down on the list of top team sports.

The sooner this rubbish format is finished the better, i have been enduring it for over 37 years, if it was a prison life sentence, i would have been released 20 years ago.

Even freddy flintoff has said cricket(test cricket) is the 4th most boring sport in the world.
Enough said - long live t20 cricket!
 
Brisbane fans have given up on Day Tests (except The Ashes) - it's far too hot and humid.

Every Aussie legacy cricket ground is now a concrete bowl stadium for Australian Rules football. There is no longer a breeze at any of them, and Day cricket is really unpleasant and uncomfortable to attend.

This Test and every other Test in Australia should be a Pink Ball Day/Night event.
 
Bro, I literally was in Australia during the series. Watched every single match in stadium. Everyone was so looking forward to watching the Indian pace attack, especially Bumrah in action. Pujara and Rahane are big names too. I was in the stadium when white Australians were rooting for Pant. Do you really live in Australia?

Junaids makes up a lot of stuff but if you really think the average Aussie spectator was looking forward to Bumrah, Pant and Rahane then you’re also smoking the same stuff as him.

But yes guys like Ashwin, Rohit, Jadeja, Ishant must be known along with Kohli ofcourse.
 
That’s a bit harsh.

Last year nobody had head of any of the Indians apart from Kohli - and they won!

Even in The Ashes, nobody would know Denley or Burns.

The problem is that Pakistan would struggle to compete at full strength, and this squad is nowhere close to full strength.

Literally the first five players I would pick for the Adelaide greentop would be

Amir
Abbas
Babar
Shadab
Faheem

Only two of those five people will even play.

Adelaide Day/Night Tests are basically double innings 60 over ODIs like we watched in England until 1990. They are more like 60 over ODIs than Tests. But Pakistan look as if they think they are entering a conventional Test match.

Pakistan are trying to compete with one hand tied behind their back.

Are you in Adelaide? I’ll be at the IC next to the ground from tomorrow afternoon if you or anyone else on PP wants to meet.

I’m still bursting with excitement at footage of the GOAT Test series in the West Indies in 1988 being found. And happy to share the excitement!

Even Faheen doesn’t rate himself as highly as you do here
 
Cricket is dying because of lack of competition from pak, Lanka and WI.

Gabba had poor turned up of 13K on opening day for both Srilanka n Pakistan. Full Seating capacity is 42K.

Last time when pak toured Gabba it had first day capacity of 26K.

When India toured Australia last time, it had 80% attendance for all test matches.

Boxing Day attendance is almost equal to ashes attendance.

Good cricket is always supported by people.
 
Cricket is dying because of lack of competition from pak, Lanka and WI.

Gabba had poor turned up of 13K on opening day for both Srilanka n Pakistan. Full Seating capacity is 42K.

Last time when pak toured Gabba it had first day capacity of 26K.

When India toured Australia last time, it had 80% attendance for all test matches.

Boxing Day attendance is almost equal to ashes attendance.

Good cricket is always supported by people.
Maybe in india, but not that much aroun the world.
Most of the fans who watched india play australia in australia were indian fans.
Test cricket is dying except for indians and the ashes.
Good riddance, i say!
 
Even Faheen doesn’t rate himself as highly as you do here
At Adelaide you need all-rounders in case you face the new ball straight after dinner and collapse to 40-5.

I hope that Amad Butt becomes twice the player that Faheem ever could be.

But frankly, for a pink ball Test at Adelaide I need 9 guys capable of scoring a Test fifty.

If I can lift 40-5 to 90-6 at the close, I can hope to bat three hours in daylight the next day and reach 220 all out. And then bowl after Dinner!
 
Last edited:
poor turned is for Pakistan series. You blame your Pakistan talent and board.
No! Indians will come out of any crack and nookie in any country to watch india play, the indigenous population doesnt care that much.
I have addressed the indian overpopulation in the world, in timepass on the mass extinction thread, take a read.
 
Bro, I literally was in Australia during the series. Watched every single match in stadium. Everyone was so looking forward to watching the Indian pace attack, especially Bumrah in action. Pujara and Rahane are big names too. I was in the stadium when white Australians were rooting for Pant. Do you really live in Australia?

I watch a lot of cricket - my last two grounds visited this year were Edgbaston and Old Trafford at the World Cup.

What you are describing is, with all due respect, ethnically Indian spectators in Australia getting excited about the Indian team. I really like Rahane, but nobody else in Australia has even heard of him.

Crowds have been poor for Pakistan so far this tour, and crowds for India in 2018-19 in Australia were barely better than for Pakistan in 2016-17.
 
Maybe in india, but not that much aroun the world.
Most of the fans who watched india play australia in australia were indian fans.
Test cricket is dying except for indians and the ashes.
Good riddance, i say!

like I said earlier it's because indian fans pre order and are wealthy compared to most Aussies in australia. Hence the large amount of fans being Indians.
 
Back
Top