What's new

U.S. forces apologise for Afghan propaganda leaflet containing Quran passage printed on image of dog

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
KABUL (Reuters) - A senior U.S. commander in Afghanistan apologized on Wednesday for a “highly offensive” leaflet which contained a passage from the Koran used in the Taliban militants’ banner superimposed on to the image of a dog.

The Taliban said the leaflet showed American hatred of Islam, adding that it had launched a suicide attack near the entrance to the U.S. Bagram Air Field, north of Kabul, in revenge.

The image, distributed by U.S. forces in Parwan province, north of Kabul, on Tuesday, showed a section of the Taliban’s banner superimposed onto the side of a dog - an animal considered unclean by Muslims. The banner contains a passage from the Koran in Arabic.

“The design of the leaflets mistakenly contained an image highly offensive to both Muslims and the religion of Islam,” Major General James Linder said in a statement.

“I sincerely apologize. We have the deepest respect for Islam and our Muslim partners worldwide,” he said, adding that an investigation would be held “to determine the cause of this incident and to hold the responsible party accountable”.

Parwan Governor Mohammad Hasem condemned the leaflet as “unforgivable”.

“Those who have committed this unforgivable mistake in the publicity, propaganda or media section of the coalition forces will be tried and punished,” he said.

The incident highlights one of the challenges facing international forces in Afghanistan, most of which are from non-Muslim cultures, despite the efforts Western forces have generally taken to avoid stoking anti-foreigner sentiment.

The risk of a backlash against international forces has grown more pronounced with a rise in civilian casualties caused by increased U.S. and Afghan government air strikes since the beginning of the year.

The Taliban, fighting to restore strict Islamic rule to Afghanistan and drive out foreign forces, issued a statement saying the leaflet made clear “that this war is a war between Islam and unbelief”.

The insurgent movement claimed responsibility for a suicide attack on the U.S. base at Bagram Air Field north of Kabul that local officials said wounded four Afghan civilians, although the Taliban itself said 20 Americans were killed.

In 2012, U.S. commanders were forced to apologize after copies of the Koran and other religious texts were mistakenly burned at Bagram Air Base near Kabul. The incident triggered large demonstrations in Kabul and other provinces in which several people were killed.

On another occasion, a film of U.S. Marines urinating on the bodies of dead Taliban fighters caused widespread offense, prompting an investigation and criminal charges.

So-called information operations conducted by government and coalition forces have long been used to try to persuade local people to turn against the Taliban and other insurgent groups.

Above the picture of a lion and the dog, the leaflet urged people to report insurgents to the authorities.

“Take back your freedom from the terrorist dogs and cooperate with coalition forces so they can target your enemy and eliminate them,” it said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-a...-afghan-propaganda-leaflet-idUSKCN1BH0M5?il=0
 
so its ok if those words are printed on a flag of a cult that goes around killing innocent, but becomes offensive when its printed on an animal.


Whats more offensive, writing the script on the flag of a group that kills people or on a harmless animal?
Had it been written on the tiger, it would had been ok perhaps?

the image could be viewed on dailymail.
 
He will be a targeted man now. His silly excuse and apology is not good enough.
 
so its ok if those words are printed on a flag of a cult that goes around killing innocent, but becomes offensive when its printed on an animal.


Whats more offensive, writing the script on the flag of a group that kills people or on a harmless animal?
Had it been written on the tiger, it would had been ok perhaps?

the image could be viewed on dailymail.

Good point.

I imagine that the locals would be offended because the NATO forces are supposed to be their allies and the 'good guys'.

Seriously, they printed the kalima on a dog? :facepalm:

DJDJlTlUQAAIYJf.jpg
 
Last edited:
Word Dog is used three times in the Quran, twice in sura kahaf and once in sura Aaraf.
If dog can be the content (which is more important), then picture should not be offensive.
 
I don't think posting this image here is a good idea. [MENTION=133760]Abdullah719[/MENTION]
 
I don't think posting this image here is a good idea. [MENTION=133760]Abdullah719[/MENTION]

I've put it in
tags now so whoever doesn't want to see it can ignore it.

To be honest it's not as offensive as it is stupid. Obviously whoever made it was completely clueless; surely if they're trying something that will help fight terrorism then you'd think they would actually put some thought into it. This is so simplistic and banal, plus it completely fails to convey the message.

Can't just put random words anywhere on a poster without knowing what they are.
 
so its ok if those words are printed on a flag of a cult that goes around killing innocent, but becomes offensive when its printed on an animal.


Whats more offensive, writing the script on the flag of a group that kills people or on a harmless animal?
Had it been written on the tiger, it would had been ok perhaps?

the image could be viewed on dailymail.

The idiots actually got the script of the flag wrong too. To quote the DailyMail:

The Taliban flag (pictured) writes the Shahada in a distinctive style to distinguish itself. Without copying this script, the leaflets simply printed the creed on a dog - offending many

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ghly-offensive-Afghan-propaganda-leaflet.html
 
so its ok if those words are printed on a flag of a cult that goes around killing innocent, but becomes offensive when its printed on an animal.


Whats more offensive, writing the script on the flag of a group that kills people or on a harmless animal?
Had it been written on the tiger, it would had been ok perhaps?

the image could be viewed on dailymail.
Despite being of Muslim background and living in a Muslim country, you appear to be completely ignorant as to the extent that religious sensitivities play a central role in highly conservative (but relatively uneducated) Muslim societies. The non-Muslim U.S. commander understands that, but you obviously don't. The Taliban have not been eradicated after 17 years despite the best efforts of the world's only superpower is primarily due to the fact that the Taliban understand these sensitivities and know how to manipulate them to garner support and recruit followers. Whoever came up with the idea of printing the kalimah on a dog scored a massive own goal for the U.S. forces.
 
it was intentional. People fail to understand the real mission in afghanistan. The mission is war without end and a military presence indefinatley till the end of time. These propaganda acts are deliberatley done to incite more violence. Therefore justifying more war and operations. When the west talks of stability they dont mean peace and prosperity. That is instability for them.
 
so its ok if those words are printed on a flag of a cult that goes around killing innocent, but becomes offensive when its printed on an animal.


Whats more offensive, writing the script on the flag of a group that kills people or on a harmless animal?
Had it been written on the tiger, it would had been ok perhaps?

the image could be viewed on dailymail.

Then why did the US commander apologise? You seem to be in disagreement with the army of the free world.
 
Pathetic

That's how you are going to win the war and the public?
 
it was intentional. People fail to understand the real mission in afghanistan. The mission is war without end and a military presence indefinatley till the end of time. These propaganda acts are deliberatley done to incite more violence. Therefore justifying more war and operations. When the west talks of stability they dont mean peace and prosperity. That is instability for them.

This is probably closest to the truth. There's no way anyone could be that stupid.
 
Pathetic

That's how you are going to win the war and the public?

they dont need to win the war. Winning is for ignorants who play video games. This is grand geopolitics. They requirea permanent presence in central asia and afghanistan is the only place that they can do so. Everywhere else is closed to them. They know the future is here in Asia and they want to remain engaged to preserve their power. Hence why they will support proxy groups to protect their interests in the region. The 4000 troops will be SOF. They will setup death squads and armed groups that will be used to further destabilise and prolong the war. End of.
 
they dont need to win the war. Winningi. is for ignorants who play video games. This is grand geopolitics. They requirea permanent presence in central asia and afghanistan is the only place that they can do so. Everywhere else is closed to them. They know the future is here in Asia and they want to remain engaged to preserve their power. Hence why they will support proxy groups to protect their interests in the region. The 4000 troops will be SOF. They will setup death squads and armed groups that will be used to further destabilise and prolong the war. End of.

bravo my friend. Well said.

How can we expect the military industry so stay so finely tuned and running without a constant war with no end.

Imagine what would happen to the PCB and pak cricket if there were no games played for a decade.
 
so its ok if those words are printed on a flag of a cult that goes around killing innocent, but becomes offensive when its printed on an animal.


Whats more offensive, writing the script on the flag of a group that kills people or on a harmless animal?
Had it been written on the tiger, it would had been ok perhaps?

the image could be viewed on dailymail.

Wait, what? When did anything they do become "ok"?
 
Back
Top