Fastest to 200 (UAE) wickets, Yasir Shah has been our best bowler in this region.
However, compared to his contemporary bowlers, he has a woeful record elsewhere, particularly overseas.
Averages 41 in England, 84 in Australia.
Compare him to Lyon, who:
Averages 30 in England, 33 in Australia, 22 in New Zealand, 14 in BD, 39 in South Africa,
Also, Ashwin, who:
Averages 32 in England, 48 in Australia, 46 in South Africa
Can Yasir get any better outside the UAE?
Puzzling thread. He has in fact done quite well in most of countries where has played, including England, where he has won two Test matches and taken a 10fer, even if he has been relatively expensive.
Yasir's only outright poor performances were in Australia. So the question should be, basically, why has he been poor in Australia? And we already have some answers to that question.
No spinner has been invincible everywhere. Warne averaged 43 in India, 39 in West Indies. Murli averaged 75 in Australia and 45 in India. Mushtaq Ahmed averaged 46 in Windies, 40 in Lanka. Kaneria 61 in the UAE, 50 in England.
Overall Yasir's averages are not only better than most Pakistani greats, his SR is better than Mushtaq's, 10 points better than Kaneria, and a full 20 points ahead of Saqlain. In fact,
his SR is as of now better than both Warne and Murli.
The UAE itself is an interesting place of comparison. Herath, who is otherwise one of the best spinners of his generation, has played quite a lot there, averages 4 points higher than Shah, and has a SR in the UAE of 61, compared to 51 for Yasir. So it tells us that while the UAE may be good for spinners, some spinners are still better than others there.
Indeed, if you are looking for a one-country/region specialist, Herath is far better fit than Yasir. Ave 72 in Windies, 64 in New Zealand, 45 in England, etc etc