Paxo will expose Corbyn at the same time. Might work out well for Farron......
Sure. But the difference is that Theresa May's whole pitch is of 'strong and stable' leadership.
After Andrew Neil listed the numerous promises May has made in the past, which she has either broken, or which turned out to be false, or unachievable, or she U-turned on, both as Home Secretary and as PM, he asked her why should the public believe her and trust her this time? He posed the question a number of times and each time she desperately tried changing the subject instead of responding to the question.
Corbyn has no such baggage to speak of. The worst that Corbyn can be challenged on is Trident, support for the Palestinian cause, and not specifically condemning the IRA but instead condemning all bombings generally, both from the Unionists side as well as the Republicans side.
Of the two, Theresa May has far more to fear from being interviewed by Paxman. May may be good at reading prepared speeches to a carefully selected Tory leaning audience whilst standing behind a podium, but she appears to be totally out of her depth when forced to answer questions directly, either in a press conference, during a Q&A session or in one-to-one interviews.
Corbyn appears far more relaxed, and gives the impression of being honest, in similar situations.
Akin to a robot faced with a situation it's not programmed for, versus a kindly old, but eccentric, uncle.