What's new

US will act if Pakistan does not destroy safe havens: CIA

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
WASHINGTON: CIA Director Mike Pompeo has warned Pakistan that if it does not eliminate the alleged safe havens inside its territory, the United States will do “everything we can” to destroy them.

As Defence Secretary Jim Mattis arrives in Islamabad on Monday to persuade Pakistan to support the new US strategy for Afghanistan, the Trump administration is sending mixed signals to its estranged ally. The new strategy seeks Pakistan’s support to defeat the Taliban in the battlefield as Washington believes that only a defeat will force them to reconcile with the Afghan government.

Talking to journalists aboard his plane on Sunday, Secretary Mattis said he did not plan to “prod” Pakistan into action because he expected Islamabad to adhere to its promises to combat terrorism.

He disagreed with a journalist who suggested that Mr Mattis might end up “butting heads” with Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and Army Chief Qamar Javed Bajwa when he meets them in Islamabad on Monday on his first visit as the Pentagon chief.

The VOA radio quoted Mr Mattis as telling the journalist that this was not his style. “That’s not the way I deal with issues. I believe that we [can] work hard on finding common ground and then we work together.”

But the CIA director sent a harsher message when asked at the Reagan National Defence Forum in Simi, California, on Saturday how would the Trump administration persuade Pakistan to adhere to its new Afghan strategy.

Mr Pompeo said: “You begin by seeking their assistance.”

The CIA director noted that Secretary Mattis was travelling to Pakistan to “make clear the president’s intent” and “will deliver the message that we would love you to do that. And that the safe haven inside of Pakistan has worked to the detriment of our capacity to do what we needed to do in Afghanistan”.

He then explained how the Trump administration would deal with the situation if Pakistan turned down Washington’s request to destroy safe havens. “In the absence of the Pakistanis achieving that, we are going to do everything we can to make sure that that safe haven no longer exists,” he said.

Since 2004, the CIA has conducted drone strikes in Fata and recent media reports have suggested that the Trump administration may expand those strikes to cover other areas inside Pakistan.

Mr Pompeo’s predecessor, Leon Panetta, also shared with the forum his experience of dealing with Pakistan as the Obama administration’s CIA chief.

“Pakistan has always been a problem. It has been a safe haven for terrorists who cross the border and attack in Afghanistan and go back into Pakistan,” he said.

“We have made every effort possible, during the time I was there, to convince Pakistan to stop it. But Pakistan, as Mike knows, has this kind of two-wedge approach to dealing with terrorism,” he added.

“On one hand, yes, they do not like terrorism, or attacks from terrorism in their country. But at the same time, they don’t mind using terrorism as leverage to deal with Afghanistan and to deal with India.”

Mr Panetta claimed that Pakistan has had this policy since his days at the CIA and that’s why “Pakistan has always been a question mark”.

Referring to US efforts to persuade Pakistan to cooperate, he said: “I hope that Mike (Pompeo) and Jim Mattis are successful in making clear to the Pakistanis that got to be able to see a little broader and they have to go after terrorists within their own territory. Unless that happens, we are going to continue to have problems in Afghanistan.”

The moderator turned to Mr Pompeo and asked if Pakistan’s approach had changed. “Not yet,” said the CIA chief.

But Secretary Mattis, who warned in October that the United States was willing to work “one more time” with Pakistan before taking “whatever steps are necessary” to address its alleged support for militants, did not show the bitterness displayed by the two CIA chiefs.

Instead, he said he was focused on trying to find “more common ground... by listening to one another without being combative.”

https://www.dawn.com/news/1374412/us-will-act-if-pakistan-does-not-destroy-safe-havens-cia
 
I thought I saw another reputable source that read Pakistan has done considerable efforts to weed out terrorism and break all alliances with any terrorist groups.

Either way this threat of of Us taking Pakistan to task brings a big yawn to my face. Us as well as Pakistan knows that Us needs Pakistan and not the other way around to help with its war in Afghanistan.
 
How about US first finishes the safe havens in Afghanistan?


Don't blame us for your failure.
 
These are danger signs for Pakistan,the establishment needs to recognize these signs along with other factors happening in Pakistan and act swiftly.
 
Why blame USA , when it was our own generals who facilitated this war on terror and made it their own war , and allowed them to carry out air strikes and surgical obl type raids , salala , Raymond Davis on Pakistan soil .

We gave them a taste of our blood , and those vampires liked it so they like Pakistani Muslim blood .


Now telling them to go do one and we are not donating anymore blood or giving you our tribal people as some sadistic human sacrifice or being hunted and killed like some sort of trophy animal in a safari park they are finding it hard to digest .
 
Eh, same old.

It's every other month somebody from the US makes a statement about how Pakistan will have to commit more or else, they're going to cut off funding and whatnot. And Pakistan will keep accepting money and make some appearances of fighting terrorism. Pakistan does just enough without completely upsetting Taliban, and America ofcourse knows this but have to keep making statements for appearance's sake.

Everybody's happy, let's keep the status quo going.
 
So less than a week after terrorists (controlled from Afghanistan) enter a university in Pakistan and kill innocent students, US tells us to do more WOW!
 
Ignore it. The US has realised it really cant do anything to Pakistan. We have played our cards relatively well here. They can go all out and sanction us or even declare us a terror state but then we will also do the same and ensure that the government in afghanistan doesnt last a week. We have no interest in doing that or letting the americans off the hook so easily.

The message given to Mattis was quite clear as said by the ISPR the other day. If you have real intelligence tell us and we'll deal with any terror elements within our borders. On the other hand you have to faciliate the return of refugees, get rid of the TTP leadership and man the border. Otherwise they can say do more all they want. The demands will remain the same.

The US doesnt want pakistan to do more. They simply want to ensure that their 4000 troops arent slaughtered like sheep and they can keep a presence there. That is it.

We want to get rid of those 4000 troops without killing them and ensure that the foreign presence in afghanistan is reduced to insignificant levels. Thus we are at a stalemate. For now.
 
Ignore it. The US has realised it really cant do anything to Pakistan. We have played our cards relatively well here. They can go all out and sanction us or even declare us a terror state but then we will also do the same and ensure that the government in afghanistan doesnt last a week. We have no interest in doing that or letting the americans off the hook so easily.

The message given to Mattis was quite clear as said by the ISPR the other day. If you have real intelligence tell us and we'll deal with any terror elements within our borders. On the other hand you have to faciliate the return of refugees, get rid of the TTP leadership and man the border. Otherwise they can say do more all they want. The demands will remain the same.

The US doesnt want pakistan to do more. They simply want to ensure that their 4000 troops arent slaughtered like sheep and they can keep a presence there. That is it.

We want to get rid of those 4000 troops without killing them and ensure that the foreign presence in afghanistan is reduced to insignificant levels. Thus we are at a stalemate. For now.

This is more about cpec than anything else.
Have they ripped up the massive Foreign intelligence within Pakistan? The answer is probably no. They are still vulnerable to being embarrassed by the Americans.... so I guess the hand they play is still very limited. The more Chinese build up in Pakistan, the more extreme the reaction from US will be as we go on.
 
Cpec is another blunder

The Chinese are pulling out on some major road projects ,it's in the news. Slowly slowly this cpec will unravel not surprised since the pmln ganjas are ruling so they will obviously ruin cpec anything these people will run will be a disaster waiting to happen , but either way it was folly when you sell yourselves and put interests of USA and china ahead of your own , don't stand on your own 2 feet (self reliance) this is what will happen .

We deserve it to be honest
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cpec is another blunder

The Chinese are pulling out on some major road projects ,it's in the news. Slowly slowly this cpec will unravel not surprised since the pmln ganjas are ruling so they will obviously ruin cpec anything these people will run will be a disaster waiting to happen , but either way it was folly when you sell yourselves and put interests of USA and china ahead of your own , don't stand on your own 2 feet (self reliance) this is what will happen .

We deserve it to be honest

err no. Its a strategic necessity and you need to ignore some of the negative reporting. There are key projects in the pipeline that will be completed. The problem with the CPEC is the way it has been misreported. There are projects outside of CPEC that are as important. CPEC is mostly about road connectivity, Gwadar and power generation. The rest is deemed as priority two.
[MENTION=44089]Eagle_Eye[/MENTION]
yes your right CPEC is a major thorn in their side. Even if it reaches half of its potential it will change everything. Thats the thing about it. No matter what you do, CPEC will change things strategically. It already has in a way with the expansion of rail and road networks. We have seen alot of negative reporting in the press but it was the same when pakistan was developing a nuclear capability and in 2008. Does anybody remember the so called analysts claiming the country would not survive beyond 2008?
 
Back
Top