OZGOD
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2005
- Runs
- 27,187
- Post of the Week
- 4
Like Marsh was given the special treatment of being sent at 3 without a previous test 50?
You're changing your goal posts for different guys.
Let me spell it out again: One guy scores a 100 in the warmup match as an OPENER and is subsequently sent at number 6 in the next test.
The other guy bats at 6 in the warmup and is sent at number 3 in his DEBUT.
And then I'm the one wanting special treatment for Khawaja?
If anything, the treatment he's receiving is unfair. One way or another, he should've been batting up high instead of one of Hughes or Marsh. Your arguments are contradictory for both of these guys.
Would your viewpoint change if Khawaja's surname was Keyes and his origins from Ireland instead of Pakistan?
Khawaja's a decent player and has a good FC record but the reality is he hasn't taken his opportunities as well as he could have. He's had three Tests, five innings so far, to really make an impression on the selectors and so far he's scored 37, 21, 21, 26 and 13*. On the other hand Marsh, who I didn't really rate before this, scores 141 on debut batting at first drop with wickets tumbling around him and with Hussey guides Australia out of strife. It's not even just his ton, it's the composure he showed batting in a tough situation which impressed me.
It's not that Uzzie has done anything wrong, he's been ok, it's just that some other bloke has come in and played a blinder to help guide OZ to a dominant position after being in a tight spot.
Whether he or Khawaja batted at 3 or 6 is irrelevant, what is relevant are results. Whatever opportunities you are given, you have to make the most of it. You can't go to the selectors saying "oh but if I opened or batted at first down or xxx or yyy I would have done better". You have to be prepared to make the most of your opportunity knowing that there is competition for spots. When Hussey came into the team he mainly batted at No.7 after scoring a ton as an opener in I think his second or 3rd Test. He had to make the most of his opportunities batting behind Gilly and behind a powerful batting lineup with the likes of Langer, Haydunce, Ponting et all all ahead of him but he was able to. You have to make the most of your opportunity because it may not come around again because some bloke came in and did better.
Sometimes I feel we give Uzzie more leeway because of the fact that he is of Pakistani origin. Nothing wrong with that, but selectors (especially since they will now be held accountable for their performances) don't/shouldn't have that luxury. The Poms don't give KP, Strauss, Trott et al more leeway because they're Saffas, or Morgan because he's a Paddy. They're all treated as Englishmen. End of day Khawaja and Marsh are both Ozzies.
Now assuming Uzzie was dropped, is it the end of the world? No. But I reckon even he would be honest enough to know that he probably hasn't taken as much advantage of his (greater) opportunities in Test cricket as Marsh has in his first dig. Now of course Marsh has to go on with it. He could be out for a duck in the 2nd innings, that might change things somewhat if Uzzie can get a half ton or so and bat with composure, weather permitting.
As for Hughes, he's a specialist opener with a better FC record than either of these two players, and he has back to back tons in SA. You're not going to bat him at No6 to accommodate either of these two. But I'd say he also needs to take his opportunities. I don't want any of these players to think their spots are secure. They need to MAKE them secure via their performances.
Last edited: