What's new

[VIDEO] 20+ no-balls not called by umpires while Pakistan were bowling against Australia (1st inns)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is astonishing. <br><br>Huge talking point & something the ICC HAS to look at. <br><br>21 no balls not called in two sessions...&#55357;&#56906; <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvPAK?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvPAK</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/7Cricket?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@7Cricket</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/7Sport?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@7Sport</a> <a href="https://t.co/SAdFIWuGw4">pic.twitter.com/SAdFIWuGw4</a></p>— Trent Copeland (@copes9) <a href="https://twitter.com/copes9/status/1197755503721381888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 22, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is astonishing. <br><br>Huge talking point & something the ICC HAS to look at. <br><br>21 no balls not called in two sessions...&#55357;&#56906; <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvPAK?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvPAK</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/7Cricket?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@7Cricket</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/7Sport?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@7Sport</a> <a href="https://t.co/SAdFIWuGw4">pic.twitter.com/SAdFIWuGw4</a></p>— Trent Copeland (@copes9) <a href="https://twitter.com/copes9/status/1197755503721381888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 22, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Around 20 no-balls were not called on the second day of the first test.

How is a bowler supposed to know that they're overstepping when the umpire doesn't even tell them??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is astonishing. <br><br>Huge talking point & something the ICC HAS to look at. <br><br>21 no balls not called in two sessions...&#55357;&#56906; <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvPAK?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvPAK</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/7Cricket?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@7Cricket</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/7Sport?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@7Sport</a> <a href="https://t.co/SAdFIWuGw4">pic.twitter.com/SAdFIWuGw4</a></p>— Trent Copeland (@copes9) <a href="https://twitter.com/copes9/status/1197755503721381888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 22, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Around 20 no-balls were not called on the second day of the first test.

How is a bowler supposed to know that they're overstepping when the umpire doesn't even tell them??

Well the bowler's coach and the staff and his team mates who will be watching from the dressing room on TV can tell the bowler during breaks
 
The ICC will launch a trial in India next month giving the television umpire responsibility for calling no-balls in close to real time, the latest effort to solve the issue of bowlers overstepping the mark.

A day after the third umpire Michael Gough’s decision not to take a wicket off Pat Cummins on the first day of the first Test, Pakistan teenager Naseem Shah thought David Warner was his first Test scalp, only for the customary review to find his front foot had landed well beyond the crease.

It was a tough pill to swallow for the 16-year-old, with Warner on 56 at the time, and raised concerns about on-field umpires not calling no-balls themselves, with replays having shown Naseem overstepping the mark earlier in the day. On the Seven coverage, it was reported there were 21 no-balls in total not called before the tea break.

"The thing that really struck home to me was the wicket that we saw fall off the no-ball, the very next delivery the seamer had his whole foot behind the whole line," former Australia Ricky Ponting said on the Seven commentary. "If he had have been told earlier, maybe he could have adjusted and things might have been different."

The ICC is attempting to confront that issue with surveillance of the line by the TV umpire in upcoming limited-overs series, starting with the Twenty20 contests between India and West Indies next month. It follows a previous trial during an ODI series between England and Pakistan in 2016 in which a Hawkeye operator gives the video official an image of the bowler’s foot and the surrounding area within seconds of it landing in real time.

The latest trial will be conducted more widely, with the system also likely to be used in limited-overs matches between South Africa and England in February and between West Indies and Ireland next month. It is unlikely to be in use for Australia’s next matches in coloured clothing, the three-match ODI series in India in mid-January.

The average time between the landing of the bowler’s foot and the television official’s decision was eight seconds in the 2016 trial.

"The footage is shown on a slight delay, it goes to super slo-mo as the foot approaches the point of landing, and then it freezes," ICC general manager for cricket operations Geoff Allardice told Cricinfo in August. "The routine works well, with the third umpire judging the no-ball off a picture that is not always shown on the broadcast."

While the world governing body is heading down that route and plans a full introduction of the system if the trial is successful, former Test captain Mark Taylor believes it should be up to on-field umpires to adjudicate.

"I personally don’t like the reviewing of no-balls," said Taylor, who is calling the first Test for Macquarie radio. "I think if you’re that close, just get on with the game. I know people won’t agree with it. But at the end of the day it doesn’t make any difference to the ball that was bowled nor the shot that you play if you’re a millimetre behind the line or a millimetre over it.

"If the umpire doesn’t call it, just get on with the game. The no ball in my opinion was never meant to be scrutinised as closely as it is. It was supposed to be just an indication of where to bowl from. As we saw yesterday if Pat Cummins had been another 5mm further behind, would [Pakistan wicketkeeper-batsman Mohammad Rizwan] have changed the shot? Why are we worried so much about it?"


https://www.theage.com.au/sport/cri...enied-maiden-test-wicket-20191122-p53d9d.html
 
Oh no. I can't believe. Australia deprived of 21 runs and 21 extra deliveries! Pak bowlers what are u doing ? Gully level cricket !
 
Oh no. I can't believe. Australia deprived of 21 runs and 21 extra deliveries! Pak bowlers what are u doing ? Gully level cricket !

The Australian bowlers bowled many no balls which were not called either
The point of this thread is to show the bad umpiring
If an umpire doesn't call the No ball, how is the bowler supposed to know that he's making a mistake??
 
If an umpire doesn't call the No ball, how is the bowler supposed to know that he's making a mistake??

There coach who is watching the replays on TV can tell the bowler
 
Has they been checking and calling Naseem would have been more careful and may not have overstepped on the wicket taking ball.
 
Unbelievable for a 16 yr old yo be bowling a dozen no balls on debut &#55358;&#56614;&#55356;&#57341;*♂️
 
There coach who is watching the replays on TV can tell the bowler

How is he supposed to show to the bowler how close he was to the line??
The bowler needs to see the footage and be told by the umpire
 
You guys are making a big issue out of it it’s not a big deal Aleem dar did the same when Kemar roach was bowling against England in a series he only gave it a no ball when he would get a wicket off of it. Kemar roach bowled over like 20 no balls in a session in that game and had cook nicked off like 3 times but were all no balls and aleem dar only called those balls no balls. It makes sense since this is a test match and giving useless no balls makes no sense since their is no free hit and you don’t want to stretch the test match longer anyways. Also now umpires automatically have to go to the third umpire for no ball check when a wicket falls so it wouldn’t have been such an issue anyways what y’all are making it out to be.
 
Unbelievable for a 16 yr old yo be bowling a dozen no balls on debut ����*♂️

If the first few no balls were called then he would have been a lot more careful. He was well behind the line after the no ball was called off the wicket. If the no ball isn't called then the bowler will obviously think that his front foot is fine.

Poor poor umpiring. I don't get why they don't just use the third umpire to call no balls.
 
You guys are making a big issue out of it it’s not a big deal Aleem dar did the same when Kemar roach was bowling against England in a series he only gave it a no ball when he would get a wicket off of it. Kemar roach bowled over like 20 no balls in a session in that game and had cook nicked off like 3 times but were all no balls and aleem dar only called those balls no balls. It makes sense since this is a test match and giving useless no balls makes no sense since their is no free hit and you don’t want to stretch the test match longer anyways. Also now umpires automatically have to go to the third umpire for no ball check when a wicket falls so it wouldn’t have been such an issue anyways what y’all are making it out to be.

OK then let's just scrap the rule altogether...
 
It makes no sense that they check the front foot for no balls after a wicket but not for any other delivery. Either check for no balls on every delivery or check them for none. If the umpire doesn't call the no ball during a wicket delivery, there should be zero reason for the third umpire to call it on the replay.
 
So Pakistani bowlers bowled some 20+ no balls awesome job, guys.
 
Back
Top