What's new

[VIDEO] Al Jazeera interview - "I am a pacifist, I am anti-war" : Imran Khan

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SpfaJtrTMfc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

It has been a year since the former cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan became Pakistan's prime minister.

Khan's campaign slogan was "Naya Pakistan" or "New Pakistan", a reflection of his promises to turn the country's economy around and end corruption.

But the first year of his premiership has not gone as smoothly as he may have hoped or even expected, especially in terms of the economy. The Pakistani rupee has lost 35 percent of its value during his time in office.

Khan's critics call him the prime minister of u-turns, as he has been forced to go back on many of his campaign pledges in an attempt to rescue the situation.

"I'm glad they say I'm a prime minister of u-turns. Only an idiot doesn't do any u-turns," Khan tells Al Jazeera. "Only a *****, when he's on a course and he comes across a brick wall, only that stupid idiot keeps banging his head against a brick wall. An intelligent person immediately revises his strategy and goes around it."

But have any of these "u-turns" had a positive impact on the country?

In terms of foreign affairs, Pakistan is closer than ever to its neighbour, China. But relations with its other neighbour, India, are at a new low.

Asked whether these two nuclear countries are at risk of another major conflict, or even war, Khan tells Al Jazeera he "absolutely" believes war with India could be a possibility.

"Eight million Muslims in Kashmir are under siege for almost now six weeks. And why this can become a flashpoint between India and Pakistan is because what we already know India is trying to do is divert attention from their illegal annexation and their impending genocide on Kashmir," he says. "They are taking the attention away by blaming Pakistan for terrorism."

"Pakistan would never start a war, and I am clear: I am a pacifist, I am anti-war, I believe that wars do not solve any problems," he says.

But, he adds: "When two nuclear-armed countries fight, if they fight a conventional war, there is every possibility that it is going to end up into nuclear war. The unthinkable."

"If say Pakistan, God forbid, we are fighting a conventional war, we are losing, and if a country is stuck between the choice: either you surrender or you fight 'til death for your freedom, I know Pakistanis will fight to death for their freedom. So when a nuclear-armed country fights to the end, to the death, it has consequences."

"So that's why we have approached the United Nations, we are approaching every international forum, that they must act right now because this is a potential disaster that would go way beyond the Indian subcontinent."

Until recently, Pakistan had made attempts to open dialogue with India "to live as civilised neighbours, to resolve our difference [over Kashmir] ... through a political settlement", but according to Khan, this is no longer the case.

"We discovered that while we were trying to have dialogue, they were trying to push us in the blacklist in FATF [Financial Action Task Force] ... If Pakistan is pushed into the blacklist of FATF that means there will be sanctions on Pakistan. So they were trying to bankrupt us economically, so that's when we pulled back. And that's when we realised that this government is on an agenda ... to push Pakistan to disaster," says Khan.

"There is no question of talking to the Indian government right now after they revoked this article 370 of their own constitution and they annexed Kashmir illegally against the UN Security Council resolution which had guaranteed the people that they would be able to hold a referendum, a plebiscite, to decide their destiny."

Asked about his government's achievements after its first year in office, Khan says: "We are already in a new Pakistan ... This government has done things which no government has done before. But, as they say, Rome was not built in a day. When you start making these massive changes, reforms, it takes time. The time to judge a government is five years ... The first year was the most difficult period, but from now onwards people will start seeing the difference ... the direction of the country is now right."

https://www.aljazeera.com/programme...nocide-kashmir-war-india-190913134545416.html
 
He was referring to his old speech which was misinterpreted.
Him saying that he's against war doesn't mean much tbh.
All we need is a spark and a conflict will follow imo
 
Taking u-turns is not wrong, but when you repeatedly say things and take decisions that you have to walk back on eventually exposes your incompetence.

If you go back a few years, Imran Khan has literally taken a u-turn on almost every single front - military, economic decisions, foreign policy, inflation, taxation etc. Not to forget the u-turn on electables.

It is so common and obvious that he no credibility anymore because you know that he is going to back-track any time. He will go from A to B and B to A, and his supporters will say that he was right on both occasions.

He is clueless and has no vision and long-term strategy. However, that doesn’t make a difference in Pakistan as long as you have cult-following and have the back of the military establishment.
 
This is getting bad to worse. Immy this is getting yawn level stuff. I am pacifist but then if we are going to lose then we will use nuclear bomb. And destroy whole Asia. Are you serious..
 
Completely lost the plot and his nerve toward the end. It was a tough interview and the Al Jazeera guy keep putting him on the spot almost as though he got all his talking points from Indian media. It was cringe worthy to watch Imran on china's treatment of Muslims and even more to watch him characterize all pakistanis as a crazed people who would rather nuke the world than lose their freedom, which ironically is not even being threatened by anyone. He seems to be completely living in an alternate universe
 
This is how the global powers-that-are will read this interview:

- Rhetoric against India with claims of genocide not seen since Nazi Germany. Without proof, they will put it down to the long and ugly rivalry between the 2 nations. But IK comes off as a slave to the past and does not compare well to Modi who is exhibiting stoic silence.

- 2 veiled threats to world powers. One, if Pakistan is stuck between surrender or a fight to the death, they will use nuclear weapons that will have global consequences. Two, if there is war, investments of countries trading with India will be in danger. World powers will not take this kindly and there may be personal repercussions for IK.

- No scope for dialogue after abrogation of Article 370 and only solution is intervention by powerful countries and institutions - this is not feasible because India will not walk back from its decision and Trump and others know it. It shows inflexibility on IK’s side and it is another cause of concern for global powers.

- No solid stance on Afghanistan. IK did not show the same conviction and earnestness as he did regarding Kashmir which the US is not going to take kindly. In their view, Afghanistan is the only issue Pakistan should focus on and help them withdraw their troops. It is possible that the military is spearheading the Afghanistan efforts but IK came off as woefully disinterested. The US wants a leader who aligns with their interests and this is dangerous because they could influence the IMF and FATF and in an extreme scenario, a change in leadership.

- The Uighur question - China’s one million incarcerated Muslims undergoing forced integration - IK feigned ignorance and seemed blind by choice and by being cornered. He did call China a ‘best friend’. It displayed Pakistan’s utter dependence on China which again will set off alarm bells in Western government offices.

- Baldev Kumar’s claim of minority abuse - he handled this well and his personal sincerity and intentions were very apparent. He came off as a good person with integrity advocating love and peace for all based on the tenets of Islam.

- Economic challenges - Claiming India is influencing FATF to put Pakistan on the blacklist will not go down well with FATF & IMF. They like to be seen as neutral institutions above reproach.

Kudos to the interviewer - he asked every question that needed to be asked.
 
He continues to be exposed by foreign media. Unfortunately for him, this isn’t Pakistan media where the script is approved by the military.
 
Wow [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] with short comments, and new account with a few previous posts with long drawn out nonsense rambles which totally misconstrue what he's saying to make Pakistan look bad, towing the Indian line?
 
He must dread getting interviewed by international media because of getting questioned on Uyghur Muslims.

It is a deliberate ploy of the government to ensure that the Pakistani media is muzzled when it comes the atrocities of our Chinese colonists against the Muslims, but the international are not going to let us get away with our shameless hypocrisy.
 
I quite like that international media keeps pressing him on China's handling of the Uyghur Muslims. It only highlights that Pakistan is not getting a better deal from anywhere else thus they are building relations with China for economic reasons only.

Would be better obviously if other major powers in the region could offer the same opportunities for Pakistan, but instead all they can do is keep honking and parping words about how nasty China is to their Muslim minority. Words don't pay the bills unfortunately.
 
While listening to BBC Radio 5 commentary last week, they mentioned that Imran Khan passed with a 3rd class degree. He has been relatively un-intelligent and clueless all along through out his life.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Imran hit the ball out of the park. Except the Uyghur Muslims question - even that he did well by rightly saying he has bigger things to worry about - he answered the other questions with the utmost grace and great knowledge. I dare Modi to do a similar interview. I bet he would run out of the interview with tails between his legs, much like our Army and Airforce, if at all he understands the questions :inti
 
Wow [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] with short comments, and new account with a few previous posts with long drawn out nonsense rambles which totally misconstrue what he's saying to make Pakistan look bad, towing the Indian line?

This :))
 
While listening to BBC Radio 5 commentary last week, they mentioned that Imran Khan passed with a 3rd class degree. He has been relatively un-intelligent and clueless all along through out his life.

Doesn't really mean that much. What were the academic credentials of Sharif or Zardari? Ronald Reagan was a former actor yet he became President of the most powerful country in the world.
 
While listening to BBC Radio 5 commentary last week, they mentioned that Imran Khan passed with a 3rd class degree. He has been relatively un-intelligent and clueless all along through out his life.

This has been said many times over especially by those who knew him at Oxford. There was a nickname he was known by which is probably insulting to post here, given he's your PM.

But I've found that immaterial for a politician or leader. He might not be intelligent. But he wants to be intellectual and his life experiences and hard work have given him a certain world view and understanding. I used to find him very similar to Rahul Gandhi. They're both mocked sometimes as being stupid but are far from that. The desire to be greater humans seems intrinsic to both. It's a different matter that they fail here and there. But I think both are idealists and basically want to be decent and sincere.
 
Doesn't really mean that much. What were the academic credentials of Sharif or Zardari? Ronald Reagan was a former actor yet he became President of the most powerful country in the world.

Its just an indicator of how intelligent, smart and thoughtful he has been all along.
As for Zardari, despite being very corrupt and dishonest, he’s a smart cookie. The way he capitalised on things for his own benefit is actually quite clever.
 
That was a decent interview by Imran backed up by another detailed interview before to Russian Television.

I personally think that Imran has nothing to hide and is going all guns blazing at the moment. He can do that because this time himself and Pakistan is in the right unlike before. On flip side Modi would not be up for a local interview forget about foreign interviews. Last time I checked before elections he got interviewed by Akshay Kumar and was asked about mangoes. Reason for mentioning this is so we know how the two leaders match up personality wise.

Now coming to the subject in this interview that everyone is harping about i.e. Uyghur muslims. This is a very big tragedy at the moment and personally I condemn it wholeheartedly. I regret that Pakistan needs China's help financially and infra structurally but I would like to see Imran condemn this in a personal capacity if he cannot do that in State capacity.

Another key point that posters in here miss out is that the only common connection of Uyghurs, Rohingya, Yemen, Jerusalem and Kashmir is humanitarian. The reason why Pakistan is harping about Kashmir issue more than others is because of the will of Pakistani people. You can see Imran mention in this interview that he is responsible for 200m Pakistanis. Most of these Pakistani's support Kashmir cause, Kashmiri's in IOK ask for Pakistan help, Pakistan is part to direct agreements in UN and Simla accord on Kashmir issue. This is the conclusion, Pakistan is a directly linked party in Kashmir which is why Imran talks more about it and in fact acts like a voice for all Pakistani's on this matter and what a voice to have! Having said that I would want Imran in his personal capacity condemn Uyghur issue.

I can see other posters making personal attack on Imran. These posters are lowest of lows who are best ignored.
 
Its just an indicator of how intelligent, smart and thoughtful he has been all along.
As for Zardari, despite being very corrupt and dishonest, he’s a smart cookie. The way he capitalised on things for his own benefit is actually quite clever.

Exactly. That's why being smart isn't the only quality required of a leader so it's not really that useful to focus on it as a negative. Smart people like Zardari very cleverly looted Pakistan. Let's all give him a big cheer!
 
That was a decent interview by Imran backed up by another detailed interview before to Russian Television.

I personally think that Imran has nothing to hide and is going all guns blazing at the moment. He can do that because this time himself and Pakistan is in the right unlike before. On flip side Modi would not be up for a local interview forget about foreign interviews. Last time I checked before elections he got interviewed by Akshay Kumar and was asked about mangoes. Reason for mentioning this is so we know how the two leaders match up personality wise.

Now coming to the subject in this interview that everyone is harping about i.e. Uyghur muslims. This is a very big tragedy at the moment and personally I condemn it wholeheartedly. I regret that Pakistan needs China's help financially and infra structurally but I would like to see Imran condemn this in a personal capacity if he cannot do that in State capacity.

Another key point that posters in here miss out is that the only common connection of Uyghurs, Rohingya, Yemen, Jerusalem and Kashmir is humanitarian. The reason why Pakistan is harping about Kashmir issue more than others is because of the will of Pakistani people. You can see Imran mention in this interview that he is responsible for 200m Pakistanis. Most of these Pakistani's support Kashmir cause, Kashmiri's in IOK ask for Pakistan help, Pakistan is part to direct agreements in UN and Simla accord on Kashmir issue. This is the conclusion, Pakistan is a directly linked party in Kashmir which is why Imran talks more about it and in fact acts like a voice for all Pakistani's on this matter and what a voice to have! Having said that I would want Imran in his personal capacity condemn Uyghur issue.

I can see other posters making personal attack on Imran. These posters are lowest of lows who are best ignored.

:14:

Excellent post, well reasoned and delivered concisely.
 
Tells nothing about dealing with Unemployment, GDP Growth, Export Increase, Healthcare & Development or Price Levels.

Extreme lack of vision with incompetence.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This was our most-read piece on Twitter this week &#55357;&#56391;<a href="https://t.co/Szt4IUg8rL">https://t.co/Szt4IUg8rL</a></p>— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) <a href="https://twitter.com/AJEnglish/status/1175333890413793280?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 21, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Tells nothing about dealing with Unemployment, GDP Growth, Export Increase, Healthcare & Development or Price Levels.

Extreme lack of vision with incompetence.

Those are seperate topics, he can't really address every issue in every interview.
 
Back
Top