What's new

[VIDEO] Disturbing allegations of entrenched racism & abuse within the UK Labour Party

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,990
Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit reveals how a British political party that claims to embrace progressive values created a hierarchy of racism that discriminated against its Black, Asian and Muslim members. Interviews, internal documents and social media messages shared by the most

<iframe width="800" height="713" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/P-cHBQf5z_M" title="The Labour Files - The Hierarchy I Al Jazeera Investigations" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Is anyone really surprised though? Maybe young idealist kids in their teens or early 20s, no one other than them.
 
I am not surprised at all.

If anyone thinks Liberal Party is a perfect party for minorities, think again.
 
Rupa Huq MP apologises for 'superficially' black remark

MP Rupa Huq says she has apologised to Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng for describing him as "superficially" black.

Speaking at a Labour Party conference fringe event, Ms Huq also said: "If you hear him on the Today programme, you wouldn't know he's black."

Her remarks were criticised and Labour suspended her from the parliamentary party pending an investigation.

Tory Party chair Jake Berry called her comments "racist" and "disgusting".

Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said the remarks were "unacceptable".

Speaking to the BBC's Politics Live programme, she said Ms Huq should apologise, while the party's foreign affairs spokesman David Lammy described the remarks as "unfortunate" adding: "I wouldn't have made them myself."

A Labour spokesperson said: "We condemn the remarks, they are totally inappropriate, and we call on her to withdraw them."

The Ealing Central and Acton MP, who will now sit in Parliament as an independent, was recorded making the comments on Monday evening at a fringe event entitled What's Next for Labour's Agenda on Race.

The audio clip was published by the Guido Fawkes website minutes before Sir Keir Starmer began his speech to the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool.

During a Q&A session, she said: "He's superficially, he's, a black man but again he's got more in common... he went to Eton, he went to a very expensive prep school, all the way through top schools in the country.

"If you hear him on the Today programme you wouldn't know he's black."

Following the publication of the clip, Ms Huq tweeted: "I have today contacted Kwasi Kwarteng to offer my sincere and heartfelt apologies for the comments I made at yesterday's Labour conference fringe meeting.

"My comments were ill-judged and I wholeheartedly apologise to anyone affected."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63050482
 
Wonder when they will do one for the Tories. We just had a Tory PM who in the past openly called niqabis as black letter boxes
 
Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit reveals how a British political party that claims to embrace progressive values created a hierarchy of racism that discriminated against its Black, Asian and Muslim members. Interviews, internal documents and social media messages shared by the most

Disaffected Corbinistas having a whinge.

Does the report talk about how the LP was found by the Equality and Human Rights Commission to be institutionally racist against Jews, on Corbyn’s watch?

https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/inquiries-and-investigations/investigation-labour-party
 
the Labour party is very racist - most members ( or ex-members) will attest to this.

Although in all honesty the labour party is actually two parties - one compromised of middle/upper class university graduates who are incredibly patronising towards anyone that is not like the and the other "traditional" working class labour voters.

And its the first of those two groups that are racist.
 
the Labour party is very racist - most members ( or ex-members) will attest to this.

Although in all honesty the labour party is actually two parties - one compromised of middle/upper class university graduates who are incredibly patronising towards anyone that is not like the and the other "traditional" working class labour voters.

And its the first of those two groups that are racist.

I'm not a Labour member but I don't see how class and racism are connected. I met plenty of working class racists and plenty of middle-class anti-racists.
 
I'm not a Labour member but I don't see how class and racism are connected. I met plenty of working class racists and plenty of middle-class anti-racists.

Middle class racism tends to be of the more subtle, backhanded and institutional variety, and therefore is arguably more powerful and deeply embedded.

Whereas working class racism is more primal and casual, but can be educated out of people.

The former type I find to be by far the worst and most terrifying.
 
Middle class racism tends to be of the more subtle, backhanded and institutional variety, and therefore is arguably more powerful and deeply embedded.

Whereas working class racism is more primal and casual, but can be educated out of people.

The former type I find to be by far the worst and most terrifying.

I would believe that of middle class Tories, but not Labourites as a rule. Their commitment to anti racism is clear, having driven the antisemites out.
 
I'm not a Labour member but I don't see how class and racism are connected. I met plenty of working class racists and plenty of middle-class anti-racists.

Yes you may know plenty that fall within each category, but from my experience the general working class elements of the Labour party are far more supportive of those from a minority background.

The unelected bunch that seem to run the party from their offices in London have an ideal minority candidate and were dismissive of the views of those that don't fit within this bracket.

For a very long time Labour would only really put up black/asian candidates in black/asian areas and were of the opinion that you could win over a community by sticking in a candidate that looked like them.
 
I would believe that of middle class Tories, but not Labourites as a rule. Their commitment to anti racism is clear, having driven the antisemites out.

Middle class Tories are actually quite meritocratic. If you work hard, don't rock the boat too much you can rise to the top as proven by Warsi, Javed, Patel, Sunak etc. They have given the second more important job in the country to a Pakistani, Indian, Kurd and African orgin person.

They really buy into the British equivalent of the "American Dream".

If we ever have a black/minority PM he/she will deffo be a Tory!
 
Last edited:
Middle class Tories are actually quite meritocratic. If you work hard, don't rock the boat too much you can rise to the top as proven by Warsi, Javed, Patel, Sunak etc. They have given the second more important job in the country to a Pakistani, Indian, Kurd and African orgin person.

They really buy into the British equivalent of the "American Dream".

If we ever have a black/minority PM he/she will deffo be a Tory!

That's the juxtaposition of Tories today. Evil but diverse
 
Middle class Tories are actually quite meritocratic. If you work hard, don't rock the boat too much you can rise to the top as proven by Warsi, Javed, Patel, Sunak etc. They have given the second more important job in the country to a Pakistani, Indian, Kurd and African orgin person.

They really buy into the British equivalent of the "American Dream".

If we ever have a black/minority PM he/she will deffo be a Tory!

Not rocking the boat is the critical part. The Tory membership is 96% white. The Tory members had the opportunity to vote for a brown man (clearly the stronger candidate) and went for the white Thatcher cosplayer.

If you look at the Labour Party front bench you will see plenty of black and brown faces. While there are plenty more in the CLPs.
 
I would believe that of middle class Tories, but not Labourites as a rule. Their commitment to anti racism is clear, having driven the antisemites out.

I thought there was elements of racism in the drive against antisemites to be honest, it was driven more by support for Israel than a genuine care for Jewish people. I don't think any Labour members actually held prejudice against Jewish people as such, the objections have usually been aimed at Israeli state policy.
 
I thought there was elements of racism in the drive against antisemites to be honest, it was driven more by support for Israel than a genuine care for Jewish people. I don't think any Labour members actually held prejudice against Jewish people as such, the objections have usually been aimed at Israeli state policy.

Blimey, try telling that to the Jewish MPs who were driven out of the party. A lot of young socialists circulated actual Nazi Party memes. It was horrific. The assumption seems to be that Jews are all rich / control the media so attacking them is punching up not down.
 
Blimey, try telling that to the Jewish MPs who were driven out of the party. A lot of young socialists circulated actual Nazi Party memes. It was horrific. The assumption seems to be that Jews are all rich / control the media so attacking them is punching up not down.

I didn't read anything about Nazi memes to be honest, that is quite astounding in this day and age.
 
The assumption seems to be that Jews are all rich / control the media so attacking them is punching up not down.

Are you saying Zionists do not control the media?

There's a difference between Jews and Zionists. Not all Jews are Zionists (i.e. ultraorthodox Jews).
 
Are you saying Zionists do not control the media?

Please don't put words in my mouth. I mean what I post, no more and no less. I posted that many young socialists see Jews as a hard target and that attacking them is not racism, because racism is punching down not up.
 
I didn't read anything about Nazi memes to be honest, that is quite astounding in this day and age.

I don't mean that there were swastikas and such. I mean that I saw some young socialists posting the same falsehoods about Jews that the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) did in the 1930s. It broke my heart.
 
Dont know if you saw the video but the bit about how calls about anti-semitism were given priority is eye opening.
 
If you look at the Labour Party front bench you will see plenty of black and brown faces. While there are plenty more in the CLPs.

Although there have been two women as “acting leaders”, every formal Labour leader in history has been a white man.

How many Cabinet ministers — not shadow cabinet members — from an ethnic minority has Labour appointed during its spells in government? Anyone apart from David Lammy? (I don’t think they have ever had an Asian minister)

Labour’s record on diversity and inclusion at the senior levels is quite poor to be honest.
 
Dont know if you saw the video but the bit about how calls about anti-semitism were given priority is eye opening.

Presumably due to the antiSemitism narrative running and running. Corbyn himself commissioned the Chakrabarti Report into antiSemitism and no other form of racism.
 
Although there have been two women as “acting leaders”, every formal Labour leader in history has been a white man.

How many Cabinet ministers — not shadow cabinet members — from an ethnic minority has Labour appointed during its spells in government? Anyone apart from David Lammy? (I don’t think they have ever had an Asian minister)

Labour’s record on diversity and inclusion at the senior levels is quite poor to be honest.

The Tories did not until Cameron introduced his fast-track plan for talented BAME candidates ten years back. But this is not reflected in the membership.

Keith Vaz was a minister under the Blair regime, as was Paul Boateng.

Looking at the Labour front bench there is Lammy, Mahmood, Allin-Khan, Gill, Debonairre and Miliband.
 
‘The Labour Files’ exposes a toxic right-wing culture poisoning our party

While the Tories were imploding last week, Keir Starmer was welcoming applause at an ostensibly unified Labour conference. But below the surface, a more divisive and concerning story was unfolding through a series of shocking documentaries, aired on the Al Jazeera news channel and YouTube.

The Labour Files, based on what producers say is “the biggest leak of confidential documents in British political history,” detailed harrowing bullying of party members by Labour’s bureaucracy and the rigging of democratic processes. Most chillingly, the series exposed a current of anti-Black racism and Islamophobia in the party under Starmer, at times apparently encouraged by its most senior officials.

The story told in The Labour Files begins with the party’s top officials, overwhelmingly drawn from the right of the party, being so horrified by the left taking leadership under Jeremy Corbyn that they used every trick in the book to undermine him and his supporters. But what has been uncovered isn’t just historic: Starmer’s officials, now in full control, are shown to have the same obsessive zeal for attacking their own party members. The result? The departure of nearly 100,000 hard-working Labour activists and, with them, the transformative policy programme urgently needed to tackle rampant inequality, failing public services and the climate crisis.

The programmes detail a nasty racial dimension to this ongoing project that should concern people across the political spectrum. We read the WhatsApp messages of senior officials writing that Diane Abbott “literally makes me sick” and speculating about whether her diabetes is “the bad diet one”. We hear Abbott – the first Black woman ever elected to parliament – respond that “the Labour party isn’t a safe space for Black women” and accuse the party of “colluding with this type of racism”.

The series explores the “hierarchy of racism” described in the recent Forde Report into Labour factionalism — a damning but under-reported document. Halima Khan, a former investigations officer in Labour’s governance unit, speaks of how reports of Islamophobia “would often sit in the complaints inbox,” while she would be asked to stay late to deal with antisemitism complaints. She tells of how Muslim Labour members in Newham were “stalked” by a local man who submitted a dossier detailing which school their children went to and where they parked their car. Although the dossier used racial profiling and was potentially based on a data breach, the party did not report it to the authorities, but instead suspended its branches in Newham, denying 5,000 mostly Muslim members a voice in the party.

Such stories echo the treatment of Apsana Begum, the UK’s first hijab-wearing MP, who has spoken of the sustained campaign of abuse and harassment she has faced within the party, explicitly linking this to her identity as a socialist, working-class Muslim woman. Begum has just returned to work after previously being signed off sick by her GP – but instead of offering support, the Labour Party chose to further enable the campaign to deselect her as an MP.

The Labour Files features case after case of local members being bullied by the party they dedicated their lives to. As a young member involved in the party, this comes as no surprise to me. I’ve seen first hand the demoralising impact these tactics have on people joining Labour to campaign for bold political change.

Most disappointing is that the party leadership had a golden opportunity to put a stop to such abuse with the publication in July of the Forde Report. Commissioned under Starmer himself, the report by Martin Forde QC was unexpectedly critical, decrying a “failure to prioritise a suitably robust response” to anti-Black racism and Islamophobia. Forde concluded that in Labour today “there are serious problems of discrimination” and implied the party had not held to account senior officials who, in the Corbyn period, engaged in WhatsApp group chats that revealed “deplorably factional and insensitive, and at times discriminatory, attitudes” including “expressions of visceral disgust” about Diane Abbott that drew on racist tropes.

Since the publication of the Forde Report, members feel deeply unsatisfied with the response. Many of us, particularly people of colour, feel dismissed and concerned that we are being told these accounts are historical, rather than the ongoing problem we know it to be. In response to the report, Starmer said: “I didn’t need the report to tell me we needed to take action, I’ve been taking action.” So the Forde Report’s many recommendations remain on the shelf, even as the Al Jazeera documentaries reveal the problems to be far deeper-rooted than thought. It’s no wonder Black Labour MPs have described Starmer’s response as "a kick in the teeth".

It suits the Labour leadership to ignore these issues. With the public overwhelmingly opposed to Kwasi Kwarteng’s bankers’ Budget and Liz Truss’ failed trickle down economics, Labour is enjoying a 30-point lead in the polls. Why expend time and resources on these issues? The answer is simple: racism and democracy are too important to simply be swept under the carpet – we must put our own house in order.

As a starting point, members deserve answers about the revelations in the documentary – Labour has so far given none. Those responsible for wrongdoing must be held to account, and anyone who participated in racist WhatsApp chats must face consequences. Next, the Forde Report’s recommendations must be implemented in full. The abuse of Labour’s disciplinary system to wage political battles needs to end and factionally-tainted suspensions and expulsions overturned, starting with the restoration of the whip to Jeremy Corbyn and action taken to support Apsana Begum.

More broadly, we need an end to the hierarchy of racism Forde has laid out, something which can only be achieved by implementation of Labour’s promise to create democratic BAME structures. The best bulwark against racism is democratic representation for people of colour and other minority communities. With it, perhaps we’d see full-throated opposition from Labour to the barbaric Rwanda refugee deportation plan, instead of calls for more deportations.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/labour-files-forde-report-keir-starmer-racism-b2198773.html
 
The above article is the only one to be found by a major British newspaper on this subject.

Seems crazy to me that there is not more coverage on "the Labour files" nor the Forde report from July that was commissioned by Starmer himself, both of which detail some quite damning and disturbing stories and trends in one of the 2 main parties of the country.

Am I missing something or is the Labour Party not deeply poisonous to the left-leaning activists and minorities it's supposed to represent? And why would that not be national news?
 
Labour MP Sam Tarry attacks deselection as ‘manufactured circus’ as he questions ‘integrity’ of result
His response came as Sir Keir announced a major shake-up of the party management in an attempt to ready it for a possible early election
Labour’s Sam Tarry has claimed his deselection from the party was a “manufactured political circus” as he demanded to be shown a list of votes to ensure the “integrity” of the result.

The left-wing former shadow transport minister, who was sacked by leader Sir Keir Starmer after allegedly “going rogue” and “making up policy on the hoof” in unsanctioned media interviews conducted from a picket line, was deselected in his east London constituency on Monday.

He has subsequently called into question the legitimacy of the Ilford South selection process, with his allies complaining of a concerted effort by the leadership to rid Labour of dissenting voices.


Mr Tarry, who is the partner of Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner, said he was “utterly crestfallen” by the result on Monday night and demanded information to be “assured of the integrity of the result”.

“I am extremely concerned about the result, which does not reflect the feeling my campaigners met on the ground talking day in day out to members, or the extensive meticulous data we gathered on the campaign,” he said.

“I am taking some time to consider what’s next, but in order to be assured of the integrity of the result I am asking the party to share with me the full information of who cast electronic votes, by what method, and when they were cast.”


Labour said Mr Tarry had been provided with a list of eligible voters including those able to vote electronically.

The candidate who local members picked over Mr Tarry on Monday was local council leader Jas Athwal, who was the frontrunner in the same seat in 2019, when he was blocked from standing under then-leader Jeremy Corbyn due to a controversial complaints process – paving the way for Corbyn ally Mr Tarry to become the candidate. The complaint against Mr Athwal was later thrown out.

Mr Tarry will remain the MP for Ilford South up until the next election, expected in 2024, when Mr Athwal will be Labour’s candidate.

Sir Keir told Labour Party staff on Tuesday that it must “get on an election footing straightaway” as he announced restructures to his top team.

“The Government’s collapse has given us a huge chance. The instability means they could fall at any time,” he said.

“Because of that, we need to get on an election footing straightaway.”

He announced his chief of staff, Sam White, was leaving as part of a merger between the Leader of the Opposition’s Office and Labour headquarters.


The restructure had been planned “for a while”, he said, but accelerated amid recent polling that has seen Labour enjoy a considerable lead against the Conservatives.

The changes will see policy and communications roles move into party HQ, reporting to general secretary David Evans.

He told staff “this is not time for complacency or caution” and Labour must “seize the opportunity we have and show the British people we are the party that can lead our country forward”.

They'd rather select quota filling sex pests. It'll soon resemble a backbench in Mohali

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/labour-sam-tarry-deselection-keir-starmer-polling-election-1906501
 
The above article is the only one to be found by a major British newspaper on this subject.

Seems crazy to me that there is not more coverage on "the Labour files" nor the Forde report from July that was commissioned by Starmer himself, both of which detail some quite damning and disturbing stories and trends in one of the 2 main parties of the country.

The Forde Inquiry was commissioned by the NEC, not Starmer.

As to why there is not more coverage, few people actually watch Aljazeera. It's not like the BBC, Sky, Channel 4 or ITN News.

Am I missing something or is the Labour Party not deeply poisonous to the left-leaning activists and minorities it's supposed to represent? And why would that not be national news?


The heat is all on the Tories at present.

For as long as I recall there have been two factions - the hard left, and the moderate centre-left. They purge each other every so often depending on who has the ascendancy.
 
The Forde Inquiry was commissioned by the NEC, not Starmer.

As to why there is not more coverage, few people actually watch Aljazeera. It's not like the BBC, Sky, Channel 4 or ITN News.

The heat is all on the Tories at present.

So are these allegations unimportant and forgotten because the Forde report was released in the aftermath of Boris' resignation and the Al-Jazeera report in the midst of a Truss fiasco? Will it get picked up again?

Corbyn was torn to pieces for the antisemitism allegations, even when the Home Select Affairs Committee ruled that there was no more antisemitism in Labour than in any other party (not that I entirely absolve them of wrongdoing), but you're saying these reports and allegations are simply a victim of poor timing? Surely they should be taken as seriously as the antisemitism allegations.

For as long as I recall there have been two factions - the hard left, and the moderate centre-left. They purge each other every so often depending on who has the ascendancy.

I see. Forgive me as I have not been following closely for very long. Was there then analogous bullying, discrimination, racism, sexism etc. against the moderate centre-left faction in the ascension to power of the hard left and Corbyn?
 
Last edited:
<b>Neath MP Christina Rees has been suspended from Labour following reported allegations of bullying.</b>

The politician, who has represented the constituency since 2015, has lost the party whip pending an investigation.

It means the former shadow Welsh secretary will sit in the Commons as an independent.

The Guardian said Ms Rees faces allegations of bullying staff.

Ms Rees told the newspaper she was cooperating fully with the investigation.

The Guardian reported the move followed complaints by staff working for her in her south Wales constituency.

Labour has declined to comment.

The MP took her seat in 2015 after Peter Hain stood down at that year's general election.

She is the 14th MP to be sitting in parliament as an independent, joining others who have lost the whip from their parties.

Born in the village of Kenfig Hill in south Wales, the qualified barrister has represented Wales in squash more than 100 times.

She was a member of the Great Britain Youth Team to the Munich Olympics.

Ms Rees, who served on the Labour frontbench during Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, was married to former Welsh Secretary Ron Davies until they divorced in 1999.

She told the Guardian: "There has been a complaint made against me to the Labour Party, which is under investigation and I am therefore under an administrative suspension until the process is concluded.

“I'm not aware of the details of the complaint but I am fully cooperating with the investigation."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-63245280
 
So are these allegations unimportant and forgotten because the Forde report was released in the aftermath of Boris' resignation and the Al-Jazeera report in the midst of a Truss fiasco? Will it get picked up again?

Corbyn was torn to pieces for the antisemitism allegations, even when the Home Select Affairs Committee ruled that there was no more antisemitism in Labour than in any other party (not that I entirely absolve them of wrongdoing), but you're saying these reports and allegations are simply a victim of poor timing? Surely they should be taken as seriously as the antisemitism allegations.

Yes.

But there’s a war on, and Truss is screwing up the economy so that’s what is gaining traction in the news cycle. This Labour story is flying under the radar which suits Starmer fine.

I see. Forgive me as I have not been following closely for very long. Was there then analogous bullying, discrimination, racism, sexism etc. against the moderate centre-left faction in the ascension to power of the hard left and Corbyn?

Sure, many Jewish members including MPs were driven out by the hard left. I don’t suggest that Corbyn was responsible for this. But he didn’t shut it down despite commissioning the Chakrabarti report.
 
Yes.

But there’s a war on, and Truss is screwing up the economy so that’s what is gaining traction in the news cycle. This Labour story is flying under the radar which suits Starmer fine.



Sure, many Jewish members including MPs were driven out by the hard left. I don’t suggest that Corbyn was responsible for this. But he didn’t shut it down despite commissioning the Chakrabarti report.

How do you feel about Hindutvas on here who have suggested that inventing a phobia based on social media is a successful tactic citing Israel as their inspiration?

You must know that there is no serious campaign against Jews in our country any more, if anything they have been viewed constantly as victims despite many of their diaspora rising to the highest echelons in British society.
 
How do you feel about Hindutvas on here who have suggested that inventing a phobia based on social media is a successful tactic citing Israel as their inspiration?

You must know that there is no serious campaign against Jews in our country any more, if anything they have been viewed constantly as victims despite many of their diaspora rising to the highest echelons in British society.

There had been no “serious campaign” against British Jewry since Moseley’s Blackshirts in the 1930s.

I think there was a tendency among young Corbynistas to attack Labour Party Jews, calling them Zionists and so on. I think such Corbynistas have an idea that because some Jews have achieved success in UK, attacking them is punching up not punching down, believing that their whiteness means they cannot be victims of racism.

Have Hindutvas on this board done what you say? I had not noticed. If so I think it would be elevating victimhood for political gain.
 
Yes.

But there’s a war on, and Truss is screwing up the economy so that’s what is gaining traction in the news cycle. This Labour story is flying under the radar which suits Starmer fine.



Sure, many Jewish members including MPs were driven out by the hard left. I don’t suggest that Corbyn was responsible for this. But he didn’t shut it down despite commissioning the Chakrabarti report.

Massive loss for Labour in North Evington in Leicester. Massive swing. They chose the wrong candidate a Modi lover and now the tories have another Councillor in a cast iron Labour stronghold.

This is where Infear Keir and Co will hurt us. Taking the Muslim and black vote for granted and appointing candidates who are unpleasant islamaphobes. As a Muslim I'm more worried about Labour than the tories and that's saying something. Even though I believe a Labour govt will be better for us.
 
Massive loss for Labour in North Evington in Leicester. Massive swing. They chose the wrong candidate a Modi lover and now the tories have another Councillor in a cast iron Labour stronghold.

This is where Infear Keir and Co will hurt us. Taking the Muslim and black vote for granted and appointing candidates who are unpleasant islamaphobes. As a Muslim I'm more worried about Labour than the tories and that's saying something. Even though I believe a Labour govt will be better for us.

I wouldn’t look too far into a single Council election result in Leicester.

You have to look at trends. Tories are getting hammered in the council main rounds, mainly to the LDs and Greens of late, but Labour were still suffering from Long Corbyn last time. I expect Labour to destroy the Tories in the next main round.
 
<b>Labour MP Conor McGinn has been suspended from the party pending an investigation, the BBC has been told.</b>

Mr McGinn, who represents the St Helens North constituency, will now sit as an independent MP.

He has previously served as an opposition whip and as a shadow Home Office minister.

Mr McGinn is the latest Labour MP to be suspended under the party's new complaints process.

The system was set up last year in the wake of controversy over how anti-Semitism allegations were handled.

BBC
 
Is this classed as anti-semitism?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Benjamin Netanyahu operates a brutal regime of apartheid over the Palestinian people. <br><br>Instead of rolling out the red carpet, Rishi Sunak should confront the Israeli PM over human rights abuses, ban the trade of illegal settlement goods, and call for justice, equality & peace.</p>— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1639200832464773126?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Is this classed as anti-semitism?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Benjamin Netanyahu operates a brutal regime of apartheid over the Palestinian people. <br><br>Instead of rolling out the red carpet, Rishi Sunak should confront the Israeli PM over human rights abuses, ban the trade of illegal settlement goods, and call for justice, equality & peace.</p>— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) <a href="https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1639200832464773126?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Unfortunately yes.
 
Back
Top