What's new

[VIDEO] Umpire changes mind after giving batter out - First time in history? Implications?

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,863
<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 50%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/2qda2j" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>

Scorchers captain Ashton Turner and BBL umpire Bruce Oxenford have created a stir after the latter bizarrely reversed his decision after initially giving the batter out caught behind.

Turner tried to pull a delivery from Stars bowler Xaver Crone, only to miss and for the ball to fly through to wicket-keeper Joe Clarke.

There was a noise as the ball passed Turner, with Oxenford giving the Scorchers star out caught behind.

But as Oxenford was pondering his decision, Turner was heard yelling out “helmet”. Replays showed the ball appeared to miss the bat and, indeed, came out off the helmet.

The decision was then bizarrely reversed by the umpire, with Turner surviving.

“No sorry not out,” Oxenford was heard saying moments after he put his finger up.

“The deflection’s gone that way and it has come off the lid. Not out.”

Stars skipper Glenn Maxwell then approached Oxenford for an explanation.

”Sorry mate, I realised as soon as I put the finger up,” Oxenford told Maxwell.

The Stars all-rounder was heard saying “don’t get sucked in by that”, before Oxenford replied: “No mate, I’m not ... The deflection’s gone the wrong way.”

Commentators Mark Howard, Adam Gilchrist and Michael Vaughan then debated whether Turner was unfairly influencing the umpire after the farcical scenes at Junction Oval.

Vaughan suggested Turner’s “helmet” cry may have had an influence on Oxenford’s reversal.

“I reckon he was (influenced). I reckon Turner’s shouted ‘helmet, helmet’ and he’s just changed his mind.

“Again, it’s fine if it’s the right decision.”

Vaughan believes the right decision was eventually made, but like Gilchrist and Howard he believes Turner overstepped the mark.

“It is the right decision by the looks of it,” he said. “Whatever way you get to the right decision whether, you are using technology or the umpire changing his mind.

“I don’t like the player shouting out. I think it is down to the umpire to make the call without the player saying anything, but fundamentally if that is the right decision at the end of the day that is absolutely fine by me.”

Get all the latest cricket news, highlights and analysis delivered straight to your inbox with Fox Sports Sportmail. Sign up now!!!

Gilchrist said it was “dangerous territory” for batters to be making gestures while an umpire is making a decision.

“It’s courageous umpiring to go, ‘I’ve made a mistake there so I’m happy to overturn it’ — and they do have the power to do that, so that’s fine,” Gilchrist said.

“But the only issue is the fact it seems like he’s responded to a player gesturing, now that opens up the opportunity should another player be in a similar situation by hitting their pad when they think they’ve edged it.”

https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricke...s/news-story/894476833b66c1d05d539ba21bdda54e
 
An instantaneous reversal like this has got to be exceptionally rare.

I have very occasionally seen batters called back by the umpire before they reach the pavilion.
 
Definitely NOT the first time in history imo


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lBlk51RqDmo" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Definitely NOT the first time in history imo


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lBlk51RqDmo" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

But no immediately like today!
 
Very odd , think I saw something similar once when umpire went to put his finger up and then started brushing his eye or something, but nothing like this raised the finger then immediately changed his mind. Is that even allowed.
 
This is not okay. Umpires should know that once they make their decision its final so they should decide responsibly.
 
Tough one. Rules are Rules, but the right decision needs to be made. The rules should be altered that if the umpire finds significant reason to change the decision within 1-2 minutes, he/she can.

Smilar to the Shaheen vs Siraj throw topic in the other thread. As per the rules Siraj did nothing wrong, whereas Shaheen did. The batsman in Siraj's case was out of the crease, whereas in Shaheen's case he wasn't. Both were wrong. But because of rules, you can punish one and not the other. Match referees in this case would need to be given the right to apply punishments on a case by case basis.
 
I think it was just an absent-minded raising of the finger. As soon as he realized it, he changed it. Strange but such things happen. It's a bit like a third umpire making the wrong call and immediately correcting it. I've seen that a few times.
 
Wow, I've certainly never seen that before. There has been cases of an umpire halfway raising his finger then changing his mind and playing it off like he's scratching his head :)

But I've never seen an umpire nod his head and fully signal out, before instantaneously changing his decision. It's as if he instinctively gave it out based on the sound, and then processed it a moment later to realise it was helmet and not bat. Poor umpiring.
 
Back
Top