topspin
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
- Runs
- 14,529
- Post of the Week
- 1
This is a fine example of blindly looking at stats at face value without any context.
Imad has played over half of his T20I innings at number from 7 to 9 for Pakistan. Shadab on the other hand has played most of his innings batting from 4 to 6.
The other flaw with your argument is we're talking about current affairs. Distant past performances doesn't give you a fair reflection of how good or badly a player will perform today. I'll give you a football analogy so you can see what I mean. It's like saying Rashford for Man Utd is worse than Trossard. Anyone who knows their football recognises that Rashford is the superior player at present.
You conveniently ignored Imad's recent performances. In the PSL he scored over 400 runs from his 10 matches at a strike rate in excess of 170. Shadab played one more game and scored a poultry 135 runs.
Shadab was the highest run getter in the recent series in Sharjah against Afghanistan. Shadab went missing with bat and ball until the dead rubber.
As for Shadab's bowling, it might be good for a mediocre side like Pakistan however Usama Mir is far better than him.
Usama Mir and Imad are two cricketers who've been discarded for Pakistan for quite some time all because they're not part of Babar's clique.
Imad*