Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nawaz is just a poor man's Imad Wasim. What an awesome bowling attack this would be with him in the side. Plus he is a superior batsman and fielder to Nawaz.
Capable of a good knock just thrust up order unnecessarily. Good bowler who puts the brakes on
Same guy who just darts it in and quite expensive?. Players really do get better in absentia
Nawaz is just a poor man's Imad Wasim. What an awesome bowling attack this would be with him in the side. Plus he is a superior batsman and fielder to Nawaz.
They also get better with experience though. And Imad was excellent in the CPL which, to be fair, is against some excellent batsman.
Darting the ball in is hardly a new or bad thing for spinners in T20 cricket. But he does it intelligently and economiclly and I have no doubt he would not bowl a no-ball in the most important moment of a game against India. Basically, he is very similar to Nawaz but with much better temperament.
Need to think horses for courses now. Will a holding finger spinner be of any benefit against the Kiwi batsmen? Can Iftikhar do the job along with Shadab?
Nawaz played a good innings against SA in Sydney so I would persist with him. And have faith in him. Bowl him 2 overs to relieve pressure off any paver who is having a bad day.
It’s about time he’s been poor the whole tournament with bat and let’s not even talk about the last time he bowled
Speaking to media at the Islamabad Club on Saturday, Nawaz was excited ahead of the historic three-match series against England.
"I will represent Pakistan for the very first time at my home ground [Pindi Cricket Stadium]. I'm excited to play in front of my home crowd,” Nawaz said.
"I'm extremely happy with the complete revival of Test cricket since major teams have also started touring Pakistan. This will be a motivation for upcoming generation of cricketers in Pakistan,” he added.
The left-armer also believes that performing in Test cricket proves beneficial in the limited-overs formats.
"I will play as a spin all-rounder in Test cricket as well. My target is to perform in Test cricket because the more you perform in longer version the more it helps to easily play in white-ball formats,” he said.
Speaking to media at the Islamabad Club on Saturday, Nawaz was excited ahead of the historic three-match series against England.
"I will represent Pakistan for the very first time at my home ground [Pindi Cricket Stadium]. I'm excited to play in front of my home crowd,” Nawaz said.
"I'm extremely happy with the complete revival of Test cricket since major teams have also started touring Pakistan. This will be a motivation for upcoming generation of cricketers in Pakistan,” he added.
The left-armer also believes that performing in Test cricket proves beneficial in the limited-overs formats.
"I will play as a spin all-rounder in Test cricket as well. My target is to perform in Test cricket because the more you perform in longer version the more it helps to easily play in white-ball formats,” he said.
If Mohammad Nawaz has the power to hit big shots why was he trying to play a finesse shot when he ended up gloving it to the English keeper? I can’t figure out why this team does the things they do.
This is how cricket is played. You don't play 'power' shots every ball in cricket.
Usama is worse and what are the other options.How big a mistake did Pakistan make by playing Mohammad Nawaz against India?
At least Imad keeps things tight and can bat.Usama is worse and what are the other options.
I don't think he would have been any better because he also doesn't spin the ball. To get good batsman out, you need to spin the ballAt least Imad keeps things tight and can bat.
Nawaz contributes to us somehow having the worst spin attack at the world cup.
In T20s Imad's economical bowling is fine but in ODIs your spinner needs to be a wicket-taking threat not just keeping things tight.At least Imad keeps things tight and can bat.
Nawaz contributes to us somehow having the worst spin attack at the world cup.
In T20s Imad's economical bowling is fine but in ODIs your spinner needs to be a wicket-taking threat not just keeping things tight.
Imad averages 62 against the teams ranked 2-6.
If our spin options are so poor we may as well play four seamers. Surprisingly seamers average better than spinners in ODIs in India since 2019 World Cup (32 v 44).
I think Jamal would be a good addition. He balls a heavy ball and is ok with the bat. Certainly adds more to the ball than Faheem.Pakistan should play four quicks. Shadab and Agha Salman can be the spin options.Faheem should be dropped for good.I don’t why Arshad Abbas Afridi or Jamal are not considered.Dahani has disappointed but he can still resurrect his career if he works hard.
no i think faheem is better option compare to jamal.. because we need someone who can bat aggressively at the end of the innings and faheem has that ability.I think Jamal would be a good addition. He balls a heavy ball and is ok with the bat. Certainly adds more to the ball than Faheem.
Or talent. No better than a Bham league spinner in terms of his lack of spin.He's a nice guy, humble and very likeable.
But has he got enough fire in his belly especially at key moments in matches. That could be one criticism of him.
Hope they continue to play 4 seamers against Asian sides.Reckon he's going to be back in for the WC if we encounter spinning pitches.