What's new

[VIDEOS] Uzma Khan withdraws case against women who attacked her, says FIR was a 'misunderstanding'

To be honest, that is a huge amount!!! Around USD 1.3 million!

If Malik Riaz can pay Rs 450 billion as fine to the Pakistani government and £190 million as fine to the UK government, then this amount is loose change for him!

I expect Malik Riaz is worth around at least USD $40 billion!
 
An agreement has been reached between the two parties.

Apparently, the actress has been offered Rs 200 million and a house!

Lol at all that bravado, and wanting to fight the Riazs, good that lawyer has disassociated herself from the case
 
To be honest, that is a huge amount!!! Around USD 1.3 million!

If Malik Riaz can pay Rs 450 billion as fine to the Pakistani government and £190 million as fine to the UK government, then this amount is loose change for him!

I expect Malik Riaz is worth around at least USD $40 billion!

His net worth is around $75 billion.
 
An agreement has been reached between the two parties.

Apparently, the actress has been offered Rs 200 million and a house!

I had already said so in the thread that apparently the girls come from a certain part of the society that is also deep rooted in the country and that got them exposed in the end.

Countless content went around even proving that and this settlement was long on the cards as they say that there always has to be a bit of noise and fizz in Pakistan on anything then it fizzes out.
 
“I sustained injuries due to falling on glass”? Seriously? It’s on video
 
I guess it’s factually correct. Even if someone body slams you onto broken glass, you do end up falling on it.
 
This has to be illegal? For an accuser to legally claim that their charges were false? When the charges are well documented? Any resident PP legal expert?
 
Money talks. No one in this country has the balls and most like her are just greedy. All that fake bravado in the video she made and then she takes it back in a second. Still strange how in this whole incident only the women ended up getting embarrassed when the main culprit was the guy
 
Uzma Khan withdraws case against women who attacked her, says FIR was a 'misunderstanding'

Actor Uzma Khan on Tuesday withdrew the case against three women and their armed guards whom she had accused last week of torturing her and her sister after angrily storming a house where she was staying in Lahore's DHA neighbourhood.

A former member of Uzma's legal team claimed that the two sides had reportedly reached a settlement which led to the withdrawal of charges, but no official confirmed this on record.

Video clips showing violence carried out on the actor and her sister Huma Khan, allegedly by the daughters of property tycoon Malik Riaz Hussain, had sparked outrage and calls for justice on social media earlier this week.

A first information report (FIR) of the incident was registered on Wednesday (March 27) on Uzma's complaint against Riaz's daughters Pashmina Malik and Ambar Malik, Amina Usman Malik (wife of Usman Malik), and 15 unidentified armed men — the private guards with whom the three women had entered the house seen in video clips.

Uzma had later denied having cut a deal with the persons involved in the violence. “These are just rumours and I reject them making it clear that no such effort is being made,” she had told Dawn on Friday, adding that neither the suspects had contacted her for any deal nor would she accept it.

But on Tuesday, Uzma submitted an application to Defence C Police, saying the case she had gotten registered last week was lodged "on the basis of a misunderstanding" and that she no longer wants to pursue it.

She said no challan had so far been submitted in the case. "I don't want to give any testimony or deposition in the above-stated case," Uzma added.

She recorded a similar statement before Judicial Magistrate Nauman Nasir of Lahore Cantt Courts under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), saying she wants to withdraw the case.

Her sister, Huma, in her separate statement recorded under Section 164 of CrPC said "no such occurrence" — a reference to the violence — had taken place at their house.

"[The] accused party has not made any torture upon me," she submitted, adding that the injuries she was seen to have sustained in social media videos were caused by broken "glass from [a] table".

She further said the suspects nominated in the FIR are "innocent".

"My sister namely Uzma Khan got registered the instant FIR due to misunderstanding. Therefore, the same may very kindly be cancelled," Huma added.

A judicial magistrate in Lahore had last week issued arrest warrants for the three women nominated in the FIR on the request of the investigating officer, however, they obtained pre-arrest bail from a sessions court on Monday.

Legal counsel dissociate from case

The development came as two members of Uzma's legal team, Hassaan Niazi and Khadija Siddiqi, announced that they were dissociating themselves from the case.

"This is to announce that we are disassociating from #UzmaKhan case. I understand the reasons of any settlement by two aggrieved women in a rigged system; my conscience doesn’t allow me to be part of any of that, even in a professional capacity," Siddiqi said in a tweet.

Niazi, meanwhile, wrote: "Since the first day, I had made it clear to my client that we won’t be part of any settlement. I only accepted the case to support the resolve of Uzma to get justice for her."

Niazi told DawnNewsTV that they had tried to reach Uzma regarding the case on Sunday night, but she neither responded to their calls and messages nor was she available when a member of Niazi's team visited her.

The next day, Niazi said he received a message from an unidentified person stating that Uzma and her sister have reached a settlement with the suspects. "I was shocked," he added, saying they subsequently decided to dissociate themselves from the case.

Videos show violence, abuse

A heated discussion had started on social media after several video clips had gone viral in which a few women accompanied by armed men in security guards’ uniform were seen storming a house and confronting Uzma and her sister. Another video that surfaced later showed a woman who said she had gone to the house chasing her husband, Usman Malik, and a woman he was allegedly having an affair with. This woman, identified as Amina, was said to be aided in the act by Pashmina and Ambar.

In one of the earlier videos, Uzma, who shot to fame with her movie Jawani Phir Nahi Ani, could be seen terrified and pleading for mercy.

Other clips showed the attacking women abusing Uzma and her sister Huma, slapping them, and hurling life threats at them for having "relations with Usman". The videos also showed shattered glass and damaged articles in the house.

Later, in a video message, Amina defended herself and the two other women seen in the video clips, alleging that Uzma had tried to break up her 13-year-old marriage by developing relations with her husband. She added that her husband had "nothing to do with Malik Riaz Hussain" and was "not part of his immediate family".

"This is being done to malign Malik Riaz. This is a personal spat between Hassaan Khan Niazi and Malik Riaz Hussain," she said.

Meanwhile, Malik Riaz had denied any involvement in the case, threatening to file a defamation lawsuit against anyone trying to "wrongfully implicate" him.

On Thursday, at a joint news conference at the Lahore Press Club, Uzma and her sister had demanded security of person and property, saying they had received life threats. They didn’t specify the source of these threats.

Uzma claimed that Usman Malik had been wanting to marry her for the last two years. She said she did not know Usman’s wife and saw her for the first time the day the woman barged into her house along with security guards.

In a video message posted on her Twitter account on early Saturday, which has since been deleted, Uzma had again denied reports that she had reached a "compromise" with those involved in the violence and that she had moved to Dubai.

She said people were advising her to make a "deal" with the assailants, saying her life was in danger. "But I have already died after what they have done to me ... they have defamed me before the whole world," she had said.

"My life is in danger," she had added, requesting the assistance of Prime Minister Imran Khan and Human Rights Minister Shireen Mazari.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1560861
 
This has to be illegal? For an accuser to legally claim that their charges were false? When the charges are well documented? Any resident PP legal expert?

Its not illegal. if two parties come to any settlement, then the case should be closed :) Even if it's case of murder.
 
I am a fortune teller :))

Hahaha! Nailed it.

Well done Uzma, shouldn't spend it all on one place. Should buy a house of her own in a key strategic place and invest the remaining millions very wisely.

If she is smart she must know her acting career might be over after this whole episode.
 
Its not illegal. if two parties come to any settlement, then the case should be closed :) Even if it's case of murder.

That can’t be true. Surely there is responsibility of the state to investigate all crimes? Otherwise you can do anything you want and just pay the other party off?

(I’m speaking about the law in general and in ideal cases — I know obviously that in Pakistan you can already do anything you want and bribe the other party off)
 
This has to be illegal? For an accuser to legally claim that their charges were false? When the charges are well documented? Any resident PP legal expert?

If the matter is between two parties, for example Ali vs Asad; then they can settle in between them, privately.

But if it's Ali vs "The people" or "the government" then it's different. You can settle even then with public's attorney but they usually go for the kill to earn their personal glory.
 
That can’t be true. Surely there is responsibility of the state to investigate all crimes? Otherwise you can do anything you want and just pay the other party off?

(I’m speaking about the law in general and in ideal cases — I know obviously that in Pakistan you can already do anything you want and bribe the other party off)
of course she is lying while withdrawing the case. But in Pakistan lying is very common. And the court is corrupt and the government is corrupt so they will not interfere. Pakistan is still the old Pakistan, shame on Imran Khan on selling us lie of New Pakistan, and shame on us to believe in him.
 
of course she is lying while withdrawing the case. But in Pakistan lying is very common. And the court is corrupt and the government is corrupt so they will not interfere. Pakistan is still the old Pakistan, shame on Imran Khan on selling us lie of New Pakistan, and shame on us to believe in him.

So it's all IK's fault that your Nooras and PPP destroyed all the institutions. Its IK that he can't fix decades of destruction in 2 years. Let's go back to those that created the mess.
 
of course she is lying while withdrawing the case. But in Pakistan lying is very common. And the court is corrupt and the government is corrupt so they will not interfere. Pakistan is still the old Pakistan, shame on Imran Khan on selling us lie of New Pakistan, and shame on us to believe in him.

Shame on Imran Khan for not dealing in court matters:s Some Pakistani people can be thick.
 
Reminds me of the Shazeb Khan case where the parents of the murdered boy accepted Rs 200 million in blood money in exchange for a pardon and request to the authorities to drop the case. There is no point in fighting a prolonged, time consuming, career threatening battle against the Mafia when the state and its institutions will do zilch to protect you.
 
^ In a sense, it is worthless to pursue a case against the powerfuls in Pakistan because the whole system is corrupt and you may even end up dead!

Whoever has tried to take on the powerfuls in Pakistan has gotten a bullet in the head. There are countless examples!

The best outcome is to get some money and try to live a normal life.
 
How can a country or a Qoum succeed if there is no justice there?

Only the day when I see a poor man winning a case against a very powerful man, I can say that this country can rule the World.
 
How can a country or a Qoum succeed if there is no justice there?

Only the day when I see a poor man winning a case against a very powerful man, I can say that this country can rule the World.

And which country is that, where a poor man wins a case against the powerful people consistently?
 
How can a country or a Qoum succeed if there is no justice there?

Only the day when I see a poor man winning a case against a very powerful man, I can say that this country can rule the World.

"Kufr ka nizaam chal jayega, leken zulm ka nahi"
 
Back
Top