What's new

Virat Kohli may not be a long-term leadership option for India: Graeme Smith

Savak

World Star
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Runs
50,127
Post of the Week
3
Former Proteas captain Graeme Smith says current Indian skipper Virat Kohli may not be a long-term leadership option in the face of the visitors' current struggles in South Africa.

Kohli has had a fair degree of home success in his three-year tenure but has failed in his first attempt to win a series in South Africa‚ where India have never won a series since 1992/93.

India's travelling record in South Africa‚ England‚ New Zealand and Australia doesn't make for pretty reading with only one win in 24 attempts since the 2010 Boxing Day test win against South Africa in Durban.

India will be travelling to England and Australia later this year.

India came to South Africa on the back of a superb 30-match streak where they had won 21 and lost only two matches

The current series defeat is Kohli's first as captain and India's first reverse in 10 since their 2-0 loss to Australia in the 2014/15 season.

Kohli took over from MS Dhoni midway through the Border-Gavaskar Trophy series which Australia had already secured after victories in Adelaide and Brisbane.

Kohli made his captaincy bow in the 48-run loss in Adelaide.

That series was India's last overseas tour outside of the West Indies and Sri Lanka‚ where they've won their away series.

The two losses in Cape Town and Centurion have not only raised questions in regards to Kohli's leadership style‚ but his ability to relate to his lesser-talented players and selection policies that saw his vice-captain and their best overseas batsman Ajinkya Rahane make way for the elegant but deficient Rohit Sharma.

The latter averages 25 away as compared to Rahane‚ who averages 53 on the road but was inexplicably dropped for the first two tests.

Having captained the Proteas 108 times‚ Smith has an idea of what's needed to survive as a Test captain while Kohli is 34 games into his tenure.

“We all know he's (Virat) a wonderful player and his intensity benefits his own personal game‚" Smith said.

"That intensity brings the best out of him.

"Sometimes there is a need to look at his intensity and how it impacts on his team mates.

"He's always in the game and responds to his players‚ but often to me his reactions to certain situations and sometimes that impact on the team.

"We know how powerful he is‚ he's built this aura and for him to find this level to connect with his players and to make the Indian team as successful as he is‚ that's something I think he's grappling with.

“I don't know if he's a long-term captaincy option for India.

"He's going to be away from home and the pressure he's going to face and the scrutiny he's going to be under‚ it's going to be different.

"He's used to this in India but when you're away from home and you're struggling for form‚ I don't know whether Virat Kohli is that type of leader to lead India consistently in that type of environment.

“He might grow‚ gain experience and learn to soften up but his performances will always speak for themselves but I think it'll be the case of getting the best out of his players in pressure situations."

Smith also said Kohli could do with a person who can challenge his cricketing ideas.

Kohli has a strong personality in current coach Ravi Shastri.

However‚ Shastri is considered to be a lesser nous for cricket as compared to his predecessor Anil Kumble‚ who stepped down at the conclusion of last year's ICC Champions Trophy.

Kumble had re-applied for his job but the former Indian leg-spinner hinted in reports that Kohli had reservations about his management style.

“When I look at Virat‚ I think he needs someone who can constructively challenge him and help him grow‚" Smith said.

"He has all the capabilities tactically‚ he knows his own game and he sets the standards in the field for everyone else.

"The way he goes about his work‚ it's almost a case of leading by example.

“There's his emotional side.

"He gets really fired up and there's how that affects other people.

"I think if he had a really constructive person in his environment who could talk to him‚ make him think and maybe challenge him in some different ides in a constructive way and not in an angry and aggressive way‚ that would make him a really good leader.”

Link: https://www.timeslive.co.za/sport/c...t-be-a-long-term-leadership-option-for-india/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol, i believe this is more a dig at Ravi Shastri more than anything.
 
I expect at least one of kohli or Shastri to be not around in their current role by the end of their away season
 
Anil Kumble was trying to do exactly this in the dressingroom but the power and influence of Kohli ensured he got shown the door.
 
Unless he quits, the selectors will not sack Kohli unless he loses a home series or India has an early exit from a world tournament. Apart from India having no real other choice, he is the star player of India.
 
They can never sack Kohli the batsman. He is too good for that. As for captaincy I do think if India put up very poor performances in England and Australia then things will get pretty ugly. Shastri would be walking on a much thinner ice.
 
Can Kohli make a team out of individuals?
That is the question one should ask. Just because he got angry in a press conference, does not mean he cannot lead the team.
 
Kohli is still the immature, exuberant kid from half a decade ago and he will never change as long as everyone in India indulges him. The best captains keep their composure and lead by example, not just through their performances but also their behaviour.

Smith was a prime example, as was Vaughan.
 
Rahane saved the series against Aus. He is the best person for this job.
 
Ponting and Smith had actual genuine aggression. Kohli is just a wanna be and nothing else.
 
I don't really think Kohli is interested in constructive criticism or anyone challenging his ways. He is basically a big child who likes being told what a good boy he is and buying toys for himself. When that does not happen then he starts screaming and stomping.
 
Get Rahane in and make him Test captain ASAP. Also kick out Shastri while we're at it.
 
One bad series and he should be removed from captaincy?

Let him first play against England and Australia!
 
Get Rahane in and make him Test captain ASAP. Also kick out Shastri while we're at it.

Let Rahane perfrom with the bat first... I dont think he has courage to captain Kohli.. You need a character like MSD to boss over Kohli
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let Rahane perfrom with the bat first... I dont think he has courage to captain Kohli.. You need a character like MSD to boss over Kohli

It's a non factor. The players HAVE to listen to the captain. People said the same when MSD took over with guys like Tendulkar, Ganguly, Dravid still there in the team. As a captain, Rahane has already shown more captaining prowess in one Test match win against Australia on the greenest track of the series at Dharamsala than Kohli has ever shown since 2015.

Plus, Kohli is a terrible influence on the team as it is by his politics and flip flopping on his selection critieria, not to mention his embarrassing antics towards both team mates and opponents on the field. The sooner Kohli is kicked out from captaincy the better it is for the team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One bad series and he should be removed from captaincy?

Let him first play against England and Australia!

We are going to lose there as well. Kohli is a good batsman but as a captain he is nowhere near Dhoni. All this aggression and making faces is fake. It looks pretty childish tbh. These types of actions are best suited for pyjama league matches not test cricket.
 
He's lost his first test series as captain and everyone wants him replaced. Sometimes he shows his emotion too much but it doesn't seem to have affected India's results . But I think he should calm down.

Imo I don't think Rahane has the personality to captain India and furthmore he isn't guaranteed a place in the team due to his inconsistent performances. Sarfraz performance in NZ is an example of what can happen to a team when a player doesn't make the team on merit.

I would stick with Kohli for now . The team seem to be behind him.
 
Kohli is a crappy captain but a great player. He can't keep lid on his emotion jar. Emotions are fying all around the ground, off the ground, press conference, media, etc.
 
Was pathetic watching his uncouth celebration. He was gesturing towards the crowd and asking them to shut up.

Sure, he is loved by the couch potato fans who talk about bravery and cowardice, but it looks ugly, especially from the captain of a team.

Kohli doesn't deserve to be representing a team as a captain.
 
Not playing Bhuvi in the 2nd test and backing Rohit over Rahane was unforgivable.

Overall, Kohli had an epic series with the bat but needs to take better selection calls as a captain.
 
He is a leader, maybe can't make strategy. But he surely can make teammates fight. Crowd booing ishant and teammates, so he does that in the end
 
Like Gavaskar (or Sehwag) said previously , Kohli's team is filled up (or is being filled) with "YES-men" . YOu actually need people in the team to question some of the tactics he has used. Especially the selection.

Everyone will not play on the same level as Kohli does, but he needs to find workarounds for the same. Otherwise this could end up like Tendulkar's captaincy. Kohli's blessed to have such a competitive team overseas compared to the past (bowling + Batting considered) .
 
While today's win was great, India will look back at this series as a big miss to win a Test series in South Africa. Such chances come rarely.

Not playing Rahane and Bhuvi in the second Test was unforgivable. The question is: does Kohli have the humility to first acknowledge his mistakes and then learn from those? As a player, he's learned to control his aggression and channelize it to make himself a better player. He needs to do the same for his captaincy.
 
Back
Top