What's new

Virat Kohli's criticism by Anderson surprising, says Inzamam; advises pacer to take wickets first

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
http://www.firstpost.com/sports/vir...ises-pacer-to-take-wickets-first-3153892.html

Karachi: Pakistan chief selector Inzamam-ul-Haq has criticised James Anderson for his uncharitable comments about Virat Kohli's technique, saying that the England pacer should first take wickets in India before questioning the Indian skipper's capabilities.

Anderson had recently said Kohli's technical deficiencies were not at display during the ongoing Test series between India and England because the pitches in India are devoid of bounce and there is lack of movement.

"It is surprising to me that Anderson should question Kohli's runs and ability because I haven't seen him take too many wickets in India," Inzamam said on a sports TV channel at Karachi on Monday night.

"Does Anderson mean to say that if you get runs in England you get some sort of certificate that makes you a quality batsman. Don't the English and Australian players struggle when they play in the sub-continent? Does that mean they are bad players or weak teams. To me it does not matter where you get runs because in Test matches runs are runs," the former Pakistan skipper added.

Inzamam, who played against the golden breed of Indian batsmen, rated Kohli highly.

"I always judge a batsman by seeing how many times the runs he scores leads to his team winning matches. In my opinion if a batsman scores 80 and it helps his team win, it matters more to me than someone scoring 150 and his team still losing.

"He is a quality player and when he is getting runs his team does well. That is important to judge or classify a batsman's value. There is hunger in him for runs," he said.

The veteran of 120 Tests lamented that the Asians have a habit of questioning their own teams and players while England and Australia always back their cricketers.

"If they don't do well there we start questioning the ability of our teams and players ourselves. We must not forget Australia lost 3-0 in Sri Lanka, we beat England 3-0 in the past in the UAE."

Meanwhile, Inzamam revealed that during his captaincy he feared Virender Sehwag the most among the Indian batsmen.

"Sehwag was a dangerous player because if he scored 80 odd runs it meant his team would end up scoring 300 or more in a Test or ODI. The more time he spent time at the crease the more he dented the morale of the bowlers, which was worrying for me as captain," said Inzamam.

On the suspension of bilateral cricket between Pakistan and India, Inzamam said it has hurt Pakistan cricket a lot.

"Overall it is not good for cricket and for both countries not to play bilateral series. But from a Pakistani perspective it has done us more damage as already foreign teams are also not touring Pakistan and our young players are not getting chances to play matches against international sides before playing for the senior team.

"People want to see Indo-Pak matches but there is nothing one can do about it until things are normal at the government level. Personally I always enjoyed the challenge of playing against India and it made a better player. To me a Indo-Pak series has always been even bigger than the Ashes," concluded Inzamam.
 
Last edited:
I understand anybody is free to comment on anything, but how did Inzamam get into this debate?
 
I understand anybody is free to comment on anything, but how did Inzamam get into this debate?

I'm guessing it all started with a discussion on Pakistani batsmen and how they only score in the UAE.

Cause he said this,

"Does Anderson mean to say that if you get runs in England you get some sort of certificate that makes you a quality batsman. Don't the English and Australian players struggle when they play in the sub-continent? Does that mean they are bad players or weak teams. To me it does not matter where you get runs because in Test matches runs are runs,"
 
Did anyone notice the subtle dig at Sachin or is it just me :P ,tbf to him seen him praise Kohli in some other article as well where he said he likes to watch him play.
 
Is Inzamam the most outspoken chief selector ever or what? No complaints though, he's a great man and knows his stuff.
 
It is good from Inzi.

Desis have a silly tendency to hate on each other. The likes of Imran, Arjuna, Ganguly, Kohli have been all good for subcontinental cricket.
 
I guess he was asked a question and he answered as an Analyst. Since he is no longer playing, I see no problems with him being critical of Anderson.

I really don't think Inzy was the sort to play mind games. He always sounded (and whatever articles he has penned) straightforward.

Whatever, but he is the last great from Pakistan that I can recall who never ever played an ugly shot, with all due respects to Younis. And that makes him worth listening to in my books :)
 
Really unnecessary comments from Anderson, to be perfectly honest. Didn't expect this from a player of his experience and stature. Yes, Kohli was abysmal in England, but that was two years ago and I don't see how that should be put into context with his recent knocks, for which he deserves all the praise.

Also, how did Inzamam come become part of this debate?
 
Inzamam is highly rated, and extremely loved in India. And he has great rapport with Indian cricketers as well, so I am not surprised he said what he said. If the subcontinent players dont come to the rescue of each other, who will?
 
There are very few 'complete' batters who can get runs in all conditions these days.

Anderson was speaking with respect - along the lines that in England there are a couple of chinks in Kohli's armour he exploited, but in India he can't stop him.

Amazed to see this spun as negative and disrespectful, and a bit saddened by some of the comments.
 
I thought the comments from Anderson about Kohli were in poor taste and failed to appreciate what a great batsman Kohli actually is.
 
There are very few 'complete' batters who can get runs in all conditions these days.

Anderson was speaking with respect - along the lines that in England there are a couple of chinks in Kohli's armour he exploited, but in India he can't stop him.

Amazed to see this spun as negative and disrespectful, and a bit saddened by some of the comments.

The problem is that had he made that statement before the start of the tour, no one would have minded, but after the last game, makes him look like a sore loser. That's all.

Anderson is a very intelligent bowler and comes across as a nice bloke off the field (as a pundit on Sky during the T20 WC, though he wouldn't appreciate other batsmen as much as say Root) but on field he has a history of riling the opposition due to which i wouldn't be ready to give him the benefit of doubt.

Let me clarify, he said nothing wrong. He spoke the truth. Kohli has had a poor tour of england, but this was not to forum to bring it up. Made it look like, Gambhir telling Wanrer "Come to India, we will see you"
 
I'm amazed that some throwaway comments by Anderson has caused such a response in the cricket world. The way some people are going on you would think that Anderson cussed Kohli's mother or something.
 
I'm amazed that some throwaway comments by Anderson has caused such a response in the cricket world. The way some people are going on you would think that Anderson cussed Kohli's mother or something.

It's probably the other way round :))
 
The problem is that had he made that statement before the start of the tour, no one would have minded, but after the last game, makes him look like a sore loser. That's all.

Anderson is a very intelligent bowler and comes across as a nice bloke off the field (as a pundit on Sky during the T20 WC, though he wouldn't appreciate other batsmen as much as say Root) but on field he has a history of riling the opposition due to which i wouldn't be ready to give him the benefit of doubt.

Let me clarify, he said nothing wrong. He spoke the truth. Kohli has had a poor tour of england, but this was not to forum to bring it up. Made it look like, Gambhir telling Wanrer "Come to India, we will see you"

Actually that was rohit sharma, although kohli is too good a player to miss on next tour since he would want prove his critics wrong.
 
Last edited:
There are very few 'complete' batters who can get runs in all conditions these days.

Anderson was speaking with respect - along the lines that in England there are a couple of chinks in Kohli's armour he exploited, but in India he can't stop him.

Amazed to see this spun as negative and disrespectful, and a bit saddened by some of the comments.

Watching on Sky over the weekend, any praise of India or Indian players came with the caveat of "in these conditions".

India are a good side "in these conditions." Kohli has played well "in home conditions."

Anderson knew exactly what he was saying - he said them on an interview with Sky, and then repeated them to the rest of the media the end of the day press conference. There is a feeling of "we will see what you are like when you tour England on seaming pitches".

This weekend also saw the english press have a go at Pep - he can't coach like that in England, he has to adapt, etc.

England honestly needs to get over itself. If Kohli fails in England, it won't make him any less of a batsman. Just as if Pep fails in his current method, his achievements with other teams will still make him a genius.

And just like no one gives a toss whether Messi can do it on a cold Tuesday night at Stoke.
 
^^ exactly.

No such caveats when praising their own.

Joe Root has succeeded in every condition blah blah. No mention of his failures in Aus and NZ.
 
Watching on Sky over the weekend, any praise of India or Indian players came with the caveat of "in these conditions".

India are a good side "in these conditions." Kohli has played well "in home conditions."

Anderson knew exactly what he was saying - he said them on an interview with Sky, and then repeated them to the rest of the media the end of the day press conference. There is a feeling of "we will see what you are like when you tour England on seaming pitches".

This weekend also saw the english press have a go at Pep - he can't coach like that in England, he has to adapt, etc.

England honestly needs to get over itself. If Kohli fails in England, it won't make him any less of a batsman. Just as if Pep fails in his current method, his achievements with other teams will still make him a genius.

And just like no one gives a toss whether Messi can do it on a cold Tuesday night at Stoke.

Beautiful. Yes 100% agree. Trescothick and Hussain sounded bitter and critical with the 'in England he has to prove' comments. However, Gower and Nick Knight were talking sense. Gower mentioned Warne's record in India and Lillie's record in Asia not coming into play when people call them ATG's. Glad they interviewed Ravi, who said, "Virat can go back and Ask jimmy - 'Hey Jimmy, how is your record in India?'"
 
While Inzi hasn't said anything wrong, Anderson's comments have been blown out of proportion. Ridiculous how sensitive Indians are. Too much hero worship in that country.
 
Inzamam should do his job right as a selector rather than involve in any unnecessary argument.
 
While Inzi hasn't said anything wrong, Anderson's comments have been blown out of proportion. Ridiculous how sensitive Indians are. Too much hero worship in that country.

Where do you see Indian fans blowing it up? Let me use your own logic- A thread about Inzi is being used to take a dig at Indian fans, how pathetic Pak fans are
 
Where do you see Indian fans blowing it up? Let me use your own logic- A thread about Inzi is being used to take a dig at Indian fans, how pathetic Pak fans are

You must have missed the actual thread about Anderson's comments. Also, your choice of words is pretty poor. Calling someone sensitive is one thing but calling them pathetic is totally another.
 
I don't think Anderson said anything insulting to be honest.

I also believe that Indian pitches minimizing kohlis weakness.

The reaction Anderson is getting is a bit harsh.
 
Back
Top