What's new

Vladimir Putin Challenges Joe Biden To A Live Online Debate

It’s unbelievable what propaganda does.

I know one thing though. As a Muslim I will feel safe and be allowed to practice my religion in UK and US. That certainly is not the case in Russia.

I think Russian muslims are fairly well integrated. Putin doesn't seem as anti Islam as Trump and some elements of the European right wing are. Of course, I do agree that I would prefer to stay in the UK than Russia for the overall freedoms and quality of living. The UK is a fantastically accomodating country to Muslims ( perhaps overly so).

However, if we were to poll the Muslims in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, areas in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Syria and ask them which of those two countries (Russia v USA) are better for Muslims I'm sure they will without question mention Russia.

Now this doesn't mean they would like to live there. The allure of the USD is far too strong, but there is no disupting that the Americans have heaped misery on the so called Muslim world.
 
I think Russian muslims are fairly well integrated. Putin doesn't seem as anti Islam as Trump and some elements of the European right wing are. Of course, I do agree that I would prefer to stay in the UK than Russia for the overall freedoms and quality of living. The UK is a fantastically accomodating country to Muslims ( perhaps overly so).

Putin may not seem anti Islam because he doesn’t need to be. He (and to be fair his communist predecessors more) have for the most part totally quashed a sense of Muslim identity of Russians Muslims native to that land. There’s no concept of them being a distinct group and the future generations may not even be Muslim beyond name. The young generations do not go to prayers and have little understanding of religion

So you may call this integration / assimilation but I would call it a cultural war where Muslim culture is being erased.

(Note this is for the Russian Muslims who lived in major centers such as Moscow, St Petersburg etc for generations; Muslim communities in Kazan, Dagestan, Chechnya etc are different stories and it’s no surprise that these have had more trouble with Kremlin since they wanted to keep hold of their Muslim identities rather than it be erased that easily - another topic tho)

So again I ask. How is Russia better for Muslims than UK, US, Canada or Western Europe where Muslims largely practice their religion freely, don’t have to register themselves for simply being able to pray and congregate and can do civil protests.

However, if we were to poll the Muslims in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, areas in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Syria and ask them which of those two countries (Russia v USA) are better for Muslims I'm sure they will without question mention Russia.

Now this doesn't mean they would like to live there. The allure of the USD is far too strong, but there is no disupting that the Americans have heaped misery on the so called Muslim world.

I don’t know about the results of this poll and it would most certainly be conjecture to give an answer; but ignorance would also play a huge part. Vast majorities of these Muslims you are asking to poll would probably not even know about the existence of large Muslim communities in Russia and the history of Muslims in that region. So whatever the poll results say would and should be taken with a grain of salt.
 
The likes of Robert would argue that the Bolsheviks backed out of WW1 in 1917 resulting in a million German soldiers flooding to the Western front and the Entente almost losing the war.

In WW2 the British alliance with USSR was based on the need to destroy the common foe of Nazi Germany. But there was no illusion that the Stalin were basically as bad as Hitler. Much of Eastern Europe fell under a different totalitarianism. The West identified the Soviets as an existential threat by 1948 and the nuclear arms race began, with a vast Soviet tank army ready to roll Europe and proxy wars exploding everywhere.

By 1990 the Iron Curtain fell, the Soviet client states became democracies and Russia under Yeltsin was considered an ally, so there was a period of hope.

But by the late noughties Putin was on an expansionist track, rearming and starting Cold War Two.

Naaah mate. First of all let me begin by saying I respect you.

Putin was 'acting' President of Russia in 1999. Even then, your criticism is Putin was a career politican? So what? So was Omaba, and so is Biden.

I'm sure Boris Yeltsin was on your friends list because he was subservient to Western temptations. A drunk politician.

Communism in USSR was already going to collapse because the Russian people had enough. You can't claim the West kicked down the communist door of USSR when the door was already open.

Doesn't change the fact the West had not won WWs if it was not for Russia. Stalin wasn't around in WW1. Why was Russia an alley of UK during WW1 then?

The talk of communist Russia is just a pretext to the cold war, the new enemy of the West after Hitler. Fear controls society and you have fallen for post war media propaganda.

More importantly, the reason why the West opposes Communism is not down to China/ME/Russia considered to be backwards, it is simply down to the fact Communism is the complete opposite of Capitalism. Let this sink in brother.

I ask you again, what did Russia do to UK for you to view Russia as the enemy?

Putin on the expansion track? So what? USA expands its 'imperialism' through the USD and geopolitics. Yet you support USA government's foreign policy.

If democracy is the pretext to Western friendship, lets talk about Pinochet. An alley of UK, but a dictator. How comes if democracy matters?

Bonus round, why did USA park nukes in Turkey before Russia did in Cuba?

Russia has done nothing to you, or the UK, but help win 2 crucial wars which shaped history. The only reason why you are against Russia is because the Western media commands you to.

Look at the bigger picture. Follow the money.
 
Naaah mate. First of all let me begin by saying I respect you.

Putin was 'acting' President of Russia in 1999. Even then, your criticism is Putin was a career politican? So what? So was Omaba, and so is Biden.

I'm sure Boris Yeltsin was on your friends list because he was subservient to Western temptations. A drunk politician.

Communism in USSR was already going to collapse because the Russian people had enough. You can't claim the West kicked down the communist door of USSR when the door was already open.

Doesn't change the fact the West had not won WWs if it was not for Russia. Stalin wasn't around in WW1. Why was Russia an alley of UK during WW1 then?

The talk of communist Russia is just a pretext to the cold war, the new enemy of the West after Hitler. Fear controls society and you have fallen for post war media propaganda.

More importantly, the reason why the West opposes Communism is not down to China/ME/Russia considered to be backwards, it is simply down to the fact Communism is the complete opposite of Capitalism. Let this sink in brother.

I ask you again, what did Russia do to UK for you to view Russia as the enemy?

Putin on the expansion track? So what? USA expands its 'imperialism' through the USD and geopolitics. Yet you support USA government's foreign policy.

If democracy is the pretext to Western friendship, lets talk about Pinochet. An alley of UK, but a dictator. How comes if democracy matters?

Bonus round, why did USA park nukes in Turkey before Russia did in Cuba?

Russia has done nothing to you, or the UK, but help win 2 crucial wars which shaped history. The only reason why you are against Russia is because the Western media commands you to.

Look at the bigger picture. Follow the money.

It’s because I can have this discussion with you without getting disappeared.

Patton wanted to carry on through Germany, engage the USSR, drive through to Moscow and defeat totalitarianism permanently - it might have been possible with more nukes - but Roosevelt wouldn’t let him.
A far smarter man than I, Clement Attlee identified the Soviets as a existential threat to democracy in 1945 - remember that they murdered more people than Hitler - commissioned the British nuclear deterrent and helped set up NATO to defend the newly freed democracies of Western Europe.

When I was a young man we all thought we would die by nuclear fire. But when USSR collapsed there was lasting hope for world peace. That hope was dashed as Putin ascended to power, turned what was once a Soviet state into a hard-right oligarchy with rigged elections, and started a new Cold War. Modern Russia is not a superpower like USSR but acts as a spoiler in international relations.
 
Four million indeed. I would be prepared to accept one million in terms of total enhanced morbidity in Iraq, mainly due to collapsed infrastructure.

“Putin has transformed Chechnya” - by murdering hundreds of thousands of civilians and displacing as many.

If you want truth - without NATO, all the Baltic states would be absorbed by Russia, as was Georgia and the Crimea. And I think you know it, though perhaps you don’t care about them.

If you blame the West for war, you must blame Putin too. Anything else is dishonesty.

Four million is a result of the policies of Nato in the last 2 decades.

You support Iraq being occupied even though all Iraqis want them out, as voted in their parliament.

You support the occupation of Afghanistan, the war in Libya, the bombing in Syria. The list goes on.

However I guarantee if you lived in those nations, you would be very anti-war. Its easy to say you'd accept a million deaths by invading armies, unless it's your own country or family being at risk.

Both cannot be compared, Putin and Russia are worried about nations on their borders which are hostile. Nato wants to control the planet and use military state terrorism or economic terrorism if they refuse to be controlled. Its like comparing a child who is violent with a whole criminal violent adult gang
 
US imposes sanctions on Russia over cyber-attacks

The US has announced sanctions against Russia in response to what it says are cyber-attacks and other hostile acts.

The measures are aimed at deterring "Russia's harmful foreign activities", the White House said on Thursday.

The sanctions, detailed in an executive order signed by President Joe Biden, target dozens of Russian entities, officials and diplomats.

The US accuses Russia of malicious cyber-activity and interference in presidential elections.

The Russian government has denied the allegations and called any new sanctions "illegal".

The measures come at a tense time for relations between the two countries.

Last month the US targeted seven Russian officials and more than a dozen government entities over the poisoning of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny. Russia says it had no part in the poisoning.

In a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday, Mr Biden vowed to defend US national interests "firmly", while proposing a meeting with Mr Putin to find areas where the two countries could work together.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56755484
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-embassy-moscow-reduce-consular-services-over-ban-hiring-local-staff-ifax-2021-04-30/

The Kremlin accused Washington on Friday of fuelling tension with “unfriendly actions” after the U.S. embassy in Moscow said it was cutting staff and stopping processing visas for most Russians.

The embassy said it was cutting consular staff by 75% and that from May 12 it would stop processing non-immigrant visas for non-diplomatic travel after a new Russian law imposed limits on how many local staff can work at foreign diplomatic missions.

That means Russians, who are not diplomats or green card seekers, will no longer be able to apply inside their own country for visas to visit the United States for tourism and other purposes. They will have to make such applications in third countries instead if they need to.

The Russian foreign ministry pointed out that Russian consulates in the United States were still issuing visas within 10 days despite suffering diplomatic cutbacks themselves and said there was nothing to stop Washington from topping up staff by bringing in U.S. nationals.

It said the U.S. diplomatic staff quota in Russia stood at 455, but that there were only 280 accredited employees, giving Washington ample room to top up staff numbers.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the embassy's decision would have little practical impact because, he said, Russians have already been struggling to get U.S. visas.

"You know, here one has to look at the root cause of the tense situation that is developing in our bilateral relations," Peskov told reporters.

"If you unravel the knot of unfriendly steps in the opposite direction, then it becomes obvious that the precursor to all of this is the unfriendly actions of the United States."

He said Russia had "expected better" of the first 100 days of Joe Biden's U.S. presidency.

He welcomed moves to extend the New START nuclear arms treaty. "But this positive baggage is still small in comparison with the load of negativity that we have accumulated over these 100 days. This load unfortunately prevails," he said.

Moscow and Washington have long differed over a range of issues, but ties slumped further after Biden said he believed President Vladimir Putin was "a killer". The United States imposed sanctions on Russia this month for alleged malign activity, including interfering in last year's U.S. election, cyber hacking and "bullying" neighbouring Ukraine.

Moscow retaliated with sanctions against the United States, and has rejected U.S. criticism of its treatment of jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny.

Russia’s ties with several countries in central and eastern Europe have also deteriorated in recent weeks, leading to a series of diplomatic expulsions.

When Putin signed the law limiting local staff employed at diplomatic missions last week, he also told the government to draw up a list of "unfriendly" states to be subject to the restrictions.

A draft list published by Russian state TV suggests the United States is one of the countries that will be on it.

"We regret that the actions of the Russian government have forced us to reduce our consular work force by 75%," the U.S. embassy said in a statement.

"Effective May 12, U.S. Embassy Moscow will reduce consular services offered to include only emergency U.S. citizen services and a very limited number of age-out and life or death emergency immigrant visas," it said.

"I have always been afraid of the 'Iron Curtain', only now it's not being imposed by our side, but by the other side," said Ksenia Sobchak, a former Russian presidential candidate.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/when-biden-meets-putin-old-foes-could-cool-off-not-reset-2021-05-13/

The United States and Russia are lowering expectations for big breakthroughs at a superpower summit between U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin, with the adversaries in no mood to make concessions on their bitter disagreements.

The summit details - location, time and agenda - are still being negotiated by the two sides with the goal of scheduling it in June in a third country, following Biden's visits to the United Kingdom and Brussels for talks with allies on his first trip abroad since taking office in January.

The White House is wary of describing Biden as seeking a "reset" in relations with Putin and U.S. officials see a face-to-face as an opportunity to rebalance the relationship away from what they see as former President Donald Trump's fawning overtures to Putin.

"It’s not in our view a reset. It’s an effort to make it less of a central focus, make it more predictable, work together where we agree - and where we disagree, make our points," a senior White House official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

"A reset implies this is going to become a single, driving, 'most important strategic relationship of the presidency' and I don’t think that’s the message we’re trying to send."

For the Kremlin, Russian officials see the summit as important to hear from Biden directly after what a source close to the Russian government said were mixed messages from the new U.S. administration.

"The best thing we can hope for now is the status quo, and that things do not get any worse," said the source.

While the Russian economy is roughly a tenth the size of U.S. gross domestic product and Moscow lags Washington in international clout, trade and alliances, the old Cold War enemy continues to be a major threat to America.

Biden wants Putin to stop trying to influence U.S. elections, stop cyberattacks on U.S. networks emanating from Russia, stop threatening Ukraine's sovereignty and to release jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny.

Putin views U.S. pressure on Navalny and its support for pro-democracy activists in Russia and Belarus as tantamount to interfering in Russian domestic affairs. If the United States convinces Europe to abandon the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that will transport energy from Russia, then Moscow would view that as an attack on Russia's energy industry.

Moscow is also unhappy about a raft of U.S. sanctions aimed at Russian entities and individuals - and Biden's threat of more - and see Ukraine as having started the crisis that led to a Russian troop buildup this year and fears of an invasion.

"It's like a managed confrontation," said Fiona Hill, a Russia expert who served on Trump's White House National Security Council. "The goal is just to stabilize. It's not looking for some kind of amazing improvement in the relationship, but it's just an effort to take down the temperature. I think it's doable if they are careful and realistic."

Putin, in power as either president or prime minister since 1999, will be dealing with his fifth U.S. president going back to Bill Clinton. The former KGB agent has proved to be a wily adversary. Most recently, he shrugged off Biden's description of him as a "killer."

"Of course Putin is interested in a summit, it is in his interests. But it will be more military men rather than diplomats from the Russian side going as that reflects our current relationship," the source close to the Russian government said.

Biden long ago lost any illusions that Putin would be a cooperative ally. While serving as President Barack Obama's vice president, he said in 2014 that during a 2011 meeting with Putin, he looked into his eyes and told him, "I don't think you have a soul."

"Joe Biden is a straight shooter and speaks bluntly and clearly," said long-time former aide Jay Carney. "Unlike former President Trump, Joe Biden does not admire bullies. He thinks bullies are bullies, and it's a big difference for Putin and Moscow."

For Biden, the summit will be his initial opportunity to put a personal stamp on the relationship and shape it to fit his own straightforward style.

U.S. officials see climate change and arms control as two areas where cooperation might be possible between the two countries. Putin joined Biden's virtual climate summit last month and the two leaders quickly extended the New START nuclear arms treaty after Biden took office.

Last weekend's hack of the Colonial Pipeline by a shadowy ransomware group called DarkSide - which may be based in Russia - would likely also be a topic of conversation.

A senior administration official said Biden brought up the idea of a summit in a meeting with national security aides in mid-April about the sanctions, telling them it was in U.S. interests to talk face to face.

The official said Biden and his team expect a complex relationship with Russia, one full of strife over many issues.

"I think we’re going into this new period of U.S.-Russian relations with very realistic expectations," the official said.

What Biden would expect to get out of a summit with Putin - beyond the broad parameters of how to work with each other - has not yet been made clear.

“There’s a lot of work to explain what the true outcome of a summit would be,” said a former senior administration official. “In general, leader-level summits are supposed to have a goal in mind. It’s not clear they’ve articulated the goal yet.”
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-threatens-knock-out-teeth-foreign-aggressors-2021-05-20/

President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday that Moscow would "knock out the teeth" of any power that tried to take a chunk of Russia's territory.

The Russian leader, in televised remarks during a virtual meeting with senior officials, cited what he said were foreign remarks questioning Russia's control of energy-rich Siberia.

A similar comment has been attributed in Russia to a former U.S. secretary of state, Madeleine Albright, although she has denied making it.

"Some even dare to say publicly that it is allegedly unfair that Russia owns the wealth of a region such as Siberia. Only one country does," said Putin.

Using combative language that appeals to his power base among the armed and security forces, Putin said Moscow would give a blunt and forceful response to any would-be aggressors.

"Everyone wants to 'bite' us somewhere or 'bite off' something of ours, but those that would do this should know that we will knock out the teeth of all of them so they aren't able to bite... And the key to this is the development of our armed forces," he said.

The comments come amid a push to agree a summit between Putin and U.S. President Joe Biden aimed at preventing Moscow's dire relations with Washington sliding further.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-will-discuss-ukraine-belarus-during-biden-putin-meeting-psaki-2021-05-25/

U.S. President Joe Biden will discuss Belarus' forced landing of a Ryanair plane and the detention of an opposition activist during next month's summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said on Tuesday.

Psaki said Biden also plans to discuss Ukraine during the summit.

Republican lawmakers have criticized Biden for agreeing to meet the Russian leader despite his provocative behavior in the region. Psaki said the criticism was misguided.

"The president of the United States is not afraid to stand up to our adversaries and use a moment of in-person diplomacy to convey areas where he has concern and look for areas of opportunity to work together in areas where we have mutual agreement," Psaki said.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/30/joe-biden-vladimir-putin-human-rights-geneva-summit

Joe Biden has said he will press Vladimir Putin to respect human rights when the two leaders meet in June.

In a speech marking the Memorial Day holiday, Biden said: “I’m meeting with President Putin in a couple weeks in Geneva making it clear we will not, we will not stand by and let him abuse those rights.“

The White House said on Friday it was planning to move ahead with the summit between the two leaders, after Microsoft flagged a cyberattack on US government agencies by Nobelium, the group behind last year’s SolarWind hack that originated from Russia.

The Kremlin has said it has no information about the latest attack.

In announcing the 16 June meeting, the White House said the two leaders would discuss a range of issues with the goal of restoring “predictability and stability” in the relationship between Washington and Moscow.

It comes amid strained relations over US election interference that Moscow denies, as well as cyberattacks and Russian intervention in Ukraine.

Biden was speaking in Wilmington, Delaware, at an annual Memorial Day service. He and his wife Jill Biden also marked the sixth anniversary of the death of the president’s son Beau Biden, a former Delaware attorney general.

Beau Biden died of brain cancer in 2015. He was 46.
 
Last edited:
Putin says US threats smack of Soviet Union's fatal mistakes

Russian President Vladimir Putin said the United States was wrong to think that it is "powerful enough" to get away with threatening other countries, a mistake, he said, that led to the downfall of the former Soviet Union.

Putin made the comments during a press briefing late on Friday as he spoke about U.S. sanctions against Moscow, according to Russia's news agency TASS.

He was speaking just days before a meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden whose cabinet in April imposed a broad array of sanctions on Russia, including curbs to its sovereign debt market.

"We hear threats from the Congress, from other sources. It is all done within the context of the United States' domestic political process," Putin was quoted as saying.

"The people who do this, they probably assume that the United States has such economic, military and political might that it can get away with that. It is no big deal, that is what they think."

Putin said such behaviour reminded him of the Soviet Union.

"The problem with empires is that they think they are powerful enough to make some mistakes. We will buy these (people), bully them, make a deal with them, give necklaces to them, threaten them with battleships. And this will solve all the problems. But problems accumulate. A moment comes when they cannot be solved anymore."

Biden and Putin will meet in Geneva on June 16, the White House and the Kremlin have said, to discuss "the full range of pressing issues", according to Washington.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...mack-soviet-unions-fatal-mistakes-2021-06-05/
 
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/15/biden-meeting-bunker-covid-putin-russian-leader

For more than a year, people who have wanted to get within breathing distance of Vladimir Putin have performed a ritual, two-week quarantine in Russian hotels and sanatoriums to protect the 68-year-old president from falling ill with coronavirus.

Since March 2020, powerful business people, regional governors, his pilots and medical staff, volunteers at an economic conference, and even second world war veterans have shut themselves away to meet the Kremlin leader or even stand in his general vicinity.

So it will be a rare sit-down when Putin jets into Geneva to meet Joe Biden, who has been on a whirlwind tour through Europe, attending the G7 summit in Cornwall and then flying to Brussels for meetings with EU and Nato leaders before travelling to Switzerland. Putin has not publicly travelled abroad since the outbreak of coronavirus in early 2020, hosting foreign leaders in Moscow or Sochi and holding most of his meetings with government ministers and regional governors over videoconference.

Critics have chided Putin for sheltering in a “bunker” during the coronavirus outbreak, reportedly protected by medical tunnels of dubious efficacy that sprayed visitors with a cloud of disinfectant.

The Proekt investigative website later claimed the Kremlin had built an identical windowless office in Sochi, a resort city on the Black Sea, where Putin was reportedly holding meetings while he was believed to be in Moscow.

All that was expected to end after Putin was given his first Sputnik vaccine dose in March, a procedure that was not documented on camera but that the Kremlin said the media would “have to take our word for it”.

But the two-week quarantine period has remained for many visitors, including the US television crew who met Putin for an interview before the summit.

“Appreciate the extra time, Mr President,” said Keir Simmons, an NBC correspondent. “The team has been in quarantine for almost two weeks, so this interview is very important to us.” Russian state television journalists have faced similar quarantine measures.

The international coronavirus response will probably take a back seat in Wednesday’s discussions to pressing issues of strategic stability, as the US and Russia try to regulate their strained, hostile relationship.

But they come as coronavirus has in effect halted normal business and tourism travel between Russia and the US, a result of Russia’s coronavirus travel restrictions and forced staff reductions at US embassies that make it difficult for Russians to get visas to the US.

Vaccines administered in the two countries also remain mutually unrecognised by medical authorities, portending a political battle for their approval.

Slow vaccination rates in Russia have led to “explosive growth in cases”, according to the Moscow mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, leading him to declare a week-long business holiday.

Before the trip for the summit, Putin’s spokesperson Dmitri Peskov told journalists he was not vaccinated because he still had a high antibody count from when he had coronavirus last year.

“All safety precautions have been taken extremely seriously,” said Yuri Ushakov, a Putin aide. “From the standpoint of the presidents’ health, both the Americans and we have taken a very serious approach toward this. There have been not that many in-person contacts lately, and so the special attention attached to these issues is natural.”
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/16/biden-to-meet-putin-at-highly-anticipated-summit-in-geneva

Russia and the US have agreed that their ambassadors will go back to their posts in Moscow and Washington, following what Vladimir Putin called “extremely constructive” talks with Joe Biden at a highly anticipated summit in Geneva.

Speaking after meeting the US president, Putin said the talks had been conducted without “hostility”. “Quite the contrary,” he said. He described Biden as a balanced and experienced politician who “spoke the same language, and who had talked fondly about his family and his mother.”

Putin added: “It showed an understanding of his moral values. That’s all quite attractive. It doesn’t mean we looked into each others’ eyes or souls. We have to represent our countries. The relationship is a pragmatic one.”

He revealed a US-Russian working group would agree a time for the ambassadors to return to their embassies. There would also be “consultations” over a wide range of issues including cyber-security and the renewal of the Start Three nuclear treaty, which is due to expire in 2024, he said.

Putin also denied Russia was behind a string of recent cyber-attacks on the US, and claimed his officials had sought to cooperate.

The Kremlin recalled its envoy to the US after Biden described Putin in a TV interview as a “killer”. His US counterpart, John Sullivan, flew home in April. Their return represents modest progress in US-Russian relations, following a long and bitter period of mutual acrimony.

Asked about the jailed Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny at a post-talks press conference, Putin said he only had himself to blame and had “broken the law” on several occasions. He refused to use Navalny’s name and described him as “this person”. He shrugged off claims he had repressed domestic critics, and accused the US Congress of supporting undesirable anti-government “political organisations” inside Russia.

Biden and Putin met earlier on Wednesday for both one-on-one talks and with their wider teams.

The Russian president’s plane flew in over a quiet Lake Geneva, touching down at 12.27pm local time (11.27 BST), the day after Biden arrived in the Swiss city. He travelled by motorcade to the summit venue, the 18th-century Villa La Grange. Uncharacteristically Putin was on time.

Biden followed minutes later and was greeted by the Swiss president, Guy Parmelin, surrounded by Russian, American and Swiss flags. Biden and Putin posed for a brief photocall in front of the mansion and shook hands. There was a glimmer of a smile from both before they went inside.

Welcoming his guests, Parmelin said he hoped the pair would have a “fruitful and productive dialogue, for the benefit of both their countries and the entire world”.

Biden and Putin reappeared together inside the mansion’s book-lined library. The Russian president said he hoped for a “productive” dialogue. In comments partly drowned out by journalists, Biden said he wanted “predictable” relations with Moscow, and to cooperate where the two great powers had mutual interests.

Biden appeared relaxed. In what has become a familiar pose, Putin leaned back into his chair, legs sprawled. Aides then evicted a large and chaotic press pack. The historic summit talks began in two by two format, with Biden flanked by the US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, and Putin accompanied by his veteran foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov.

The conversation in this smaller group lasted about an hour and a half. The talks then expanded into a larger bilateral meeting, with delegations from both sides, wrapping up around 5pm local time, a White House official said.

Ahead of Wednesday’s meeting, Biden said he was seeking “stable, predictable” relations with Russia despite claims that Putin has interfered in American elections, provoked wars with his neighbours, and sought to crush dissent by jailing opposition leaders. Putin brought his own list of grievances to Geneva in his first trip abroad since the outbreak of the coronavirus in 2020. He has expressed anger about US support for Ukraine’s government and claims of opposition backing in Russia and neighbouring Belarus, as well as the expansion of Nato into eastern Europe.

Wednesday’s summit was the first meeting between US and Russian leaders since Putin met Donald Trump in Helsinki in 2018. In a meeting seen as deeply embarrassing for the US, Trump appeared to kowtow to Putin by rejecting his own FBI’s assessment that Russia had interfered in the 2016 US presidential elections. “President Putin says it’s not Russia. I don’t see any reason why it would be,” he told journalists. An aide later said she had considered faking a medical emergency to end the joint press conference.

Biden appeared to be taking no chances of a repeat on Wednesday. The two presidents brought senior diplomatic and military advisers to the villa summit. They include Russia’s chief of general staff, Valery Gerasimov, responsible for developing the doctrine of “hybrid war”. Hundreds of journalists have flown in for the talks, which shut down much of the city centre, including the picturesque coastline of Lake Geneva.

Nonetheless, Biden has been under pressure for agreeing to meet Putin without any preconditions, gifting the Russian leader the prestige of a presidential summit with little expectation of any concessions or even progress in the relationship. His advisers reportedly told him not to appear with Putin after the talks.

The talks also raised concerns among Russia’s neighbours such as Ukraine, whose president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, sought an audience with Biden to argue the country’s case for Nato membership before this week’s summit. The US has left the door open to Ukraine’s accession to the alliance, but did not take meaningful steps to speed up that process.

Putin appeared defiant in a US television interview last week, refusing to give guarantees that the opposition leader Alexei Navalny will get out of prison alive and comparing his movement to the US protesters who stormed the US Capitol on 6 January.

He also dangled the possibility of arranging a trade for two Americans imprisoned in Russia – the former US marine Trevor Reed, and Paul Whelan, a Michigan corporate executive. He said Moscow would seek the release of imprisoned Russians, including Konstantin Yaroshenko, a pilot arrested in May 2010 in Liberia on charges of conspiracy to smuggle drugs, and handed over to the Drug Enforcement Administration, which flew him to the US for trial.

“We have a saying: ‘Don’t be mad at the mirror if you are ugly,’” Putin told an NBC journalist, accusing the US of hypocrisy.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-talks-down-russia-spurs-allies-bid-back-putin-into-corner-2021-06-17/

President Joe Biden on his first foreign foray sought to cast Russia not as a direct competitor to the United States but as a bit player in a world where Washington is increasingly pre-occupied by China.

Aides said Biden wanted to send a message that Putin was isolating himself on the international stage with his actions, ranging from election interference and cyber-attacks against Western nations to his treatment of domestic critics.

But Biden could struggle in a parallel attempt to stop the rot in U.S.-Russia relations and deter the threat of nuclear conflict while also talking down Russia, some observers said.

"The administration wants to de-escalate tensions. It's not clear to me that Putin does," said Tim Morrison, a national security adviser during the Trump administration. "The only cards he has to play are those of the disruptor."

Officials on both sides had played down the chances of major breakthroughs at the talks, and they were right. None materialized.

But the two leaders pledged to resume work on arms control as well as cyber security and to look for areas of possible cooperation, signs of some hope for a relationship between two countries with little common ground of late.

Ties were already frayed when Biden, at the start of his administration, repeated his description of Putin as "a killer." That deepened a diplomatic rift that saw both countries withdraw their ambassadors from each others' capital.

Echoing an approach by former President Barack Obama, who called Russia a “regional power” after it annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, Biden sought to cast Russia not as a direct competitor to the United States.

Speaking after his meeting with Putin, Biden said Russia wants "desperately to remain a major power."

"Russia is in a very, very difficult spot right now. They are being squeezed by China,” Biden said before boarding his plane out of Geneva, quipping that the Russians “don't want to be known as, as some critics have said, you know, the Upper Volta with nuclear weapons." Biden was referring to the former French West African colony, which changed its name to Burkina Faso.

Biden also pointed to the troubles of Russia’s economy and called out Putin on Russia’s detention of two Americans, and threats toward U.S. government-funded Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty.

American businessmen “don’t want to hang out in Moscow,” he said.

Matthew Schmidt, associate professor at the University of New Haven and a specialist on Russian and Eurasian affairs, said Biden was seeking to undermine Putin's importance on the global stage.

"The strategy is very simply to push Putin's buttons, but with some real facts," Schmidt said. "Backlash will happen anyways, regardless."

Putin, a former agent in Russia’s KGB security agency, lived through the fall of the Soviet Union, a humiliation for the nation that he has sought to right with increasingly aggressive foreign policy, as seen in the Crimea move and Russian support for separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Biden arrived at the lakeside villa in Geneva where he met Putin on Wednesday on the back of meetings of the G7 group of nations and the NATO alliance.

A senior administration official said Biden’s approach to Russia was more likely to be successful because Biden met Putin straight after rallying allies around the principle of upholding a “rules-based international order” at a G7 meeting in Britain and talks with NATO members in Brussels.

“There was strong alignment on the basic proposition that we all need to defend … this order, because the alternative is the law of the jungle and chaos, which is in no one's interest,” the official said.

At home, Biden's Republican opponents quickly criticized Biden for failing to block a major Russian-backed natural gas pipeline being built in Europe.

U.S. Senator Lindsay Graham, a frequent Republican critic of Biden, said he was disturbed to hear the president suggest Putin would be troubled by how other countries view him.

“It is clear to me that Putin could care less about how he's viewed by others and, quite frankly, would enjoy the reputation of being able to successfully interfere in the internal matters of other countries,” the South Carolina senator said.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-offered-us-use-central-asia-bases-afghan-intel-paper-2021-07-17/

President Vladimir Putin in June offered U.S. counterpart Joe Biden the use of Russian military bases in Central Asia for information gathering from Afghanistan, the Kommersant newspaper reported on Saturday, as American troops leave the country.

Taliban fighters have made major advances as U.S. forces pull out after 20 years of war, a security headache for Moscow which fears refugees may be pushed into its Central Asian backyard and its southern defensive flank destabilised.

In a rare offer during a period of frosty relations between Washington and Moscow, Putin proposed at June 16 talks with Biden in Geneva that they coordinate on Afghanistan and put Russia's bases in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan to "practical use", Kommersant reported, citing sources.

The newspaper said this could involve the exchange of information obtained using drones but that there had been no concrete response from the U.S. side. The Kremlin did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Earlier this month, Reuters reported that the Biden administration was in talks with Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan about temporarily taking in thousands of Afghans who worked with U.S. forces and now face threats from the Taliban, citing three sources familiar with the matter.

Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Friday said the U.S. and NATO alliance withdrawal from Afghanistan made the political and military situation more uncertain, which in turn exacerbated the terrorist threat in the region.

Speaking at a conference with senior Central Asian officials in Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan, Lavrov said Russia wanted to help kickstart peace talks between the warring sides in Afghanistan.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-russia-hold-nuclear-talks-geneva-after-summit-push-2021-07-28/

Senior U.S. and Russian officials on Wednesday restarted talks on easing tensions between the world's largest nuclear weapons powers and agreed to reconvene in September after informal consultations, the State Department said.

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman and Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov headed their delegations at the meeting at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Geneva.

TASS news agency cited Ryabkov as saying he was satisfied with the consultations and that the United States showed readiness for a constructive dialogue at the talks.

Armed with mandates from their leaders, it was the first time in nearly a year that the sides had held so-called strategic stability talks amid frictions over a range of issues, including arms control.

U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose countries hold 90% of the world's nuclear weapons, agreed in June to launch a bilateral dialogue on strategic stability to "lay the groundwork for future arms control and risk reduction measures".

After informal consultations aimed at "determining topics for expert working groups" in the next round, the two sides agreed to reconvene in late September, State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement.

Calling the discussions "professional and substantive," he said the U.S. side discussed its policy priorities, the current international security environment, "the prospects for new nuclear arms control" and the format for further talks.

The decision to meet again showed the sides understand the need to resolve arms control disputes, a senior State Department official said, that have seen an end to several Cold War-era treaties, including one that limited intermediate-range missiles.

"We know we have a responsibility as the largest nuclear weapons states to find a way to improve strategic stability to deal with a deteriorating arms control architecture," the official briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.

That includes dealing with threats posed by "new emerging technologies that can upset strategic stability," the official said.

Such new threats could include artificial intelligence-controlled weapons, possible cyber attacks on existing nuclear weapons systems and more esoteric arms such as highly maneuverable aerial or submerged hypersonic weapons that can evade defenses.

Andrey Baklitskiy, senior research fellow at the Center for Advanced American Studies at Moscow State Institute of International Relations, told reporters in Geneva: "We are starting with a new U.S. administration, starting pretty much from scratch.

"It's just meet and greet and try to establish some basic understandings," he said.

Russia and the United States in February extended for five years the bilateral New START nuclear arms control treaty days before it was set to expire.

The treaty limits the numbers of strategic nuclear warheads, missiles and bombers that Russia and the United States can deploy.

The two sides had been expected to discuss which weapons systems and technologies are of greatest concern.

"For example, Russia still has concerns with U.S. modification of heavy bombers and launchers to launch ballistic missiles, and that's been there for a while now," Baklitskiy said.

The Biden administration has asserted that Russia has engaged unilaterally in low-yield nuclear testing, in violation of a nuclear testing moratorium, he said.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-us-asked-24-its-diplomats-leave-by-sept-3-2021-08-02/

Russia's ambassador to the United States said Washington had asked 24 Russian diplomats to leave the country by Sept. 3 after their visas expired.

Anatoly Antonov did not say whether the U.S. request was prompted by any particular dispute, and there was no immediate comment from Washington.

"Almost all of them will leave without replacements because Washington has abruptly tightened visa issuing procedures," Antonov said in an interview with the National Interest magazine published on Sunday.

Moscow and Washington have long differed over a range of issues, and ties slumped further after U.S. President Joe Biden said he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin was a killer.

Tensions somewhat eased after Biden met Putin for talks on June 16, which even led to the return of some foreign investors' money into Russian government bonds.

"We hope that common sense will prevail and we will be able to normalize the life of Russian and American diplomats in the United States and Russia on the principle of reciprocity," Antonov said.

Antonov also said he hoped that the recently started dialogue between the United States and Russia on cybersecurity issues will continue.

"As an option, we can debate on cyber threats to arms control systems, etc."
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senators-suggest-expelling-300-russian-diplomats-amid-embassy-dispute-2021-10-05/

U.S. Democratic and Republican senators urged President Joe Biden on Tuesday to expel 300 Russian diplomats from the United States if Moscow does not issue more visas for Americans to represent Washington in Russia.

The suggestion from the leaders of the Senate foreign relations and intelligence committees - Democrats Bob Menendez and Mark Warner and Republicans Jim Risch and Marco Rubio - would mark a sharp escalation in an ongoing dispute over embassy staffing amid tension between Washington and Moscow.

Russia in August banned the U.S. embassy in Moscow from retaining, hiring or contracting Russian or third-country staff, except for guards, forcing the mission to let go 182 employees and dozens of contractors, the State Department said. That meant there are only about 100 U.S. diplomats in Russia, compared with 400 Russian diplomats across the United States, the senators said.

"This disproportionality in diplomatic representation is unacceptable. Accordingly, Russia must issue enough visas to approach parity between the number of American diplomats serving in Russia and the number of Russian diplomats serving in the United States," the senators wrote in a letter to Biden.

If Moscow does not do so, they said Biden should begin expelling as many as 300 Russian diplomats.

The White House and State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 
Putin says US threats smack of Soviet Union's fatal mistakes

Russian President Vladimir Putin said the United States was wrong to think that it is "powerful enough" to get away with threatening other countries, a mistake, he said, that led to the downfall of the former Soviet Union.

Putin made the comments during a press briefing late on Friday as he spoke about U.S. sanctions against Moscow, according to Russia's news agency TASS.

He was speaking just days before a meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden whose cabinet in April imposed a broad array of sanctions on Russia, including curbs to its sovereign debt market.

"We hear threats from the Congress, from other sources. It is all done within the context of the United States' domestic political process," Putin was quoted as saying.

"The people who do this, they probably assume that the United States has such economic, military and political might that it can get away with that. It is no big deal, that is what they think."

Putin said such behaviour reminded him of the Soviet Union.

"The problem with empires is that they think they are powerful enough to make some mistakes. We will buy these (people), bully them, make a deal with them, give necklaces to them, threaten them with battleships. And this will solve all the problems. But problems accumulate. A moment comes when they cannot be solved anymore."

Biden and Putin will meet in Geneva on June 16, the White House and the Kremlin have said, to discuss "the full range of pressing issues", according to Washington.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...mack-soviet-unions-fatal-mistakes-2021-06-05/

USSR didn’t collapse because of USA. There were several factors…

1. Bankruptcy due to the Afghanistan war.
2. Perestroika allowed the Soviet satellite states to begin breaking away from Moscow
3. The Chernobyl disaster fatally wounded citizens’ faith in the Soviet state.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-russia-lift-targeted-sanctions-allow-nuland-visit-moscow-2021-10-10/

Russia will allow U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland to visit for talks despite having previously blacklisted her, after Washington agreed to lift a similar restriction placed on a Russian citizen, Moscow said on Sunday.

The U.S. official, who is expected in Moscow from Oct. 11 to 13, visits at a time when political ties between the countries are badly strained. She will meet senior officials to discuss bilateral, regional and global issues, the State Department has said.

"She was actually on our sanctions lists that mean that a person cannot cross the border," Maria Zakharova, Russia's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, was quoted as saying by RIA news agency.

"They (the U.S.) included Russian representatives and foreign policy experts on their sanctions lists. So in this case, the question was resolved on a parity basis. Yes, she will be in Russia," she was quoted as saying.

Zakhrova later clarified to the Govorit Moskva radio station that one Russian citizen had been removed from the U.S. sanctions list. She did not disclose the person's name.

The United States has imposed an array of sanctions on Russia. Relations between Moscow and Washington sank to post-Cold War lows in 2014 after Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, and they remain strained over a range of other issues.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/russias-putin-blames-west-tensions-europe-2021-12-21/

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday blamed the West for escalating tensions in Europe, saying it had incorrectly assessed the outcome of the Cold War.

Speaking to senior military officials, Putin said Russia would respond "adequately" to any Western aggression and would develop its army further.

"Why did they expand NATO and renounce the missile defence treaties? They are to blame for what is happening now, for the tensions building up in Europe," Putin said.

After what it regarded as its victory in the Cold War, Washington's judgement has been clouded by euphoria, he said, leading it to poor policy choices.

Russia has amassed tens of thousands of troops on the border with Ukraine, demanding that NATO refuse to accept the former Soviet republic as a member and guarantee that no weapons or troops will be deployed there.

Putin said he hoped for constructive talks with Washington and Brussels on Russia's demands for security guarantees as there were signs the West was ready to work on the issue.

"Armed conflicts and bloodshed are absolutely not something we would choose, we do not want such a scenario," Putin said.

He said Russia's proposals were no ultimatum, but it had nowhere to retreat over Ukraine.

Speaking at the same meeting, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said the United States had deployed some 8,000 troops near Russian borders and, alongside NATO allies, frequently mounted flights by strategic bomber planes close to Russia.

Attempts by NATO to get the Ukrainian army involved in the alliance's activities present a security threat, Shoigu said.

Earlier on Tuesday, a senior Russian diplomat said contacts had already begun between Moscow and Washington on the issue of security guarantees that Russia is seeking, and there was a possibility that the sides would reach an understanding.
 
Ukraine tensions: Biden and Putin phone call seeks 'diplomatic path'

US President Joe Biden is set to hold talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin for the second time this month, in a bid to de-escalate tensions over Ukraine.

The two leaders will speak by phone on Thursday.

They will discuss forthcoming security talks between the countries and the situation in Europe, a White House official said.

Russia, which recently built up forces on the border with Ukraine, denies planning to invade the country.

It says its troops are there for exercises, and that it is entitled to move its troops freely on its own soil.

Hours before the call, Mr Putin told Mr Biden in a holiday message he was "convinced" the pair could work together based on "mutual respect and consideration of each other's national interests".

His spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said Moscow was "in the mood for a conversation".

A day earlier, a US official told AFP news agency that Mr Biden would offer his Russian counterpart a "diplomatic path" but remained "gravely" concerned by the Russian troop build-up on the border.

The head of Ukraine's national security council, Oleksiy Danilov, sought to downplay that on Thursday, suggesting the number of troops was not currently increasing: "As for the troops build-up near our borders reported by foreign media - we do not see that. There is a certain increase of [Russian] military and we closely monitor what's happening at our borders."

Less than a month ago, Ukraine's defence minister told parliament - citing intelligence reports - that Russia had massed more than 94,000 troops near the border and could be gearing up for a large-scale military offensive at the end of January.

The US has consulted European leaders ahead of the call to co-ordinate a common response to the Ukraine issue, according to a White House statement.

While Ukraine is not a Nato member, it has close ties with the bloc.

Russia has said it wants legally binding guarantees that Nato will not move eastwards and that weapons will not be sent to Ukraine or any neighbouring countries.

Nato Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has been adamant that Ukraine's membership of the alliance is a matter for Nato and Kyiv. "Any dialogue with Russia has of course to respect the core principles which European security has been based on," he previously said.

Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda has described the current situation as probably "the most dangerous it's been in 30 years".

Russian officials are due to meet US counterparts in Geneva on 10 January. Asked earlier this week if he would meet Mr Putin on that date, Mr Biden replied "We'll see", but he is not expected to attend the talks in Geneva.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59818978
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/biden-speak-with-ukraine-president-sunday-white-house-2021-12-31/

President Joe Biden said on Friday he told his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin that a move on Ukraine will draw sanctions and an increased U.S. presence in Europe, where tensions are high after Russia's military buildup at the border.

The U.S. and Russian leaders exchanged warnings over Ukraine in a 50-minute call on Thursday to address Russian military actions.

"I made clear to President Putin that if he makes any more moves, if he goes into Ukraine, we will have severe sanctions. We will increase our presence in Europe, with our NATO allies, and there will be a heavy price to pay for it," Biden told reporters as he left a Wilmington, Delaware, restaurant.

Biden says Putin agreed on "three major conferences" next month with senior staff to help find a resolution and said he expected progress from those negotiations. However, he added, "I made it clear that it only could work if he de-escalated."

Asked if Moscow faces sanctions if it kept troops on the border, Biden said, "I'm not going to negotiate here in public but we made it clear that he cannot - emphasize cannot - move on Ukraine."

Biden will speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Sunday, a White house official said earlier on Friday.

He will reaffirm support for Ukraine, discuss Russia’s military buildup and review preparations for diplomatic efforts to calm the situation in the region, the official said.

The Biden-Putin exchange set the stage for lower-level engagement between the countries that includes the U.S.-Russia security meeting on Jan. 9-10, followed by a Russia-NATO session on Jan. 12, and a broader conference including Moscow, Washington and other European countries on Jan. 13.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken sought to lay the groundwork for those talks on Friday in calls with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and others, the State Department said.

In conversations with the foreign ministers of Canada and Italy, Blinken discussed a united response to deter further Russian aggression against Ukraine.
 
I expect Putin to own Biden if any such debate happens.

As a matter of fact, I expect Putin to own most western politicians in a debate.
 
I expect Putin to own Biden if any such debate happens.

As a matter of fact, I expect Putin to own most western politicians in a debate.

It would be a very bad idea for Biden to try and debate anyone at this stage to be honest.
 
https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-says-its-disappointed-by-us-signals-before-geneva-talks-2022-01-09/

Russia said on Sunday it would not make any concessions under U.S. pressure at talks this week on the Ukraine crisis and its demands for Western security guarantees, and that there was a risk they might end quickly.

The hard line from Moscow underscored the fragile prospects for negotiations that Washington hopes will avert the danger of a new Russian invasion of Ukraine, at the tensest point in U.S.-Russia relations since the Cold War ended three decades ago.

Talks are due in Geneva, Brussels and Vienna but the state-owned RIA news agency quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov as saying it was entirely possible that diplomacy could end abruptly after a single meeting.

"I can't rule out anything, this is an entirely possible scenario and the Americans... should have no illusions about this," he was quoted as saying.

"Naturally, we will not make any concessions under pressure and in the course of threats that are constantly being formed by the Western participants of the upcoming talks."

Interfax news agency quoted Ryabkov, who will lead the Russian delegation in Geneva, as saying Moscow was not optimistic going into the negotiations.

The comments from Ryabkov, who has compared the situation to the 1962 Cuban missile crisis when the world stood on the brink of nuclear war, were consistent with the uncompromising line that Russia has been signalling for weeks.

Tens of thousands of Russian troops are gathered within reach of the border with Ukraine in preparation for what Washington and Kyiv say could be an invasion, eight years after Russia seized the Crimea peninsula from Ukraine.

Russia denies invasion plans and says it is responding to what it calls aggressive and provocative behaviour from the NATO military alliance and Ukraine, its former Soviet neighbour which has tilted towards the West and aspires to join NATO.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has accused Russia of pushing a false narrative. "That's like the fox saying it had to attack the hen house because its occupants somehow pose a threat. We've seen this gaslighting before," he said last week.

Further complicating the picture, Russia sent troops into neighbouring Kazakhstan last week after the oil-producing former Soviet republic was hit by a wave of unrest. Its foreign ministry reacted furiously on Saturday to a jibe by Blinken that "once Russians are in your house, it's sometimes very difficult to get them to leave".

Last month Russia presented a sweeping set of demands including for a bar on further NATO expansion and an end to the alliance's activity in central and eastern European countries that joined it after 1997.

The United States and NATO have said large parts of the Russian proposals are a non-starter.

A senior Biden administration official on Saturday said the United States was not willing to discuss limits on U.S. troop deployments or the U.S. force posture in NATO countries in the region.

It was ready, however, to talk about the possibility of each side restricting military exercises and missile deployments in the region.

To accept that limited agenda and abandon its other demands would be a major climb-down that Russia seems unlikely to make, especially after weeks of troop movements near Ukraine and a series of tough statements from President Vladimir Putin.

The Kremlin leader has said that after successive waves of NATO expansion it is time for Russia to enforce its "red lines" and ensure the alliance does not admit Ukraine or station weapons systems there that would target Russia.

Ukraine won a NATO promise back in 2008 that it would be allowed to join one day, but diplomats say there is no question of that happening any time soon.

NATO says it is a defensive alliance and Moscow has nothing to fear from it. That is far from Putin's world view, which sees Russia as under threat from hostile Western powers he says have repeatedly broken promises given as the Cold War ended not to expand towards its borders. The United States and its allies dispute such pledges were given.

In two conversations with Putin over the past five weeks, U.S. President Joe Biden warned him that Russia would face unprecedented economic sanctions in the event of further aggression against Ukraine. The Group of Seven nations and the European Union have joined in threatening "massive consequences".

Putin responded that this would be a colossal mistake that would lead to a complete rupture of relations.

Russia's foreign ministry said the team led by Ryabkov had arrived in Geneva, where the formal talks are due on Monday.

Russia is also due to hold negotiations with NATO in Brussels on Wednesday and at the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe in Vienna on Thursday.
 
The risk of new conflict in Ukraine is real.

That was the warning from Jens Stoltenberg, the head of the NATO alliance, which is braced for the possibility of a further Russian invasion of the vast eastern European state.

Around 100,000 Russian troops - combat-ready and equipped with artillery, medical supplies and jamming devices to disrupt enemy communications - remain close to Ukraine's border despite weeks of increasingly loud calls from Western capitals to de-escalate.

Instead, Russian President Vladimir Putin has made seemingly impossible demands of his democratic rivals to reduce their military footprint in eastern and central Europe and give a guarantee not to allow Ukraine to become a member of the NATO club.

Ukraine's growing reserve army 'getting ready' amid fears of Russian attack

It makes this crisis not just about the future of Ukraine but about the security of the whole of Europe and the wider democratic world.

No one seems to believe rare talks this week between Russia and the United States and then between Moscow and all 30 NATO allies will immediately defuse the crisis.

But a key indicator as to whether the standoff explodes into wider war or can yet be pulled back from the brink will be whether the Kremlin is genuinely seeking dialogue or is simply going through the motions.

A fear among western diplomats is that President Putin intends for the talks to fail to create a pretext for war, eight years on from his annexation of Crimea and the backing of an insurgency in eastern Ukraine.

If that is the case, then Ukrainian officials believe further military action against them is all but inevitable as to back down without anything to show for it would make him look weak.

One source said he expected any Russian attack to be intense but limited - with the Kremlin seeking to make new gains before agreeing to negotiate a ceasefire.

In trying to understand his calculations, a Western military expert also pointed to President Putin's age - at 69 he will not be in power forever - and the fact that he faces an unusually weak West.

The US administration is still bruised following a messy pull-out from Afghanistan, Germany has a new, untested government, France is preparing for presidential elections and everyone is simultaneously dealing with the COVID pandemic.

This combination of factors could motivate Russia's president to take greater risk on Ukraine as he thinks about his legacy, the military expert said.

The United States and other NATO allies have said they would not send troops to support Ukraine in the event of a further invasion because it is not a member state.

But they are drawing up plans to increase the number of troops deployed on the alliance's eastern flank to bolster its defences - a move that would likely be seen by Russia as aggressive.

Such reinforcements could also increase the risk of a mistake or a miscalculation by either side that would place NATO and Russia one-step closer to a direct confrontation.

The unpredictability and the high-stakes are why this crisis is of such grave concern among western leaders.

It is also why Ukrainian ministers have warned that a new conflict in their country could be the spark that ignites World War Three.

SKY
 
Russia tells US they 'don't intend on invading Ukraine'

US deputy secretary of state Wendy Sherman has said Russia told her they do not intend to invade Ukraine, and that troop build-up on the border is "typical manoeuvring".

She added that the US defines de-escalation as returning troops to barracks or letting the US know what exercises are ongoing, as well as what their purpose is.

She also said that the US was firm in pushing back on security proposals that are non-starters and not allowing anyone to slam shut NATO's open-door policy during talks with her Russian counterpart in Geneva.

Ms Sherman added that the US had frank and forthright discussions with the Russian delegation over the course of nearly eight hours and is open to meeting again soon to discuss bilateral issues in more detail.
 
Back
Top