Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,264
I would like to know the thoughts of PP on this. Was de Villiers that good to be considered the Richards of this era?
IN LOs, nobody can take the bowling apart as Viv did and on a consistent basis in Modern era except maybe ABD. Even he is the closest we can get to.
An average of 53@ SR of 100 in an era of 2005-2018 with a World Cup number reading as 63 AVG @SR 117 sounds even better to be put into context.
Add in,the test average of 50 with double hundreds in subcontinent and match-winning hundreds in Australia, West Indies and England. However, unlike a Viv Richards, de Villiers had the other side of the game as well- to block, block and block! His stone-wall defense game in Adelaide helped SA save a test match and ultimately won them a series in Australia.
So, is it fair if we call him a Saffer version of Viv or a modern-day Viv Richards, whatever fits better?

IN LOs, nobody can take the bowling apart as Viv did and on a consistent basis in Modern era except maybe ABD. Even he is the closest we can get to.
An average of 53@ SR of 100 in an era of 2005-2018 with a World Cup number reading as 63 AVG @SR 117 sounds even better to be put into context.
Add in,the test average of 50 with double hundreds in subcontinent and match-winning hundreds in Australia, West Indies and England. However, unlike a Viv Richards, de Villiers had the other side of the game as well- to block, block and block! His stone-wall defense game in Adelaide helped SA save a test match and ultimately won them a series in Australia.
So, is it fair if we call him a Saffer version of Viv or a modern-day Viv Richards, whatever fits better?

