What's new

Was it a mistake of Imran to not support Musharraf, and handing over the country to Zardari/Nawaz?

Vega

Debutant
Joined
May 24, 2019
Runs
88
In 1999, Pakistan was very close to be Bank corrupt due to Nawaz Sharif. Pakistan got only about 145 Million USD foreign reserves.

When Musharraf came to power, then he succeeded in increasing the foreign reserves from 145 million USD to 3 Billion USD during his first 3 years (from 1999 to 2001).

Please remember, Musharraf was able to achieve it without the US aid during his first 3 years when the sanctions upon Pakistan continued.

US aid started coming to Pakistan only after US attacked Afghanistan in 2001.


After 2002, Musharraf had to bring the Democracy again in the country. And only politicians who were ready to support him, were Chaudhry brothers, who were also corrupt along with all other politicians. Otherwise, name me the names of the politicians who were not corrupt and Musharraf should have relied upon them?

Musharraf was right in not handing over the country to Zardari/Nawaz. It was not ideal to had Chaudhry brothers in government, but still much better option than Zardari/Nawaz.

Although the progress under Musharraf+Chaudhries was slow from 2002 to 2007, but still Pakistani economy was going towards the positive, and Musharraf was able to pay the Pakistan's foreign Debts (or at least he didn't take such huge debts like Zardai/Nawaz).

During all this period, Imran Khan was busy in pulling the leg of Musharraf.

Imran Khan has a disease of "Only Me".

Imran Khan supported the Mullahs of Lal Mosque, and went to Lal Masjid and delivered a speech there after the Friday prayer, claiming the operation against Lal Masjid to be wrong.

Imran Khan opposed the presence of Pak Army in Swat. He supported that Swat should be handed over to Sufi Muhammad, so that he could start the Nizam-e-Muhammadi there.

As the result of this foolishness of Imran Khan (and other leaders like Zardari/Nawaz), unfortunately Pak Army had to pull it's troops out of Swat, and Taliban were able to take control of whole Swat in next 3 days.

Afterwards, Taliban started killing the innocent civilians of Swat right and left and Taliban were beheading people in the Bazars of Swat and then they started their military campaign in the neighbouring areas too.

Imran Khan showed the nation wrong dreams of streams of milk and honey after the imposition of Nizam-e-Muhammad in Swat. He should accept his mistake. Due to this foolishness, later Army had to start whole operation, due to which 1 million people had to leave their homes and they became internally displaced.

Nation lost Billions of money and thousands of human life due to this foolish decision of Imran/Zardari/Nawaz.

In short, Imran Khan was campaigning that he would even support the governments of Zardari/Nawaz, but Musharraf should go.


Imran Khan finally succeeded in becoming PM of Pakistan. But it seems that it's already too late, and economy has gone so down that Imran Khan has no means to control it.

I wished that Imran Khan would have supported Musharraf right from the beginning and had helped Pakistan to get rid of Zardari/Nawaz at the right time.
 
Musharaf was a one man show , Imran supporting or not supporting him would hardly have made a difference. The only thing I have against Musharaf is that he tried to be a politician when he should have acted as a ruthless dictator. He should have ruled with an iron-fist and carried out a ruthless accountability across the board.. Had he done so , Pakistan would have been a lot better country as against to what it has become in last 10-12 years..
 
Last edited:
Imran end up getting on the top with the help of same lot so yes he could have done it with Musharraf too and maybe he had a little bit of chance to do some good.
 
Imran back then wasn't influential enough to have made any sort of significant difference. Zardari and Nawaz would have still toppled Musharaf with all the public support they had, and Imran would have just committed political suicide had he supported the public enemy number one at the time.
 
Imran Khan politically became relevant after 2011, before that he was just cashing in on his celebrity and legendary cricketer status. Under Musharraf he would have been a weak PM and eventually there would have been an ego clash between the two. Besides he would have lost a lot of political credibility in the public.
 
IK like all politicians changes like the weather.
 
In hindsight,yes, he should have supported Musharraf instead of Iftikhar Chaudhry. Musharraf's era saw Pakistan's GDP growth rate rise to 7 % annually. Later, Zardari destroyed all the progress made by Musharraf.
 
Imran back then wasn't influential enough to have made any sort of significant difference. Zardari and Nawaz would have still toppled Musharaf with all the public support they had, and Imran would have just committed political suicide had he supported the public enemy number one at the time.

Imran Khan politically became relevant after 2011, before that he was just cashing in on his celebrity and legendary cricketer status. Under Musharraf he would have been a weak PM and eventually there would have been an ego clash between the two. Besides he would have lost a lot of political credibility in the public.


Do you think if Musharraf has made Imran Khan PM in 2002 instead of taking support from Chaudhry brothers, still then Musharraf had lost the popularity?

I think it were the Chaudhry brothers who were useless and also corrupt and thus popularity of Musharraf went down due to them in the government.

Moreover, Imran Khan would have been able to defend Musharraf much better than the useless Chaudhry brothers.
 
No that debacle, second only to the '71 dismemberment of the country rests squarely on the shoulders of the Mushy the coward...
 
In hindsight,yes, he should have supported Musharraf instead of Iftikhar Chaudhry. Musharraf's era saw Pakistan's GDP growth rate rise to 7 % annually. Later, Zardari destroyed all the progress made by Musharraf.

No annual growth was 7% in only a few years under Mush, the average was more like between 5-6%

Furthermore, it followed a neo-liberal growth trajectory, only the elite were reaping the benefit.

Mush's growth was also superficial and he didn't do jack for structural reforms, increased economic activity/productivity, job growth, poverty alleviation, or inflation.
 
No.
He was a nobody politically at the time and he would have been tainted for life as a selected politician. Not that he cant be accused of that now. Along the way he has made plenty of compromises to get to power.

At this stage what I suspect he understand betters than the people before him, that no matter how big the democratic mandate of the ruling party, at best they can only be equal partners to the military establishment in Pakistan. It means accommodating or giving up some control in certain areas while gaining control in other areas.
Perhaps if his predecessors understood that they would have found a way to co-exist and do the right thing for the country rather than cheep sloganeering and petty corruption.
 
IK was wrong on Mush but Mush became greedy and made a deal with the devil's and it's consequences are being felt to this day, with the adding of $40bn of debt that should never have been added.
 
Back
Top