What's new

In-Depth Analysis of Corruption and Other Legal Charges Against Imran Khan

@emranabbas
Who is Khwaja Asif telling about this corruption? Isn't he Minister in the govt?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">وطن عزیز کی آدھی سے زیادہ بیوروکریسی پرتگال میں پراپرٹی لے چکی ھے اور شہریت لینی کی تیاری کر رہی ھے۔ اوریہ نامی گرامی بیوروکریٹس ھیں ۔ مگر مچھ اربوں روپے کھا کے آرام سے ریٹائرمنٹ کی زندگی گزار رہیں۔ بزدار کا ایک قریب ترین بیوروکریٹ چار ارب بیٹیوں کی شادی پر صرف سلامی وصول کر چکا…</p>&mdash; Khawaja M. Asif (@KhawajaMAsif) <a href=" ">August 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Why Do Pakistan’s Generals Oppose Imran Khan?

Around 85% of Pakistan’s military officers retire at the rank of Colonel or below. These officers are not corrupt—they live well due to military benefits and remain loyal patriots. That’s why many in the lower and mid ranks support Imran Khan.

But the top 15%—the military elite—oppose him, and here’s why:​
  1. This elite has ruled Pakistan directly for about 58% of its history since 1947, and controlled the rest through puppet civilian governments and hybrid regimes.​
  2. They control over 50 businesses, 12% of Pakistan’s land, and 7% of its GDP.
  3. Their actions led to the breakup of Pakistan in 1971, after their harsh direct rule triggered rebellion in East Pakistan.​
  4. They backed jihad during the Soviet-Afghan war, helped foreign fighters enter Afghanistan, and later supported the Taliban.​
  5. After 9/11, they reversed course overnight, gave the U.S. access to military bases, and allowed bombings in Afghanistan—creating deep anger among Afghans and in Pakistan’s tribal areas.​
  6. This has led to a long insurgency, killing over 70,000 Pakistanis and the killing continues despite repeated and newer military operations.​
The top brass has never been held accountable. They control the courts, media, and politicians. But Imran Khan’s popularity threatens their control—and that’s why they fear and oppose him.​
 
@emranabbas
Who is Khwaja Asif telling about this corruption? Isn't he Minister in the govt?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">وطن عزیز کی آدھی سے زیادہ بیوروکریسی پرتگال میں پراپرٹی لے چکی ھے اور شہریت لینی کی تیاری کر رہی ھے۔ اوریہ نامی گرامی بیوروکریٹس ھیں ۔ مگر مچھ اربوں روپے کھا کے آرام سے ریٹائرمنٹ کی زندگی گزار رہیں۔ بزدار کا ایک قریب ترین بیوروکریٹ چار ارب بیٹیوں کی شادی پر صرف سلامی وصول کر چکا…</p>&mdash; Khawaja M. Asif (@KhawajaMAsif) <a href=" ">August 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
@emranabbas
@Mamoon
@Major
@psyoptica
@IMMY69
@@KingKhanWC

Is this a confession of massive corruption or have I miss understood this confession.
 
Brother,

I am treating you all like Muslims and with politeness and courtesy and not playing any games, not lying and not being dishonest. All I am asking is that you clarify your position that you disagree with Imran Khan due to Islam (and then provide Islamic evidence) and not "your opinion".

Everuthing I am saying, I am providing reasons and facts. I am not providing my opinion on anything, here is summary:​

Corruption:
  1. Imran Khan is not corrupt, he didn't steal 190 million.
  2. Imran Khan sold gifts (given to him) at 20% as per the law of Pakistan and used the money to repair Roads instead of using Taxpayer money.
  3. If you think Imran Khan is corrupt, please provide evidence on both of these issue with facts.
Being Qadiyani:
  1. Imran Khan has clarified his stance on Khatm-e-Nubuwwat
  2. if you think that he is Qadiyani, please provide evidence.

Being Kaafir, Yahoodi Agent:
  1. Imran Khan has clarified his stance on Kalima
  2. if you think that he is Qadiyani, please provide evidence.
Being married to a Yahoodi:
  1. Imran Khan is divorced and his "ex-wife" was Muslim
  2. But lets suppose that she was a "Jew", it is permitted in Islam to marry a Jew.
  3. if you disagree, please provide evidence.

Being a "Playboy":
  1. Imran Khan as accepted his past life and admitted his sins
  2. In Islam, it is then forbidden to refer to someone's past life and "taunt" a person and there is warning on this matter.
  3. if you disagree, please provide evidence.

Marrying "Busha Bibi" during Iddah Period
  1. In Islam, the testimony of woman is accepted.
  2. Bushra Bibi directly tallks about it (listen from minutes 39 onwards).
  3. if you disagree, please provide evidence.
Imran Khan denying Tyrian White?:
  1. Imran Khan as accepted his past life and admitted his sins
  2. From an Islamic standpoint, Imran Khan’s refusal to publicly acknowledge the child is not sinful, though the original act remains a serious offense.
  3. From a legal point of view, Imran Khan has been tried on this issue various times and not convicted.
  4. if you disagree, please provide evidence.
Clearly say that from an Islamic point of view OR leagl point of view this is the issue and then explain yourself. Pick a topic and start the discussion using your method and your tools and your way.

Thanks
The cheek of these PMLN supporters to mention White and ignore Shehbaz's disgraceful marital life.
 
I like how no one cares about the posts made from chat gpt
Why don't you answer them. We live in the digital age and people can use whatever they want to make their point. Answer his point or are you running because you dont have an answer.
 
Back
Top